Italian Open organizer eyes tournament as 5th tennis Grand Slam

The AO is a player favourite and it starts the season off with a bang, so I'd advise you not to go into business. You lack acumen.

We're an English colony and we were all British subjects with no Australian citizenship until after WWII.

Without this connection there would never have been an Australian slam.

And there we have it. Melbourne was granted slam status not because of any fair global selection process but purely as a result of English colonial legacy and favouritism.
Players then proceeded to routinely skip Melbourne for 50 years and treated Melbourne as the red-headed stepchild.
Today, many players and fans are complaining that Melbourne has deteriorated into a rowdy Rugby League atmosphere.
All while our favourite Bart pretends AO is some sacred cow that can't be touched and refuses to share the pie. Where is the inclusivity?

Meanwhile the CCP has the highest of tennis ambitions.

CCP Sports Policy:
  • The CCP’s 2021–2025 national sports plan calls for “hosting more world-class sporting events, promoting Chinese sports culture, and enhancing the country’s sports soft power.”
  • State media and official statements frequently stress the importance of integrating “Chinese characteristics” and “telling China’s story well” through sports.

One of the 4 slams needs to move over and Melbourne is the best candidate.


 
Last edited:
Forget about Indian Wells.
Rome stands alone as the most beautiful and prestigious Masters 1000 event, especially now amid the Renaissance of Italian tennis led by the young Sinner and the beloved Roman Paolini.
In the 1980s, players routinely skipped the Australian. None of the players like traveling to that regime down under anyway.
:rolleyes:

Novak-Djokovic-Australian-visa-controversy.jpg
Those masks disqualifies whatever their message is....
 
Colonial legacy is why your Indian countrymen play cricket. It's the CPC, by the way, there is no CCP.

And there we have it. Melbourne was granted slam status not because of any fair global selection process but purely as a result of English colonial legacy and favouritism.
Players then proceeded to routinely skip Melbourne for 50 years and treated Melbourne as the red-headed stepchild.
Today, many players and fans are complaining that Melbourne has deteriorated into a rowdy Rugby League atmosphere.
All while our favourite Bart pretends AO is some sacred cow that can't be touched and refuses to share the pie. Where is the inclusivity?

Meanwhile the CCP has the highest of tennis ambitions.

CCP Sports Policy:
  • The CCP’s 2021–2025 national sports plan calls for “hosting more world-class sporting events, promoting Chinese sports culture, and enhancing the country’s sports soft power.”
  • State media and official statements frequently stress the importance of integrating “Chinese characteristics” and “telling China’s story well” through sports.

One of the 4 slams needs to move over and Melbourne is the best candidate.


 
We're an English colony and we were all British subjects with no Australian citizenship until after WWII.

Without this connection there would never have been an Australian slam.
In Argentina, we are contemplating abandoning our claims to the Malvinas in exchange for a slam.
 
we don’t need a 5th major. indian wells would be first up anyway.
Two slams in one country? I doubt that will ever happen. IMO, there is no need for another slam. Also, having five slams would make the slam count unfair to players who competed in a four slam era.
 
Two slams in one country? I doubt that will ever happen. IMO, there is no need for another slam. Also, having five slams would make the slam count unfair to players who competed in a four slam era.
i agree that it shouldn’t happen
 
Nobody needs a 5th Slam. Unless they want to disrupt all tennis stats to date. We were happy with 4 for more than 100 years. Why change?
We actually were even happier with no tiebreaks in the fifth only at U.S. Open and they change that I’m still so mad
 
Forget about Indian Wells.
Rome stands alone as the most beautiful and prestigious Masters 1000 event, especially now amid the Renaissance of Italian tennis led by the young Sinner and the beloved Roman Paolini.
In the 1980s, players routinely skipped the Australian. None of the players like traveling to that regime down under anyway.
:rolleyes:

Novak-Djokovic-Australian-visa-controversy.jpg
Tennis fans know about Aussie Open in the old days. Why would the Majors approve of one more? makes zero sense. I'll admit that the Italian has come a long way since the 70's.
 
And there we have it. Melbourne was granted slam status not because of any fair global selection process but purely as a result of English colonial legacy and favouritism.
Players then proceeded to routinely skip Melbourne for 50 years and treated Melbourne as the red-headed stepchild.
Today, many players and fans are complaining that Melbourne has deteriorated into a rowdy Rugby League atmosphere.
All while our favourite Bart pretends AO is some sacred cow that can't be touched and refuses to share the pie. Where is the inclusivity?

Meanwhile the CCP has the highest of tennis ambitions.

CCP Sports Policy:
  • The CCP’s 2021–2025 national sports plan calls for “hosting more world-class sporting events, promoting Chinese sports culture, and enhancing the country’s sports soft power.”
  • State media and official statements frequently stress the importance of integrating “Chinese characteristics” and “telling China’s story well” through sports.

One of the 4 slams needs to move over and Melbourne is the best candidate.


What's the problem with rowdy crowds? That's why I love the US Open. for the record the phase re-headed stepchild is stupid. chose another analogy. Tennis needs to work on making sure it's a viable sport for the top 500 players to make a living.
 
We're an English colony and we were all British subjects with no Australian citizenship until after WWII.

Without this connection there would never have been an Australian slam.

I guess the profusion of good Australian tennis players in that era helped fuel the decision to make their biggest tournament a Slam.
 
What's the problem with rowdy crowds? That's why I love the US Open. for the record the phase re-headed stepchild is stupid. chose another analogy. Tennis needs to work on making sure it's a viable sport for the top 500 players to make a living.
In the USO, I have less tolerance for people seated late in their places after the play is starting, because they couldn’t wait to eat or drink something, than rowdy crowds.
 
In the USO, I have less tolerance for people seated late in their places after the play is starting, because they couldn’t wait to eat or drink something, than rowdy crowds.
It depends on the stadium, honestly that's small stuff that i don't worry about. .
 
They can eye it up all they want, it's never going to happen, and if it was, they'd have to get in line behind the Saudi's.
 
It depended on which countries were big players in tennis and tennis politics circa 1910s/1920s.

The original big two were Wimbledon and French to which the USA and Australia were added.

The prime mover was, of course, Wimbledon:


I guess the profusion of good Australian tennis players in that era helped fuel the decision to make their biggest tournament a Slam.
 
Last edited:
Is Dr. Raúl Indian?
That accounts for my two most admired users in this place!

Please do ignore the wild speculations of our favourite CCP BEV Huckster Globalist Bart.
Only a dunderhead makes assumptions based on name.
:rolleyes:
  • The name Raul is a cognate of the Anglo-Germanic names Ralph or Rudolph and the French Raoul, originating from the Old English name Rædwulf (meaning "wolf counsel" or "wise counsel") through the medieval French Raoul and Old High German Radulf
  • While Raul is widely recognized as a Spanish name, it is also common in many other languages and countries, including Italian, Romanian, Estonian, Swedish, Danish, Finnish, Norwegian.
9780618507559.jpg
 
Last edited:
Please ignore our favourite CCP BEV huckster Globalist Bart. Only a dunderhead makes assumptions based on name.
:rolleyes:
  • The name Raul is a cognate of the Anglo-Germanic names Ralph or Rudolph and the French Raoul, originating from the Old English name Rædwulf (meaning "wolf counsel" or "wise counsel") through the medieval French Raoul and Old High German Radulf
  • While Raul is widely recognized as a Spanish and Portuguese name, it is also common in many other languages and countries, including Italian, Romanian, Estonian, Swedish, Danish, Finnish, Norwegian
9780618507559.jpg
That young man gives me strange vibes. Brownshirt type I’d like to forget.
 
Your name is probably Rahul, which is Indian. Some Indian posters refer to you as Indian.

As I've mentioned many times, your go-to sources for news are Indian English-language publications.

For some reason, you want to self-identify as an American so I'm happy to accept your choices in life without demur.

Please do ignore the wild speculations of our favourite CCP BEV Huckster Globalist Bart.
Only a dunderhead makes assumptions based on name.
:rolleyes:
  • The name Raul is a cognate of the Anglo-Germanic names Ralph or Rudolph and the French Raoul, originating from the Old English name Rædwulf (meaning "wolf counsel" or "wise counsel") through the medieval French Raoul and Old High German Radulf
  • While Raul is widely recognized as a Spanish name, it is also common in many other languages and countries, including Italian, Romanian, Estonian, Swedish, Danish, Finnish, Norwegian.
9780618507559.jpg
 
But didn't he uses his diplomatic status to help a lot of Jews escape from N azi Germany?
Oh, sorry for my ignorance. I gave an opinion prior to doing my research, total opposite of what's the norm in these forums.

Found this

Raoul Wallenberg was a Swedish diplomat and humanitarian who played a crucial role in saving thousands of Hungarian Jews during the Holocaust. As Sweden's special envoy in Budapest in 1944, he issued protective passports and provided shelter in buildings designated as Swedish territory. His efforts helped many escape Naz i persecution. However, in January 1945, Soviet agents arrested him on suspicion of espionage, and he subsequently disappeared. His fate remains a mystery, with conflicting reports about his death in Soviet custody. His legacy is honored worldwide for his bravery and humanitarian work.
 
Last edited:
2023 was the centenary year of Slam Tennis, so if you think this history will be sold off then I've got a bridge to sell you ...

It depended on which countries were big players in tennis and tennis politics circa 1910s/1920s.

The original big two were Wimbledon and French to which the USA and Australia were added.

The prime mover was, of course, Wimbledon:

 
Wouldn't be too upset to see the AO go. The surface skulduggery, focus on 'entertainment' and lack of local hope have eroded interest.
 
If the AO did go, or if there were a fifth slam, then Spring and Summer in the Southern hemisphere would be ideal times, but all this is pie-in-the-sky.

Wouldn't be too upset to see the AO go. The surface skulduggery, focus on 'entertainment' and lack of local hope have eroded interest.
 
That tournament already exists, it's called the ATP Finals.
:p

ATP could elevate the ATP Finals to a Slam if it wanted to. It is the year-end championship.

IW and Rome should take the place of the 1,500 points currently available at ATP Finals. China could come in here but needs to start from scratch. The Shanghai set up is problematic, not first rate. The Saudis are getting in somewhere, and a1500 indoor tournament there would be interesting.

1,000 points to the rest of the current Super Nine, plus a new, grass-court tournament, possibly in South Africa. Germany should get the ATP Finals on a long-term or permanent basis, or get the new grass-court 1000.


Just a thought.
 
A few years ago , Madrid and IW used to vie for 5th slam. They had the money.
Now Rome has the money . But it will remain a master's only.

I only feel for Hamburg. A master's that got demoted to accomodate Shanghai and Madrid clay masters
 
The ATP can't elevate anything to a slam as the slams are someone else's property.

ATP could elevate the ATP Finals to a Slam if it wanted to. It is the year-end championship.

IW and Rome should take the place of the 1,500 points currently available at ATP Finals. China could come in here but needs to start from scratch. The Shanghai set up is problematic, not first rate. The Saudis are getting in somewhere, and a1500 indoor tournament there would be interesting.

1,000 points to the rest of the current Super Nine, plus a new, grass-court tournament, possibly in South Africa. Germany should get the ATP Finals on a long-term or permanent basis, or get the new grass-court 1000.


Just a thought.
 
You can't buy a slam unless the current slam owners sell a spot and they aren't.

A few years ago , Madrid and IW used to vie for 5th slam. They had the money.
Now Rome has the money . But it will remain a master's only.

I only feel for Hamburg. A master's that got demoted to accomodate Shanghai and Madrid clay masters
 
I fundamentally disagree. It is precisely because the 4 Grand Slam tournaments system has a century-old tradition that it has stood the test of time. Why change something that works??
 
If the AO did go, or if there were a fifth slam, then Spring and Summer in the Southern hemisphere would be ideal times, but all this is pie-in-the-sky.

Pie is yummy though.

Maybe just give America another. Two Slams per popular tennis region. Indian Wells does make a lot of sense.
 
Back
Top