jcgatennismom
Hall of Fame
Here is the announcement that came out today http://www.itftennis.com/news/256730.aspx
The article states that 14,000 players played pro tournaments last year. The ITF's goal is to reduce the number of pro players to 750 men and women. Currently there are probably close to 2000 players with one or more ATP points. The 15K level Futures will be replaced with transition tournaments where players would earn entry points into pro tournaments that actually earn ATP points.
I wonder how this will affect college players-will more players gravitate to college as it will be harder to earn ATP points or will players stay away from college in '17 and '18 to earn ATP points in the Futures before they are eliminated? I assume the best college players will still get WCs into tourneys or the qualis of tourneys that earn ATP points. Whatever changes the ITF organization makes, it is supposed to ease transition from junior ITFs to pros. If the number of tourneys that actually earn points are reduced (fairly and proportionally across regions), then maybe the best of the juniors, collegians, and pros wont have to play so many rounds of qualis and tourneys before winning some MD matches and and moving up the ranks. Ranked college players go deep in several MDs and they are still stuck in Qualis at the next ones unless they get WCs. At some Future Qualis, the competitors currently range from UTR 8 to 15; reducing the Quali draws may be a good thing if the tourneys/qualis have a narrower UTR range, e.g 13-15. Will be interesting to see how it plays out.
The current ITF president is Haggerty who is an American. Hopefully these changes will be neutral or an improvement for American juniors, collegians, and pros. The current Futures structure favors Europeans because there are so many more Futures in Europe than the US.
Here is an excerpt " Transition Tour tournaments will be created through the repositioning of the existing $15,000 (Level I) tournaments on the ITF Pro Circuit that will no longer be held as part of the Pro Circuit in 2019. Transition Tour tournaments will offer ITF Entry Points instead of ATP/WTA ranking points, with the two systems linked to ensure that the more successful players are able to use their ITF Entry Points to gain acceptance into ITF Pro Circuit tournaments. The ITF’s proposed restructuring will radically reduce the number of professional players competing for ATP and WTA ranking points. The ITF’s extensive modelling work has led to a recommended professional player group of no more than 750 men and 750 women players."
Overall, I think this is a positive move, but it will probably be messy for a couple of years. Obviously there are a lot of college and post college players who are seeking competition who are not really pro material-maybe local UTR events or events similar to club tennis in Europe will rise up over time to meet their needs.
The article states that 14,000 players played pro tournaments last year. The ITF's goal is to reduce the number of pro players to 750 men and women. Currently there are probably close to 2000 players with one or more ATP points. The 15K level Futures will be replaced with transition tournaments where players would earn entry points into pro tournaments that actually earn ATP points.
I wonder how this will affect college players-will more players gravitate to college as it will be harder to earn ATP points or will players stay away from college in '17 and '18 to earn ATP points in the Futures before they are eliminated? I assume the best college players will still get WCs into tourneys or the qualis of tourneys that earn ATP points. Whatever changes the ITF organization makes, it is supposed to ease transition from junior ITFs to pros. If the number of tourneys that actually earn points are reduced (fairly and proportionally across regions), then maybe the best of the juniors, collegians, and pros wont have to play so many rounds of qualis and tourneys before winning some MD matches and and moving up the ranks. Ranked college players go deep in several MDs and they are still stuck in Qualis at the next ones unless they get WCs. At some Future Qualis, the competitors currently range from UTR 8 to 15; reducing the Quali draws may be a good thing if the tourneys/qualis have a narrower UTR range, e.g 13-15. Will be interesting to see how it plays out.
The current ITF president is Haggerty who is an American. Hopefully these changes will be neutral or an improvement for American juniors, collegians, and pros. The current Futures structure favors Europeans because there are so many more Futures in Europe than the US.
Here is an excerpt " Transition Tour tournaments will be created through the repositioning of the existing $15,000 (Level I) tournaments on the ITF Pro Circuit that will no longer be held as part of the Pro Circuit in 2019. Transition Tour tournaments will offer ITF Entry Points instead of ATP/WTA ranking points, with the two systems linked to ensure that the more successful players are able to use their ITF Entry Points to gain acceptance into ITF Pro Circuit tournaments. The ITF’s proposed restructuring will radically reduce the number of professional players competing for ATP and WTA ranking points. The ITF’s extensive modelling work has led to a recommended professional player group of no more than 750 men and 750 women players."
Overall, I think this is a positive move, but it will probably be messy for a couple of years. Obviously there are a lot of college and post college players who are seeking competition who are not really pro material-maybe local UTR events or events similar to club tennis in Europe will rise up over time to meet their needs.
Last edited: