Then why call it „Jannik Sinner racket” while it’s not?They mentioned that the lead tape was removed which explains weight discrepancy.
These youtubers are getting worse and worse.
Then why call it „Jannik Sinner racket” while it’s not?They mentioned that the lead tape was removed which explains weight discrepancy.
What are you talking about? It is one of his used frames.Then why call it „Jannik Sinner racket” while it’s not?
These youtubers are getting worse and worse.
330g with overgrip right? Same for 33.3 balance?That is NOT Sinner's actual spec...WAAAAYYYY off.
His strung SW is 340, static weight is 330g
The frame is but when they test it with SW317 and give their opinion while he uses 340SW then it doesn’t make senseWhat are you talking about? It is one of his used frames.
Ya I get what you’re saying. You can see the placebo effect on some coaches when they said it had more plowthrough but it’s only 317 swingweight. I’m assuming twistweight comes in higher so that adding lead only at 12 is doable but a racquet with 317 swingweight, 323 grams, 63 ra, and a 22mm beam does not plow through the ball.The frame is but when they test it with SW317 and give their opinion while he uses 340SW then it doesn’t make sense
The person who has the rackets took off the lead tape, not the people who posted the video.That is NOT Sinner's actual spec...WAAAAYYYY off.
His strung SW is 340, static weight is 330g
Then, I am not sure what’s the point of “measuring the spec” and showing it as “sinner’s racket”. It is just like the Speed Touch MP…The person who has the rackets took off the lead tape, not the people who posted the video.
That's what he does for every racket that they use so they stick to their routine. Of course, for people that want to replicate the exact weight and balance of Sinner's racket, it is no good for them.Then, I am not sure what’s the point of “measuring the spec” and showing it as “sinner’s racket”. It is just like the Speed Touch MP…
i am assuming his coaching staff adds lead to the head and handle. Noone has seen the finished playing version that Siinner actually has in his bagYa I get what you’re saying. You can see the placebo effect on some coaches when they said it had more plowthrough but it’s only 317 swingweight. I’m assuming twistweight comes in higher so that adding lead only at 12 is doable but a racquet with 317 swingweight, 323 grams, 63 ra, and a 22mm beam does not plow through the ball.
I wonder if someone got it directly from his hand, also on another note he was seen wearing the VP11i am assuming his coaching staff adds lead to the head and handle. Noone has seen the finished playing version that Siinner actually has in his bag
i doubt it. those specs above are Before adding all the lead to the head and handle which his coaching staff does for Sinner. Head doesn't do it for some reasonI wonder if someone got it directly from his hand, also on another note he was seen wearing the VP11
His coaching staff does not do anything to his rackets. His rackets come fully customized from Head Pro Room in Austria.i doubt it. those specs above are Before adding all the lead to the head and handle which his coaching staff does for Sinner. Head doesn't do it for some reason
I have seen and hit with his actual and fully customized frame when in KB. As I said, to me, that racket was not a positive experience. But obviously fits him and a few other top pros quite well...i am assuming his coaching staff adds lead to the head and handle. Noone has seen the finished playing version that Siinner actually has in his bag
Often with pros they get used to the racket and don’t want to change. Doesn’t mean it’s a great racket for them just what they used before and settled on.I have seen and hit with his actual and fully customized frame when in KB. As I said, to me, that racket was not a positive experience. But obviously fits him and a few other top pros quite well...
Who else besides Ruusuovori?I have seen and hit with his actual and fully customized frame when in KB. As I said, to me, that racket was not a positive experience. But obviously fits him and a few other top pros quite well...
Anderescuu for example but there is moreWho else besides Ruusuovori?
It's mainly players who have played that mold their whole career right? The ones who switch to Head from another brand mainly choose the 339 mold it seems.Anderescuu for example but there is more
That is correct and it makes sense. The TGT339.x layups are much better and the TK339 mold is very versatileIt's mainly players who have played that mold their whole career right? The ones who switch to Head from another brand mainly choose the 339 mold it seems.
Then how do you explain such a Low swing weight ? there is no way he can play top tour level tennis with SW 316, even 340 is lowHis coaching staff does not do anything to his rackets. His rackets come fully customized from Head Pro Room in Austria.
What the hell are you talking about FEDACE????Then how do you explain such a Low swing weight ? there is no way he can play top tour level tennis with SW 316, even 340 is low
The person who has the rackets took off the lead tape, not the people who posted the video.
You obviously read his coaches do not add lead, and the pro room in AUT does. Hopefully your account suffers the same fate as fedace, BANNEDThat's exactly what i mean. after they get the racket, his coaches add lead tape to the head and handle, and it brings up the SW significantly. I am trying to find out exactly what locations Cahill adds the tapes at. most likely 3 and 9 position and just above the grip
What do you mean by versatile Dan?That is correct and it makes sense. The TGT339.x layups are much better and the TK339 mold is very versatile
The best selling mold that is very good with many layups in it, many TGK339.x, PT10, PT57A...What do you mean by versatile Dan?
When head gives sponsored college players 339.x racquets or other racquets, what is the usual/standard swingweight? I see a lot of racquets at 295 unstrung sw and 310 grams static weight on pro stock tennis. Is this the standard for most head racquets? I recently saw Inaki Montes switch to a pro stock speed (top college player for virginia).The best selling mold that is very good with many layups in it, many TGK339.x, PT10, PT57A...
Pros like it, College kids like it, broad market likes it
Head offers full customization service for pros and for sponsored players. If a player utilizes own services, they would get uncustomized frames that are (mostly) considerably lighter than 310g and 295SWWhen head gives sponsored college players 339.x racquets or other racquets, what is the usual/standard swingweight? I see a lot of racquets at 295 unstrung sw and 310 grams static weight on pro stock tennis. Is this the standard for most head racquets? I recently saw Inaki Montes switch to a pro stock speed (top college player for virginia).
How would someone reach out to head for prostock frames?Head offers full customization service for pros and for sponsored players. If a player utilizes own services, they would get uncustomized frames that are (mostly) considerably lighter than 310g and 295SW
Are you a Pro?How would someone reach out to head for prostock frames?
No, top ranked JuniorAre you a Pro?
Then reach out to your Head Rep to talk to the Head people and see if they would sponsor you..No, top ranked Junior
No,, Where is that post ?? i don't remember reading such post anywhereYou obviously read his coaches do not add lead, and the pro room in AUT does. Hopefully your account suffers the same fate as fedace, BANNED
Yes tf has reached out and one other...Then reach out to your Head Rep to talk to the Head people and see if they would sponsor you..
Although if you are the top ranked Junior, I would think they (multiple racket companies) would have noticed you
How would you compare the new speed pro vs sinner's setup?Then reach out to your Head Rep to talk to the Head people and see if they would sponsor you..
Although if you are the top ranked Junior, I would think they (multiple racket companies) would have noticed you
As mentioned above, I did not care about Sinners frame, Touch Speed MP or Pro. To me it was just blah, unstable and weird feel. The new, 2024 Speed Pro (Auxetic 2.0) is a good frame but too muted for my liking. I like to feel communication from the handle…How would you compare the new speed pro vs sinner's setup?
How did it compare to the auxetic 1.0?As mentioned above, I did not care about Sinners frame, Touch Speed MP or Pro. To me it was just blah, unstable and weird feel. The new, 2024 Speed Pro (Auxetic 2.0) is a good frame but too muted for my liking. I like to feel communication from the handle…
I think there is a whole thread on what you are asking in the Racket section. I have not tried the 1.0How did it compare to the auxetic 1.0?
so then whats the point of the video lol..They mentioned that the lead tape was removed which explains weight discrepancy.
To hit the ball with Sinner's racquet.so then whats the point of the video lol..
Too bad they don’t have a clue what they’re talking about. Not one clue.
What is wrong with the video? Harry did mention that the lead was taken off to protect Sinner's information.Too bad they don’t have a clue what they’re talking about. Not one clue.
I like my 1.0 frames better than my new 2.0. More feel and feedbackHow did it compare to the auxetic 1.0?
Every video that guy posts is full of nonsense…Too bad they don’t have a clue what they’re talking about. Not one clue.
I agree, they are very misinformed but altleast they measure things with RDC machine.Too bad they don’t have a clue what they’re talking about. Not one clue.
Do you play them stock? I just bought 2 but came very different so I am customizing them, thinking on which set up will benefit the frame better.I like my 1.0 frames better than my new 2.0. More feel and feedback
No, all 5 of mine are weighted to 355 static and 9 pts HL.Do you play them stock? I just bought 2 but came very different so I am customizing them, thinking on which set up will benefit the frame better.