Jannik Sinner 2024 vs. Novak Djokovic 2011 on HC: has the Sinner already surpassed Djokovic peak on HC?

The main difference here is that Sinner was tested positive twice in 2024. 2011 Djokovic wasn't. Any sane person knows it completely invalidates the comparison.

But I guess being a Dull devotee explains giving Sinner a free pass. (y)
 
The main difference here is that Sinner was tested positive twice in 2024. 2011 Djokovic wasn't. Any sane person knows it completely invalidates the comparison.

But I guess being a Dull devotee explains giving Sinner a free pass. (y)
Huh? The discussion to which you were responding was about the fact that Djoker's 2011 competition was vastly superior to Sinner's in 2024. Not sure why your topic is even relevant.
 
Huh? The discussion to which you were responding was about the fact that Djoker's 2011 competition was vastly superior to Sinner's in 2024. Not sure why your topic is even relevant.
It shouldn't matter, as any other factor when you know Player B was tested positive. There's no comparison to begin with.
 
Jannik Sinner 2024
Record: 54-3 (94.7%)
Grand Slams: 2
Titles: 7
ATP Finals: W
Losses with 0 sets won: 0

Novak Djokovic 2011
Record: 46-5 (90.1%)
Grand Slams: 2
Titles: 6
ATP Finals: RR
Losses with 0 sets won: 3

:unsure:
Fun fact; Up until the US Open, Djoko had a 44 percent break rate on HC
 
in this period, 1,5 years, nole won more big HC titles than sinner in his whole career, and with stronger field but not so much positivity as sinner had.

21-03-2016Miami Masters
W
07-03-2016Indian Wells Masters
W
18-01-2016Australian Open
W
15-11-2015Tour Finals
W
02-11-2015Paris Masters
W
11-10-2015Shanghai Masters
W
31-08-2015US Open
W
16-08-2015Cincinnati Masters
F​
10-08-2015Canada Masters
F​
25-03-2015Miami Masters
W
12-03-2015Indian Wells Masters
W
19-01-2015Australian Open
W
09-11-2014Tour Finals
W
27-10-2014Paris Masters
W

3 vs 3 slams
2 vs 2 WTFs
7 vs 5 masters
 
Last edited:
in this period, 1,5 years, nole won more big HC titles than sinner in his whole career, and with stronger field but not so much positivity as sinner had.

21-03-2016Miami Masters
W
07-03-2016Indian Wells Masters
W
18-01-2016Australian Open
W
15-11-2015Tour Finals
W
02-11-2015Paris Masters
W
11-10-2015Shanghai Masters
W
31-08-2015US Open
W
16-08-2015Cincinnati Masters
F​
10-08-2015Canada Masters
F​
25-03-2015Miami Masters
W
12-03-2015Indian Wells Masters
W
19-01-2015Australian Open
W
09-11-2014Tour Finals
W
27-10-2014Paris Masters
W

3 vs 3 slams
2 vs 2 WTFs
7 vs 5 masters
Too early to compare surely?
 

Well, I'm not sure, since he lost to nearly 39 year old Djokovic while at his own peak.
In general I'm not a believer that one result should undo a fantastic body of work and consistency over a long period of time, but it's hard to deny that this feels extremely pertinent to the specific debate of Sinner vs Djokovic. And even if you take the period just between Sinner's two AO wins, he hasn't demonstrated as much big title winning on HC as Djokovic regardless of the field. The standards are sky-high and he needs another great run in the future to even approach what was going on from 2015-16
 
In general I'm not a believer that one result should undo a fantastic body of work and consistency over a long period of time, but it's hard to deny that this feels extremely pertinent to the specific debate of Sinner vs Djokovic. And even if you take the period just between Sinner's two AO wins, he hasn't demonstrated as much big title winning on HC as Djokovic regardless of the field. The standards are sky-high and he needs another great run in the future to even approach what was going on from 2015-16

Djokovic is seen as the HC GOAT for a reason.
 
Jannik Sinner 2024
Record: 54-3 (94.7%)
Grand Slams: 2
Titles: 7
ATP Finals: W
Losses with 0 sets won: 0

Novak Djokovic 2011
Record: 46-5 (90.1%)
Grand Slams: 2
Titles: 6
ATP Finals: RR
Losses with 0 sets won: 3

:unsure:
In '11, Djokovic beat several world-class players, such as Nadal & Federer. In fact, he dominated those two, combining for 10-1 record.

The only world-class player that Sinner meets is Alcaraz. And Sinner has a record of 2-7 vs Alcaraz the last two years.
 
OP has a history of acute tennis analysis

He has zero chance to defeat Alcaraz at the games next year, even Nadal on 1 leg is generally better than Djokovic. He needs a really devastating injury for Djokovic to have a chance on clay.

He's also going to extend his record number of consecutive wins over Djokovic, a record he took from Nadal

But I will say this. At least OP is willing to make predictions. Most of the eye test brigade no longer does that since they know it would only serve to show how limited their eye test analysis really is.
 
probably but i am talking about overall peak. tennis is played on 3 surfaces and clay is just one of them and minor compare to hard!
Nadal on clay is the highest peak of anyone in any sport ever..that is actually undisputed fact that is agreed by every sportsperson and has been stated many times.
 
Nadal on clay is the highest peak of anyone in any sport ever..that is actually undisputed fact that is agreed by every sportsperson and has been stated many times.
can be, but still he was never close to highest level overall. never on any of 2 biggest indoors events. and tennis is not played only on clay. so yes he is the greatest CC player,CC BOAT and CC GOAT. but nole is HC, indoors and overall BOAT and GOAT! and both are undisputed!
 
Overall peak, Federer has a very strong cases for his utter dominance in 2004 to 2007.
if it is 4 seasons that is not peak. the absolute peak do not last 4 seasons. it is one year period that is the best to look. one year is all tournaments, all surfaces all conditions but still short enough to sustained the peak level. and even point system is in one year cyrkles! not 4 or 5 years. nole has clearly most dominant year, most dominant season, 20 months and 2 years. why ake 4 but not 10 years or whole career?!?!

one peak year determinate the highest peak and that is noles W15-RG16 with 4 slams, WTF, 5 masters + 3 finals, 2 MM, 16950 points (17110 in current system), 31 top10 wins and 16 top5 wins! that is the highest peak ever!!!!! and no one comes even close to it!
 
if it is 4 seasons that is not peak. the absolute peak do not last 4 seasons. it is one year period that is the best to look. one year is all tournaments, all surfaces all conditions but still short enough to sustained the peak level. and even point system is in one year cyrkles! not 4 or 5 years. nole has clearly most dominant year, most dominant season, 20 months and 2 years. why ake 4 but not 10 years or whole career?!?!

one peak year determinate the highest peak and that is noles W15-RG16 with 4 slams, WTF, 5 masters + 3 finals, 2 MM, 16950 points (17110 in current system), 31 top10 wins and 16 top5 wins! that is the highest peak ever!!!!! and no one comes even close to it!

Djokovic has the best one year, and best 18 month, I agree.

But everyone has their own perception of what is peak.
 
Djokovic has the best one year, and best 18 month, I agree.

But everyone has their own perception of what is peak.
peak is the peak. nole simultaneously owned all 4 slams, WTF, 5 masters and made 3 more finals + 2 MM. he has the PEAK record of 16950 points. that is the peak!

he has also the best 2 years, W14-RG16!

fed had negative h2h vs his main rival in his own era and in his greatest season or year. he had 2 rivals with 10+ matches that he had negative h2h to, so how he can be undisputed the most dominant player ever even if we take a longer periods.

nole simultaneously held most important and best titles, had records in points, ELO and top10 wins in a year (or the season) and all those by significant margin and with positive h2h vs all rivals he played more than few matches! under one year he dominate ALL surfaces, conditions and rivals as no one ever did!
 
peak is the peak. nole simultaneously owned all 4 slams, WTF, 5 masters and made 3 more finals + 2 MM. he has the PEAK record of 16950 points. that is the peak!

he has also the best 2 years, W14-RG16!

fed had negative h2h vs his main rival in his own era and in his greatest season or year. he had 2 rivals with 10+ matches that he had negative h2h to, so how he can be undisputed the most dominant player ever even if we take a longer periods.

nole simultaneously held most important and best titles, had records in points, ELO and top10 wins in a year (or the season) and all those by significant margin and with positive h2h vs all rivals he played more than few matches! under one year he dominate ALL surfaces, conditions and rivals as no one ever did!

Yes, I am aware no one had a better peak year long run that Djokovic.
 
can be, but still he was never close to highest level overall. never on any of 2 biggest indoors events. and tennis is not played only on clay. so yes he is the greatest CC player,CC BOAT and CC GOAT. but nole is HC, indoors and overall BOAT and GOAT! and both are undisputed!
You are delusional lol. Djokovic is not greatest on any surface peak wise, that is undisputed.

You seem nto not understand what 'highest peak' means. Nobody in history in any sport has had a higher peak than Nadal on clay, that is undisputed fact.
 
Well, please consider that soccer is a SIGNIFICANTLY more difficult sport than tennis.
Winning one world cup = winning 20 Slams minimum
You do know many World Cups have been totally rigged. Obvious ones are:
Argentina 1978 (Peru had an Argentinian GK in goal for a match against Argentina they needed to win 5-0..they won 6-0!)
France 1998 (whole R9 saga was obvious distraction)
Qatar 2022 (Argentina undefeated for 3 years lose 1st match to Saudi Arabia then win World Cup final between two countries who star players played for a team sponsored by Qatar Airways)

Pains me to say it, but England 1966 was dodgy AF, and Germany 1974 ive doubts over given the Netherlands were comfortably the best side in the world then and Germany 1974 and France 1998 both seem fixed for the hosts who were vastly inferiror to the runners-up.

If you are smart, put $1,000 on USA winning this years World Cup!
 
Culturally yes, but there are plenty of bums or unknown players with a world cup on their resumes.
In terms of difficulty to become highly skilled at the sport and master the techniques, soccer >>>>> tennis.
It's not even remotely comparable.
It's like comparing prime Nadal on clay to prime Ruud on clay.
If you've played both sports or at least tried, you would know, believe me.
 
In terms of difficulty to become highly skilled at the sport and master the techniques, soccer >>>>> tennis.
It's not even remotely comparable.
It's like comparing prime Nadal on clay to prime Ruud on clay.
If you've played both sports or at least tried, you would know, believe me.
Look, think of it this way:
Tennis is arguably one of the (if not, THE) easiest sports in the world. The techniques are incredibly easy to master compared to e.g. soccer or basketball.
This means that the sport automatically filters out athletes who are naturally exceptionally gifted, because only the least talented and skilled people resort to choosing tennis (over other far harder sports).
But as for soccer, it's exactly the other way around. Because of how ridiculously hard it is to reach pro level in soccer, only the very best of the best among the most gifted athletes in the world choose the sport. This means that a supposed "bum" in soccer is still very likely to have a far higher aptitude than a 10+ Grand Slam champion in tennis.

Let me give you an analogy: if you were a billionaire and you really wanted to eat some sushi, what option would you choose, Michelin-starred Omakase or gas station sushi? Well, you'd obviously choose the first option. Why? Because a billionaire can afford opulent meals. Similarly, a soccer player can afford to pursue soccer because he has enough talent and skill to succeed in this ultra-difficult sport.

On the other hand, if you were broke (or facing significant financial struggles) yet you still really wanted to eat some sushi, you'd have no choice but to choose the second option: the gas station sushi. Why? Well, because you simply cannot afford opulent meals. This broke guy represents a tennis player.

In case it wasn't obvious, the Michelin-starred Omakase symbolizes the sport of soccer, whereas the gas station sushi represents the sport of tennis.

tl;dr
soccer is for the best of the best, whereas tennis is for the worst of the worst. Even reaching pro level in a field consisting of the best of the best > dominating in a field consisting of the worst of the worst.
 
Last edited:
You do know many World Cups have been totally rigged. Obvious ones are:
Argentina 1978 (Peru had an Argentinian GK in goal for a match against Argentina they needed to win 5-0..they won 6-0!)
France 1998 (whole R9 saga was obvious distraction)
Qatar 2022 (Argentina undefeated for 3 years lose 1st match to Saudi Arabia then win World Cup final between two countries who star players played for a team sponsored by Qatar Airways)

Pains me to say it, but England 1966 was dodgy AF, and Germany 1974 ive doubts over given the Netherlands were comfortably the best side in the world then and Germany 1974 and France 1998 both seem fixed for the hosts who were vastly inferiror to the runners-up.

If you are smart, put $1,000 on USA winning this years World Cup!
1994 world cup semi final Bulgaria vs Italy was totally rigged with the blatant non call when Lechkov was tripped in front of the goal, not to mention other non calls that benefitted Italy.
 
You are delusional lol. Djokovic is not greatest on any surface peak wise, that is undisputed.

You seem nto not understand what 'highest peak' means. Nobody in history in any sport has had a higher peak than Nadal on clay, that is undisputed fact.
yes, just on clay. he is clay GOAT and BOAT. nole is overal GOAT and BOAT and HC and indoors GOAT and BOAT!
 
Back
Top