BGod
G.O.A.T.
The 2013 ESPN 30 for 30 documentary titled " This is what they want" reviewed Connors' magical run in 1991 to the semifinals of the US Open. This, granted in a weak draw after 1 year off due to injury at 39 years of age.
At the time, Federer winning his 7th Wimbledon to tie Sampras at near age 31 was hailed as a triumph.
Now in 2019, Federer has made yet another Wimbledon final at near age 38. And you have to look at Nadal and Novak still going as well as Wawrinka's late career push and recovery.
Jimmy Connors' 1991 US Open is now a footnote which will pale in comparison to Federer at the very least if not overshadowed by Novak/Nadal's twilight year runs.
I'd like to reflect how such a miracle run is now aged so poorly in hindsight.
At the time, Federer winning his 7th Wimbledon to tie Sampras at near age 31 was hailed as a triumph.
Now in 2019, Federer has made yet another Wimbledon final at near age 38. And you have to look at Nadal and Novak still going as well as Wawrinka's late career push and recovery.
Jimmy Connors' 1991 US Open is now a footnote which will pale in comparison to Federer at the very least if not overshadowed by Novak/Nadal's twilight year runs.
I'd like to reflect how such a miracle run is now aged so poorly in hindsight.