D
Deleted member 25923
Guest
Hey Kal-el, have you hit with the FXP Radical tour?
Kal-El's Racquet Review Section
- Thread starter Kal-El 34
- Start date
klementine
Hall of Fame
I have always strayed from prince and their 'holey' racquets. No racquet plays to my liking stock, so I have to add or take away weight from here and there.
Hey Kal-El, was wondering if you customize. And if you think the new prince lineup is easier for one to customize to their liking?
Hey Kal-El, was wondering if you customize. And if you think the new prince lineup is easier for one to customize to their liking?
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
Hey guys, sorry I have taken a short break from the boards. Haven't had a whole lot of time to the computer lately...
i would do yonex reviews, but never really tried too many yonex frames..
yes i have hit with, and owned the FXP radical tour. I will post thoughts on both it and the regular FXP radical, even though I feel they are the worst of the Radical line in my opinion.
The new Prince line is fairly easy to customize. Grommets, no grommets, you can tweak them here and there. They still have that new school, Prince, dampened feeling though and I have not figured out how to get rid of that haha. If you love it you love it, if not... it aint happening.
I will be posting reviews tomorrow... keep a look out
i would do yonex reviews, but never really tried too many yonex frames..
yes i have hit with, and owned the FXP radical tour. I will post thoughts on both it and the regular FXP radical, even though I feel they are the worst of the Radical line in my opinion.
The new Prince line is fairly easy to customize. Grommets, no grommets, you can tweak them here and there. They still have that new school, Prince, dampened feeling though and I have not figured out how to get rid of that haha. If you love it you love it, if not... it aint happening.
I will be posting reviews tomorrow... keep a look out
sunnyIce
Semi-Pro
hi kal..are you going to be able to get around to re-reviewing after adding lead. this racq is pretty awesome i think after lead. i'd just be curious to see your review after. please see the ag100 thread for some of the mods us guys have been making.
emerckx53
Semi-Pro
Volkl's and Becker's and Fischer's oh my......
Kal,
Very nice work your doing. As per many top juniors/satellite players/D1 college players you are partial to Head products and Wilson products. Always wondered how much of it was quality and how much was the fact that many of you started your careers with these brands simply out of sponsorship reasons. Both brands obviously have lines that are giants in the players racquet world but both also suffer from over marketed models that are simply re-hashes of re-hashes. That said, there is a whole mess of euro-dogs on this forum that grew up playing Volkl's and Fisher's etc...there are legions of us around that want your feedback! Like it or not we are going to ride you to review these frames! Here is your task Mr. Kal if you should choose to accept:
Volkl: C-10 series/PB 10 series/VE variants 93's etc
Becker: BB 11's mids/mid plus's/pros
Fischer's: M Pro's reg and lights
We can narrow this list down for you if you like...I actually think you may even enjoy hitting with some euro product. When you get a chance of course....
Mj
Kal,
Very nice work your doing. As per many top juniors/satellite players/D1 college players you are partial to Head products and Wilson products. Always wondered how much of it was quality and how much was the fact that many of you started your careers with these brands simply out of sponsorship reasons. Both brands obviously have lines that are giants in the players racquet world but both also suffer from over marketed models that are simply re-hashes of re-hashes. That said, there is a whole mess of euro-dogs on this forum that grew up playing Volkl's and Fisher's etc...there are legions of us around that want your feedback! Like it or not we are going to ride you to review these frames! Here is your task Mr. Kal if you should choose to accept:
Volkl: C-10 series/PB 10 series/VE variants 93's etc
Becker: BB 11's mids/mid plus's/pros
Fischer's: M Pro's reg and lights
We can narrow this list down for you if you like...I actually think you may even enjoy hitting with some euro product. When you get a chance of course....
Mj
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
Head LiquidMetal Radical TOUR Review
Note this is the Tour version of the LM Radical, and not to be confused with my earlier LM Radical MP reveiw.
I LOVED this stick. I had it for longer than I can remember, with a 4 and 1/2 grip, and had it strung every which way possible. I liked it best with Full Luxilon ALU Power Ice at 62 Pounds though FWIW.
Groundstrokes I give a 9/10. This is one of my favorite groundstroke racquets of all time. Take the feel of the original LM Radical mid-plus, which I already liked, and add some heft to it in stock weight and this frame became an absolute beast. I always tried to lead my LM MP to feel like these, but it never quite felt right. It had the feel of the liquidmetal, with the plow through of a much heavier, old scool feel. It was awesome. I can't explain it, but I always felt like it was hard for me to miss with this racquet haha. I could free swing, and get perfect depth and power, while not giving up any spin. The extra weight game me more power and control, which I especially liked on my forehand. I could snap topspin shots deep in the court with massive bit, or roll a short angle winner no problem. Flat shots were fine, better with this version due to the better drive through the ball. However, I did tend to favor my topspin. Of all of my ratings, this was my favorite frame to hit my 2 hand backhand flat with. I could just take the racquet back and try and rip the cover off the ball. Big improvement from the stock MP in this category. The heft of this frame just felt good in my hands, and I felt confident I could do whatever I could with this frame. Another shot I noticed I loved to hit with this was a defensive shot, and one I usually don't give props to. This was the forehand slice, on the run. I usually hit this shot defensive, to try and get myself back into a point. However, with the same swing with this racquet, I got offensive shot type power with it, and actually did not feel defensive with this racquet at all. I even hit it as an offensive shot when needed, and set myself up nicely with it.
Serve returns were also awesome with thsi racquet. The extra weight I preferred here. I got better control, and really could just stick returns. Good power and depth, with no loss of control was very nice. I always felt confident returning serve against anyone with this frame. In fact, I haven't found a frame since then I like as much on serve returns as this one.
Volleys get an 8/10. Volleys were never the strongest point of the LM radical series. However this one was a little better at the net in my opinion than the standard MP. The extra weight made it a bit more sluggish at the net, but not enough so that it ws a burden. The extra weight of the frame did give some nice, needed extra drive through the ball on volleys. This allowed for better depth, which was nice. Touch was not the best with this racquet, but at the time I was not coming to the net much so it wasn't a major issue for me at the time. I would like to revisit this frame now that I serve and volley much more. I could still hit the drop volleys and angle touch volleys, but they were not as smooth as with other frames I have hit with.
Serves bump up to an 8.5/10. The extra weight of this racquet allowed for more plow through the ball, and more power. This was nice while not losing the control. I loved hitting flat bombs with this frame. I could just wind up and crack one wherever I felt like. Slice serves were also very nice. I noticed the extra plow through the ball made my slice bite extra nice with this one. My kick serve was not as good as it is with say a prestige, but it was still there with the LM Radical Tour. I could hit serves all day with this frame, and never get tired as well. I loved that about this frame as well. I loved the weight, and could play 3 or 4 matches in one day and not be dead armed when it was all said and done.
Overall this is one of my favorite, if not my favorite all around racquet I've hit with. Good frome everywhere, and an excellent choice for an all courter with big groundies and an aggressive serve.
Note this is the Tour version of the LM Radical, and not to be confused with my earlier LM Radical MP reveiw.
I LOVED this stick. I had it for longer than I can remember, with a 4 and 1/2 grip, and had it strung every which way possible. I liked it best with Full Luxilon ALU Power Ice at 62 Pounds though FWIW.
Groundstrokes I give a 9/10. This is one of my favorite groundstroke racquets of all time. Take the feel of the original LM Radical mid-plus, which I already liked, and add some heft to it in stock weight and this frame became an absolute beast. I always tried to lead my LM MP to feel like these, but it never quite felt right. It had the feel of the liquidmetal, with the plow through of a much heavier, old scool feel. It was awesome. I can't explain it, but I always felt like it was hard for me to miss with this racquet haha. I could free swing, and get perfect depth and power, while not giving up any spin. The extra weight game me more power and control, which I especially liked on my forehand. I could snap topspin shots deep in the court with massive bit, or roll a short angle winner no problem. Flat shots were fine, better with this version due to the better drive through the ball. However, I did tend to favor my topspin. Of all of my ratings, this was my favorite frame to hit my 2 hand backhand flat with. I could just take the racquet back and try and rip the cover off the ball. Big improvement from the stock MP in this category. The heft of this frame just felt good in my hands, and I felt confident I could do whatever I could with this frame. Another shot I noticed I loved to hit with this was a defensive shot, and one I usually don't give props to. This was the forehand slice, on the run. I usually hit this shot defensive, to try and get myself back into a point. However, with the same swing with this racquet, I got offensive shot type power with it, and actually did not feel defensive with this racquet at all. I even hit it as an offensive shot when needed, and set myself up nicely with it.
Serve returns were also awesome with thsi racquet. The extra weight I preferred here. I got better control, and really could just stick returns. Good power and depth, with no loss of control was very nice. I always felt confident returning serve against anyone with this frame. In fact, I haven't found a frame since then I like as much on serve returns as this one.
Volleys get an 8/10. Volleys were never the strongest point of the LM radical series. However this one was a little better at the net in my opinion than the standard MP. The extra weight made it a bit more sluggish at the net, but not enough so that it ws a burden. The extra weight of the frame did give some nice, needed extra drive through the ball on volleys. This allowed for better depth, which was nice. Touch was not the best with this racquet, but at the time I was not coming to the net much so it wasn't a major issue for me at the time. I would like to revisit this frame now that I serve and volley much more. I could still hit the drop volleys and angle touch volleys, but they were not as smooth as with other frames I have hit with.
Serves bump up to an 8.5/10. The extra weight of this racquet allowed for more plow through the ball, and more power. This was nice while not losing the control. I loved hitting flat bombs with this frame. I could just wind up and crack one wherever I felt like. Slice serves were also very nice. I noticed the extra plow through the ball made my slice bite extra nice with this one. My kick serve was not as good as it is with say a prestige, but it was still there with the LM Radical Tour. I could hit serves all day with this frame, and never get tired as well. I loved that about this frame as well. I loved the weight, and could play 3 or 4 matches in one day and not be dead armed when it was all said and done.
Overall this is one of my favorite, if not my favorite all around racquet I've hit with. Good frome everywhere, and an excellent choice for an all courter with big groundies and an aggressive serve.
emerckx53
Semi-Pro
emerckx53 - may have to supply KE with those frames if he doesn't have access to them.
I sure can if he is interested...
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
Head Flexpoint Radical Tour Review
Alright, so with the LM review done, I figured it would be easy to go right to its successor (whoops). This frame should not even be in the same category as the LM Radical Tour.
I had this for about 8 months, and had it strung every possible way. I found it best at 65, with full polyester. If I kept anything else in there, it broke too fast.
Groundstrokes receive a 7.5/10. This racquet is no terrible. I just prefer the tour that came before it. They made the headsize a little bigger with this one, and opened the string patter up a little. What happened was more spin. The spin potential of this frame is incredible. Topspin is great. I could get absolutely nasty with the ball, and would get nice depth and pace; especially on my forehand. Slice had good bite as well, and the weight of the racquet isn't bad. However, I noticed that I found it difficult to flatten the ball out, even when I wanted to. I've hit open string patterns before, but this one wanted to eat into the ball, even when I didnt want it to. My backhand I like to flatten out, and it made me mad I was not as effective with it as I was with my old LM Rad Tours. It was also frustrating on approach shots when I wanted to flatten one out to put it away, and it came off with some loopy topspin. COME ON. The feel of this frame is better than the Midplus version I felt, and I did like the extra weight of this over the stock FXP Midplus.
Serve returns were good with this one. The 100 sq. in. head, large sweetspot, and biting string pattern allowed for free swinging from the baseline. The fact that the string pattern bites into the ball so much, allows for good control and spin on returns. The ball does not sail, but again it is hard to flatten one out when needed.
Volleys get an 8/10. I actually felt like this frame had a little more feel at the net than my old ones. It wasn't as maneuverable with the bigger headsize, but it allowed for better volleys on off center hits. The extra weight still allows for good depth and stick on volleys. The extra bite gives good control, and the feel is better on touch volleys and angle shots as well. I felt I lost a bit of control on my backhand volley though. I don't know if this was due to the bigger head, the string pattern or what. i felt solid on the forehand volley, but noticed my backhand would get a case of the fliers every now and again.
Serves get a 7/10. I lost quite a bit of what I loved about serving with the LM Radical Tour. I felt the pop was less, and I couldn't just wind up and bomb a flat one anymore with this frame. I love killing flat serves, and this was a problem. Spin serves were nasty though. My slice had good bite, and I really could get some sweet angles on the deuce side. My kick serve lost a bit of pace but made up for it with extra spin. I noticed some gigantic jump on the ball, which was nice. I wish I could have found a little more pace though.
Overall this frame I don't think was as good as the LM Radical Tour. If they would have kept the specs the same with the FXP, it might have been better. However, I think some may have really enjoyed the bigger headsize and open string pattern. I couldn't keep strings that weren't all Poly in there for more than a day though, and I don't enjoy stringing racquets that much haha. If you are a spinny player, and don't go flat too often, you may give this a look; although I think the Microgel Radical pro is an upgrade from this.
Alright, so with the LM review done, I figured it would be easy to go right to its successor (whoops). This frame should not even be in the same category as the LM Radical Tour.
I had this for about 8 months, and had it strung every possible way. I found it best at 65, with full polyester. If I kept anything else in there, it broke too fast.
Groundstrokes receive a 7.5/10. This racquet is no terrible. I just prefer the tour that came before it. They made the headsize a little bigger with this one, and opened the string patter up a little. What happened was more spin. The spin potential of this frame is incredible. Topspin is great. I could get absolutely nasty with the ball, and would get nice depth and pace; especially on my forehand. Slice had good bite as well, and the weight of the racquet isn't bad. However, I noticed that I found it difficult to flatten the ball out, even when I wanted to. I've hit open string patterns before, but this one wanted to eat into the ball, even when I didnt want it to. My backhand I like to flatten out, and it made me mad I was not as effective with it as I was with my old LM Rad Tours. It was also frustrating on approach shots when I wanted to flatten one out to put it away, and it came off with some loopy topspin. COME ON. The feel of this frame is better than the Midplus version I felt, and I did like the extra weight of this over the stock FXP Midplus.
Serve returns were good with this one. The 100 sq. in. head, large sweetspot, and biting string pattern allowed for free swinging from the baseline. The fact that the string pattern bites into the ball so much, allows for good control and spin on returns. The ball does not sail, but again it is hard to flatten one out when needed.
Volleys get an 8/10. I actually felt like this frame had a little more feel at the net than my old ones. It wasn't as maneuverable with the bigger headsize, but it allowed for better volleys on off center hits. The extra weight still allows for good depth and stick on volleys. The extra bite gives good control, and the feel is better on touch volleys and angle shots as well. I felt I lost a bit of control on my backhand volley though. I don't know if this was due to the bigger head, the string pattern or what. i felt solid on the forehand volley, but noticed my backhand would get a case of the fliers every now and again.
Serves get a 7/10. I lost quite a bit of what I loved about serving with the LM Radical Tour. I felt the pop was less, and I couldn't just wind up and bomb a flat one anymore with this frame. I love killing flat serves, and this was a problem. Spin serves were nasty though. My slice had good bite, and I really could get some sweet angles on the deuce side. My kick serve lost a bit of pace but made up for it with extra spin. I noticed some gigantic jump on the ball, which was nice. I wish I could have found a little more pace though.
Overall this frame I don't think was as good as the LM Radical Tour. If they would have kept the specs the same with the FXP, it might have been better. However, I think some may have really enjoyed the bigger headsize and open string pattern. I couldn't keep strings that weren't all Poly in there for more than a day though, and I don't enjoy stringing racquets that much haha. If you are a spinny player, and don't go flat too often, you may give this a look; although I think the Microgel Radical pro is an upgrade from this.
reesespiecestennis
Rookie
Hey Kal-El I've demoed the microgel prestige midplus and it's an awesome racquet. I demoed it along with the
Pure Drive standard
Radical Pro
Fischer Mpro
I didn't like the Radical Pro or Fischer. The Babolat was cool for a while but I have to hold up a litte on groundstrokes and couldn't serve comfortably with it.
For my maybe final group of demos I think I'm going to include
Either 18x20 or 16x18 k 61 95- think this might be too heavy but I would like to try it again.
Storm Tour
Technifibre 325 and 320
Are these good choices before I decide on the prestige?
Pure Drive standard
Radical Pro
Fischer Mpro
I didn't like the Radical Pro or Fischer. The Babolat was cool for a while but I have to hold up a litte on groundstrokes and couldn't serve comfortably with it.
For my maybe final group of demos I think I'm going to include
Either 18x20 or 16x18 k 61 95- think this might be too heavy but I would like to try it again.
Storm Tour
Technifibre 325 and 320
Are these good choices before I decide on the prestige?
D
Deleted member 25923
Guest
I've never played with an 18x20. Maybe i'm missing out by not playing with the LM Rad tour, but I like the FXP so i'll stick with it.
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
yea man the prestige is sweet. i preferred the 18x20 k6.1 95 over the 16x18. It is stiff though but if you like it it is a rewarding frame. I dunno too much about technifibre, but im workin on that haha
reesespiecestennis
Rookie
Which would be the better overall purchase a microgel prestige or a liquidmetal radical? Because I really like the prestige right now.
I know you didn't like the pure drive but it was nice for me to an extent. My returns were deadly and my defensive shots and overheads were good too. But If I really tried to go for a shot it was a little bit harder to keep it in as usual, and it never felt right for serves because I'm used to something heavier. I'm thinking if I gave this a chance with soft poly strings it might work for me. I just see so many great college players using it especially at UVA and that really influences me.
On the other hand the prestige was great for serving. Flat, slice, kick. My shots were consistent and the racquet felt pretty comfy. I just don't think it gives me an edge like the pure drive does, but makes me more confident serving at the same time.
Serving: Prestige
Forehand: Prestige
Backhand: Pure Drive
Returns: Pure Drive
Defense: Pure Drive
Volleys: Prestige
Overheads: Pure Drive
Urgh I'm so confused about which racquet to get.
I know you didn't like the pure drive but it was nice for me to an extent. My returns were deadly and my defensive shots and overheads were good too. But If I really tried to go for a shot it was a little bit harder to keep it in as usual, and it never felt right for serves because I'm used to something heavier. I'm thinking if I gave this a chance with soft poly strings it might work for me. I just see so many great college players using it especially at UVA and that really influences me.
On the other hand the prestige was great for serving. Flat, slice, kick. My shots were consistent and the racquet felt pretty comfy. I just don't think it gives me an edge like the pure drive does, but makes me more confident serving at the same time.
Serving: Prestige
Forehand: Prestige
Backhand: Pure Drive
Returns: Pure Drive
Defense: Pure Drive
Volleys: Prestige
Overheads: Pure Drive
Urgh I'm so confused about which racquet to get.
Last edited:
I wouldn't worry about it. I love the LM Rads - they're really popular around my area, too.
klementine
Hall of Fame
Does anyone here think that a LM Radical can be upgraded to play with the same characterisitcs as the LM Radical tour?
I'am considering buying a LM Radical a grip size smaller, slapping a leather grip and two overgrips--adding somewhere between 15-18grams to the handle. Then, adding 5grams of lead tape to the hoop and a prestige CAP grommet adding a total of 15-17grams to the hoop.
All these mods would land a standard 11.2oz., 325sw and 4ptHL LM Radical >>>>(lowest estimation) around 12.2oz., mid340's swingweight and 2pts. headlight.
Again these are all estimations. I know it can be done. But has anyone tried to modify a stock LM Radical and try to capture the solidness of a Radical tour?
I'am considering buying a LM Radical a grip size smaller, slapping a leather grip and two overgrips--adding somewhere between 15-18grams to the handle. Then, adding 5grams of lead tape to the hoop and a prestige CAP grommet adding a total of 15-17grams to the hoop.
All these mods would land a standard 11.2oz., 325sw and 4ptHL LM Radical >>>>(lowest estimation) around 12.2oz., mid340's swingweight and 2pts. headlight.
Again these are all estimations. I know it can be done. But has anyone tried to modify a stock LM Radical and try to capture the solidness of a Radical tour?
Hey Kal,
I also tested the prestige pro. Man i really liked it. It was very manouvrable and it has tons of power BUT sometimes i found that my balls were floating. Did you also noticed that? I didn't have the chance to test the mp yet but do you think the prestige mp is better than the pro?And does the pro have much more power than the mp?
Thanks in advance
Kal,
Great thread this that has really developed very nicely.
Now you've already done a lot of reviews of key rackets of today. I wonder though if there's any chance you might look at and speak about the 6.1 series - PSC, HPS, n95? Plus also, due to its standing, I'm sure a PT 630/280 review would go down very well around here. Finally, I'd be curious as to your impressions of the Bab PST.
Keep up the excellent work (if you have the time!)
Thanks
R.
Great thread this that has really developed very nicely.
Now you've already done a lot of reviews of key rackets of today. I wonder though if there's any chance you might look at and speak about the 6.1 series - PSC, HPS, n95? Plus also, due to its standing, I'm sure a PT 630/280 review would go down very well around here. Finally, I'd be curious as to your impressions of the Bab PST.
Keep up the excellent work (if you have the time!)
Thanks
R.
Did you try with the string hole inserts? I've been told that it's feels and plays better, more like a traditional POG.
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
thanks man. i will be doing a 6.1 lineup here in the near future. i like that idea. i briefly hit the pt630, but not enough to review it. I think one of our local pros has one he may let me swing it around a bit. I am working on reviewing the becker frame and technifibre per poster request, so those will be next, following my next comparison post between the MG Prestige and KPS88
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
i hit with it for a couple of days and thought it was light years behind the liquidmetal prestige.
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
yes it does play a little better with the inserts, but not that much. i barely noticed it, but a little crispier feel to it.
D
Deleted member 25923
Guest
Do you live in chi-town, or a suburb?
Automatix
Legend
Regarding the Kneissl Red Star...
I agree. Although some people comment on it's stiffness I found this frame very forgiving and with a really big sweetspot at that!
In my experience with this frame the racquet provides useful but not overwhelming power. It isn't a racquet launcher but gives you that bit of controllable extra zip which helps you in tough situations.
Agreed 110% !!!
I found this frame more comfortable and much more solid than the LM Radical Tour... but my frames are tweaked a bit (bumped up to 335g strung) so it could also be the case.
This is one of the best serving frames I've played... it's not the i.Prestige Mid XL but still it's very very good. Ohh and I actually served better on the advantage side...
I'd give this frame a 9/10... it really made my day. I was really enjoying the time spent on the court. The PJ is first rate.
Funny you mention that... at first I thought the string was crappy but after 10 minutes I was like WOW! As soft as polyester but grabbed the ball like a poly... if I could buy it I'd use it as my main string... at least in my Red Stars!
Cheers!
I agree. Although some people comment on it's stiffness I found this frame very forgiving and with a really big sweetspot at that!
In my experience with this frame the racquet provides useful but not overwhelming power. It isn't a racquet launcher but gives you that bit of controllable extra zip which helps you in tough situations.
Agreed 110% !!!
I found this frame more comfortable and much more solid than the LM Radical Tour... but my frames are tweaked a bit (bumped up to 335g strung) so it could also be the case.
This is one of the best serving frames I've played... it's not the i.Prestige Mid XL but still it's very very good. Ohh and I actually served better on the advantage side...
I'd give this frame a 9/10... it really made my day. I was really enjoying the time spent on the court. The PJ is first rate.
Funny you mention that... at first I thought the string was crappy but after 10 minutes I was like WOW! As soft as polyester but grabbed the ball like a poly... if I could buy it I'd use it as my main string... at least in my Red Stars!
Cheers!
Tennis_dude ^_^
Semi-Pro
hey can you please do some racket reviews on tecnifibre
they have great string and there rackets look ok
they dont look too bad
Jaewonnie
Professional
Hey, can you compare the KPS 88 and the MG Prestige mid? They're both around 88 sq in head sizes and from reading other reviews, their in the same league. I just wanna know which is better at so-and-so. I'm having a hard time deciding which to get, they both sound really nice.
Oh, and a side note, TW's review on the Prestige doesn't make it sound to great. Do you think the scores the playtesters gave to the mid matches what you thought about the racquet?
bad_call
Legend
me thinks KE lives a little south of that area. don't want to give specifics cause 4.0s like myself will pester him to practice.
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
i like my kps88 at the higher end of the tension range. 58-60 feels best for me.
I have used hollow core - terrible
full big banger original rough - very night
luxilon alu flouro / nxt - very nice
pro red code - very nice
prince twisted poly - little cheaper feeling string but feels good
Luxilon M2 feels awesome, but loses tension and breaks fast
I have used hollow core - terrible
full big banger original rough - very night
luxilon alu flouro / nxt - very nice
pro red code - very nice
prince twisted poly - little cheaper feeling string but feels good
Luxilon M2 feels awesome, but loses tension and breaks fast
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
I am actually from central illinois, BUT have spent the last 3 summers in Long Grove (North West Burb)
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
i will do this yes. I did a whole section comparing the prestige MP and KPS88. I'll get to the mid. These reviews take time to crank out. I've just been a little backed up with training and coaching that I have neglected my TT board. I apologize.
bad_call
Legend
in my youth, lived a number of years in southern illinois and have relatives living in Chicago area. go SIU...
Kal-El 34
Hall of Fame
AGHHH i was more a war on 74 kid. Go Bradley haha
