Kevlar/Poly Hybrid: Improved every aspect of my game!

travlerajm

Talk Tennis Guru
My regular string setup in my leaded up NXG OS frames is Kevlar hybrid (Ashaway Crossfire II) at 67 lbs.

I decided to experiment with Ashaway Kevlar mains and Polygut 16 crosses at 50 lbs. I was amazed to find that this setup improved every aspect of my game. I'm very impressed.

The stringbed is extemely stiff. This setup at 50 lbs feels slightly stiffer than my old setup at 67 lbs. The high stiffness really pays dividends on the volleys. The stiff stringbed feels like a paddle at the net - I got the type of directional accuracy that I had only experienced before with supertight stringbeds. The NXG is a frame that is good for spin, returns, and passing shots, but is normally a little too flexible to shine at the net. But this stiff stringbed makes it play more like a crisp leaded-up tweener at net.

Unlike a supertight stringbed, which cuts down on spin potential, the low tension Kevlar/Poly hybrid gave me excellent spin on groundies and serve - in fact, I had more bite than with any other string setup I have ever tried.

Power level was similar to the Kevlar/syn gut hybrid at 67 lbs that I was using before, but the increased bite gave more more control to harness the power.
My serve benefited from both the stiff stringbed (which improved directional accuracy) and the extra bite, which made my serves naturally dive downward into the box. Serving was never the NXG's stringpoint, but this stringbed really made me feel precise like I never had before with this frame.

This is not a complete review because I have only had one day of hitting. I'm hopeful that this string setup will maintain its playability for a while as I continue to play with it.

In short, if you are looking for a string that maximizes control, bite, and precision, and you are ok with the dead feel of Kevlar, this might be a good option. The fact that I use a heavily leaded frame (12.5 oz. and 365 SW) should be noted, as a stringbed this stiff might be too jarring and low powered to use in a lighter frame. This setup is a player's setup that benefits big hitters and serve-and-volleyers.

I wouldn't be surprised to see some ATP pros use this type of setup, because it really does give you an advantage - the spin benefit of low tension poly combined with the directional accuracy of a superstiff stringbed.
 
Last edited:
Hows your arm? Thats a very harsh hybrid.

I have about 21g of lead added to the upper half of the hoop, so my arm doesn't really feel any shock. The ball takes a quite a beating though.

Please note that my NXG is shortened to 26.9", which allows me to add lots of lead to the hoop while keeping the swingweight low.
 
Hehe...I made a thread about the possibility of a kevlar/poly hybrid a while back. Any chance it influenced this discovery?
 
Hehe...I made a thread about the possibility of a kevlar/poly hybrid a while back. Any chance it influenced this discovery?

I don't know if it was your thread. But yes, someone here posted about a Kevlar/poly hybrid strung in the 40's with nice results - I decided to give the concept a test-drive, and I'm glad I did.

I called the stringing shop this morning, and changed my order to have my other two frames strung the same as my first one that I tested last night.
 
Last edited:
I have tried this and so has my brother. My brother uses Prince Triple Threat Graphite Midsizes and he wanted me to string them at like 70 pound and I said that I woudln't go that far. He wants his racquet as dead and stiff as possible. So a couple of years ago we tried kevlar/poly hybrid strung at 63 POUNDS in his 95 sq. in. head. He loved the feel - used them for quite a while.
 
very interesting. never would have thought about that hybrid, not that i will be trying it any time soon. what made you choose to lower the tension so much?
 
Wow, that makes my elbow hurt just reading about it!

Interesting anecdote. Today I was hitting around with a 75-yr-old ex-pro who plays with an n1. I let him hit a few with my Wilson PS 4.7 OS (which is an OS stiff tweener), but mine is heavily leaded up to 12 oz. and 368 SW.

It was strung with the Kevlar/poly hybrid, but his reaction after hitting with it was that it "felt softer than I'm used to". He wasn't used to playing a racquet that plowed through the ball so much. With the extra mass, he didn't even notice that the stringbed was much stiffer than the low-tension syn gut job on his n1.

Also, he said that he felt like he couldn't generate as much power with my racquet as he could with his. However, the funny thing was that his shots had much more sting on them with the leaded frame!
 
very interesting. never would have thought about that hybrid, not that i will be trying it any time soon. what made you choose to lower the tension so much?

I lowered the tension because I wanted to take advantage of the slippery surface of the poly. I choose polygut after running my fingers over several reel poly's and deciding that the polygut 16 had the most lubricious surface. At low tension, the slippery poly surface allows the mains to snap back into place, enhancing spin.
 
I don't know if it was your thread. But yes, someone here posted about a Kevlar/poly hybrid strung in the 40's with nice results - I decided to give the concept a test-drive, and I'm glad I did.

I called the stringing shop this morning, and changed my order to have my other two frames strung the same as my first one that I tested last night.

That would be me. I've had nothing but positive feedbacks from my kevlar/aramid and poly hybrids.
 
I agree. I started stringing with forten 18 g kevlar mains and signum pure 17 crosses at 44 lbs this summer and it plays fantastic. I have had no arm problems with this setup whatsoever. But my racquets are quite armfriendly to begin with.
 
Travler,
I've been playing with kevlar/poly hybrid for a while now in my radicals. I love the control and stiffness of the string bed. This hybrid tears the felt off of balls and I'm hit a fairly flat ball. However I've been stringing mine at 64 lbs., though I plan on trying some lower tensions to compensate for the power decrease.
 
Travler,
I've been playing with kevlar/poly hybrid for a while now in my radicals. I love the control and stiffness of the string bed. This hybrid tears the felt off of balls and I'm hit a fairly flat ball. However I've been stringing mine at 64 lbs., though I plan on trying some lower tensions to compensate for the power decrease.

I'm curious to hear how you rate the low tension vs high tension.
 
I am going to try a kevlar/gut combo and see how it compares to the kevlar/poly hybrid. Anyone who has tried both?
 
I am going to try a kevlar/gut combo and see how it compares to the kevlar/poly hybrid. Anyone who has tried both?

I have Forten Aramid 18g M/VS Touch 16g on my PK Laver S right now. I find it softer than the Forten/SPPP hybrid. The crispness is less. I feel the trampoline effect more and have to put more ts to keep the balls in. Touch shots feel more traditional as well as better pocketing.

Overall, I still prefer the Aramid/SPPP hybrid for my doubles racquets, the PK Laver.
 
I reckon that I was one of the 1st people to try this setup. Ashaway Kevlar Mains 17 gauge with sppp in the crosses. Been using it for a few years now. I have tried a few other Polys in the crosses but none of them has worked as good as sppp.
 
I'm glad to know that someone else experimented with this kind of set up.
I was about to string with Ashaway Kevlar mains and Big Hitter crosses art low tension.
I'll post later after couple of matches.......
 
Back
Top