newpball
Legend
QFT!They cant have reached the level that they have without it. It takes huge amounts of self confidence to be the best.
:grin:
QFT!They cant have reached the level that they have without it. It takes huge amounts of self confidence to be the best.
Federer is possibly one of the most arrogant players of all time, and that certainly didn't stop him from winning majors.
Kyrgios's antics on court may seem to be too much for some, but I he seems to be a pretty down to earth kid off the court. He will be fine.
Very confused by this. I know Fed was arrogant in his earlier years but he is genuinely one of the nicest guys off the court nowadays. Met him in Brisbane while I was working and he's amazing and humble and not one person working had anything negative to say about Fed. I've heard many things about Kyrgios being a **** outside of the courts. And his personality on court isn't the best as well.
Now, i'm not saying he won't win majors, he probably could win one someday, but his attitude needs to improve.
An attempt at sandbagging? :grin:I'll elaborate:
I don't think Kyrgios's game is the best right now, and he has some technical difficulties. For example, I think his forehand is too wristy, and he could seriously damage it. If he were to do less of a windshield wiper motion, he could get a little more penetration on it.
His volleys are pretty bad, nobody can deny that. He doesn't bend his legs at all. I remember one point from watching him against Nadal at Wimbledon, and all he had to do was volley an easy ball over the net, and he would've won the point, no doubts. However, he didn't bend his knees, and the ball went straight into the net. It just seems a bit lazy, and I suppose I'm projecting because I've had to work on remembering to bend my knees for volleys.
His attitude is the thing that gets me. I've run into too many people here on campus who have attitudes like him, and it annoys me. There's a difference between arrogance and confidence, and he's more on the side of the former right now.
All that being said, I truly want to support him, but not until he fixes his attitude. He's got the most potential out of all the young ones, but that really isn't saying much.
Tons of hype surrounding this arrogant spoiled little brat. What do y'all even see in his game? His backhand is meh, his forehand is awkward, his volleys are atrocious, his movement is horrible. Literally, his only weapon is his serve. The only reason he's hyped up so much is because he beat Nadal in the 4th round of Wimbledon and reached the quarterfinals of Wimbledon and the Australian Open. Guess what? Tomic did almost the same thing, and where is he now?
Kyrgios will never win a major. Book it here.
She's up there in the list. Top 5 material for sure.
What's the purpose of this thread really? I suspect OP wants the thread to be bumped years later when Kyrgios wins a Slam.
Funny how nobody feels confident enough to dispute the points that OP made. This is a tennis forum guys, let's discuss tennis. If Kyrgios is never going to win a major, it's not because he's arrogant or because nobody likes him, it will be because he's just not good enough.
Now, OP, I heavily disagree with the technical criticism you gave. As others, including Federer, have mentioned, Kyrgios is very talented and there's not much awkward about his shots at all. What you call wristy, I see as loose. You think he has bad technique, because his shots don't look textbook. But I say that the guy is so talented that he knows how to hit effectively, without adhering to textbook perfect form. His backhand looks a little awkward indeed, but it always holds up, so the guy knows what he's doing. He does stand up very straight when playing, but maybe you don't kneed to bend your knees when your arm is that long and as loose as a rubber band.
Obviously he's got an amazing serve, but that's not his only strength at all. I think this thread is going to be bumped later and you're going follow like more of a fool than the guy who said djokovic would never be #1, no offense intended
He did win a "Major"
His arrogance is what gives him his no-fear attitude against big players like Nadal and Federer. His loud mouth feed his fire a la Johnny Mac. His age is an asset at a time when the big 4 are approaching their waning years.
Whether he can win a major in the next 4 years is debatable. But I think it's a safe bet he'll do it at some point in his career. After all, there's nobody else his age contending at his level.
He did win a "Major"
Pathetic bringing an old post up like this. I take it you mustve scoured the forum to find something where someone said NK wouldnt win a major.
That is a sad life you have.
Scour, no.
Google Search in 1 second.
Yes, but I did not search talk tennis (search bar), no?You know the meaning? Cos i do, and it tells you on google .
Why do you think it’s pathetic? Is it because you’re a Nick HATER?Pathetic bringing an old post up like this. I take it you mustve scoured the forum to find something where someone said NK wouldnt win a major.
That is a sad life you have.
The doubles scene must be PATHETIC if Nick’s sniffing a major of any sort
No one cares about that major though.He did win a "Major"
Nothing new. Even chubsy Sock won multiple majors in doubles.
Kyrgios will never win a major. Book it here.