THANKS!! Thats an amazing offer and it gives me great sadness to put you through watching these vids! Though I promise to implement any advice you have.
Here I was learning and focusing on a real unit turn, laying back the wrist, and planting:
Here is a few month later and I am trying to hit 100 balls in a row. Honestly I never thought I would do it, as slowing down and being consistent is not a forte. If I slow down the stroke they seem to fly and I need to swing out to get spin. But this night I managed to hit bunches of 3/4 paced FHs:
Thanks again!
Seems to me that the second video is getting pretty close to where you want to be. As someone pointed out, you seem to have some "old style" stuff going on sometimes. I *think* the first video was old style, and I think that in the second video that you could have been swinging much harder and still gotten away with nice shots as you were using the "modern" stroke. One of the major differences (to me) between the "old style" and the "modern" is demonstrated in the two "freeze frames" that I just stuck into this little Flickr album.
https://www.flickr.com/photos/mentalblock/albums/72157670003246346 Yer racket face is already facing "left" (old style), whilst Fed's is still sorta facing his target (modern).
My sense is that you were using the modern stroke most of the time in the second video. If the racket face remains on plane, then swinging faster just means adding more spin and pace, but the trajectory remains pretty much the same, with the added spin still bringing the faster ball down into the court. It looked like there was a tendency to send a number of the balls on a little too high a trajectory, but I think that could be easily dealt with by closing the racket face angle a degree or two - probably via grip.
I don't think yer very far off. You certainly can't do what JY suggests with the contact further forward without keeping the racket face "on plane". With the old style, the racket will be facing to the left before you get to that contact area.
What a great thread. I'm still a bit lost on one thing that doesn't seem to yield itself to "commonality". Looking at JY's fine slo-mo's of Fed, Djoker, and Rafa, as well as the cool slo-mo of Jack Sock, I remain stumped by the "plane angle" variation amongst these guys during the "wipe". The extremes seem to be Socks's, which remains almost completely vertical as it was at contact, and Fed's which very quickly closes after contact (though his may be somewhat more closed *at* contact than the others, too).
Seems to me the bottom line for a modern forehand is having a laid back wrist coming into contact, which allows the counterclockwise "doorknob" move to make the racket head "wipe" on plane, and allowing for a more "driving forward" contact out front than the old eastern forehand that has the racket face aiming "left" soon after reacing its contact area (and relies mostly on a "low-to-high" swing path for a little spin). (Is the Fed closing the face as he goes through the ball???)