Rod Laver vs Pete Sampras, in their primes, at Roland Garros. Who wins? (Time machines are functioning here.) Note: This thread is not meant to be a popularity contest, not a ******* match, not a place to defend your favorite player to your dying breath. I'm just curious, more than anything, how people see this match playing out, tactically and strategically. What weaknesses of Sampras' could Laver exploit on clay, and vice versa? That kind of thing. In short, Why do you think Laver or Sampras would win, and How?