Why did Rafter beat the crap out of Fed so many times like a red headed step child? You say he was young.
So it's ok for fed to lose when he is young but not Nadal? Hypocritical Vphuc.....
I say. Where did I say it?
Bring up my post where I made the excuse for Fed being young. Prove me wrong.
This is what I have always said. In the losses against Rafa, Fed just lost. No excuses (from me). He lost, fair and square.
"So it's ok for fed to lose when he is young but not Nadal? Hypocritical Vphuc....."
Say who? Say me?
Again, bring the post when I said it. Can't put lies in people's mouth, right?
Again, all you could come up was excuses: Rafa skipped this, Rafa skipped that. Well, too bad. If I could go back in time, I would have told him, "Don't skip it".
You show no comparo of these tournaments because you know damn well Rafa was a NO-FACTOR.
He skipped, or got his butts kicked before the Final, then too bad. Swallow the pill. Instead you claim that Fed's win then meant nothing because Rafa wasn't there. Bouhoo...
Show me a rule where Fed has to beat Rafa in every single GS title for it to be meaningful, and not to be called "weak"!
For not being there in the final, wasn't Rafa WEAKER than the weak opponent Fed played? More tears for your twisted logic?