Life after Srsh Thread

Turbo-87

G.O.A.T.
The coffee shoppe baristas may have caught the srshs eye, but they have a lot of competition. How the srsh is able to be find time for so manny baby mamas while still being top on the rec dessert tour is unfathomable.
The Sureshs™ had to have found at least a few that don't meet his high standards. Every female desires him, there is no question about that. He is the top chauvinist on the rec tour.
 

JoelDali

Talk Tennis Guru
The moar Golden Gram Slams that Srshur accumulates the moar jellus Silly Senti becomes.

Senti doesn’t understand that the STC is affordable and teaches The All Time Champion Internet Tennis he has been seeking for many decades.
 

Turbo-87

G.O.A.T.
He's the Bobby Riggs of our times.
Although I think he wouldn't lose to Srshena.
billie.png

10/10 bikini-wearing baristas surveyed did not approve of The Sureshs™ appearance either.
 
Surena confessed that the long nights she shared with Suresh in Grand Gulab Jammings tournaments negatively affected both of their careers but she has no regrets.
This is de rigeur for the toppe players like the Srshs.
Jimmy mcresh and chrisshy.
Monfilsh and shvitolina.
The Srshs and countless many. If plied enough gul jams and drinks at a bar, it may even evoke a grate story or 10 out of the man hymself.
 
We’re seeing the literal annihilation and decimation of a spoart propelled by incontrovertible dominance by an Indian Internet. People thawt Laverer was the highest level but he is merely a rising mid level 4.0 Internet championship compared to Koresherer.

yNiTnqS.gif
This panoramic view can offer the curious scientists a fascinating study of the Srshers natural habitat, pray species and maytes.

Excerpt from a srshpedia article on a felid that the srshs has previously referred to for parallels with some of his traits:
srshspedia said:
Lions spend much of the time resting; inactive for about twenty hours per day. Activity generally peaks after dusk with a period of socialising, grooming and defecating.
 
The srshena smash drop volley stc distribution v2.0 has been used to end a 221 shot rally in the badminton racquet spoarts. The difference is the masters smart enough to just hit this within the first few shots, while mere tour players take 220 shots to get to it.

From user olli j post in gppd:

was he the linesman on the right:?))8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B8-B...........
 

Sentinel

Bionic Poster
The moar Golden Gram Slams that Srshur accumulates the moar jellus Silly Senti becomes.

Senti doesn’t understand that the STC is affordable and teaches The All Time Champion Internet Tennis he has been seeking for many decades.
My chartered accountant, Mr. Butchi Babu Gorantla, is examining your allegations on his chartered flight to the national capital.

The DCP East, Amrutha Guguloth, is joining us on a conference call.
 

ojo rojo

Legend
how come he's so small/skinny, comparing w/ the linesmen/ballboys:?)):-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D:-D..........
When judging the heaviness of two objects with equal mass, people perceive the smaller and denser of the two as being heavier. Despite the large number of theories, covering bottom-up and top-down approaches, none of them can fully account for all aspects of this size-weight illusion and thus for human heaviness perception. Here I propose a new maximum-likelihood estimation model which describes the illusion as the weighted average of two heaviness estimates with correlated noise: One estimate derived from the object’s mass, and the other from the object’s density, with estimates’ weights based on their relative reliabilities. While information about mass can directly be perceived, information about density will in some cases first have to be derived from mass and volume. However, according to the model at the crucial perceptual level, heaviness judgments will be biased by the objects’ density, not by its size. In two magnitude estimation experiments, I tested model predictions for the visual and the haptic size-weight illusion. Participants lifted objects which varied in mass and density. I additionally varied the reliability of the density estimate by varying the quality of either visual (Experiment 1) or haptic (Experiment 2) volume information. As predicted, with increasing quality of volume information, heaviness judgments were increasingly biased towards the object’s density: Objects of the same density were perceived as more similar and big objects were perceived as increasingly lighter than small (denser) objects of the same mass. This perceived difference increased with an increasing difference in density. In an additional two-alternative forced choice heaviness experiment, I replicated that the illusion strength increased with the quality of volume information (Experiment 3). Overall, the results highly corroborate our model, which seems promising as a starting point for a unifying framework for the size-weight illusion and human heaviness perception.
 

JoelDali

Talk Tennis Guru
When judging the heaviness of two objects with equal mass, people perceive the smaller and denser of the two as being heavier. Despite the large number of theories, covering bottom-up and top-down approaches, none of them can fully account for all aspects of this size-weight illusion and thus for human heaviness perception. Here I propose a new maximum-likelihood estimation model which describes the illusion as the weighted average of two heaviness estimates with correlated noise: One estimate derived from the object’s mass, and the other from the object’s density, with estimates’ weights based on their relative reliabilities. While information about mass can directly be perceived, information about density will in some cases first have to be derived from mass and volume. However, according to the model at the crucial perceptual level, heaviness judgments will be biased by the objects’ density, not by its size. In two magnitude estimation experiments, I tested model predictions for the visual and the haptic size-weight illusion. Participants lifted objects which varied in mass and density. I additionally varied the reliability of the density estimate by varying the quality of either visual (Experiment 1) or haptic (Experiment 2) volume information. As predicted, with increasing quality of volume information, heaviness judgments were increasingly biased towards the object’s density: Objects of the same density were perceived as more similar and big objects were perceived as increasingly lighter than small (denser) objects of the same mass. This perceived difference increased with an increasing difference in density. In an additional two-alternative forced choice heaviness experiment, I replicated that the illusion strength increased with the quality of volume information (Experiment 3). Overall, the results highly corroborate our model, which seems promising as a starting point for a unifying framework for the size-weight illusion and human heaviness perception.
This young man is not a trained Ontologist or a famous Biologist - he is a fan of Surshesz Internet Tennis Victory.

Disgrace and Shaulk.
 

donquijote

G.O.A.T.
At the Monaco Grand Prix, Martin Brundle acknowledged that The Sureshs™ is the top sour-scented tennis pro. He noted that The Sureshs™ is conceited and would fit in well on the F1 circuit if he desired.
I hear these vehicles' seats are quite tight and any extra weight has an effect on its performance, they can't probably tolerate the extra ton and a half.
 

Sudacafan

Bionic Poster
When judging the heaviness of two objects with equal mass, people perceive the smaller and denser of the two as being heavier. Despite the large number of theories, covering bottom-up and top-down approaches, none of them can fully account for all aspects of this size-weight illusion and thus for human heaviness perception. Here I propose a new maximum-likelihood estimation model which describes the illusion as the weighted average of two heaviness estimates with correlated noise: One estimate derived from the object’s mass, and the other from the object’s density, with estimates’ weights based on their relative reliabilities. While information about mass can directly be perceived, information about density will in some cases first have to be derived from mass and volume. However, according to the model at the crucial perceptual level, heaviness judgments will be biased by the objects’ density, not by its size. In two magnitude estimation experiments, I tested model predictions for the visual and the haptic size-weight illusion. Participants lifted objects which varied in mass and density. I additionally varied the reliability of the density estimate by varying the quality of either visual (Experiment 1) or haptic (Experiment 2) volume information. As predicted, with increasing quality of volume information, heaviness judgments were increasingly biased towards the object’s density: Objects of the same density were perceived as more similar and big objects were perceived as increasingly lighter than small (denser) objects of the same mass. This perceived difference increased with an increasing difference in density. In an additional two-alternative forced choice heaviness experiment, I replicated that the illusion strength increased with the quality of volume information (Experiment 3). Overall, the results highly corroborate our model, which seems promising as a starting point for a unifying framework for the size-weight illusion and human heaviness perception.
Density!
 

JoelDali

Talk Tennis Guru
Joey Ramone was a massive sewretch groupie.

At least for a while.

Then when sue got more massive than him, he quit.
After the 2016 election a Pizzagate believer went to Bangaloar Pizza Shoppe armed with a SRSH 95 Graphite with a bright white over-grip and Spaulding strings. He thought Rawfur had hidden Indian Tennis Champions in the basement. That was a failure of ATP security encryption.
 
Top