Little Two? Little Three? Little Four?

  • Little Two (Med/Zed)

    Votes: 2 4.7%
  • Little Three (Med/Zed/Stef)

    Votes: 16 37.2%
  • Little Three (Med/Zed/Domi)

    Votes: 2 4.7%
  • Little Four (Med/Zed/Stef/Domi)

    Votes: 3 7.0%
  • Little Four (Med/Zed/Stef/Rub)

    Votes: 2 4.7%
  • All of them are mugs

    Votes: 18 41.9%

  • Total voters
    43

Fedeonic

Hall of Fame
We all know that there's a Big Three, many argue that there was a Big Four, and some people consider that we currently have a Big Two.
But what about a Little Three? Or a Little Four? Or even a Little Two?

Daniil Medvedev and Alexander Zverev have the highest quantity of Big Titles, highest W/L percentage, most overall titles, best regularity of the Next Gen.
Then you have Stefanos Tsitsipas with a Masters and a M1000 title, and a high W/L percentage.
You could also add Dominic Thiem, who along with Medvedev have a Grand Slam and second in overall titles.
Or Andrey Rublev, which is closer in age to Med/Zed/Stef, and has showed some regularity.

Discuss.
 

Aabye5

G.O.A.T.
Tried to sneak Korda in there like we wouldn’t notice

i-dont-know-what-youre-talking-about-michael-che.gif
 

Subway Tennis

G.O.A.T.
A lot of people mention Zverev, Rublev, Berrettini etc etc but to me the tier of players directly below the Big 3 is made up of players aged 22-30 who have beaten a big 3 player in a major.

The tier immediately below the Big 3 for me is The Big Six:

- Medvedev
- Tsitsipas
- Hurkacz
- Dimitrov
- Thiem
- Kyrgios

Some of the names might be a suprise to some people (I'm as big a Kyrgios critic as anyone on here) but these are the guys who deserve to be on that stratum directly below the Big 3 right now.

The most interesting thing to me is this group pf players in the 18-22 age group (Ruusuvuori, Alcaraz, Rune, KORDA, Sinner etc etc.)

These guys could be good enough to almost bridge the generation gap and start challenging for majors before their mid twenties which would completely shatter the ageing of the game paradigm that we have taken for granted in tennis for almost a decade now.
 

albatros_forehand

Professional
A lot of people mention Zverev, Rublev, Berrettini etc etc but to me the tier of players directly below the Big 3 is made up of players aged 22-30 who have beaten a big 3 player in a major.

The tier immediately below the Big 3 for me is The Big Six:

- Medvedev
- Tsitsipas
- Hurkacz
- Dimitrov
- Thiem
- Kyrgios

Some of the names might be a suprise to some people (I'm as big a Kyrgios critic as anyone on here) but these are the guys who deserve to be on that stratum directly below the Big 3 right now.

The most interesting thing to me is this group pf players in the 18-22 age group (Ruusuvuori, Alcaraz, Rune, KORDA, Sinner etc etc.)

These guys could be good enough to almost bridge the generation gap and start challenging for majors before their mid twenties which would completely shatter the ageing of the game paradigm that we have taken for granted in tennis for almost a decade now.
Are you seriously trying to put St. Nick into any category with these mugs?
 

Sudacafan

Bionic Poster
I voted for the last option, and then I changed my mind.
So I clicked change vote button, and then voted all mugs again.
 

8020

New User
Thiem is hundred times better than Zod, Tsititrash and Pushvedev. So much disrespect for a great player.
 

Fabresque

Legend
Wife beater and ********** are failures who’s careers will die out a pathetic death once Alcaraz grows up a bit. Meddy might hold on a bit since he’s still gonna be near unbeatable in the US HC swing for the next 3 years minimum, but will be blown out by Alcaraz and a continuously improving FAA everywhere else.

The rest of them, who cares. Thiem’s finished, Rublev and Berrettini way too one dimensional to be threats.

Edit: Apparently S1ssypants is censored. Fun
 

beltsman

G.O.A.T.
Wife beater and ********** are failures who’s careers will die out a pathetic death once Alcaraz grows up a bit. Meddy might hold on a bit since he’s still gonna be near unbeatable in the US HC swing for the next 3 years minimum, but will be blown out by Alcaraz and a continuously improving FAA everywhere else.

The rest of them, who cares. Thiem’s finished, Rublev and Berrettini way too one dimensional to be threats.

Edit: Apparently S1ssypants is censored. Fun

Post is correct except that I think Tsits and Zverev will be relevant far longer than Med. I already think Med is on the way down. Unless he's serving super well, then he can grab titles.
 

UnderratedSlam

G.O.A.T.
Medvedev is ahead of the bunch. Lumping him with the others is a bit silly.

4 GS finales, one title, plus a WTF (which is overrated) and 4-5 M1000s.

Zverev doesn't come close to this with his 0-1 in slam finales (vs Thiem not even the Big 3). I don't care about his 2 WTFs, they don't play a big role in this because if WTF were so huge then its last 5 winners wouldn't have just one slam title combined...
 
Top