Lleyton Hewitt can win Wimbledon 2010

Hewitt should definitely be above Djokovic. This is grass. By the way are those the odds before or after Hewitt beat Federer in Halle?

Current odds.

This is a betting exchange so your odds will lie between the back and lay prices.


Mens Tournament - Winner Matched: USD 799,185


Selections: (80) Back Lay



Roger Federer
2.52 2.54
Rafael Nadal
3.9 3.95
Andy Murray
11.5 12
Novak Djokovic
40 42
Nikolay Davydenko
230 260
Andy Roddick
18 18.5
Robin Soderling
24 25
Jo Wilfried Tsonga
170 250
Marin Cilic
55 60
Fernando Verdasco
230 280
Gael Monfils
500 680
Radek Stepanek
740 850
Tommy Robredo
1000
Gilles Simon
1000
David Ferrer
810
Lleyton Hewitt
44 46
Mikhail Youzhny
590 610
Stanislas Wawrinka
510 660
Juan Carlos Ferrero
1000
Tomas Berdych
70 75
Ivan Ljubicic
650 850
John Isner
100 130
Nicolas Almagro
420 590
Philipp Kohlschreiber
820 990
Albert Montanes
1000
Juan Monaco
1000
Sam Querrey
90 95
Viktor Troicki
1000
Jurgen Melzer
540 620
Ivo Karlovic
420 470
Marcos Baghdatis
210 240
Thomaz Bellucci
1000
Janko Tipsarevic
1000
Jeremy Chardy
1000
Julien Benneteau
1000
Feliciano Lopez
450 740
Richard Gasquet
110 150
Lukasz Kubot
1000
Taylor Dent
1000
James Blake
520 1000
Mario Ancic
830
Ernests Gulbis
140 160
David Nalbandian
340 800
Juan Martin Del Potro
640
Leonardo Mayer
1000
Michael Llodra
780
Victor Hanescu
1000
Guillermo Garcia Lopez
1000
Philipp Petzschner
1000
Benjamin Becker
770
Igor Andreev
1000
Thiemo De Bakker
1000
Dudi Sela
840 1000
Jarkko Nieminen
1000
Evgeny Korolev
1000
Xavier Malisse
1000
Mardy Fish
200 270
Igor Kunitsyn
1000
Fabio Fognini
1000
Marcel Granollers
1000
Teimuraz Gabashvili
1000
Nicolas Kiefer
1000
Jamie Baker
1000
Andrey Kuznetsov
1000
Kei Nishikori
1000
Lukas Lacko
1000
Andreas Beck
1000
Rainer Schuettler
880
Grigor Dimitrov
1000
Simon Greul
1000
Marco Chiudinelli
1000
Federico Gil
1000
Andreas Seppi
1000
Potito Starace
1000
Juan Ignacio Chela
1000
Pablo Cuevas
1000
Fernando Gonzalez
1000
Tommy Haas
1000
Andrey Golubev
1000
Denis Istomin
500
 
How on earth have they got Soderling as twice as likely to win as Hewitt?

I know it's based on the betting for each player, but after the Halle win I'd have expected Hewitt's odds to shorten considerably (maybe 20/1).
 
How on earth have they got Soderling as twice as likely to win as Hewitt?

I know it's based on the betting for each player, but after the Halle win I'd have expected Hewitt's odds to shorten considerably (maybe 20/1).

Maybe because Sod reached the FO final?
 
If Rodge, Rod, Murray, Nadal, Soderling, Berdych, Djoker... go out early he has a chance

He doesnt even have a dark horse status

Exactly. I have no problem with him winning wimby, I'd like to see it. But let's be realistic. It takes more than 1 good tournament to put him back at that level.
 
Exactly. I have no problem with him winning wimby, I'd like to see it. But let's be realistic. It takes more than 1 good tournament to put him back at that level.

True. But you could definitely call him the dark horse of Wimbledon. People were saying Gulbis was the dark horse of the FO!
 
very dangerous is Nadal. no one expects him to win.

I do. LOL @ *******s. Speak 4 yourself. No one expects him 2 win? Downplayin there main squeeze. WTF He is #1 and just swept through the French and no one expects him 2 win? He is the favorite 2 win. Until Roddick, Federer, Murray and Hewitt show me some epic form in the QF's then I will say others have a shot.
Federer and others the favorite? LOL that is bizzare thinking. He is old and is getting in the same boat as Pete was @ the end. Natural healthy tennis decline.
 
Hmmm, if I'm to believe the sentiments on these boards, then:

-Nadal is not expected to win b/c it's grass (even though he's won Wimbledon before)

-Federer is not expected to win b/c he's not been in good form lately

-Djokovic is not expected to win b/c ditto on the form.

-Murray is not expected to win b/c he's not aggressive enough

-Roddick is not expected to win b/c it seems he hasn't been the same since Indian Wells and Miami

With all of these players not expected to win, I'm wondering, who the heck IS expected to win?!?!

Gotta love TT boards...
 
Hmmm, if I'm to believe the sentiments on these boards, then:

-Nadal is not expected to win b/c it's grass (even though he's won Wimbledon before)

-Federer is not expected to win b/c he's not been in good form lately

-Djokovic is not expected to win b/c ditto on the form.

-Murray is not expected to win b/c he's not aggressive enough

-Roddick is not expected to win b/c it seems he hasn't been the same since Indian Wells and Miami

With all of these players not expected to win, I'm wondering, who the heck IS expected to win?!?!

Gotta love TT boards...

The last 3 make sense out of those 5. It'll be either Federer or Nadal who wins, 95%.
 
2 Slam finals, 1 Wimbledon semi, 4 Masters Series titles, no4 in the world.
He has a chance.

I didn't ask for Murray's resume. :roll:

I asked when was the last time a defensive junkballer won Wimbledon? Seriously, is that too much to ask?
 
I didn't ask for Murray's resume. :roll:

I asked when was the last time a defensive junkballer won Wimbledon? Seriously, is that too much to ask?

Do you know you are one of the most pessimistic, negative person I have ever read.
Why is this?
 
Come on Anaconda. Be more positive.
You know he can do it.

I'm not a Murray fan. So me wanting someone (who's game i dislike) to win would be out of the question. He's got a better, much better chance than Hewitt who will probably be out first week.
 
I'm not a Murray fan. So me wanting someone (who's game i dislike) to win would be out of the question. He's got a better, much better chance than Hewitt who will probably be out first week.

It was a joke! I was trying to lighten the mood.
 
I'm not a Murray fan. So me wanting someone (who's game i dislike) to win would be out of the question. He's got a better, much better chance than Hewitt who will probably be out first week.

If Murray went out in the first or second round, would that make you happy?
If he does then I want to see a big smiley face.
I would even sacrifice Murray losing early.
Anything, just anything to make you happy.
 
I'm not a Murray fan. So me wanting someone (who's game i dislike) to win would be out of the question. He's got a better, much better chance than Hewitt who will probably be out first week.

Hewitt's got a better chance than Murray. Hewitt is a great player on grass.
 
If Murray went out in the first or second round, would that make you happy?
If he does then I want to see a big smiley face.
I would even sacrifice Murray losing early.
Anything, just anything to make you happy.

I'm indifferent to Murray; i couldn't care less how well he does at the tournament just as long as he doesn't win it.
 
That would be a huge shot in the arm for tennis! Would love to see it happen. This guy deserves it if not for anything but for his fighting qualities and belief in his game, limited as it may be. Come on Hewitt! :)
 
I'm indifferent to Murray; i couldn't care less how well he does at the tournament just as long as he doesn't win it.

Is there anyone you would like to see winning it?
I would love to see Hewitt win and Murray of course.
I think Hewitt's chances are minimal but wouldn't it just be great.
 
That would be a huge shot in the arm for tennis! Would love to see it happen. This guy deserves it if not for anything but for his fighting qualities and belief in his game, limited as it may be. Come on Hewitt! :)

If you fail to win a specific tournament, then you don't deserve it. Just like many great grass court players have failed to win Wimbledon because they did not play well enough. Hence they didn't deserve to win.
 
If you fail to win a specific tournament, then you don't deserve it. Just like many great grass court players have failed to win Wimbledon because they did not play well enough. Hence they didn't deserve to win.

Jeez.
You really weren't kidding when you said you had aspergers were you.
 
I think a lot of you have Hewitt rated way too high. Ranking him as a top contender at Wimby? Granted he did well last year but there's a lot of guys I like more than Hewitt at Wimby including Feds, Nadal, Roddick, Murray, Djoker, Soderling, Verdasco, Tsonga, Cilic, Berdych, Isner, Gonzo and even guys ranked lower than Hewitt like Gulbis, Karlovic, Gasquet, and Fish. If Hewitt gets to semis again I would be shocked. If he gets to quarters I would be kinda surprised but it also depends on his draw.
 
Is there anyone you would like to see winning it?
I would love to see Hewitt win and Murray of course.
I think Hewitt's chances are minimal but wouldn't it just be great.

Well, i like Hewitt however he won't win so there is no point dreaming about it. That leaves Roddick. However i realise that Roddick isn't as good as Federer and Nadal. If he uses his game and plays the wat he should (Miami SF v's Nadal) then he can beat anyone. It's whether he does play big off the FH though?
 
Jeez.
You really weren't kidding when you said you had aspergers were you.

No i was being sarcastic to that so called 'Dr' Fedace. If i had Aspergers then i wouldn't be communicating with people; whether it's online or in real life.
 
Heard of Andy 'I don't mind losing 8 finals to Federer' Roddick? P*ricks with that kind of mentality are the ones that don't deserve it, unlike great fighters like Hewitt.

If you fail to win a specific tournament, then you don't deserve it. Just like many great grass court players have failed to win Wimbledon because they did not play well enough. Hence they didn't deserve to win.
 
Heard of Andy 'I don't mind losing 8 finals to Federer' Roddick? P*ricks with that kind of mentality are the ones that don't deserve it, unlike great fighters like Hewitt.

LOL. Idiot.

I guess Hewitt has beaten Federer in a slam too. Federer has beaten Hewitt around 8 times amirite? Roddick has actually came loser alot more than Hewitt when it comes to KO'ing Federer at a slam.
 
LOL. Idiot.

I guess Hewitt has beaten Federer in a slam too. Federer has beaten Hewitt around 8 times amirite? Roddick has actually came loser alot more than Hewitt when it comes to KO'ing Federer at a slam.

It is not just about winning or losing. Hewitt brings a fighting mentality when he plays Federer. Unfortunately Federer is a horrible matchup for him, Hewitt has been past his prime since atleast 2006 (maybe sooner), and so Federer just outplays him virtually everytime. However he doesnt bring the quitters mentality to court of some others, most notably guys like Blake and Davydenko.

As for Roddick I used to be impressed with his fighting heart when he played Federer but when he made that "I dont mind losing 100 times in a row to this guy or something" it turned me off completely.
 
"I dont mind losing 100 times in a row to this guy or something" it turned me off completely.

Get me a link!


I'm sure Roddick was real pleased that he lost the Wimbledon 09 final 16-14 wasn't he :roll:. not that he wasn't nearly shedding tears, that didn't happen did it?
 
Exactly, great post! But it must be too much for the moron to understand.

It is not just about winning or losing. Hewitt brings a fighting mentality when he plays Federer. Unfortunately Federer is a horrible matchup for him, Hewitt has been past his prime since atleast 2006 (maybe sooner), and so Federer just outplays him virtually everytime. However he doesnt bring the quitters mentality to court of some others, most notably guys like Blake and Davydenko.

As for Roddick I used to be impressed with his fighting heart when he played Federer but when he made that "I dont mind losing 100 times in a row to this guy or something" it turned me off completely.
 
Exactly, great post! But it must be too much for the moron to understand.

No i actually understood the post. Hence why i replied to it. You're the stupid sack of crap accusing players who are renound for their mental strength to be mentally weak. LOL just keep embarrassing yourself. You're quite good at it.
 
You must have horse cr*p in your head for a brain.

So Andy Roddick says he doesn't mind losing 8 finals to Federer and he's renouned for his mental strength. ROFL!

No i actually understood the post. Hence why i replied to it. You're the stupid sack of crap accusing players who are renound for their mental strength to be mentally weak. LOL just keep embarrassing yourself. You're quite good at it.
 
It would be cool to see Hewitt win another Wimbledon. I was in the stadium for his quarterfinal last year against Roddick, and the match could've gone either way. Good luck to him.
 
Hewitt's chances to win Wimbledon are about as high as Donald Young's to win calendar grand slam next year.

Now see here... That is so not true. Donald Young will never win any tournament. Hewitt can beat just about anyone on grass when his legs are working. He has at least some chance.
 
Now see here... That is so not true. Donald Young will never win any tournament. Hewitt can beat just about anyone on grass when his legs are working. He has at least some chance.
Not good for either one. (Maybe a little better for Hewitt. He got lucky in Halle.)
 
Sorry but when was the last time a junk baller who played defensive won Wimbledon?

He isn't a defensive junk baller. Out of all the millions of tennis players on earth there are only 3 ahead of him. That makes him God-Like.

Not to mention that he almost won it last year.
 
You must have horse cr*p in your head for a brain.

So Andy Roddick says he doesn't mind losing 8 finals to Federer and he's renouned for his mental strength. ROFL!

so what he says is more important than what he does on court ? LOL ! roddick has a quitter mentality ? All I can say at this is LOL !

besides what was the exact context in which he said that ?
 
ABMK ... swami, you got me with my pants down! LOL! I hate being defeated in arguments but one can't always win! :)

Context: following his loss to Federer in the final of U.S Open 2006.

so what he says is more important than what he does on court ? LOL ! roddick has a quitter mentality ? All I can say at this is LOL !

besides what was the exact context in which he said that ?
 
It is not just about winning or losing. Hewitt brings a fighting mentality when he plays Federer. Unfortunately Federer is a horrible matchup for him, Hewitt has been past his prime since atleast 2006 (maybe sooner), and so Federer just outplays him virtually everytime. However he doesnt bring the quitters mentality to court of some others, most notably guys like Blake and Davydenko.

As for Roddick I used to be impressed with his fighting heart when he played Federer but when he made that "I dont mind losing 100 times in a row to this guy or something" it turned me off completely.
I highly doubt Andy was serious when he said that.I don't know what people play at taking Andy's pressers SO seriously.A lot of players try to put a positive spin on their losses immediately after a match.They don't have to necessarily mean what they say.And in Andy's case-He's displayed quite a few times that he's ready to take it to Fed-He has been slightly unfortunate to lose some of their matches.
Anyway Andy also said something like if one threw enough crap at the wall( Fed) something was bound to stick in the same presser.LOL
 
LOL, priceless ... the justifications that Federer fans put out for Andy 'confidence personified' Roddick!

If what you're saying is true, perhaps you can tell us why Roddick's coach at that time, Jimmy Connors, called it bullsh*t?! Yes, he did go on record calling Roddick's comment bullshi*t and saying 'I don't accept that'.

I highly doubt Andy was serious when he said that.I don't know what people play at taking Andy's pressers SO seriously.A lot of players try to put a positive spin on their losses immediately after a match.They don't have to necessarily mean what they say.And in Andy's case-He's displayed quite a few times that he's ready to take it to Fed-He has been slightly unfortunate to lose some of their matches.
Anyway Andy also said something like if one threw enough crap at the wall( Fed) something was bound to stick in the same presser.LOL
 
NOBODY foresaw Sampras winning his last US Open based on his form going into that final slam. But once he got a match under his belt, and got rolling, his instincts and pure talent took over. Hewitt can ride the same supernatural wave that Pete did. Sure it's unlikely, sure it's an unconventional prediction. But those who somewhat know the unique fire that blazes inside Hewitt know he is capable of absolutely anything. I really believe that win over Federer, the hurdle he overcame, can be the key.

The Federer/Nadal stranglehold at Wimbledon will end.
 
LOL, priceless ... the justifications that Federer fans put out for Andy 'confidence personified' Roddick!

If what you're saying is true, perhaps you can tell us why Roddick's coach at that time, Jimmy Connors, called it bullsh*t?! Yes, he did go on record calling Roddick's comment bullshi*t and saying 'I don't accept that'.

The only one u love is Zeeshan! U basterd!
;)
 
LOL, priceless ... the justifications that Federer fans put out for Andy 'confidence personified' Roddick!

If what you're saying is true, perhaps you can tell us why Roddick's coach at that time, Jimmy Connors, called it bullsh*t?! Yes, he did go on record calling Roddick's comment bullshi*t and saying 'I don't accept that'.
No,I can't tell you why Jimmy said that.Only Jimmy,Andy and camp know the circumstances fully.I won't be surprised if people like you( press in other words) took Andy's remark out of context and put it on Jimbo's ears..Are YOU sure of what Andy really meant?Are you sure Jimmy knew whether Andy really meant what he said at the time the remark was made?If you are and can provide a good argument then I shall stand corrected. Have you even bothered to read Andy's whole presser or are just parroting off that one remark because you LOVE to bash him up every opportunity you get?

Andy hasn't given up against Roger.It's been evident in many of their matches .And he just beat your hero in Miami.
Your irrational bashing is worse than my justification.Isn't there a limit to all this bashing ?How long is Andy going to be grilled for that one remark(even if,let's say,he truly meant every word of it) ?
 
Last edited:
Back
Top