Discussion in 'General Pro Player Discussion' started by SStrikerR, May 29, 2012.
haha yeah, thats kinda old but still funny
Very old and been played on here numerous times!
Yet another pointless thread.
More classic clay court Murray.
oh, some human drama
does anyone knows the exact story please?
they really seem to hate each other.
ooh young delpo with longish hair haha
Juan Martin del Awesome.
It's funny to see an umpire talk to the players like they're children :lol:
i think this one from the söderking was even better tho
I love how the announcers are saying they should just "go for it" like in ice hockey, "rackets down, shirts off" good ol' brawl. THAT i would pay to see.
Look who is sitting on a USO title and look who has jack. Says it all.
Oh sure, coz everyone knows Murray has won nothing at all!
Oh...hang on a minute!
More like Juan Martin del Phony. Sitting there like butter wouldn't melt in his mouth, like he's the injured party or something...lol!
Slams are everything. Nobody remembers what Rios won, people just remember what he didn't win: a slam. At the moment it's the same for Murray.
Still enjoyable, and has led to other videos being posted for people's enjoyment. It's actually a fun thread, that, besides you, isn't affected by the general idiocy of this board. If you think it's pointless, do us all a favor and turn off your computer instead of sharing your opinion that nobody cares about.
Now he's just trying to troll everybody...fail.
Ah of course...you are of the school that only Slams count. Do you only watch tennis 4 times a year then? If not, why not?
You didn't post this for fun. You posted it to troll Murray just like your 'Murray is finished' thread. At least try and be honest about it!
Which is why Del Potro owns Murray to a winning percentage of 16.7%.
It's a quarter final match from 2009 Monte Carlo. Murray won 7-6, 6-4. The incident was right near the end of the match.
But people do remember that Rios got to world number 1
Andy Murray has the 2nd best personality in tennis.
Q. What are your pet peeves?
AM. ....snakes and....rats....don't like them either.
That's because Rios is the most talented player since Rod Laver.
Murray leads Davydenko 5-4 in their head-to-head yet they haven't met since this match over 3 years ago.
Winning percentage in slam finals.
Del potro = 100%
Murray = 0%. Hasn't won a set. Not one set. I repeat. Not a single set.
remind me, how many slam finals has JMDP actually reached?
as for the head to head, lol, no contest..
Murray up 5 - 1 so far....
Del Potro such a joke. A footnote in history alongside Orantes, Edmonson and co...
1 > 0
That's all. first player ever to beat nadal and federer back to back in a slam.
oh, right, so I guess I should file him in teh same place as Adrianno Pannatta then?
(only person to ever beat Borg in Paris. What do you mean you've never heard of him?? )
If Murray doesn't win a slam, he won't even be a footnote. People aren't on a be like, "oh yeah he was incredible, he won 637 masters titles and had a winning record over a slam winner, he was quite the player!" slam or bust.
Davy's reaction is hilarious.
"That poor fool"
Why did you assume he hadn't heard of Panatta? Panatta was an excellent player. He beat Borg twice in Paris.
Del Potro is still very young and got injured right as he peaked, so he got a bit of a bum deal, however there is still great possibility that he'll win another slam.
oh, I know, but I am bored, and trolling del potro fans is fish in a barrel stuff.
Watched him practice at the AO this year, actually, just basically stood on the baseline hitting groundstrokes as hard as humanly possible for about a half hour and left..
both of these are fantastic. Soderlings voice did not sound like what I thought it would
Wish they had the ability to show the hawk eye replay for clay just to get these arguments out of the way.
This. Just use hawkeye on clay and avoid this regular nonsense with wrong marks.
the collective fail is what makes that one so awesome imo.
söderling gets the mark wrong by about 2 meters (lol) then the umpire comes down and points to another mark (that is also wrong) and 5 seconds later he cant find it anymore.. lmfao
Am I the only one who can't hear the audio on this video? :???:
My browser updates Flash automatically so I should be able to hear it. Yes, I checked the volume. :cry:
I can hear the audio, but...the audio is pretty bad.
Wait, are you guys saying that Del Potro has 1 grand slam title while Murray has 0 grand slam titles?
Because that's news to me.
Yep. It's old news, really.
did his forehand break down?
The umpire needs to learn a thing or two in communicating with players. He made it looks like it was 'in' by his initial reaction. Andy thought the umpire called it 'in'. That reaction was just natural from Andy.
If I was incharge, I would fire that umpire right away.
Don't mind him. Blinky is just being a Muurya-hater as usual :roll:
In addition to that, the mark that the umpire indicated was incorrect. So although Murray won the point, he won it, on a wrong call. It was a different mark.
It is about getting things right. Umpires cannot always get away doing wrong things. Andy didn't like that. He reacted like any normal person, who feels he was cheated, would.
And it was ridiculous for Davydenko to laugh at it.
Blinky is Lendl's advisor.
Blinky is actually Lendl :shock: Sly........ :twisted:
Ahhhh. Now I get it.
Quiet, you two... this forum is where I go to get coaching ideas.
Wow. Good thing you aren't in charge then.
How do you know it was the wrong mark? Oh wait, you don't. LOL
Separate names with a comma.