Long Serena Interview in Fader

Garhi Shot First

Hall of Fame
In Fader:

Serena Williams seems invincible. Over the course of a 20-year professional tennis career, she’s succeeded more often and for longer than anyone ever, winning all four Grand Slams consecutively, twice, and matching Steffi Graf’s record of 186 weeks ranked at No. 1. Her record-tying 22 wins in major tournaments, and the staggering fact that when she’s been in major finals she’s only lost five times, make a Williams win a more reliable proposition than investing in Apple or casting Tom Hanks as the lead in your movie. In a world where people often confine what they think women are capable of, there are no limits to how much winning Serena Williams can do.

That’s not the best part. Even when she’s robot-marching through her competition, Williams’s matches are events. Her draws at this year’s U.S. Open were attended by a trail of disparate celebrities —Jay Z and Beyoncé, Carmelo and LaLa, Kevin Spacey and Alec Baldwin and Uzo Aduba (separately), and Pharrell Williams and adidas tennis legend Stan Smith (together) — giving tennis matches in 2016 the see-and-be-seen cachet of a Lakers game in the ’80s or a Floyd Mayweather fight in the aughts.

When Williams, now 34 years old, takes on Yaroslava Shvedova on a Sunday in the tournament’s fourth round, the crowd at Arthur Ashe Stadium builds a sonic wall of approval for every 116-m.p.h. ace raining down on the poor upstart. Queen Latifah jumps up and fist pumps after one, and Michael Strahan casts a shadow over roughly two rows of seats when he gets on his feet. In contrast, when Shvedova manages a point, one of her lone countrymen chants “Ka-zhak-stan, Ka-zhak-stan” to giggles from the home crowd. Williams eviscerates her in one hour and eight minutes.

Days later, when Williams gets bounced from the Open by the No. 6-ranked Karolina Pliskova, the result is as much a shock for the outcome as it is for the way she loses: on a double fault in the tiebreak set. She’s conditioned us, through so many nail-biters, to believe that no deficit is unsurmountable. Time and time again, Williams has played best when her back is up against a wall — the same quality that’s made icons of American athletes from Muhammad Ali to Michael Jordan.

Which is why it was so galling, after this year’s Wimbledon semis, when a reporter asked Williams whether she should be considered one of the greatest female athletes of all time. Her perfect response: “I prefer the words ‘one of the greatest athletes of all time.’”


Most of us need to be told we could be like this or that role model — remember the Be Like Mike campaign? But when Serena Williams’s mother and father told her that she could be the greatest of all time, rather than looking around for an imitable path, a target to match, she took it as permission to be fully herself. Whether she was an unranked understudy to her sister Venus or the sport’s marquee player, her game has never been tentative, her outfits have never lost their color, and her emotion has never been restrained.

Williams emphatically and frequently salutes her foremothers: she is a reverent student of history who read Maya Angelou’s “Still I Rise”at her Sports Illustrated Sportsperson of the Year dinner last year and name-checks Althea Gibson and Zina Garrison in post-match press conferences. With all due respect, though, there’s never been a Serena Williams before Serena Williams. There has been no blueprint for an athlete to arrive at the intersection of gender and race and dominance and scrutiny that she has. Perhaps even more than her wins, Williams’s greatest feat has been the very act of breathing herself into existence.

Greatest American athlete. Most dominant black tennis player. Highest-paid woman in sports. Whatever. Serena Williams is also a very, very bad loser. When we first meet this summer in Palm Beach, Florida, she’s just returned home from an early exit in the Olympics. With four gold medals from three past Olympiads, Williams has never failed to medal until now. Coincidentally, as the two of us begin to talk, her sister and closest friend on the planet is competing in Rio in the mixed doubles final, though Williams doesn’t so much as check her phone to track Venus’s progress.

“I just… I can’t watch her,” she says. “I watch her in person at a tournament, but I get so nervous on TV. I feel like in person she can hear me say, ‘Come on!’ — cause I know when I hear her say ‘Come on,’ a familiar voice, it really helps me. It doesn’t really help when I’m screaming at the TV, and I get so nervous. Like, it’s really crazy how nervous I get after all these years."

It’s probably for the best: minutes into our hour-long conversation, Venus’s match ends in a loss. After Serena gets the news that her sister will settle for her first silver medal, she moves on quickly, stroking inches of bone-straight black hair laid over her right shoulder and expectantly awaiting my questions about her legacy.

Much more at the link.
 

PDJ

G.O.A.T.
What does that even mean?
Isnt it obvious. How many times has she failed to make the final. Only losing 5 major finals is incredible. But it's only part of the picture, she's played more than 27 majors. How did she do when she didn't reach the final? Do you know?
 

Soianka

Hall of Fame
Isnt it obvious. How many times has she failed to make the final. Only losing 5 major finals is incredible. But it's only part of the picture, she's played more than 27 majors. How did she do when she didn't reach the final? Do you know?
It's a stupid point.

She won 22 slams, only lost in 5 finals.

Your point adds nothing to the picture. It's actually rather silly.
 

PDJ

G.O.A.T.
It's a stupid point.

She won 22 slams, only lost in 5 finals.

Your point adds nothing to the picture. It's actually rather silly.
To you it's silly. To me it's a genuine question.
We will beg to differ. You probably think she's also a role model. Again, we would beg to differ.
I think it's perfectly acceptable to question some points made in the article.
Do you not think so?
 

cknobman

Legend
Serena has had a great career.

Not sure if age or expectation is catching up with her but this year has definitely shown "chinks" in Serenas armor.

Hopefully next year she can get that all alluding 23rd major.
 
C

Chadillac

Guest
Nothing about the 27 tue's she got so she could take peds? 22 grand slams, each has a * next to it

Looks like a fluff article
 

Man of steel

Hall of Fame
Isnt it obvious. How many times has she failed to make the final. Only losing 5 major finals is incredible. But it's only part of the picture, she's played more than 27 majors. How did she do when she didn't reach the final? Do you know?
She's lost 6 major finals not five.....
If you're gonna chat s**t at least get your facts straight PDJ:p
 

Man of steel

Hall of Fame
Sorry, but the s**t was in the article ( the journalist states 5) ! I assumed they would have their facts straight. Silly of me given some of the content.
Plus I'm perfectly happy to be wrong - lost 6 major finals it is.
:)
Why are you bringing up the number of finals serena has made and why she failed to make all of them or at least more....what has that necessarily have to do with the thread
 

PDJ

G.O.A.T.
Why are you bringing up the number of finals serena has made and why she failed to make all of them or at least more....what has that necessarily have to do with the thread
It's in the article she lost 5 finals, not 6, I assumed the facts to be correct. Are you stating I can't bring up a subject that is clearly in the OP? Isnt that rather the point? If not, I'm clearly missing something.
And whilst I don't particularly like the on court Serena Williams, do you genuinely believe I just "spit venom" as stated above.
 
Last edited:

Man of steel

Hall of Fame
It's in the article. Are you stating I can't bring up a subject that is clearly in the OP? Isnt that rather the point? If not, I'm clearly missing something.
And whilst I don't particularly like the on court Serena Williams, do you genuinely believe I just "spit venom" as stated above.
Well all their stating is her wins and losses in finals which is the best in terms of win percentage in finals. No biggy.
If you want to bring up that subject then you might as well include that of every other ATG.
 

PDJ

G.O.A.T.
Well all their stating is her wins and losses in finals which is the best in terms of win percentage in finals. No biggy.
If you want to bring up that subject then you might as well include that of every other ATG.
And as you pointed out, the article is not even correct, so you're right, it's no biggie as it's clearly not accurate.
Cheers
:)
 

cknobman

Legend
Thank you for cleaning up the thread.

Anyone think Serena will play, and win, the year end finals? Or do you think she will skip out and rest up for the AO next year?
 
C

Chadillac

Guest
Thank you for cleaning up the thread.

Anyone think Serena will play, and win, the year end finals? Or do you think she will skip out and rest up for the AO next year?

Nah she is laying low until the fancy bear thing passes. She will step on glass and cut the back of her hand again or something
 

heftylefty

Hall of Fame
Why are you bringing up the number of finals serena has made and why she failed to make all of them or at least more....what has that necessarily have to do with the thread
This what happenswhen you run out of things to criticize about. This is the only time that 22 Slam titles are meaningless.
 

PDJ

G.O.A.T.
This what happenswhen you run out of things to criticize about. This is the only time that 22 Slam titles are meaningless.
That's simply not true. 22 titles is amazing. And did I say there was a question mark? No.
I'm assuming you are aiming your post at me, given @Man of steel response was to me.
 

Man of steel

Hall of Fame
Thank you for cleaning up the thread.

Anyone think Serena will play, and win, the year end finals? Or do you think she will skip out and rest up for the AO next year?
She might play...she said she was aiming to play. Whether its just for 3 rounds then bow out...who knows
 
  • Like
Reactions: PDJ
Top