Razer
G.O.A.T.
Of course Pete is a legend. Who denies that? I don't see why this cross era comparison needs to be made. Its impossible to compare this way. Yes its a trivia and you've eliminated people like Mac who have done it so I don't even know if its a unique one in any way.
You overreacted that day on the Running forehand post as well on a light comment, I was silent at that time while you were going on and on, this is the second time you are finding Sampras-Nadal talks annoying so I find it a bit disturbing. Even if the post compared Sampras and Nadal you should be honored, Sampras is not just any legend/any atg, he is as good as Nadal and for some people even better since he has a better record on more surfaces than Nadal and a higher dominance in his era. Nadal has his own records over Pete and a lot of people rate him ahead today since he has more slams by a good margin (22), that is all good both ways, so there is no need to feel upset at seeing cross era comparisons, this post was not to compare but even if it were, there is no need to frown over it because end of the day that is what we do here, so if we get upset then better to ignore the post as long as there is nothing demeaning about any player, in this case certainly.
Reg McEnroe, no I did not ignore him, check the post properly first, he is already mentioned. He was ranked in the top 5 at 30/31 but honestly he was not successful in slams & restricted to a few small carpet tourneys I think so. He did not a reach a single slam final after age 26, so he being in top 5 was irrelevant.
