lululemon marks down clothes, in the sale section. 120$ sweats are as low as 50$ and these shirts will fall to 48$ usually
Is there a problem with my computer, or what I am seeing is a polo that costs $84 and there are only S and M sizes left?
Also, I will be damned, if I pay $50 for a synthetic shirt on a steep discount.
If you call that cheap, then you don't value money.
Lacoste, Nike, Adidas, Unqlo and a number of other brands go well beyond that, when they are on steep discount.
Sorry, I am not buying your "cheap price" point.
I have the 2009 red day fed polo from us open and the collar is not very good. The button holes are loose and the collar doesnt really hold shape and flops all around
I don't refuse to believe that you might have encountered problems, but I also don't completely believe you when you say such things as the following.
I can also post a RF Polo shirt from a couple of years back and it will display none of the things you are talking about.
Moreover, like I hinted in my previous post, I don't think that you are paying attention, if you make some claims like that.
For example, My RF polos all have a pretty soft collars that just rest on your arms. They don't exactly "stand" and that is actually normal for them. Being soft will make them be like that and that is pretty known between the people, that use high quality clothing.
Next in order of softness is the NIKE Grand Slam polo, which is soft but with somewhat structured (and much wider and taller) collar.
Then come the "normal" polos.
That is why I asked, whether you have used polos from Lulu (not whether they have such), why you are not using them etc..
It was because you have to understand that not everything you buy serves the same purpose or should be measured against ANYTHING.
I am talking here about NIKE as you use the same company as an example, but can give examples with multiple producers, (some probably not known around here, because people will run havoc, if they are to buy such items on their respective price points to play sports), the products of which display the same relation between durability, structure, quality of craftsmanship etc.
I have the orange creamsicle shirt from 2012 miami and the button holes are also loose and the shirt is extremely faded. My lululemon shirts all have gotten more wear in the last 3 summers than anything else and with roughly 80-90 washes for each garment they are still going strong and look bright
I can believe in your first comment.
Such issue might arise from you changing weight (my tailor has to sometimes redo a stitching, after I unwisely have worn a garment too fitted for me), too tight garments, floppy washing service etc, etc.
I cannot believe that your Lulu clothes have not lost some colour after three seasons of frequent wearing in the texan summer.
My uniqlo shirts have become rough and have lost their softness, my lululemon shirts have not had any issues and are just as soft as when i first got them
the collars from the 2009 style shirts that have the different collars have all become limp and the black faded to a brown color.
Uniqlo is not on the level of NIKE and ADIDAS, from what I have seen.
more recently my pink 2012 rf polo has lost most of its color, and none of nike logos have lasted more than 3 months of normal use.
I don't know what you do to your clothes but I don't have that problem in my rotation. I have had a logo fall off here and there, but nothing to the extend that you describe and for laminated logos that is pretty much guaranteed to happen at some point.
What is "normal use" for you?
I do have a fair amount of tennis clothing from major brands, but almost all my tennis spending these days is on shoes. Some of the major brands are pricing me out of the market. 
