M Cilic v. JM del Potro -- 4th Round

Who will earn the 360 QF ranking points?

  • Cilic in 3

    Votes: 4 5.1%
  • Cilic in 4

    Votes: 18 22.8%
  • Cilic in 5

    Votes: 22 27.8%
  • Del Potro in 3

    Votes: 2 2.5%
  • Del Potro in 4

    Votes: 21 26.6%
  • Del Potro in 5

    Votes: 12 15.2%

  • Total voters
    79
  • Poll closed .
The gate has opened to Nadal or Murray to the title match. They must be smiling in their hotel now.

Considering Cilic wiped their arses all over the court last time he played both of them I don't think they're any happier than they were before.
 
Good match overall. I'm going to sleep and record the Roddick match to watch when I wake up. I'd prefer it if Del Potro had won it but I'm a neutral in the end.
 
Considering Cilic wiped their arses all over the court last time he played both of them I don't think they're any happier than they were before.

To me Delpo seems to be more dangerous due to his consistency of pounding groundstrokes( although he hasn't shown it today) and variety.
 
Great effort by Cilic though,he has truly shown he will be a player to watch out for in 2010,and has a great chance of breaking into the top 10. I can see him scaling the rankings and improving his performance in the Grand Slams. :)

However,its still too early to label him as a contender at Grand Slams just because he beat both Nadal and Murray last year. Being objective here,the Nadal last year obviously isn't the Nadal now,and Murray had a wrist injury back then. If Cilic plays either the current Nadal or Murray,I'm pretty sure he'll lose in straights or 4. And despite Delpo's loss today,I still regard Del Potro as a better player overall than Cilic,but Cilic's getting closer and closer day by day.
 
Lol on the espn all the announcers talking about how roddick will do against cilic, then fowler pipes in saying "he still has to beat gonzalez you know" lol.
 
That was an ugly match. Glad it's over. I still hope for a Nadal and Roddick semi but...eh...
 
Congrats Cilic, he was the better player throughout the match.

This just goes on to prove that Del Potro was lucky the top players weren't in good form towards the end of last year and he capatalized his *well earned* slam title victory.
 
Congrats Cilic, he was the better player throughout the match.

This just goes on to prove that Del Potro was lucky the top players weren't in good form towards the end of last year and he capatalized his *well earned* slam title victory.

Yeah but DP wasn't really playing his best from what I saw...and Cilic played well enough to win.

How can you say DP was lucky? I certainly don't see that...
 
Congrats Cilic, he was the better player throughout the match.

This just goes on to prove that Del Potro was lucky the top players weren't in good form towards the end of last year and he capatalized his *well earned* slam title victory.

Just because Delpo outshone Murray in Grand Slam glory in 2009 doesn't mean he is lucky.
 
Yeah but DP wasn't really playing his best from what I saw...and Cilic played well enough to win.

How can you say DP was lucky? I certainly don't see that...

Well, Federer had two slams under his belt, twin babies, he wasn't playing tennis like he played the year before at the US open final. Again Nadal returning to the tour from injury was just average in the semi's.

He was quite lucky to play Federer and Nadal in that form, unlike Murray who had to play his best in the semi's and in the final, he faced a top form Federer in 2008 US open.
 
Well, Federer had two slams under his belt, twin babies, he wasn't playing tennis like he played the year before at the US open final. Again Nadal returning to the tour from injury was just average in the semi's.

He was quite lucky to play Federer and Nadal in that form, unlike Murray who had to play his best in the semi's and in the final, he faced a top form Federer in 2008 US open.

yeah but Murray was lucky to not play a top form Nadal so I don't really like that logic
 
Nadal was in the form of his life, he just won the French and Wimbledon that year. He was beaten by the better player.

If you look back at the transcripts even he acknowledges that he wasn't near his best form and he is usually not one to do that (until maybe a bit recently). It's certainly not Murray's fault and he did what he needed to do, but the same applies to Del Potro.
 
Nadal was in the form of his life, he just won the French and Wimbledon that year. He was beaten by the better player.

cmon-son.jpg


GTFOOHWTBS
 
If you look back at the transcripts even he acknowledges that he wasn't near his best form and he is usually not one to do that (until maybe a bit recently). It's certainly not Murray's fault and he did what he needed to do, but the same applies to Del Potro.

Well, Nadal is known for making excuses when he loses. Nadal couldn't have played better that day. He tried everything he could and still lost. However, his performance exactly a year later was prety pathetic. He handed Del Potro that match. I am not saying Nadal would have won, but he shouldn't be losing 2, 2 and 2 in a slam semi final.
 
Well, Nadal is known for making excuses when he loses. Nadal couldn't have played better that day. He tried everything he could and still lost. However, his performance exactly a year later was prety pathetic. He handed Del Potro that match.

Really? You may be right, but do you have any examples because I wasn't aware.
 
Well, Nadal is known for making excuses when he loses. Nadal couldn't have played better that day. He tried everything he could and still lost. However, his performance exactly a year later was prety pathetic. He handed Del Potro that match. I am not saying Nadal would have won, but he shouldn't be losing 2, 2 and 2 in a slam semi final.

USO 2008 in the semifinals against Andy, in addition to just having completed the Channel Slam and being the first person to have done it since Borg, Rafa had also won the Rogers Cup, played in Cincinnati, and won the Gold Medal for Mens' Singles in the Olympics.

USO 2009 he was playing in the semifinals against JMDP with an unhealed abdominal tear.

If you're going to malign someone for "making excuses", at least have your facts straight, please.
 
i couldn't bear to watch cilic's last game. JMDP let his fans down

I'm one of his fans, and I don't feel let down.

I think there's a reason he didnt play any even exhibition matches in the month of January and didn't defend his Heineken Open title ....... think he's not quite 100% but do feel he gave all he had to give today, and that's really all any fan can expect, isn't it? :)
 
it crushes me to see him lose especially today it was abysmal. i mean the guy stopped moving. he even turned his back on one of the points. it was like he had long given up. i dread to think of a future marred with injuries for him. somebody talked of steroid addiction here. if he comes to the dubai open i'd save him
 
Nadal was in the form of his life, he just won the French and Wimbledon that year. He was beaten by the better player.

If you look back at the transcripts even he acknowledges that he wasn't near his best form and he is usually not one to do that (until maybe a bit recently). It's certainly not Murray's fault and he did what he needed to do, but the same applies to Del Potro.

Well, Nadal is known for making excuses when he loses. Nadal couldn't have played better that day. He tried everything he could and still lost. However, his performance exactly a year later was prety pathetic. He handed Del Potro that match. I am not saying Nadal would have won, but he shouldn't be losing 2, 2 and 2 in a slam semi final.

USO 2008 in the semifinals against Andy, in addition to just having completed the Channel Slam and being the first person to have done it since Borg, Rafa had also won the Rogers Cup, played in Cincinnati, and won the Gold Medal for Mens' Singles in the Olympics.

USO 2009 he was playing in the semifinals against JMDP with an unhealed abdominal tear.

If you're going to malign someone for "making excuses", at least have your facts straight, please.

Not sure how that would prove my point wrong that Nadal played better in 2008 US open semi's than at 2009.

If he played with an *abdominal tear* like you say, it makes it even easier for Del Potro (which is what I had earlier said). I took nkhera1's comment as a fact that Nadal believed he didn't play his best tennis in 2008 US open semi's, which I don't accept (atleast not when we compare his performance with the next year).
 
Not sure how that would prove my point wrong that Nadal played better in 2008 US open semi's than at 2009.

If he played with an *abdominal tear* like you say, it makes it even easier for Del Potro (which is what I had earlier said). I took nkhera1's comment as a fact that Nadal believed he didn't play his best tennis in 2008 US open semi's, which I don't accept (atleast not when we compare his performance with the next year).

I don't think he played his best in either of them. I obviously think he played much worse in 2009 than in 2008, but again I feel that if you play and get beat you shouldn't be making excuses. I only did it to just show you how annoying it can be to put down another player who isn't your favorite. Also Federer was in great form heading into the US Open with his drubbing of Djokovic and Murray at Cincy and Djokovic again at the US Open.
 
As far as DP goes, I wasn't going at him for retiring. I was trying to get some other posters to have a go at him for retiring (hint: ramej, sakalam, regnarman).

But those other posters are fooled by Delpo's nice guy looks and they think he's infallible as a sportsman.

Shows you how important it is to cultivate an image.

I think his on court personality varies tremendously compared to when he's off-court. On court he comes across as a bit of a Big Guy with an agressive looking face. BUT off court, in his interviews he's nothing more than a kitten. :)
 
Back
Top