tennis_pro
Bionic Poster
LMAO you bitter baby you will be back to your cave when the clay season is over, maybe even sooner.I hope you put money on it.
Last edited:
LMAO you bitter baby you will be back to your cave when the clay season is over, maybe even sooner.I hope you put money on it.
He said:Rafa played much better against Fognini? Wow! Are you serious?
Erm... you see, the problem is that Kyrgios serve is somewhat neutralized by the clay surface. That seems to be one factor why he couldn't hurt Rafa when compared to Grass which is a faster surface.I actually think Rafa played better than Kyrgios in general at Wimbledon, especially the last 3 sets but Kyrgios played the big points better and that was the difference. If Kyrgios serves well it will always be a close contest no matter who you are, it comes down to taking those few opportunities you get.
What a prediction! Keep up the good work!Nadal's cumbersome movement?
P.S. I thought Kyrgios would do better vs Nadal than he did.
It looked that way. He tends to give up if he feels he is not healthy. He's had this hip issue since the US Open last year.Did Nick's hip injury affect him during the match?
TD
Yes. One has 17 slams and the other has 14.
At least I got it right.BULLIEVE !!!!
Wow. Didn't see the match. Scoreline suggests a beatdown by KoC. Is that accurate? How bad is Kyrgios on clay?
I don't know why ppl are so much after Nick after this match. He won as many games as Fed did in a GS final on clay against Rafa and that was a BO5 match.
Yeah. I know match was a big let down for many (not for me) and it looked to me at times that Kyrgios is not putting as much effort. But if you see the 6th game of second set (the only game which he won in second set) you would not feel there was any lack of efforts from Kyrgios. Also there was a rally with multiple drops which Kyrgios ended up winning. I think Kyrgios approach towards the match had lot to do with the level Rafa was playing. He hit as series of breathtaking down the line forehand winners which landed right in the corner and no player in the world would have reached. So many of his winners were just around the lines. It becomes difficult for opposite player to keep morale high when one is playing like that.Hehe
Nick is playing doubles too, he cant be that injured.
That's an extremely mild way to put it (least we 'forget' that Djokovic first has to win against Nishikori, which at this point isn't exactly set-in-stone):Woah....didn't expect such a beatdown. Couldn't watch it because it was pretty late at night and just watched th highlights. Rafa waw extremely sharm especially the ROS. Kyrgios was pretty average but it hardly mattered in the end. If Nadal can keep up this form, I think he'll beat Djokovic in SF and clinch the title.
Yep, and it's very much deserved, to see how well he's been doing right from the start of this season.Btw if Rafa wins today's match he'll be #1 in the race![]()
Come on, don't be delusional. Nick wasn't playing anywhere near his best, i.e. the way he did vs Federer in Miami for instance but even if he did I'm not sure he would have defeated Nadal. Anyways we'll never know. The question now is can Goffin or Djokovic/Nishikori beat Nadal on clay?
Erm... you see, the problem is that Kyrgios serve is somewhat neutralized by the clay surface. That seems to be one factor why he couldn't hurt Rafa when compared to Grass which is a faster surface.
Nadal has a better ROS of serve than Federer, obviously.Sorry, but there was nothing on his serve, regardless of the clay. The guy could hit 22 aces against Fed on this very same court. He can hit 130/140s regularly, didn't see that yesterday.
Nadal has a better ROS of serve than Federer, obviously.
It looked that way. He tends to give up if he feels he is not healthy. He's had this hip issue since the US Open last year.
But was Nick clowning around? Some of you are so disappointed that that Rafa gave him a Master Class that you are scratching looking for mitigating circumstances to make excuses for Nick.
Yes, I would say Nick was partially clowning around. He admitted in his post match interview that he wasn't really ready for this match and didn't practice much due to his grandfather's death. With that said, if you step on the court you are fit to play so his excuses are BS. It's his job as a professional tennis player to get himself ready and to give his best in every match. He unfortunately hasn't received that memo. Nadal played very well though and even if Nick gave it his all and played well, I doubt he would have defeated Nadal on clay.
Most definitely, and I think that may well be one of the main reasons why Fed apparently likes Nadal as much as he does, despite being his main party-pooper on - at least - the clay.You gotta admire Nadal's work ethics, though. No matter what the scoreline says, he goes on with his business, dead serious. His attitude on the court should really be inspiring the likes of Kyrgios and Tomic.