Man bets 40k on Kyrgios to win AO

Candide

Hall of Fame
3692599f48953bad1133639f72480341--funny-movie-quotes-favorite-movie-quotes.jpg
 
I agree with the rest of the post, but not that. Talent is the only reason Kyrgios is spoken of. Its been the only thing that anyone could hold on to so far.

And its a horrible thing to hold on to

Everyone in the top 500 has "talent" whatever that means

Hitting a couple goofy shots for winners and ignoring all the goofy shots that missed is like claiming you are a winner at the casino the one time you made 50 bucks on slots after spending 500 bucks
 

EloQuent

Legend
And its a horrible thing to hold on to

Everyone in the top 500 has "talent" whatever that means

Hitting a couple goofy shots for winners and ignoring all the goofy shots that missed is like claiming you are a winner at the casino the one time you made 50 bucks on slots after spending 500 bucks
Kyrgios has beaten top players and lost/tanked to nobodies. That's why people say he has talent, just lacks motivation
 

True Fanerer

G.O.A.T.
And its a horrible thing to hold on to

Everyone in the top 500 has "talent" whatever that means


Hitting a couple goofy shots for winners and ignoring all the goofy shots that missed is like claiming you are a winner at the casino the one time you made 50 bucks on slots after spending 500 bucks
All anyone has to do is watch his matches vs Federer. He pushed Fed to the limit. Matches could have went either way. Can't compare him to players down in the hundreds. Its not even close.
 

Matthew Lee

Professional
I mean what exactly is this "talent"

And how exactly is he the most "talented" always

Thats not a measure of anything at all really. Its a nice catchphrase though
Yep...it's a nice catchphrase. But if you can see all the shots he can pull off, all of the skills he has, like his raw power/pace, powerful serves, decent movement, knack for good feel/touch/drop shots/slices/lobs, and most importantly, the shots he does for fun like tweeners and faking shots, etc., you can't deny the "talent" he has. Sure, every player can do what he does, or attempt to, but they can't seem to do it as fluidly, nonchalantly, as often, as Kyrgios does.

Or, maybe his weapons are up there with the top guys.
 
What is a measure then? If you can't recognize that he has talent, I'm not sure how to help you.

Wins and losses

You know. The entire basis of the sport.

Does Jack Sock have as much talent? Im sure you would say no. He does have a masters 1000 title and a WTF semi and thats what matters
 

Shaolin

G.O.A.T.
I mean what exactly is this "talent"

And how exactly is he the most "talented" always

Thats not a measure of anything at all really. Its a nice catchphrase though

You ''there is no such thing as talent'' guys are a joke.

You're like flat-earthers...Just because YOU cant see it means its not there right?

Guys like Kyrgios, Fed, Safin, even Gulbis can roll out of bed and hit shots that guys like Mike Russell, with all his hard work and dedication, cannot come close to hitting with any regularity or at all even in practice.

Just like you could never dream of being as good as Russell, even if you put in even more time and effort than he does. Or how I wouldn't be able to play piano like Mozart even if I practiced for 100 years longer.

Talent. Its a thing.
 

BeatlesFan

Bionic Poster
What is a measure then? If you can't recognize that he has talent, I'm not sure how to help you.
Don't even try. This topic has been beaten to death here. I think some people's hatred of Nick blinds them to the reality of his talent and if a tennis fan can't see his talent, that's their loss. If someone can't see in 5 minutes that Nick has about 50 times the talent of someone like Raonic, then their knowledge of tennis is quite limited.

Talent does not mean Nick will ever win any big title in his life. Leconte and Mecir were both insanely talented but never broke through to win a slam. When you have Annacone, Henman, Rafter, Becker and Wilander all saying that Kyrgios is the second most talented player (after Fed) of the last 20 years, that speaks volumes. Those guys know more than any of us will ever know about tennis. But Nick haters won't acknowledge those voices of reason and just point out his lack of results.

The Nick haters get their knickers in a twist when anyone dares point out his outrageous talent and inevitably (and correctly) respond, "yeah, well, check back when he wins a slam." Again: massive talent does not always translate into results on court
 

EloQuent

Legend
Wins and losses

You know. The entire basis of the sport.

Does Jack Sock have as much talent? Im sure you would say no. He does have a masters 1000 title and a WTF semi and thats what matters

Kyrgios has a M1000 Final (and a couple of SFs) and a 500 win. Couple of 250s too. QFs in slams. You have to win against other players to get that far. Speaking of wins, he has wins against all big 3.

And yes, Sock is talented too.
 

EloQuent

Legend
Don't even try. This topic has been beaten to death here. I think some people's hatred of Nick blinds them to the reality of his talent and if a tennis fan can't see his talent, that's their loss. If someone can't see in 5 minutes that Nick has about 50 times the talent of someone like Raonic, then their knowledge of tennis is quite limited.

Talent does not mean Nick will ever win any big title in his life. Leconte and Mecir were both insanely talented but never broke through to win a slam. When you have Annacone, Henman, Rafter, Becker and Wilander all saying that Kyrgios is the second most talented player (after Fed) of the last 20 years, that speaks volumes. Those guys know more than any of us will ever know about tennis. But Nick haters won't acknowledge those voices of reason and just point out his lack of results.

The Nick haters get their knickers in a twist when anyone dares point out his outrageous talent and inevitably (and correctly) respond, "yeah, well, check back when he wins a slam." Again: massive talent does not always translate into results on court

Yeah exactly. Just watch the guy, or listen to people who know what they are seeing.
 
D

Deleted member 733170

Guest
He’s a modern day pantomime villain, just a bit more dull and predictable.
 

Slightly D1

Professional
The problem with Kyrgios is that one “bad” call can lead him to losing a game and then the set and then next thing you know he is down 1-2 and tanks. He can talk about being motivated or caring or playing his best tennis but none of that matters once he’s in the middle of a match.
 
Top