Mardy Fish is a mess

DoubleHanded&LovinIt

Professional
Mardy Fish has so much to work on it's not even funny. He's fat. He has no leg muscles. His forehand is terrible. He loses his balance on his serve. He has terrible shot selection. He has slow reactions. He just looked completely lost out there. Come in Mardy! You have nice hands. Hit some volleys. There were many times when he'd hit a nice, deep, cross-court backhand that would pin Federer. Federer would amble over and float a slice deep and back into the middle of the court. Where was Fish? On the baseline waiting for the floater. So frustrating...
 
I don't know why Fish tried to get into Forehand rallies with Federer he should have been attacking the backhand more imo. And yes fish needs to work on his fitness overall and tighten his forehand but Federer makes just about everyone look bad.
 
and Fish isn't a very cool last name! oh, I thought we were just bashing him...

everyone has their off days.. maybe he was up late last night smoking cigars and playing strip poker with his drinkin buddies.
 
roger2016 said:
and Fish isn't a very cool last name! oh, I thought we were just bashing him...

everyone has their off days.. maybe he was up late last night smoking cigars and playing strip poker with his drinkin buddies.
Yeah man, we had a good time!
 
I don't understand what Todd Martin's influence on Mardy has been. Todd was an underachiever who trained hard and used his mind out on the courts to be the best he could be. Mardy Fish is a pretty talented player. But I think today's match showed me that the biggest reason for why players have trouble against Federer is that they can't hit on the rise. I pray for the day a Landsdrop/Tom Stowe disciple comes from the backcourts, takes the ball on the rise, and comes to the net.
 
I think one reason Fish played so terrible today is because Todd Martin is taking apart his game and trying to make it better, or at least that what Cliff Drysdale and Pat McEnroe said at the start of the match. Fish is a good volleyer, and in the match he had many oppurtunities to come to net and didn't take them, that was his first big mistake. So maybe in his next tourny he'll show up better prepared.
 
And about coming in to net...

Fish hit a slice approach to the backhand and got passed crosscourt then down the line repeatedly, usually on break points too. He hit an approach to the forehand- Federer lobbed him for a winner. Still, he tried to come in to net. He eventually began simply hitting his approaches down the middle, trying not to give Federer angles.
You certainly can't fault him for that. Anyway, can you imagine how helpless it must feel to be passed over and over again?
And Fish's hustle should not be knocked. Did you see his amazing down the line passing shot in which he sprinted across the court twice? Or the one where he chased a wickedly angled forehand well off the court (and tv screen, for that matter) and hit it for a winner? Even Federer was stunned.
I think Fish's doomed himself with his inconsistent forehand and double faults. But take it easy on the guy.

And by the way, what did you guys think about the no-show socks?
 
Fish lost that match when he went down an early break in the first set. His confidence and game went south.
 
I don't like the no-show socks. I think they look unprofessional and kind of feminine.

USCfan, Mardy Fish, and his boy Andy Roddick for that matter, need to learn when to come into net. You and I both know Fish has a much better chance at the net against Federer than at the baseline.

I really like Mardy Fish. I want to see him do well. I remember that awesome final he had against Andy Roddick at the 2003 Cincinatti tourney. Roddick was at his peak and Fish took him to 3 sets playing agressive serve-and-volley, chip-and-charge tennis. I want to see that old Mardy Fish. The new Mardy Fish is out of shape and seemingly apathetic. I don't want him to rest on his laurels (money from advancing a couple of rounds in tourneys and endorsements contracts from Adidas and Dunlop). Maybe I'm wrong, but Fish can serve well, has a great backhand, and awesome touch at the net. That reminds me of a Marat Safin. However, Marat Safin moves much better than Fish and plays to his strengths more than Fish does. Todd Martin and Mardy Fish need to get down to business very soon.
 
I think that's a pretty good assessment. I can't really judge his shape though, as I haven't seen under his shirt. Yes, he was wrongfooted a couple of times, but I didn't think that was a huge factor. His serve, in my opinion, failed him.
His volleys are much better than Roddick's, but against Federer, how many times will you truly have a good ball to come to net behind?
 
Vlad said:
Fish lost that match when he went down an early break in the first set. His confidence and game went south.

No, he lost the match as soon as he stepped on the court.

Fish is not in Federer's league, period. So, why the fu*k is this thread even here? EVERYONE loses to Fed most of the time, and their form doesn't look so great in doing so-HE makes them look off balanced. Fish is a second-tier player, not a potential #1, so what do you a-holes expect from him? SHOULD he have won? No, not at all. Leave the guy alone-Federer's beaten a lot better-23 straight Top-10er's, and those victims aren't getting this kind of crap. His SOCKS??!!??!!???

Oh, I see, this is because Fish is an AMIERICAN...that changes it. He's EXPECTED to win...solely because he's American? Is that what you think? What a bunch of b.s. Singlehanded? You're a MO-RON.
 
Ritalin is one drug that I've never needed, SH&LI. Now COFFEE, on the other hand...I haven't had mine, yet.
 
Steamlined? You ever see a blow fish? That is one NON-STREAMILINED vertebrate. Additionally, Washington state salmon are, well, American fish, as are Long Island Sound cod, and Florida m(M)arlins. Additionally, Maine lobsters and Alaska king crab are both American custacieans (or however you spell that). So as you can see, our country has its fair share of Fish and fish.
 
Phil said:
Oh, I see, this is because Fish is an AMIERICAN...that changes it. He's EXPECTED to win...solely because he's American? Is that what you think? What a bunch of b.s. Singlehanded? You're a MO-RON.

You hit the nail on the head Phil. This is what I see over and over. It's a either a conspiracy or luck when the Americans win and it's the American was fat, stupid or has an idiot for a coach when he loses. It's so sad see this behavior that has become predictable and repeated often here. The American pros seem to be favorite targets for some strange reason. I would really like to see the country of origin of those posters who like to bash anyone. I am sure some hidden agendas would come to surface then.
 
andfor said:
You hit the nail on the head Phil. This is what I see over and over. It's a either a conspiracy or luck when the Americans win and it's the American was fat, stupid or has an idiot for a coach when he loses. It's so sad see this behavior that has become predictable and repeated often here. The American pros seem to be favorite targets for some strange reason. I would really like to see the country of origin of those posters who like to bash anyone. I am sure some hidden agendas would come to surface then.

Yes why are we ragging on Fish for losing to Federer the best player in the world? Here are some much worse losses but I don't see anybody ragging on these guys/gals.

F Santoro (FRA) d (11)J Johansson (SWE) 46 62 76(6)
P Mathieu (FRA) d (16)T Haas (GER) 76(3) 63
Berdych (CZE) d (19)M Ancic (CRO) 75 36 62
J Craybas (USA) d (10)E Likhovtseva (RUS) 61 64
(WC)J Kirkland (USA) d (22)M Bartoli (FRA) 60 61
 
goober said:
Yes why are we ragging on Fish for losing to Federer the best player in the world? Here are some much worse losses but I don't see anybody ragging on these guys/gals.

F Santoro (FRA) d (11)J Johansson (SWE) 46 62 76(6)
P Mathieu (FRA) d (16)T Haas (GER) 76(3) 63
Berdych (CZE) d (19)M Ancic (CRO) 75 36 62
J Craybas (USA) d (10)E Likhovtseva (RUS) 61 64
(WC)J Kirkland (USA) d (22)M Bartoli (FRA) 60 61

True, I could have talked about why JJ lost to a slow, over-the-hill, little better than journeyman junk baller or asked if Haas's match was in the morning (see Haas's excuse for losing in Memphis) but I didn't.

Before anyone starts in don't even go there about those American women no names beating seeded players. Those wins are legit!

Now can't we all just get along? :D
 
Mardy ball

Mardy has a lot of work to do. It seems that he really did not know what he wanted to do out there. In one of the last games, he hit a great return inches from the baseline that Roger couldn't do anything with. Other times, he floated some pretty lame shots long and wide.But Roger is on another planet, and his challengers are few. Fish hit a deep approach to Roger's backhand within a 2-3 feet of the baseline and Roger routinely rolled it crosscourt for a winner. Only the best can do that on a regular basis
 
Based on the critiques furnished by the posters on this forum, I am shocked that there are any of us left. We should all be coaching a pro somewhere or on the tour ourselves, in the top ten no less. As pitiful and sorry and stupid and lazyas he is, not to mention the name, compared to us, Mardy Fish is a tennis god.
 
One thing can be said about the match:

Federer had Fish for lunch.

I agree with the he's an American assessment by the way. Why is everyone considered a failure if they're not number 1? Let's look at Fish's circumstances. He's ranked in the top 100 of the world. He is a sponsored player for Adidas and Dunlop, so I would guess that he's making some coin there. He's traveling the world. He's living a life that any one of us would give our right.....well you get the idea. All in all, I think the boy is doing very well for himself.

Some guys are cut out to be number one, and I think you have to be a bit of an a-hole to be number one. Other guys, and this has been true of South Americans historically, aren't as interested in being #1. There's no future in it. Why have all the rocks thrown at you?

Anyone else hear Fed's interview after the match? He was very Williams-like. He gave Safin absolutely no credit for his win in Australia. Matter of fact, he blamed a blister on his foot for the loss and said that he was one point away from the match and that he should have won it.... etc etc etc.
 
SingleHanded&LovinIt said:
andfor, what are you implying?

Well, in attempt to be brief here goes.

1. JJ and Haas lost to players they shouldn't have. Why did JJ lose? You can't tell me it was solely because of Santoro's slice. Haas used some bogus excuse a few weeks ago about having to play K. Carlsen in the Semis of Memphis at 10:30 AM. Haas said he was not used to playing in the morning.

Why is Fish under the microscope? Is this a troll?

2. You would have to search for the Americans benefit from some cockamamie conspiracy theory that the tours and ESPN try to give them an unfair advantage. i.e. Roddick's draws, match times, suspicious line calls, shot spot, etc., etc.

Overall my posts are in jest and I find these conversations amusing. Anyone who gets offended or defensive usually has a concealed axe to grind.
 
Matching Fish's 2nd Tier game against Federer's ... I thought Fish did about as well as one could expect. Todd may help Mardy get to the 16s more often, but it will be rare for Mardy to be a regular in the Quarters.

- KK
 
Did anyone catch the Haas match? I expected him to do much better. I was looking forward to Haas - Hewitt. What happened?

- KK
 
Let's hear it for the no-show socks. I'd be shocked if they weren't all balled up by Mardy's toes by the end of the match, though.
 
Rabbit....I also saw the post-match interview with Fed...I was surprised and disappointed with his arrogance. You are absolutely right that he gave no credit to Safin and blamed claimed that he was "thinking about his foot blister more than the match" and that's why he lost. To be honest, he seemed very defensive talking about the Australian Open loss and he was obviously not "over it" as he claimed....something tells me that the next time he runs into Safin again, it's gonna get interesting.

As far as Fish goes, I agree, why bash the guy when he was clearly outmatched? I do think he could have faired better, as he just seemed very SCARED and just wincing and waiting to get his lashings...he almost seemed surprised at himself when he was able to win points....and a lot of him "playing without a plan" or seeming confused, I'd attribute to nerves, or maybe just flat-out FEAR....I think when he saw how Fed ripped his first couple of passing shots dead on, he got scared to go to the net, and when he did, he got scared and overswung or shanked a few easy ones, making it even worse....then there was that one sick topsin lob that seemed to just demoralize him completely....that'd pretty much make me start doubting my tactics! Anyway, his backhand looks pretty solid : his best chnace may have been to hit some heavy backhand exchanges to Fed's backhand the way Safin did and try to wear him down a little before coming in to the net...Fed's backhand does once in while seem to inexplicably malfunction, as dangerous as it is potentially.
 
Mardy is in a transition, trying to take his game to another level, and in the process is having to take a step back in the hopes of moving ahead in 6 months.
He looked like he doubted the wisdom of Todd Martin's strategy as he got passed repeatedly at the net, but at least he seems like he is going to keep trying to learn from Martin.

I am sure people will jump all over me, but I thought Fed looked very beatable... if Fish didn't double fault as much and generally served better, that is.
A little bit better approach shots... and a different outcome maybe. Fish does need to pick and keep a playing style and a hair style, though. ;)

Fed was spraying a lot of balls... I think the pack is catching up to him a bit. We shall see!
 
Safina, I agree with you. I was really annoyed by how Fish wouldn't take advantage of the many opportunities he had to come into net when Fed would float back slices deep into the court. I know he was passed a few times by Federer. However, this just highlights the fact that tennis players today have a more defensive mentality. Get passed once, stay back, and still get beaten. Let's learn to take some risks.
 
Federer's girlfriend asked Cliffie and PMac last year to say something bad about him. It seems that he was beginning to believe his press clippings. She was afraid that he would become "over confident" (read arrogant). Well, it would seem that her worst fears have been realized. The guy was just plain dismissive of Safin and the Australian Open results in general. He actually seemed to play up the Dubai tournament over the Grand Slam. I think the FedEx could be on its way to being derailed.

Safina - I agree with your assessment as well. Fish didn't play that badly. 6-3, 6-3 in most states is a break a set. That's hardly a blowout. I think the pace of the match (just over an hour) leant itself to the perception, but it wasn't a blowout by any stretch.
 
Rabbit....I also saw the post-match interview with Fed...I was surprised and disappointed with his arrogance. You are absolutely right that he gave no credit to Safin and blamed claimed that he was "thinking about his foot blister more than the match" and that's why he lost. To be honest, he seemed very defensive talking about the Australian Open loss and he was obviously not "over it" as he claimed....something tells me that the next time he runs into Safin again, it's gonna get interesting.

Arrrghh....Many times, Roger has acknowledged that Marat was the better man.

What Roger said in that interview is not what you have portrayed him to have said. After he talked about his foot and being one point away, he said that maybe that is why he wasn't too disappointed about it. Why can't you people, the ones I have seen a lot of places lately saying that Federer is arrogant, tell the whole truth? Instead, you tell parts of it and misquote him! Please find me the place in that interview where he said that he "should have won, etc."

Federer's girlfriend asked Cliffie and PMac last year to say something bad about him. It seems that he was beginning to believe his press clippings. She was afraid that he would become "over confident" (read arrogant). Well, it would seem that her worst fears have been realized. The guy was just plain dismissive of Safin and the Australian Open results in general. He actually seemed to play up the Dubai tournament over the Grand Slam. I think the FedEx could be on its way to being derailed.

This is too good. It was also the last straw. I wouldn't register on this board normally, but this post was just too much. In fact, she did not ask Cliffy and PMac to say something bad. She told..who was it, John McEnroe I think, actually that he should stop saying all these nice things, because he was reading the press. He isn't infallible, I won't lie. But, he got over it did he not? I think he's matured a lot since then, because he used to read press and he even said he used to try to show off. At least he told the truth.

Also, no he wasn't dismissive. I saw and heard the interview. He said Dubai and Rotterdam are big tournaments. Are they not? Not GS, but pretty big. He showed a positive reaction to that loss, while Safin lost in the first round in straights. Do you see his point? I'll expound on the interview more as soon as I hear it again. I want to make sure I have the quotes and meanings right.

Well, it would seem that her worst fears have been realized.

Man...come on! This is just too much...I came on here to challenge the facts of your post because this is just the last straw...Do you think he's about to be 'derailed' or do you want it? Think hard. I've seen a lot of misinformation about Roger lately around some boards and it's sad because it seems people are just sick of him because he wins...why? Any little quote, you don't care how he said it or if you saw the whole exchange...only "he's arrogant." Ugh.
 
I agree with Fedubai. It is so strange different people read the same thing can have completely different view. Federer didn't dismiss Safin at all in that interview.

"Federer's girlfriend asked Cliffie and PMac last year to say something bad about him." Stop spread those nonsense. It's Jmac, not PMac. JMac corrected himself in later broadcast already. He said he was joking, and actually repeated what she said.

It seems people seem to want to interpret what they already believe. Nothing is new. Exactly this country has become. Objectivity is gone.
 
By the way, if people really want to interpret someone said in post-match interview, please read the transcript. Press in this country likes to take quote without giving complete context. This is so often in tennis post-match interview because I do read them. I find it so much better than sound bite from the press "quote".
 
This must be the 1000th time he has been asked about the AO result in all the interviews he gives in various countries in several languages, so it's not too surprising he gave a curt reply. He has the same confidence about him being best when at peak as Pete did, although Pete used to express it more tactfully ("When I am playing my best, I like my chances against anybody").

What struck me was he doesn't seem to have the same confidence in long matches. He made a comment to the effect that "when I came back in the 5th, that was surprising" this tells that he lost his belief once he failed to wrap up the match in the 4th set tiebreak.

As other posters said, the comment Mirka made about reading the press clippings was indeed to Johnny Mac during last year's Wimbledon final.

As far as this match with Fish, Phil nailed it in his earlier post - it's not worth the time to do a minute analysis.
 
The tennis guy said:
"Federer's girlfriend asked Cliffie and PMac last year to say something bad about him."

No, actually I heard Cliffie make the comment myself. It is one thing to disagree and quite another to call someone a liar. I think Federer's getting arrogant. I think Sampras was arrogant. I think you have to be arrogant to be number 1. Just because you can be arrogant doesn't mean you have to be publicly.
 
Well, you can believe whatever you want. It is not backed up by fact. Cliff repeated later what JMac joked about, which he corrected later, and said what Mirka actually said. I heard that too. You just didn't hear what was originally said by PMac at Wimbledon.

To believe he is becoming arrogant is one thing, to use non-existing "fact" to back it up is another. Federer has been believing he is the best player in the last year and half. That is true. If you believe that is arrogant, that's fine. He didn't dismiss Safin's win at Australia Open in that post-match interview.

To me, arrogant is someone who believes something that is not completely true. I don't believe Federer and Sampras were arrogant. They simply stated the fact.
 
Webster's definition of arrogant is this:

"Offensively exaggerating one's own importance."

Now, I know that the line between being very confident (as you have to be to be the best) and arrogant is blurry sometimes but I thought that that definition is a helpful barometer. People who are arrogant mouth off about their imminent greatness. Likewise, the people who do that are always the ones who have to because normally they aren't good enough.

I just have trouble seeing where Roger has been offensively exaggerating his own importance. Yes, he is very confident, but when you are at the top confidence is huge; that isn't just a cliche, it's true.

I didn't see Sampras much but from what I've heard and some clips I've seen etc., he didn't seem like the sort of guy to mouth off. And one thing I've found with Roger is that it is important to watch the clip and/or listen to it, because he often says stuff with a modest (yes, it's true) smile or shrugs his shoulders. He's a very matter of fact guy. Meaning, he just tells people what he thinks, but I've never found him to have an air about him that says he is being anything but honest about it.

Watch an interview some time...the arrogant have a way of saying things and people can pick that out. I've never found that to be true of Roger. I hope it never happens either, because his humility is something that is cherished by a lot of people, I can tell you that. He isn't "the rich athlete with his nose in the air" that some of these guys are. The lifestyle can get to your head, if you let it. These guys begin to feel that they are really important people that deserve to be treated differently than the rest of us. I'm glad he hasn't taken that track, and hope he never does, because apart from his tennis I really appreciate his attitude, as do a lot of others.
 
How uncocky.
He thinks this year, he can do what he did last year.
I'm sure he'll destroy Hewitt in 2 slams this year.

BBC America TV: "I can't believe I wasn't number 1 in 2003. I won on all court surfaces."

"Don't feel sorry for me if I don't win all 4 slams this year."
"Every other week, I won a title."

ATP Tennis Show: "I don't want to give interviews in the morning."

Khaleej Times Online >> News >> SPORTS
I am still the best, says Federer
By Ahmed Abbas Rizvi

26 February 2005



DUBAI — Greatness knows itself. One look at Roger Federer and you know the truth of that maxim.


Dare suggest that his loss to Marat Safin in the Australian Open semifinals and three consecutive third set tie-breaks could be because the rest are catching up, and he looks up at you hurt.

“You wouldn’t like to say that because I have the feeling I haven’t been playing well but still coming through,” the ‘Basel Dazzler’ said after his latest escape, a 4-6, 6-3, 7-6 (6) win over Juan Carlos Ferrero at the Dubai Tennis Championships Men’s Open on Thursday night, when he survived two match points to enter the quarterfinals.

“I am winning the crucial points so that shows I am at the top of my game when I have to be,” he added.

And then, as if to challenge the rest, he said: “We will see at the big occasions if they are close or not. I am still by far the number one player in the world.”

To even suggest that the amazing Swiss’ powers are on the wane would be incredulous, if not blasphemous.

Hear it when past master John McEnroe tells you Federer has “a chance to be one of the greatest players to ever live.”

Believe it when Lleyton Hewitt says “Roger has raised the bar for us over the last 18 months. Does he have any weaknesses? I don’t think so. We’ll all just have to work harder.”

McEnroe should know. Hewitt should know: He lost six straight to Federer in 2004, none of them particularly close.

Federer finds himself astride the men’s tennis world that he has pounded into a lopsided shape favouring himself. The Safin loss at the Australian is just an aberration.

He is 33-1 in his last 34 matches, and the past season has given him divine bragging rights.

The Swiss, blessed with prodigious talent and unflappable playing style, went 18-0 during 2004 against so-called peers in the Top 10. He lost just six matches in 2004 while winning 74, thus batting .925, the highest winning percentage since Ivan Lendl’s .925 in 1986 and John McEnroe’s .965 in 1984.

He won 11 titles in 2004, the most since Thomas Muster racked up a dozen in 1995. And he has won every one of his last 15 finals.

So what’s with this Safin “secret” to beat Federer?

“You know, he knows so many secrets, it’s amazing: He knows everything,” laughed Federer, when reminded of the Russian’s boast that he knows the secret of beating the Swiss. “No, I am just joking. He is a good guy.

“Ferrero said he has a secret, Hewitt knows a secret, Safin knows a secret — they all know it. But I am still on top,” the Swiss replied.

But then, what is the secret of stopping the ‘Fed Ex’?

“You shouldn’t ask me, you should ask them,” he said. “I have no clue how to beat myself.

“Jeez, I am such a good player,” he added with a laugh. On a more serious note, he added: “It all depends on your form on the day. Of course I cannot expect that every time I play a Top 10 player, I am going to beat him. I think they know that.”

But surely, there must be some chinks in the armour?

“My backhand and my returns at times,” he revealed. “Some days it could be your volleys, sometimes your quickness on the court lets you down — It all depends upon your form on the day.

“But my backhand has always been bad,” he added, with a sheepish grin.

And yes, the defeat to Safin in the Australian Open semifinal had also got him thinking.

“It was on my mind till just before the tournament in Rotterdam,” he revealed. “I was not sure how I am going to cope with this defeat because it hadn’t happened since the Olympics. That was quiet a while ago.

Good start

“In Rotterdam, the start was good and I ended up winning the tournament. So that’s (the Safin loss) forgotten and it’s good.”

The three tight wins — the Rotterdam final and two matches here — have only added to Federer’s confidence.

“I am so happy to have won the last three close ones,” he said. “There was one close one before that I lost and that was a rough one against Safin (at the Australian Open).

“So I am happy to have now overcome this again. When I get into tie-break in the third set, I am not thinking about the Safin match.”

The Safin match couldn’t have bothered him for long anyway. Because Federer’s mind is always on winning — not just the Majors, but every tournament he participates him.

“When I come to a tournament, I am here to win it; I am here to do well and not just to participate,” he said.

He understands that some players use certain tournaments for practice purpose. But not him.

“It’s easy to practice around a tournament. All the players are here, the setup is perfect,” he said. “At home, sometimes it can be tough to find the right sparring partner.

“For the ladies, it’s different. They can hit with a guy. But we are already the best out there, so we cannot just go and hit with anybody. We need somebody who, at least, can handle our rhythm. So for this reason, sometimes players come to a tournament and take it as a preparation for the next week. But I don’t like to look at it this way,” he asserted. “Every tournament counts for me; it is not just the Slams.”

Such hunger, if he can keep it burning, will someday surely see Federer eclipse Pete Sampras’ monumental record of 14 singles majors, accomplished in 13 seasons between 1990 and 2002. Sampras had won five majors at age 23. Federer, 23, has won four.

Neither Lendl nor McEnroe won three majors in one year as Federer did in 2004 (Australian Open, Wimbledon, and US Open). Mats Wilander did it in 1988, but failed in the Masters, losing in the round-robin.

Of the game’s big five (the majors plus the Masters), Federer won four in 2004. In 2005, he has missed out on the Australian Open.

That will surely have made him hungrier, as McEnroe warned.

“Federer’s the kind of guy that as soon as he lost at Australia, he was setting his sights on the French Open (which begins in May),” McEnroe said.

“He’s the sort of guy that immediately starts looking toward the next major.

“The loss will make him hungrier. I think it will motivate him even more. And that’s a scary thing for the rest of the field.”
 
I agree that Fed at interviews and in general, comes as honest. Loosing to Safin at AO was in fact because of BLister, that's a fact, that's what Lundgren was saying by watching Fed play, and knowing him for many years.

Are you guys suggesting that Safin would outplay Fed, if Fed was healthy???? You must be out of your mind or Safin fanatics (cult)...
 
"You know I want to stay No. 1 in the world," Federer said. "It's not like I lost in straight sets and had no chance against Safin. When I'm at my best, no one can beat me."http://www.thedesertsun.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20050313/EVENTS10/503130308/1002/sports
 
"You know I want to stay No. 1 in the world," Federer said. "It's not like I lost in straight sets and had no chance against Safin. When I'm at my best, no one can beat me."

Yup, definitely snappy, makes for a great headline. There's a story behind that quote, it just has to be found. :roll:

If you are at all interested in the actual interview and quote, here it is:

ROGER FEDERER: If I want to repeat what I did last year, I've already messed it up. Got to win the French or the next three. So we'll see, you know (smiling).

You know, I want to stay No. 1 in the world. I'm No. 1 in the race again, so that's exactly the position I wanted before the American hard courts. One point away from being in the final. So it was very close. It's not like I lost in straight sets and had no chance against Safin . Then, you know, you could wonder. But the way the match turned out, you know, for me it was quickly forgotten. The reaction was good. You know, I agree, there were some close matches.



And, here is the link to the actual interview, the whole thing:

http://www.pacificlifeopen.com/en/players/interviews/interviews/05_federer5.asp

So, you know, I just thought that that was an interesting insight into how the press clips and rearranges their quotes to further their agenda. I thought you would have figured that out about our media friends by now. But I guess when it comes to calling Federer arrogant, anything goes.
 
He thinks this year, he can do what he did last year.
I'm sure he'll destroy Hewitt in 2 slams this year.

BBC America TV: "I can't believe I wasn't number 1 in 2003. I won on all court surfaces."

"Don't feel sorry for me if I don't win all 4 slams this year."
"Every other week, I won a title."

ATP Tennis Show: "I don't want to give interviews in the morning."

You know what devilla? I looked up every one of your quotes on google and not one came up. Where did you get them from? Any sources with a link?
 
Back
Top