Maria Sakkari

jarko111

Hall of Fame
Wilson Ultra Tour?
The beam looks very thin for an Ultra 100??? But it is Camo so one can never really tell.
 

TagUrIt

Hall of Fame
Wilson Ultra Tour?
The beam looks very thin for an Ultra 100??? But it is Camo so one can never really tell.
I play with the Wilson Ultra 100. She’s not using the camo either, that’s definitely the Tour. Her arms are amazing btw. That’s truly some Grecian art there.
 

jarko111

Hall of Fame
So she's playing with the heavier 97 square inch racket?
What do you mean it's not camo? The racket she has in Perth is definitely the camo paint.
But there is PWS on those pics. Which means it's Pro Open/Juice family, right?
 

TagUrIt

Hall of Fame
So she's playing with the heavier 97 square inch racket?
What do you mean it's not camo? The racket she has in Perth is definitely the camo paint.
But there is PWS on those pics. Which means it's Pro Open/Juice family, right?

I stand corrected, I just went back and watched the match footage and you’re absolutely right, it’s the camo pj. I was going by the photos posted here in the thread.
 

MRfStop

Hall of Fame
I am not too familiar with all of the Wilson molds.
I am familiar with the H19 (UT) and H22 and this not either one of them
From a google search she played with a Babolat Pure Drive several years ago and played with first gen Wilson Ultra paint.
 

TagUrIt

Hall of Fame
WHat are you talking about??
How can it be the Ultra Tour if it has PWS???
I have no problem admitting when I’ve made a mistake. I said in the post right above yours that I was wrong.


Again, I said I went back and watched the match highlights and saw it was a Wilson Ultra camo.

Is there an underlying need to be right or prove a person wrong on this board? It’s just a tennis racquet, what the hell guys???
 

jarko111

Hall of Fame
I've play tested the Ultra 100 CV and it's a very easy racket to spot. It's thick beamed and the throat is very PD-ish. Maybe this is an Ultra 100 and it's the camo making it so difficult to tell. But the racket she has in the pic above with the camo paint sure doesn't look like the Ultra 100 CV in the other pics she's using. I guess we'll never know for sure. Because as someone posted, they do have a very large range of molds to choose from and people keep changing their paintjobs.

I mean, all the burn paintjob players are using blade pjs. And then you have steam and prostaff users who are either with the white and black or the ultra paint. It's just a weird time to be interested in what is really being used at wilson. And I know as racket nerds that's always the case but particularly right now.
 

jarko111

Hall of Fame
Those arms are scary
But that's what the WTA is now. The players are faster and more powerful, certainly more athletic looking than just 5-10 years ago. Tough time to be a counterpuncher. Even Bertens, Halep and Woz have added more power to their games.
 

CosmosMpower

Hall of Fame
But that's what the WTA is now. The players are faster and more powerful, certainly more athletic looking than just 5-10 years ago. Tough time to be a counterpuncher. Even Bertens, Halep and Woz have added more power to their games.
Yeah but none of those look like they could tear your head off your spine.
 

MRfStop

Hall of Fame
I have no problem admitting when I’ve made a mistake. I said in the post right above yours that I was wrong.




Again, I said I went back and watched the match highlights and saw it was a Wilson Ultra camo.

Is there an underlying need to be right or prove a person wrong on this board? It’s just a tennis racquet, what the hell guys???
All I did was post a picture of the camo PJ. The pic is from several months ago.
 

MRfStop

Hall of Fame
I've play tested the Ultra 100 CV and it's a very easy racket to spot. It's thick beamed and the throat is very PD-ish. Maybe this is an Ultra 100 and it's the camo making it so difficult to tell. But the racket she has in the pic above with the camo paint sure doesn't look like the Ultra 100 CV in the other pics she's using. I guess we'll never know for sure. Because as someone posted, they do have a very large range of molds to choose from and people keep changing their paintjobs.

I mean, all the burn paintjob players are using blade pjs. And then you have steam and prostaff users who are either with the white and black or the ultra paint. It's just a weird time to be interested in what is really being used at wilson. And I know as racket nerds that's always the case but particularly right now.
Maybe Ultra 100 without CV? Paint is shiny. There are pics of her playing with the 1st gen Ultra.
 

jarko111

Hall of Fame
Yea, with the PWS I am sure it's 1rst Gen Ultra. That camo paint ticks me off. Especially against that blue court. lol Camo makes things blend in and reduce in size to the eye. That beam could be as thick as any regular Ultra and I'm just not seeing it like that. I don't think it looks that cool. The Black with blue on the sides or the reverse pjs are very nice, imo. Wilson did that pj right.
 

PBODY99

Legend
Thanks to everyone who worked through what she might be using.
I thought they put her in a cameo p.j. so when the Clash is revealed, she could use the release p.j. as an "endorser" of that model.
 

jarko111

Hall of Fame
I haven't even been thinking about the amount of players that will be using the clash or it's paintjob soon. I need to keep that in mind when I see someone like Svitolina hitting with a blacked out Wilson and some players that haven't turned in their burn pjs yet.
 

mpournaras

Hall of Fame
Its a Pro Open Pro stock. You can tell by the general roundness of the beams and the flatness of the PWS. Most Ultra players are using Pro Opens of some sort. As for what generation of Pro Open? No clue
 

ron schaap

Hall of Fame
But that's what the WTA is now. The players are faster and more powerful, certainly more athletic looking than just 5-10 years ago. Tough time to be a counterpuncher. Even Bertens, Halep and Woz have added more power to their games.
navratilova was weight lifting a long time ago already. did everybody forget that?
 
Top