I fundamentally disagree with people who, because they are appalled at the Seles case, think it's OK to say she would have been greater if it hadn't happened, but don't concede that Maureen Connolly would also have been greater if her horse riding accident hadn't happened. And of course Connolly died of cancer aged mid-30s so her life is more tragic than Seles' by any measure.
I'm surprised individuals exist who don't think Connolly would have won more than her nine majors, but for her accident.
A distinction between suffering a pre-meditated attack & suffering an accident should & isn't always made though. Latter point is a bit 'Bette Davis' territory for me, individual hardships shouldn't be a competition.
Another interesting thing is many of these same few experts who claim Seles would have won 20 plus slams without the stabbing are the exact same ones who predicted when she came back after the stabbing she was going to win atleast another 10 slams, both around the times of the 95 U.S Open and 96 Australian Open.
Predicting Seles' tournament performances pre & post stabbing = polar opposites. I do remember many commies at the time made remarks about Seles needing to get fitter to achieve similar feats, achieved pre-stabbing that is.
btw, who was it who led that anti Seles grunting campaign at 1992 Wimbledon? Nearly everybody was in on it of course, people like the Maleevas, Novotna, etc who had all taken some huge beatings from Monica. Not Graf though. I recall she stayed out of it though the reporters kept trying to bait her in interviews.
Agassi and ecstasy - Sports Illustrated.
To say the contretemps had its effect on Seles in the rain-plagued finals -- a rematch of her battle with Graf for the French Open championship, which Seles won 10-8 in the third -- is an understatement. "In Paris, Monica was really loud," Graf said with a smile before the match. "Will I complain here? We will see."
People mature at different pace in different ways, reflecting their upbringing, social intelligence and group. Take Fed, for example, he stared out a total dweeb, but he met Mirka, and as his tennis success grew, he moved up the ladder and into new circles. Look at the people in or around his box over the years, seems to be fashion editors, banking types, .... he became this smooth talking, suave, sophisticated fellow.
Corporate clones.
Success (it could be argued, maturity was responsible - I'm not buying that.)
brought -
Federer - cut his hair, wore ill advised 'garments' at Wimbledon, racquet smashing became alot rarer, almost non-existant. As for 'his box/support', moving on...
Nadal - sleeves were introduced, pirate pants disappeared, interviews became far less funny, hair was cut shorter & shorter.
And to 'prove' Nike isn't the only corporation to stifle 'personality.'
Djokovic - Humour seems forced were once it was simply endearing & funny, racquet smashes became infrequent. Boring babbling on about responsibility to the tour etc. The 'New Safin' disappeared as quickly as he appeared.
Connolly- the Seles story of another era. Except at her peak before the tragic accident of a different sort at almost the same age, she was WAY more dominant than Seles at her peak had been. Hard to make any case for Seles her given the parallel and that Connolly just outperformed in the same window.
Seles - 1990-1993
Connolly - 1951-1954
Sometimes a little 'digging under the surface' is required. Of the GS events both competed in, Seles won 8/11, Connolly won 9/9. It should be pointed out, Seles was competing against a player (Graf) who won the grand slam two years previous to her four year period. (Winner of 7 of the previous 8 majors to boot.)
Graf could've done a whole lot more to ease that burden. I think when Monica was away for those 2 years, Graf should've donated some trophies to Monica. She would've still have the check and her place in the record book, but simple gestures of humanity and sportsmanship would've won many people over, including Monica.
With hindsight, Graf should have abstained (or better yet agreed to the No.1 ranking being frozen) mirrored Sabatini regarding the top ranking. She gave Gunter on a plate, just what the man wanted, sadly she wasn't alone. The trophies won were won by her, no donation of trophies should have been given imo.
I don't feel as though Steffi Graf should have shouldered any particular burden in this instance because she had absolutely no control over the circumstances that lead to Seles' stabbing.
Well she could have beaten Seles in Berlin'90 & won more to be ranked No.1 on the computer but alas she didn't realise someone who is bed ridden in 2013 (karma?) was taking a sport seriously, far too seriously.
'Steffi had 22 but she didn’t have anyone to play against. This guy changed the course of tennis history, no doubt about that.'
I always feel sorry for Sanchez when these types of comments are made. A player who competed in some of the greatest matches of the 90s.
Navratilova absolutely correct with the latter point, Seles' career path not unique in changing the course of tennis history though. One of the very saddest mind, imo the saddest.