Match Analysis - Djokovic def. Alcaraz @ 2024 Olympics Final

Should I be doing more such Analytical work in the future?


  • Total voters
    42
What new level did Novak bring to Carlos at RG (in TB action) in 2023 when there were no TBs and Carlos had cramps after rhe 2nd set? Come on, the RG 2023 SF was 50/50 before the cramps.

I'll give you that Novak was fairly superior to Carlos today, but not only in the TB. Overall as well. In the second set, Novak was reaching 40-0 with his service games most of the time, while Alcaraz had to save break proins and had to dealt with the pressure of Novak's return all the time.

Novak served light outs and Carlos could not damage his serve in the 2nd set. It was an almost forgone conclusion Novak would win the 2nd set TB.
Level wise the first set at RG last year, took it's toll on Carlos cramps AND emotional power, he never got back in that match, it was the high intense level that Carlos did not face against other players, but did face against the goat, that led to him trying to break himself keeping up with Novak in that match = therefore the cramps.

Same here today with the TB level, was just too intense for Carlos, therefore the tears also afterwards because he realized it was the super goat Novak again, the great level and intensity that Novak beat him also today, when it really mattered.
 
Level wise the first set at RG last year, took it's toll on Carlos cramps AND emotional power, he never got back in that match, it was the high intense level that Carlos did not face against other players, but did face against the goat, that led to him trying to break himself keeping up with Novak in that match = therefore the cramps.

Same here today with the TB level, was just too intense for Carlos, therefore the tears also afterwards because he realized it was the super goat Novak again, the great level and intensity that Novak beat him also today, when it really mattered.
Carlos won the 2nd set in their RG 23 SF and had all the momentum. His cramps had nothing to do with the level Novak brought in the first set but rather with his own internal state of tension and nervousness (Ferrero even said he noticed Carlos was abnormally tense before the match).

Nadal faced Novak 10 times at the French Open and never had those cramps. It's not about Novak's level but rather about Carlos' immaturity and lack of experience dealing with tense matches in 2023.
 
Last edited:
Carlos won the 2nd set in their RG 23 SF and had all the momentum. His cramps have nothing to do with the level Novak brought in the first set but rather with his own internal state of tension and nervousness (Ferrero even said he noticed Carlos was abnormally tense before the match).

Nadal faced Novak 10 times at the Frencg Open and mever had those cramps. It's not about Novak's level but tather Carlos immaturity ane lack of experience in 2923.
The intensity brought by Novak building up to the cramps after two sets, Carlos giving all his powers then and emotions to win 2nd set, the breakdown physically and emotionally was the result. He was not ready yet to keep up to Novak's level there at RG, only later at Wimby.

Was the same in TB's' today, physically he was fine, but Novak is not the TB goat for nothing, he played the TB on a level that Carlos could not keep up, therefore 7-3 and then 7-2, super goat level, just plain facts.

Carlos will learn, and be better prepared next time.
 
Djokovic won both tiebreakers fairly easily. That tells you everything you need to know about match analysis.
That doesn't explain why did he win the tie-breaks fairly easily.

The second set brings us the answer. Djokovic was getting to 40-0 in most of his service games, and Alcaraz was doing 0 damage to Novak's serve. In other words, it was a combination of Novak's clutch serving and Alcaraz's poor returning day. After witnessing that pattern in the 2nd set, it was an almost foregone conclusion Carlos would lose the tie-break.
 
Last edited:
Rookie question here: what do you guys mean by calling a shot "heavy"? Is it its spin? Speed? I've seen it mentioned often but haven't deciphered yet
 
The intensity brought by Novak building up to the cramps after two sets, Carlos giving all his powers then and emotions to win 2nd set, the breakdown physically and emotionally was the result. He was not ready yet to keep up to Novak's level there at RG, only later at Wimby.

Was the same in TB's' today, physically he was fine, but Novak is not the TB goat for nothing, he played the TB on a level that Carlos could not keep up, therefore 7-3 and then 7-2, super goat level, just plain facts.

Carlos will learn, and be better prepared next time.
No, it wasn't "Novak's intensity" what led to tge cramps. Nadal faced Novak at the French Open 10 times and never had cramps.

It was Alcaraz' own nervousness and lack of experience in those tense matches. The level wasn't that impressive judging by the 2nd set by the way.
 
There was more fatigue than he would have liked to due to the long summer he's had including the unavoidable Nadalcaraz saga.

Some of the final crushing he was doing was just a tired response.
I don't necessarily think it was tiredness; had the match gone to a 3rd set somehow, it'd have definitely favoured the Spaniard for sure.
He desperately needs to start using angles to dictate.
 
Djokovic did surprisingly well in rallies but he did not win this match by outrallying Carlos. Carlos was far stronger in converting from advantage if Djokovic gave up attackable balls he was toast and Djokovic was not converting at near the same rate. Djokovic was a little more steady but Carlos's ability to generate offense separated him from the back. Djokovic just had an incredible day on serve and was better on return that's why he won.
In my opinion, this is the best match Djokovic's played on clay in the last 4 years, right up there with RG 2021 SF. Alcaraz underestimated him just as he did at Cincy & RG last year, and paid the price.
 
He was dictating. Djoker just put on a master class on defending it back and getting to live for another shot.
Still don't know how Djoker stayed alive in those rallies.



Serve saved his life. He had to serve perfectly today.
Djokovic stayed alive in the rallies; because Alcaraz's shots, while extremely heavy, still didn't have the depth & angles required to push Djokovic way behind the baseline, into the depths and corners of the court; and he didn't move the Serb from side to side as relentlessly as he should've because he wasn't willing to fully take charge.
 
Excellent post my man.
This match was decided on two main things in my opinion.

Alcaraz having a poor day with his RoS. No sugarcoating it, he was either netting the returns or just dropping them near service lines giving Djokovic ample time to dictate play on his serve and also hold serve easily

Djokovic hitting his FH like 2011(especially in the tiebreaks). The general shot quality of his forehand was amazing whether he took it down the line, cross or inside out. Hitting with consistent depth and pace.

Alcaraz was not able to boss him around the baseline like I thought he would do because Djokovic brought out his best clay ground stroke level in years.
S+R combo was really a decisive factor, Djokovic saved 3 break points on the AD side by going to the Alcaraz forehand in that 4-4 game.
 
I don't necessarily think it was tiredness; had the match gone to a 3rd set somehow, it'd have definitely favoured the Spaniard for sure.
He desperately needs to start using angles to dictate.

Maybe more mental tiredness than physical. I would have favored Carlos in a 3rd too. But at the end of the day, I think there are a lot of positives from this for him. This was a red hot Djokovic giving him everything he could muster and it was stil tight af. But for Carlos there may be some low(er) hanging fruit here (tactical mostly) to adjust and gain. Could be a good lesson for him, as this one hopefully stings painfully enough.
 
Does anyone know the breakdown of unforced errors by Alcaraz in the match between FHs and BHs? To me it seemed like he made many more BH errors and Djokovic was targeting the BH wing contrary to what the OP posted. I have to confess though that I watched a match replay only after 5-5 in set 1 and don’t know what happened before that.
 
S+R combo was really a decisive factor, Djokovic saved 3 break points on the AD side by going to the Alcaraz forehand in that 4-4 game.
Yes.. and all three were service winners if I remember correctly and there were also two backhand errors, one to the net and one to the side when Djokovic did a serve and volley.
 
Overthinking it.

Novak served well & won the crap shoot that's a tie breaker. That's literally it. Alcaraz was pretty unlucky not to eek out a break to win either or both sets as his level was probably a bit better for most of the match

Crap shoot tie breaker would be a 18-16 or 14-12, for me. Winning TBs at 3 and 2 is another story.
 
No, it wasn't "Novak's intensity" what led to tge cramps. Nadal faced Novak at the French Open 10 times and never had cramps.

It was Alcaraz' own nervousness and lack of experience in those tense matches. The level wasn't that impressive judging by the 2nd set by the way.
Yes, it was Novak's high intensity that lead to the in experienced guy to tighten up, which led to physical problems.

In other words, the best player on the day, holistically won, no excuses.
 
Great analysis. Based on this it would be cool to see you do a long form post like this more often. Not only is your analysis great but you write in an effortless way that is enjoyable to read.

To all the Djokovic fans, congratulations and enjoy the moment. It feels genuinely right for Novak to have experienced Olympic gold given his illustrious career.

We now have the correct order of things. The 5 titans of the Big 5 era, and clearly the best 5 players of the last 20 years, Nadal, Federer, Murray, Djokovic and Stan have all tasted Olympic Gold in one form or another.
 
Maybe more mental tiredness than physical. I would have favored Carlos in a 3rd too. But at the end of the day, I think there are a lot of positives from this for him. This was a red hot Djokovic giving him everything he could muster and it was stil tight af. But for Carlos there may be some low(er) hanging fruit here (tactical mostly) to adjust and gain. Could be a good lesson for him, as this one hopefully stings painfully enough.
It needs to sting, for sure. Becoming arrogant and cocky should be punished.
 
Yes.. and all three were service winners if I remember correctly and there were also two backhand errors, one to the net and one to the side when Djokovic did a serve and volley.
Yep, there were a few BH errors as well, but Djokovic in general preferred going to the Alcaraz forehand more often on crucial points, because the Spaniard was spraying just like a paint machine.
 
Last edited:
Great analysis. Based on this it would be cool to see you do a long form post like this more often. Not only is your analysis great but you write in an effortless way that is enjoyable to read.

To all the Djokovic fans, congratulations and enjoy the moment. It feels genuinely right for Novak to have experienced Olympic gold given his illustrious career.

We now have the correct order of things. The 5 titans of the Big 5 era, and clearly the best 5 players of the last 20 years, Nadal, Federer, Murray, Djokovic and Stan have all tasted Olympic Gold in one form or another.
Thanks a lot for the kind words, mate. I'd try to keep up with it for big matches. Although I must accept that I'm nowhere near as good as @Waspsting, who is undoubtedly the best online tennis analyst I've came across on the internet, he is so good with the numbers, patterns and everything else.
 
This is for all tennis fans in general; and read this If you're happy or sad, in light mood or angry, enjoying the moment or are disappointed. I'm here to talk about Djokovic defeating Alcaraz in the 2024 Olympics tennis final 76 (3) 76 (2) to claim the Olympic Gold. Ladies and gentlemen, kindly read this and open your consciousness for my analysis.

First of all, huge congratulations to Djokovic, 37 and still strong as a rock, especially when it really matters. He deserved this Gold medal, the final thing that was eluding him. personally speaking, I am extremely happy for him, Serbian people and the nation of Serbia; you and your man totally deserved it. Congratulations once again. (Tagging the only Serb I know of on this forum so far, the 8yo kid @TripleATeam, now don't you dare eat too much chocolate or it'll rot your teeth xD)

Coming back to the result, I think it is somewhat of a learning experience for Alcaraz to be brought back to the ground after the channel slam; from his pre-final interview here, I felt that he was starting to sound arrogant for his usual down-to-earth demeanor, which was not a good sign. Now he'll learn, take his lessons, and be better prepared for the USO series coming up. I feel that he needs some tactical improvements.

Talking about the match, as I said before, Djokovic has a matchup advantage over Alcaraz on clay as long as he moves well. Alcaraz needs to stop trying to outhit Djokovic in heavy, but short landing & centre-ish shots, it just won't work on slow and/or high bouncing courts because Djokovic's lateral movement on the baseline, to & fro movement between net & baseline is still elite; plus his anticipatory skills & ability to block balls on the stretch with depth makes it difficult for Alcaraz to just pound away. Alcaraz needs to spread the court, push Djokovic behind the baseline with heavy & angular strokes (but not outright winner attempts) and expose his declined behind-the-baseline movement. If you saw the match, that much should be very clear to you.

On the other tactical front, I felt that he was letting Djokovic dictate way too much today, just like their previous FO 2023 SF, Cincy F etc. ,Carlos was relying way too much on outrageous gets/winner attempts to win the points. It is an absolute tactical suicide, if you allow Djokovic, an elite ballstriker, to take the initiative and make you run all over the entire area of the court, which would drain you eventually. The reason behind it is that Djokovic wouldn't go for an outright winner and rather be happy to keep you on the move, as he knows he'd win a vast majority of such points by his opponent throwing in an UFE or FE; and even if the opponent does win a few points by sensational retrievals or winners, the percentages are still with the Serbian Veteran. Today, Djokovic was the one in charge of the points more often than not, especially when it really mattered (don't be fooled by the number of Winners), and some of Alcaraz's winners were outrageous shots that he stole, not 'safe' or 'regular' winners. Unlike his matches with Djokovic at Wimbledon 2023 & 2024, Alcaraz surrendered way too much court space & initiative to Nole despite having an upper hand in terms of heaviness of the stroke & more 'penetrability', which ultimately hurt his chances. He needs to take the initiatives and play the points on his term, that's what works well against Djokovic.

Last but not the least, Djokovic exposed Alcaraz's forehand return & forehand on the stretch just like he did at Cincy & RG last year. Alcaraz stood way too much behind the baseline today, and Djokovic used his slider out wide & slider down the T serve to perfection, as the ball dipped while Alcaraz tried to take huge cuts on the ball, dumping it as an error. Alcaraz needs to employ his Wimbledon playbook & opt for a chip FH return, standing closer to the baseline. Because, even when be did get the FH return into play, it was short & sitting high, ideal for Djokovic to start dictating the point straight away. Unless you're Rafael Nadal who can have immaculate depth on the return from behind the baseline while not missing 99% of the returns, you're asking for trouble against an elite spot server and balstriker such as Djokovic. Alcaraz just doesn't have those qualities of Rafa yet, and ends up dumping way too many 1st & 2nd serve FH topspin returns into the net or wide or short for the opponent to strike; so better stick to what you're good at.

So, that's my takeaway from the match. I hope you all liked it. Kindly let me know your feedback through comments & votes about whether I should continue doing such tactical analysis in the future or not, for big matches if possible.


Edit 1 - additional points by @TripleATeam

Alcaraz was clearly excelling in his touch and his forehand when he got his feet planted. With that in mind, his goal automatically should've been dictating play and getting Djokovic defensive (so he can get a neutral ball that he can pound away at). Alcaraz is good with shotmaking, so each attack would end up favoring him in the long term. The touch would be a good way to neutralize the ball as well. A dropshot into a net rush (as Djokovic does the CC counterdrop 90% of the time) would set up a quick point, or neutralize the ball to such a degree that it's his to dictate. He didn't do that often enough.


The major problem for Alcaraz is getting into the rally after the serve. Djokovic's serve was amazing today. Alcaraz needs to neutralize that via a better return (whether that's doing a lower % return or improving the high % return, I don't care), but then he can rely on his strengths.


I think Alcaraz believed Djokovic would stop playing his peak game soon enough and he'd capitalize with consistent play. But Alcaraz got nervy when he needed not to be (some weird misses) and Djokovic's level didn't drop enough for him to take advantage.
Just one thing. Alcaraz's FH is considered elite, why then it can be exposed with such a devastating effect?
 
Alcaraz's FH on the stretch, FH return & forehand squash shots are highly exploitable due to the lack of heaviness in his racquet. The SW needs to go up by 15% imo.
Yes Djokovic is a master of exploiting weak spots. I do not know if any former player was as good as Novak in finding weak spots
 
Really weird considering Alcaraz just demolished him 3 weeks ago.
Alcaraz is overrated on clay imo. Yeah his title haul looks impressive there but I feel like he’s put together stronger performances on the other surfaces. Pretty much everything he’s won on clay was by the skin of his teeth against guys like Zverev who aren’t really what I’d consider to be world-beaters on the surface.

He’s still good there ofc but I think that’s just a product of his base game being fundamentally sound rather than anything special he does on clay—except speed of course.
 
This is for all tennis fans in general; and read this If you're happy or sad, in light mood or angry, enjoying the moment or are disappointed. I'm here to talk about Djokovic defeating Alcaraz in the 2024 Olympics tennis final 76 (3) 76 (2) to claim the Olympic Gold. Ladies and gentlemen, kindly read this and open your consciousness for my analysis.

First of all, huge congratulations to Djokovic, 37 and still strong as a rock, especially when it really matters. He deserved this Gold medal, the final thing that was eluding him. personally speaking, I am extremely happy for him, Serbian people and the nation of Serbia; you and your man totally deserved it. Congratulations once again. (Tagging the only Serb I know of on this forum so far, the 8yo kid @TripleATeam, now don't you dare eat too much chocolate or it'll rot your teeth xD)

Coming back to the result, I think it is somewhat of a learning experience for Alcaraz to be brought back to the ground after the channel slam; from his pre-final interview here, I felt that he was starting to sound arrogant for his usual down-to-earth demeanor, which was not a good sign. Now he'll learn, take his lessons, and be better prepared for the USO series coming up. I feel that he needs some tactical improvements.

Talking about the match, as I said before, Djokovic has a matchup advantage over Alcaraz on clay as long as he moves well. Alcaraz needs to stop trying to outhit Djokovic in heavy, but short landing & centre-ish shots, it just won't work on slow and/or high bouncing courts because Djokovic's lateral movement on the baseline, to & fro movement between net & baseline is still elite; plus his anticipatory skills & ability to block balls on the stretch with depth makes it difficult for Alcaraz to just pound away. Alcaraz needs to spread the court, push Djokovic behind the baseline with heavy & angular strokes (but not outright winner attempts) and expose his declined behind-the-baseline movement. If you saw the match, that much should be very clear to you.

On the other tactical front, I felt that he was letting Djokovic dictate way too much today, just like their previous FO 2023 SF, Cincy F etc. ,Carlos was relying way too much on outrageous gets/winner attempts to win the points. It is an absolute tactical suicide, if you allow Djokovic, an elite ballstriker, to take the initiative and make you run all over the entire area of the court, which would drain you eventually. The reason behind it is that Djokovic wouldn't go for an outright winner and rather be happy to keep you on the move, as he knows he'd win a vast majority of such points by his opponent throwing in an UFE or FE; and even if the opponent does win a few points by sensational retrievals or winners, the percentages are still with the Serbian Veteran. Today, Djokovic was the one in charge of the points more often than not, especially when it really mattered (don't be fooled by the number of Winners), and some of Alcaraz's winners were outrageous shots that he stole, not 'safe' or 'regular' winners. Unlike his matches with Djokovic at Wimbledon 2023 & 2024, Alcaraz surrendered way too much court space & initiative to Nole despite having an upper hand in terms of heaviness of the stroke & more 'penetrability', which ultimately hurt his chances. He needs to take the initiatives and play the points on his term, that's what works well against Djokovic.

Last but not the least, Djokovic exposed Alcaraz's forehand return & forehand on the stretch just like he did at Cincy & RG last year. Alcaraz stood way too much behind the baseline today, and Djokovic used his slider out wide & slider down the T serve to perfection, as the ball dipped while Alcaraz tried to take huge cuts on the ball, dumping it as an error. Alcaraz needs to employ his Wimbledon playbook & opt for a chip FH return, standing closer to the baseline. Because, even when be did get the FH return into play, it was short & sitting high, ideal for Djokovic to start dictating the point straight away. Unless you're Rafael Nadal who can have immaculate depth on the return from behind the baseline while not missing 99% of the returns, you're asking for trouble against an elite spot server and balstriker such as Djokovic. Alcaraz just doesn't have those qualities of Rafa yet, and ends up dumping way too many 1st & 2nd serve FH topspin returns into the net or wide or short for the opponent to strike; so better stick to what you're good at.

So, that's my takeaway from the match. I hope you all liked it. Kindly let me know your feedback through comments & votes about whether I should continue doing such tactical analysis in the future or not, for big matches if possible.


Edit 1 - additional points by @TripleATeam

Alcaraz was clearly excelling in his touch and his forehand when he got his feet planted. With that in mind, his goal automatically should've been dictating play and getting Djokovic defensive (so he can get a neutral ball that he can pound away at). Alcaraz is good with shotmaking, so each attack would end up favoring him in the long term. The touch would be a good way to neutralize the ball as well. A dropshot into a net rush (as Djokovic does the CC counterdrop 90% of the time) would set up a quick point, or neutralize the ball to such a degree that it's his to dictate. He didn't do that often enough.


The major problem for Alcaraz is getting into the rally after the serve. Djokovic's serve was amazing today. Alcaraz needs to neutralize that via a better return (whether that's doing a lower % return or improving the high % return, I don't care), but then he can rely on his strengths.


I think Alcaraz believed Djokovic would stop playing his peak game soon enough and he'd capitalize with consistent play. But Alcaraz got nervy when he needed not to be (some weird misses) and Djokovic's level didn't drop enough for him to take advantage.

What did alcaraz say in his post match interview?

It's possible novak is still a problem for carlos. Looking back gives a different perspective. We can't read anything from the wimby '24 final as novak was just coming back and didn't have his best game. Carlos smartly capitalized on it from the start of the match.

But when carlos lost to novak here at the Olympics, at cinci '23, and against medvedev at uso '23, strategy seemed lacking.
 
Alcaraz is overrated on clay imo. Yeah his title haul looks impressive there but I feel like he’s put together stronger performances on the other surfaces. Pretty much everything he’s won on clay was by the skin of his teeth against guys like Zverev who aren’t really what I’d consider to be world-beaters on the surface.

He’s still good there ofc but I think that’s just a product of his base game being fundamentally sound rather than anything special he does on clay—except speed of course.
Third serve. I miss your analysis. When can we expect one?
 
Alcaraz, 21, said he had not felt that type of pressure in the four Grand Slam finals that he played -- and won -- so far in his career.

"It was a different type of pressure," Alcaraz said. "Everyone in Spain wanted me to win the gold, and I wanted to win the gold as well."
He said the extra pressure cost him especially in the decisive moments of the game.

"In those difficult moments I usually raise my level, but I wasn't able to do that today," Alcaraz said. "Probably I felt the pressure in those situations. You play four Grand Slams every year, the Olympics is only once every four years."

 
I don't necessarily think it was tiredness; had the match gone to a 3rd set somehow, it'd have definitely favoured the Spaniard for sure.
He desperately needs to start using angles to dictate.
He struggles to generate angles because of his footwork. Angles mean a lot of racket head work and hitting the ball from optimal position.
 
He struggles to generate angles because of his footwork. Angles mean a lot of racket head work and hitting the ball from optimal position.

I also noticed footwork issue that Novak was able to exploit by wrong footing him so many times especially in the 2nd set
 
Probably the best two sets match ever! Almost three hours for two sets, with extraordinary quality! This final will be remembered forever, and not just for its historical importance!
 
This is for all tennis fans in general; and read this If you're happy or sad, in light mood or angry, enjoying the moment or are disappointed. I'm here to talk about Djokovic defeating Alcaraz in the 2024 Olympics tennis final 76 (3) 76 (2) to claim the Olympic Gold. Ladies and gentlemen, kindly read this and open your consciousness for my analysis.

First of all, huge congratulations to Djokovic, 37 and still strong as a rock, especially when it really matters. He deserved this Gold medal, the final thing that was eluding him. personally speaking, I am extremely happy for him, Serbian people and the nation of Serbia; you and your man totally deserved it. Congratulations once again. (Tagging the only Serb I know of on this forum so far, the 8yo kid @TripleATeam, now don't you dare eat too much chocolate or it'll rot your teeth xD)

Coming back to the result, I think it is somewhat of a learning experience for Alcaraz to be brought back to the ground after the channel slam; from his pre-final interview here, I felt that he was starting to sound arrogant for his usual down-to-earth demeanor, which was not a good sign. Now he'll learn, take his lessons, and be better prepared for the USO series coming up. I feel that he needs some tactical improvements.

Talking about the match, as I said before, Djokovic has a matchup advantage over Alcaraz on clay as long as he moves well. Alcaraz needs to stop trying to outhit Djokovic in heavy, but short landing & centre-ish shots, it just won't work on slow and/or high bouncing courts because Djokovic's lateral movement on the baseline, to & fro movement between net & baseline is still elite; plus his anticipatory skills & ability to block balls on the stretch with depth makes it difficult for Alcaraz to just pound away. Alcaraz needs to spread the court, push Djokovic behind the baseline with heavy & angular strokes (but not outright winner attempts) and expose his declined behind-the-baseline movement. If you saw the match, that much should be very clear to you.

On the other tactical front, I felt that he was letting Djokovic dictate way too much today, just like their previous FO 2023 SF, Cincy F etc. ,Carlos was relying way too much on outrageous gets/winner attempts to win the points. It is an absolute tactical suicide, if you allow Djokovic, an elite ballstriker, to take the initiative and make you run all over the entire area of the court, which would drain you eventually. The reason behind it is that Djokovic wouldn't go for an outright winner and rather be happy to keep you on the move, as he knows he'd win a vast majority of such points by his opponent throwing in an UFE or FE; and even if the opponent does win a few points by sensational retrievals or winners, the percentages are still with the Serbian Veteran. Today, Djokovic was the one in charge of the points more often than not, especially when it really mattered (don't be fooled by the number of Winners), and some of Alcaraz's winners were outrageous shots that he stole, not 'safe' or 'regular' winners. Unlike his matches with Djokovic at Wimbledon 2023 & 2024, Alcaraz surrendered way too much court space & initiative to Nole despite having an upper hand in terms of heaviness of the stroke & more 'penetrability', which ultimately hurt his chances. He needs to take the initiatives and play the points on his term, that's what works well against Djokovic.

Last but not the least, Djokovic exposed Alcaraz's forehand return & forehand on the stretch just like he did at Cincy & RG last year. Alcaraz stood way too much behind the baseline today, and Djokovic used his slider out wide & slider down the T serve to perfection, as the ball dipped while Alcaraz tried to take huge cuts on the ball, dumping it as an error. Alcaraz needs to employ his Wimbledon playbook & opt for a chip FH return, standing closer to the baseline. Because, even when be did get the FH return into play, it was short & sitting high, ideal for Djokovic to start dictating the point straight away. Unless you're Rafael Nadal who can have immaculate depth on the return from behind the baseline while not missing 99% of the returns, you're asking for trouble against an elite spot server and balstriker such as Djokovic. Alcaraz just doesn't have those qualities of Rafa yet, and ends up dumping way too many 1st & 2nd serve FH topspin returns into the net or wide or short for the opponent to strike; so better stick to what you're good at.

So, that's my takeaway from the match. I hope you all liked it. Kindly let me know your feedback through comments & votes about whether I should continue doing such tactical analysis in the future or not, for big matches if possible.


Edit 1 - additional points by @TripleATeam

Alcaraz was clearly excelling in his touch and his forehand when he got his feet planted. With that in mind, his goal automatically should've been dictating play and getting Djokovic defensive (so he can get a neutral ball that he can pound away at). Alcaraz is good with shotmaking, so each attack would end up favoring him in the long term. The touch would be a good way to neutralize the ball as well. A dropshot into a net rush (as Djokovic does the CC counterdrop 90% of the time) would set up a quick point, or neutralize the ball to such a degree that it's his to dictate. He didn't do that often enough.


The major problem for Alcaraz is getting into the rally after the serve. Djokovic's serve was amazing today. Alcaraz needs to neutralize that via a better return (whether that's doing a lower % return or improving the high % return, I don't care), but then he can rely on his strengths.


I think Alcaraz believed Djokovic would stop playing his peak game soon enough and he'd capitalize with consistent play. But Alcaraz got nervy when he needed not to be (some weird misses) and Djokovic's level didn't drop enough for him to take advantage.
key point: "...Unlike his matches with Djokovic at Wimbledon 2023 & 2024, Alcaraz surrendered way too much court space & initiative to Nole despite having an upper hand in terms of heaviness of the stroke & more 'penetrability', which ultimately hurt his chances."
excellent analysis. He was standing too far back on return and frankly i don't understand why he does that at roland Garros unless he needs time to handle the bounce even with the slower speed. you are spot on the winner/UE stat was misleading. novak had less forced errors while Alcaraz had more (don't have the exact number) but it was close to the points won difference between them (+10-12). But also Carlos was not hitting with depth on his FH during medium rallies. it was partly because of novaks forehand depth and pace (also spin) but not all the time. it was just short and spinny and frankly attackable. plus novak was also getting height and shape with his own spin a fair bit and preventing Alcaraz from going big. its weird that Carlos can handle heavy spin at madrid better where the ball speed is faster but not at roland Garros. novaks serving and forehand power on big points in the breaker was the difference. plus carlos made a lot of BH errors which was unusual because it's a compact and reliable shot for him.
 
ALCARAZ ditched his aggressive retuning which helped him cruise at Wimbledon.

Very questionable decision which cost him a massive match
exactly. unless the higher bounce on clay impacts his return position but he is more aggressive at madrid from what i have seen. strange he does it well in faster conditions.
 
Alcaraz is overrated on clay imo. Yeah his title haul looks impressive there but I feel like he’s put together stronger performances on the other surfaces. Pretty much everything he’s won on clay was by the skin of his teeth against guys like Zverev who aren’t really what I’d consider to be world-beaters on the surface.

He’s still good there ofc but I think that’s just a product of his base game being fundamentally sound rather than anything special he does on clay—except speed of course.
clay used to be his weakest surface at one time according to his coach. despite his success on it, its clear he has a lot of scope for improvement. of course he has improved on it but he prefers hard courts (and now grass for sure) over clay.
 
Alcaraz is overrated on clay imo. Yeah his title haul looks impressive there but I feel like he’s put together stronger performances on the other surfaces. Pretty much everything he’s won on clay was by the skin of his teeth against guys like Zverev who aren’t really what I’d consider to be world-beaters on the surface.

He’s still good there ofc but I think that’s just a product of his base game being fundamentally sound rather than anything special he does on clay—except speed of course.
He has attributes that are excellent weapons on clay like his touch, drop shots and defensive speed. At the end of the day, like Federer, he has a killer mindset and doesn’t naturally have the patience for the surface. I’m not going to fault him though as I can’t stand grinders who just want to play percentages and draw errors. It’s the ****tiest style of play to watch and it’s a travesty that that style of play has made its way to the majority of hard courts.
 
Back
Top