Carlos Alcaraz beat Jannik Sinner 7-6(5), 6-1 in the Rome final, 2025 on clay
It was Alcaraz’ first title at the event and with the result, he completed full set of clay court masters titles. He had recently won Monte Carlo for the first time also. It was Sinner’s first final at the event or at a clay masters event and his first tournament after serving a 3 month suspension
Alcaraz won 74 points, Sinner 59
Serve Stats
Alcaraz...
- 1st serve percentage (48/75) 64%
- 1st serve points won (35/48) 73%
- 2nd serve points won (16/27) 59%
- Aces 4
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (20/75) 27%
Sinner...
- 1st serve percentage (35/58) 60%
- 1st serve points won (25/35) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (10/23) 43%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (18/58) 31%
Serve Pattern
Alcaraz served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 62%
- to Body 5%
Sinner served...
- to FH 29%
- to BH 55%
- to Body 16%
Return Stats
Alcaraz made...
- 37 (18 FH, 19 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 17 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (3 FH, 4 BH)
- 10 Forced (4 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (37/55) 67%
Sinner made...
- 53 (17 FH, 36 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 16 Errors, comprising...
- 12 Unforced (7 FH, 5 BH)
- 4 Forced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- Return Rate (53/73) 73%
Break Points
Alcaraz 2/3 (3 games)
Sinner 0/2 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Alcaraz 15 (12 FH, 1 BH, 2 FHV)
Sinner 6 (2 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV)
Alcaraz' FHs - 1 cc, 2 dtl/inside-out (1 at net), 1 inside-out, 2 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc, 1 longline at net, 4 drop shots
- BH - 1 dtl
Sinner's FHs - 1 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl
- BHs - 2 dtl, 1 drop shot at net
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Alcaraz 33
- 25 Unforced (18 FH, 7 BH)
- 8 Forced (2 FH, 5 BH, 1 OH)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.4
Sinner 36
- 23 Unforced (12 FH, 9 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 4 BH, 1 OH, 1 BHOH, 1 Over-Shoulder)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.2
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Alcaraz was 5/7 (71%) at net
Sinner was 3/11 (27%) at net, with...
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
One coin flip, server dominated set and 1 wipeout. Alcaraz rallies smartly and in time, finds something like his best shot-making to surge ahead. Sinner largely survives off very good serving, but is outplayed in all ways from the baseline and falters some on the return
Drastic difference in the 2 sets makes match long stats of limited use. Stand outs would be relatively high freebies (Sinner 31%, Alcs 27%). Sinner’s is due to excellent serving, Alcs also serves well, within limits of ability and Sinner’s returning has a hand
Predictably, Alcs with large lead in winners (15-6… he also leads errors forced 13-8, which is less predictable), and more importantly, staying even on UEs (he has 25, Sinner just 23). The rallying contest is a bit unusual; neither players consistency is impressive, but both players’ ball striking is good. Alcs tends to outlast Sinner to draw errors in longer rallies. He mixes up pace, spin and trajectory of his shots nicely to make it tricky for Sinner to get into his usual hitting groove. Alcs also misses high lot of third ball groundies to near sloppy territory, with Sinner’s thumped to firm returning having a hand
Mixed up pace, spin and trajectory
Thumped to firm returns
Good stuff. Not so good that its likely to stump top class players
To be clear, the two players aren’t ‘stumped’ by it, but they’re far from taking it in stride. ‘Troubled’ is a good word for the problems it creates
Generally speaking, Alcs would be expected to lead aggressively ended points, as he does, so its staying even on UEs that’s more important for him
As for his lead in winners (and errors forced), that all comes in the breadstick. Two players are virtually even on that front after grindy, ball-bash’y, serve-shot centered first set
In second, Alcs turns it on and pastes Sinner, aided by a disastrous drop in first serve percentage, who serves at 23% for the set
It’s a good sign for Alcs to have forced 13 errors, to go with 15 winners. He’s often prone to skipping middle ground of attacking and just flay winners. One of the things that makes him such a crowd favourite. Also, one of the things that makes him prone to getting upset (more broadly, losing)
First set - coin flip
No breaks, both players with 1 game with break points in it (Alcs has 1 chance, Sinner 2)
Alcs serving 42 points for his 6 holds, Sinner 39
Some good serving from both and its nice to see both look to be aggressive with the second return, with mixed results for both
First serve in - Alcs 56%, Sinner 71%
First serve won - Alcs 78%, Sinner 75%
Second serve won - Alcs 57%, Sinner 46%
Freebies - Alcs 26%, Siner 36%
Sinner serves particularly well - both for the high in count and the power and placement of those serves. Alcs isn’t bad either - not as powerful, not as well placed as opponent - but pretty good
Early on, both return from half-back to well-back against first serves, but both step in to take second serves moving forward from on the baseline starting point. As set goes on, Alcs is all over the place for first returns - from full-back to on the baseline and all points in between. Varies a bit against second serves too, though mostly stays just behind baseline and still moving forward as he strikes. Sinner varies less, taking first returns slightly earlier than start of match (still far from ‘early’ in normal sense - just earlier than well-back)
Movement for the return isn’t great. Its most noticable for Sinner because great movement could make his job comfy. Alcs by contrast would be up against tough task regardless, though he does move better than Sinner
Good to pretty good first serves draw errors from both players. Make most, miss a few trying to pound the second return early too. Sinner gets powerful second returns off more often
Match long numbers (not just first set) -
Aces - Alcs 4, Sinner 1
Return UEs drawn - Alcs 12, Sinner 7
Return FEs drawn - Alcs 4, Sinner 10
Alcs misses 12 first returns (2 marked UEs), 5 seconds
Sinner misses 10 first returns (7 marked UEs), 5 seconds (1 marked FE)
Proportion of first return errors marked UEs (most of Alcs, very few of Sinners) good indicator of strenght of each players first serve. Pretty good serving from Alcs, but from cozily backward returning position, not too troubling to put in play. Sinner’s movement for the return isn’t always sharp either. Scope for Sinner to bump his return rate 5% or so
On flip side, very strong serving from Sinner. Alcs tries every returning position there is and struggles in all of them
Both players with some thumped, early taken second returns inside court. Not wide hit and not powerful to forceful degree (as in, if it draws third ball error, it’ll still be marked UE), but enough to force a neutral third ball shot or put another way, thoroughly discourage aggressive third ball. Sinner does this all first set, though oddly falls back to return normally second set. Sinner getting such thumped returns off more often
Gist of serve-return - Sinner with more powerful serve, Sinner not as consistently quick on the return, but making firmly thumped ones more often
For match long gist, throw in Sinner’s in count going down the toilet in second set to 23%
It was Alcaraz’ first title at the event and with the result, he completed full set of clay court masters titles. He had recently won Monte Carlo for the first time also. It was Sinner’s first final at the event or at a clay masters event and his first tournament after serving a 3 month suspension
Alcaraz won 74 points, Sinner 59
Serve Stats
Alcaraz...
- 1st serve percentage (48/75) 64%
- 1st serve points won (35/48) 73%
- 2nd serve points won (16/27) 59%
- Aces 4
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (20/75) 27%
Sinner...
- 1st serve percentage (35/58) 60%
- 1st serve points won (25/35) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (10/23) 43%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (18/58) 31%
Serve Pattern
Alcaraz served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 62%
- to Body 5%
Sinner served...
- to FH 29%
- to BH 55%
- to Body 16%
Return Stats
Alcaraz made...
- 37 (18 FH, 19 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 17 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (3 FH, 4 BH)
- 10 Forced (4 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (37/55) 67%
Sinner made...
- 53 (17 FH, 36 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 16 Errors, comprising...
- 12 Unforced (7 FH, 5 BH)
- 4 Forced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- Return Rate (53/73) 73%
Break Points
Alcaraz 2/3 (3 games)
Sinner 0/2 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Alcaraz 15 (12 FH, 1 BH, 2 FHV)
Sinner 6 (2 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV)
Alcaraz' FHs - 1 cc, 2 dtl/inside-out (1 at net), 1 inside-out, 2 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc, 1 longline at net, 4 drop shots
- BH - 1 dtl
Sinner's FHs - 1 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl
- BHs - 2 dtl, 1 drop shot at net
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Alcaraz 33
- 25 Unforced (18 FH, 7 BH)
- 8 Forced (2 FH, 5 BH, 1 OH)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.4
Sinner 36
- 23 Unforced (12 FH, 9 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 4 BH, 1 OH, 1 BHOH, 1 Over-Shoulder)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.2
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Alcaraz was 5/7 (71%) at net
Sinner was 3/11 (27%) at net, with...
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
One coin flip, server dominated set and 1 wipeout. Alcaraz rallies smartly and in time, finds something like his best shot-making to surge ahead. Sinner largely survives off very good serving, but is outplayed in all ways from the baseline and falters some on the return
Drastic difference in the 2 sets makes match long stats of limited use. Stand outs would be relatively high freebies (Sinner 31%, Alcs 27%). Sinner’s is due to excellent serving, Alcs also serves well, within limits of ability and Sinner’s returning has a hand
Predictably, Alcs with large lead in winners (15-6… he also leads errors forced 13-8, which is less predictable), and more importantly, staying even on UEs (he has 25, Sinner just 23). The rallying contest is a bit unusual; neither players consistency is impressive, but both players’ ball striking is good. Alcs tends to outlast Sinner to draw errors in longer rallies. He mixes up pace, spin and trajectory of his shots nicely to make it tricky for Sinner to get into his usual hitting groove. Alcs also misses high lot of third ball groundies to near sloppy territory, with Sinner’s thumped to firm returning having a hand
Mixed up pace, spin and trajectory
Thumped to firm returns
Good stuff. Not so good that its likely to stump top class players
To be clear, the two players aren’t ‘stumped’ by it, but they’re far from taking it in stride. ‘Troubled’ is a good word for the problems it creates
Generally speaking, Alcs would be expected to lead aggressively ended points, as he does, so its staying even on UEs that’s more important for him
As for his lead in winners (and errors forced), that all comes in the breadstick. Two players are virtually even on that front after grindy, ball-bash’y, serve-shot centered first set
In second, Alcs turns it on and pastes Sinner, aided by a disastrous drop in first serve percentage, who serves at 23% for the set
It’s a good sign for Alcs to have forced 13 errors, to go with 15 winners. He’s often prone to skipping middle ground of attacking and just flay winners. One of the things that makes him such a crowd favourite. Also, one of the things that makes him prone to getting upset (more broadly, losing)
First set - coin flip
No breaks, both players with 1 game with break points in it (Alcs has 1 chance, Sinner 2)
Alcs serving 42 points for his 6 holds, Sinner 39
Some good serving from both and its nice to see both look to be aggressive with the second return, with mixed results for both
First serve in - Alcs 56%, Sinner 71%
First serve won - Alcs 78%, Sinner 75%
Second serve won - Alcs 57%, Sinner 46%
Freebies - Alcs 26%, Siner 36%
Sinner serves particularly well - both for the high in count and the power and placement of those serves. Alcs isn’t bad either - not as powerful, not as well placed as opponent - but pretty good
Early on, both return from half-back to well-back against first serves, but both step in to take second serves moving forward from on the baseline starting point. As set goes on, Alcs is all over the place for first returns - from full-back to on the baseline and all points in between. Varies a bit against second serves too, though mostly stays just behind baseline and still moving forward as he strikes. Sinner varies less, taking first returns slightly earlier than start of match (still far from ‘early’ in normal sense - just earlier than well-back)
Movement for the return isn’t great. Its most noticable for Sinner because great movement could make his job comfy. Alcs by contrast would be up against tough task regardless, though he does move better than Sinner
Good to pretty good first serves draw errors from both players. Make most, miss a few trying to pound the second return early too. Sinner gets powerful second returns off more often
Match long numbers (not just first set) -
Aces - Alcs 4, Sinner 1
Return UEs drawn - Alcs 12, Sinner 7
Return FEs drawn - Alcs 4, Sinner 10
Alcs misses 12 first returns (2 marked UEs), 5 seconds
Sinner misses 10 first returns (7 marked UEs), 5 seconds (1 marked FE)
Proportion of first return errors marked UEs (most of Alcs, very few of Sinners) good indicator of strenght of each players first serve. Pretty good serving from Alcs, but from cozily backward returning position, not too troubling to put in play. Sinner’s movement for the return isn’t always sharp either. Scope for Sinner to bump his return rate 5% or so
On flip side, very strong serving from Sinner. Alcs tries every returning position there is and struggles in all of them
Both players with some thumped, early taken second returns inside court. Not wide hit and not powerful to forceful degree (as in, if it draws third ball error, it’ll still be marked UE), but enough to force a neutral third ball shot or put another way, thoroughly discourage aggressive third ball. Sinner does this all first set, though oddly falls back to return normally second set. Sinner getting such thumped returns off more often
Gist of serve-return - Sinner with more powerful serve, Sinner not as consistently quick on the return, but making firmly thumped ones more often
For match long gist, throw in Sinner’s in count going down the toilet in second set to 23%