Bjorn Borg beat Ivan Lendl 6-1, 4-6, 6-2, 3-6, 6-1 in the French Open final, 1981 on clay
It was Borg's 4th title in a row at the event, his 6th overall and would turn out to be his last Slam title and participation at the French Open. Lendl was playing his first Slam final
Borg won 140 points, Lendl 108
(Note: I've made confident guesses regarding serve type for a small number of points)
Serve Stats
Borg...
- 1st serve percentage (92/129) 71%
- 1st serve points won (62/92) 67%
- 2nd serve points won (21/37) 57%
- Aces 8
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (20/129) 16%
Lendl...
- 1st serve percentage (57/119) 48%
- 1st serve points won (37/57) 65%
- 2nd serve points won (25/62) 40%
- Aces 3
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (12/119) 10%
Serve Patterns
Borg served...
- to FH 63%
- to BH 31%
- to Body 6%
Lendl served....
- to FH 25%
- to BH 69%
- to Body 6%
Return Stats
Borg made...
- 103 (52 FH, 51 BH), including 26 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 7 Forced (2 FH, 5 BH)
- Return Rate (103/115) 90%
Lendl made...
- 105 (77 FH, 28 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 12 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (8 FH, 1 BH)
- 3 Forced (3 BH)
- Return Rate (105/125) 84%
Break Points
Borg 9/13 (9 games)
Lendl 5/12 (6 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Borg 28 (6 FH, 9 BH, 2 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 5 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 3 OH, 1 BHOH)
Lendl 36 (21 FH, 8 BH, 3 FHV, 2 FH1/2V, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Borg's FHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl passes, 1 inside-in and 1 running-down-drop-shot at net dtl pass
- BHs - 3 cc, 3 dtl (1 pass, 2 at net), 2 longline (1 pass, 1 at net) and 1 lob
- 1 from a return-approach point, a BH1/2V
- 1 OH was on the bounce, 1 BHV can reasonably be called a BHOH and 1 BHOH can reasonably be called a BHV
Lendl's FHs - 6 cc (2 passes, 1 return - on which Borg had lost his racquet), 5 dtl (4 passes), 5 inside-out, 3 inside-in, 1 longline at net and 1 lob
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass... the non-pass can reasonably be called a drop shot), 4 dtl (2 passes) and 2 drop shots (1 at net - a net chord dribbler)
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first 'volley' FH1/2V
- 1 OH was on the bounce
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Borg 56
- 35 Unforced (17 FH, 15 BH, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 21 Forced (7 FH, 12 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 43.1
Lendl 88
- 61 Unforced (44 FH, 16 BH, 1 BHV)
- 27 Forced (14 FH, 12 BH, 1 Behind Back)... with 1 BH at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 42.0
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Borg was...
- 38/55 (69%) at net, with...
- 1/1 return-approaching
Lendl was...
- 24/33 (73%) at net, including...
- 3/4 (75%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 1/1 forced back
Match Report
Very good, hard hitting baseline slug fest. Borg is sizably better due to far greater consistency, though Lendl isn't wanting in this area either. Its just that Borg is so much better at it
UEs read Borg 35, Lendl 61. And that's due to the difference in FHs, where Borg has 17, Lendl a massive 44. On the BH, the two are virtually equal (Borg 15, Lendl 16)
Its Borg's choice to keep things predominantly FH-FH. He also serves there 63% of the time. This is unusual for him
Generally on clay in particular, Borg prefers to lead with BH cc rallies, which he hits very consistently, loopily and unthreateningly. It creates a passive, who-blinks-first dynamic... his balls get up high to opponents upper ribs or shoulders from where their shots can't pack a punch and it would be very difficult to attack dtl (even if they do go longline, its without power and Borg can easily run ball down). So they go back cc. And the cc rallies continues til someone gives up the error. Overwhelming majority of time, its not Borg, whose BHs land in like clockwork. Length of rally is irrelevant... Borg's always the more secure
So for him to initiate and maintain FH-FH cc rallies is surprising. He must feel that Lendl's more vulnerable on that side and events would suggest he was right.
Lendl is harder hitter and more damaging. FH-FH rallies tend to be long (in fact, all rallies are) and he's usually the one hitting flatter and harder, pushing Borg back a bit, in more comfortable position when making his shots. It usually doesn't extend to the point of Lendl attacking/Borg defending, but its fair to say Lendl leads/Borg reacts most of the time, after Borg initiates the rallies. Lendl seems just as happy for this to be staple of play and makes no effort to turn things BH-BH, which would be simple to do
Lendl's FH also has match high 21 winners (Borg has just 6 and 17 total groundstroke winners). 11 of them are baseline-to-baseline shots (Borg has 2). He does get his damaging hits in, but Borg's too solid to give up errors, even when slightly pushed back. With rallies being long, all credit to Borg's wall-like play. It takes a long time for Lendl to give up the UE and he's regularly hitting hard enough to 'beat-down' Borg. Only the ball keeps coming back
Significant amount of genuinely, error forcingly hard hit, slightly wide shots or longline change ups from Lendl's FH. Again, Borg races ball down and puts them back in play. A much higher lot of Borg's 19 baseline FEs are from baseline-baseline situations than Lendl's 25, which are mostly passing shots.
In nutshell, excellent FH play from both players - both being highly consistent (rallies are long) and Lendl being pressuringly hard hitting to boot. Borg though isn't just consistent - he's a wall
BH-BH play makes up minority and dynamics are similar. Again, Lendl is the harder hitter and leads play, while Borg reacts more and is lightly pushed back. Lendl doesn't have the same consistent power of that side - its a wonder he has as much as he does hitting one-handed against shoulder high balls. For most of match, Lendl has slight consistency advantage too. Towards end, he makes a few careless and/or tired errors. He makes no attempt to initiate the rallies, though getting short end of the FH stick
Reactive or not, Borg does maintain decent depth, unlike other matches where he tends to drop balls short of service line quite regularly. Not troublingly deep, but not short as to invite Lendl to attack the ball
Both players do well coming to net, Borg winning 69% of his 55 approaches, Lendl 73% of his 33. Borg is apt to come in on important points and in fourth set, actively manufactures approaches. Lendl shows little interest in coming forward. He does so most regularly near the end, when he's likely tiring (and probably half given up)
Note low UEFIs of Borg 43.1, Lendl 42.0. Neither player overdoes the aggression. With the retrieving and defence of both - particularly Borg - its unlikely to have pay dividends.
And behind it all is both players returning with great consistency. Generally, Borg is apt to roll in first serves on clay to extent that they'd be difficult to distinguish from second serves. Here, he serves firmly enough that that's not the case - while hammering down the occasional one (particularly on game point). 8 aces is a lot for him on clay, but Lendl returns most near everything else. Just 12 return errors from Lendl, with disproportionate number near end
Borg returns even better. For one thing, Lendl's first serve is very strong. On grass, he could easily have 50% first serves unreturned as hard as he sends them down. Borg, like his groundgame, puts them back in play like clockwork and returns at a full 90%. Near end, he even starts returning aggressively deep and wide. Its good ploy from Lendl - get as much of first serve as possible (unfortunately for him, he doesn't get much) and take his chances on long rallies
Large 25% difference between Lendl's first serve and second serve points won, with the second being a problematicly low 40%. Borg's difference is just 10% and he wins healthy 57% second serve points. These numbers are a fair indicator of how the two stack up in play. Even most of Lendl's first serve points turn into 50-50 rallies, but he does get a significant number of advantageous starting positions. Even those rallies usually go long. Play on other 3 serves are mostly 50-50 starting points... and Borg wins the bulk on all of them
Borg has at least 1 winner from FH, BH, FHV, FH1/2V, BHV, BH1/2V, OH and BHOH. This is just the second instance of this that I've come across. Borg would have been one of the last players I'd expect to have done it
It was Borg's 4th title in a row at the event, his 6th overall and would turn out to be his last Slam title and participation at the French Open. Lendl was playing his first Slam final
Borg won 140 points, Lendl 108
(Note: I've made confident guesses regarding serve type for a small number of points)
Serve Stats
Borg...
- 1st serve percentage (92/129) 71%
- 1st serve points won (62/92) 67%
- 2nd serve points won (21/37) 57%
- Aces 8
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (20/129) 16%
Lendl...
- 1st serve percentage (57/119) 48%
- 1st serve points won (37/57) 65%
- 2nd serve points won (25/62) 40%
- Aces 3
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (12/119) 10%
Serve Patterns
Borg served...
- to FH 63%
- to BH 31%
- to Body 6%
Lendl served....
- to FH 25%
- to BH 69%
- to Body 6%
Return Stats
Borg made...
- 103 (52 FH, 51 BH), including 26 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 7 Forced (2 FH, 5 BH)
- Return Rate (103/115) 90%
Lendl made...
- 105 (77 FH, 28 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 12 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (8 FH, 1 BH)
- 3 Forced (3 BH)
- Return Rate (105/125) 84%
Break Points
Borg 9/13 (9 games)
Lendl 5/12 (6 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Borg 28 (6 FH, 9 BH, 2 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 5 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 3 OH, 1 BHOH)
Lendl 36 (21 FH, 8 BH, 3 FHV, 2 FH1/2V, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Borg's FHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl passes, 1 inside-in and 1 running-down-drop-shot at net dtl pass
- BHs - 3 cc, 3 dtl (1 pass, 2 at net), 2 longline (1 pass, 1 at net) and 1 lob
- 1 from a return-approach point, a BH1/2V
- 1 OH was on the bounce, 1 BHV can reasonably be called a BHOH and 1 BHOH can reasonably be called a BHV
Lendl's FHs - 6 cc (2 passes, 1 return - on which Borg had lost his racquet), 5 dtl (4 passes), 5 inside-out, 3 inside-in, 1 longline at net and 1 lob
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass... the non-pass can reasonably be called a drop shot), 4 dtl (2 passes) and 2 drop shots (1 at net - a net chord dribbler)
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first 'volley' FH1/2V
- 1 OH was on the bounce
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Borg 56
- 35 Unforced (17 FH, 15 BH, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 21 Forced (7 FH, 12 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 43.1
Lendl 88
- 61 Unforced (44 FH, 16 BH, 1 BHV)
- 27 Forced (14 FH, 12 BH, 1 Behind Back)... with 1 BH at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 42.0
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Borg was...
- 38/55 (69%) at net, with...
- 1/1 return-approaching
Lendl was...
- 24/33 (73%) at net, including...
- 3/4 (75%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 1/1 forced back
Match Report
Very good, hard hitting baseline slug fest. Borg is sizably better due to far greater consistency, though Lendl isn't wanting in this area either. Its just that Borg is so much better at it
UEs read Borg 35, Lendl 61. And that's due to the difference in FHs, where Borg has 17, Lendl a massive 44. On the BH, the two are virtually equal (Borg 15, Lendl 16)
Its Borg's choice to keep things predominantly FH-FH. He also serves there 63% of the time. This is unusual for him
Generally on clay in particular, Borg prefers to lead with BH cc rallies, which he hits very consistently, loopily and unthreateningly. It creates a passive, who-blinks-first dynamic... his balls get up high to opponents upper ribs or shoulders from where their shots can't pack a punch and it would be very difficult to attack dtl (even if they do go longline, its without power and Borg can easily run ball down). So they go back cc. And the cc rallies continues til someone gives up the error. Overwhelming majority of time, its not Borg, whose BHs land in like clockwork. Length of rally is irrelevant... Borg's always the more secure
So for him to initiate and maintain FH-FH cc rallies is surprising. He must feel that Lendl's more vulnerable on that side and events would suggest he was right.
Lendl is harder hitter and more damaging. FH-FH rallies tend to be long (in fact, all rallies are) and he's usually the one hitting flatter and harder, pushing Borg back a bit, in more comfortable position when making his shots. It usually doesn't extend to the point of Lendl attacking/Borg defending, but its fair to say Lendl leads/Borg reacts most of the time, after Borg initiates the rallies. Lendl seems just as happy for this to be staple of play and makes no effort to turn things BH-BH, which would be simple to do
Lendl's FH also has match high 21 winners (Borg has just 6 and 17 total groundstroke winners). 11 of them are baseline-to-baseline shots (Borg has 2). He does get his damaging hits in, but Borg's too solid to give up errors, even when slightly pushed back. With rallies being long, all credit to Borg's wall-like play. It takes a long time for Lendl to give up the UE and he's regularly hitting hard enough to 'beat-down' Borg. Only the ball keeps coming back
Significant amount of genuinely, error forcingly hard hit, slightly wide shots or longline change ups from Lendl's FH. Again, Borg races ball down and puts them back in play. A much higher lot of Borg's 19 baseline FEs are from baseline-baseline situations than Lendl's 25, which are mostly passing shots.
In nutshell, excellent FH play from both players - both being highly consistent (rallies are long) and Lendl being pressuringly hard hitting to boot. Borg though isn't just consistent - he's a wall
BH-BH play makes up minority and dynamics are similar. Again, Lendl is the harder hitter and leads play, while Borg reacts more and is lightly pushed back. Lendl doesn't have the same consistent power of that side - its a wonder he has as much as he does hitting one-handed against shoulder high balls. For most of match, Lendl has slight consistency advantage too. Towards end, he makes a few careless and/or tired errors. He makes no attempt to initiate the rallies, though getting short end of the FH stick
Reactive or not, Borg does maintain decent depth, unlike other matches where he tends to drop balls short of service line quite regularly. Not troublingly deep, but not short as to invite Lendl to attack the ball
Both players do well coming to net, Borg winning 69% of his 55 approaches, Lendl 73% of his 33. Borg is apt to come in on important points and in fourth set, actively manufactures approaches. Lendl shows little interest in coming forward. He does so most regularly near the end, when he's likely tiring (and probably half given up)
Note low UEFIs of Borg 43.1, Lendl 42.0. Neither player overdoes the aggression. With the retrieving and defence of both - particularly Borg - its unlikely to have pay dividends.
And behind it all is both players returning with great consistency. Generally, Borg is apt to roll in first serves on clay to extent that they'd be difficult to distinguish from second serves. Here, he serves firmly enough that that's not the case - while hammering down the occasional one (particularly on game point). 8 aces is a lot for him on clay, but Lendl returns most near everything else. Just 12 return errors from Lendl, with disproportionate number near end
Borg returns even better. For one thing, Lendl's first serve is very strong. On grass, he could easily have 50% first serves unreturned as hard as he sends them down. Borg, like his groundgame, puts them back in play like clockwork and returns at a full 90%. Near end, he even starts returning aggressively deep and wide. Its good ploy from Lendl - get as much of first serve as possible (unfortunately for him, he doesn't get much) and take his chances on long rallies
Large 25% difference between Lendl's first serve and second serve points won, with the second being a problematicly low 40%. Borg's difference is just 10% and he wins healthy 57% second serve points. These numbers are a fair indicator of how the two stack up in play. Even most of Lendl's first serve points turn into 50-50 rallies, but he does get a significant number of advantageous starting positions. Even those rallies usually go long. Play on other 3 serves are mostly 50-50 starting points... and Borg wins the bulk on all of them
Borg has at least 1 winner from FH, BH, FHV, FH1/2V, BHV, BH1/2V, OH and BHOH. This is just the second instance of this that I've come across. Borg would have been one of the last players I'd expect to have done it
Last edited: