Bjorn Borg beat Ilie Nastase 6-4, 6-2, 9-7 in the Wimbledon final, 1976 on grass
It was the first of 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles for Borg and would remain the only instance in the Open Era of a player winning the event without loss of set until 2017. Nastase had also not dropped a set en route to the final
Borg won 122 points, Nastase 98
Borg serve-volleyed off all but 6 first serves and rarely off second. Nastase, all but 4 times of first serves and the majority off seconds
Serve Stats
Borg...
- 1st serve percentage (69/112) 62%
- 1st serve points won (51/69) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (24/43) 56%
- Aces 5
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (32/112) 29%
Nastase...
- 1st serve percentage (70/108) 65%
- 1st serve points won (44/70) 63%
- 2nd serve points won (17/38) 45%
- Aces 4, Service Winners 2
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (22/108) 20%
Serve Patterns
Borg served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 11%
Nastase served...
- to FH 35%
- to BH 65%
Return Stats
Borg made...
- 83 (48 FH, 35 BH), including 20 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 16 Errors, comprising...
- 3 Unforced (3 FH), including 2 runaround FH
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- Return Rate (83/105) 79%
Nastase made...
- 78 (34 FH, 44 BH), including 4 runaround FHs & 13 return-approaches
- 2 Winners (2 BH)
- 27 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH), including 2 return-approach attempts
- 23 Forced (7 FH, 16 BH)
- Return Rate (78/110) 71%
Break Points
Borg 6/10 (8 games)
Nastase 2/12 (5 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Borg 48 (15 FH, 11 BH, 9 FHV, 6 BHV, 7 OH)
Nastase 32 (10 FH, 5 BH, 13 FHV, 4 BHV)
Borg had 14 from serve-volley points
- 4 first volleys (1 FHV, 3 BHV)
- 5 second volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
- 3 third volleys (1 FHV, 2 OH)
- 1 fourth volley (1 FHV)
- 1 re-approach volley (1 OH)
- 1 other BHV was a stop
- 24 passes (13 FH, 10 BH, 1 FHV)
- FHs - 7 cc (1 return, 1 return, 1 running-down-drop-volley played net-to-net), 1 running-down-drop shot dtl, 4 inside-out and 1 inside-in
- BHs - 5 cc, 3 dtl (1 return, 1 running-down-drop-shot) and 2 inside-out
- FHV - played from just behind the service line but counted a net point
- regular FHs - 1 at net and 1 dtl (off a 'delayed' serve-volley point)
- regular BH - 1 net chord dribbler (with Nastase at net)
Nastase had 18 from serve-volley points
- 11 first 'volleys' (7 FHV, 1 BHV, 3 FH at net)… 1 of the FH at net was a drop shot
- 6 second volleys (4 FHV, 2 BHV)… 1 BHV was a net chord dribbler played net-to-net
- 1 third volley (1 FHV)
- 2 from return-approach points (1 FHV, 1 BHV)… the BHV was played net-to-net
- 11 passes (6 FH, 5 BH)
- FHs - 2 cc, 2 dtl and 2 inside-out
- BHs - 2 dtl (1 return), 2 inside-out (1 return) and 1 inside-out/dtl
- 1 FH at net, which Borg at net gave up on and turned away from
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Borg 42
- 10 Unforced (3 FH, 4 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 32 Forced (9 FH, 19 BH, 1 FHV, 3 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47
Nastase 39
- 18 Unforced (2 FH, 1 BH, 7 FHV, 7 BHV, 1 OH)
- 21 Forced (8 FH, 10 BH, 1 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.8
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Borg was...
- 64/87 (74%) at net, including...
- 46/63 (73%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 42/58 (72%) off 1st serve and..
- 4/5 (80%) off 2nd serve
--
- 1/1 return-approaching
- 1/2 forced back/retreated
Nastase was...
- 62/108 (57%) at net, including...
- 45/83 (54%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 34/60 (57%) off 1st serve and..
- 11/23 (48%) off 2nd serve
--
- 9/13 (69%) return-approaching
Match Report
Consummate from Borg - his serve, return and passing in particular being impressive. Net play is also the best I've seen from him (which isn't necessarily saying much - but its good by a general standard too). Nastase plays pretty but has a problem on the pass and is prone to sloppy errors at net
Playing Style
An important distinction to keep in mind is between style and quality and its particularly pertinent to Nastase. Certainly in this match - and probably in general (haven't seen enough of him to judge). He makes the game look so easy that its easy to say he played badly or was careless in making errors. In my experience - playing and watching and not just tennis - that's usually just a visual perception, an illusion if you like
Some people just make games look easy. Doesn't mean it is for them. Borg at net is the counter-thesis of this
Separating style from quality, I think a big dose of how stylish Nastase is is his use of touch rather than power.... because he doesn't have power and in situations where power would be superior to even great touch
Serve & Return
To start, Borg serve-volleys almost always off first serve (the few he doesn't are mostly 'delayed' serve-volleys, where he steps into court and holds off on approaching but is ready to do so if the return warrants it) and almost never off seconds
Nastase also all but always serve-volleys off first serve (when he doesn't, he usually comes in off third ball) and most of the time on seconds
Borg sends down a meaty first serve. Power, not placement is the point... he seems to be hitting it as hard as he can, without licking lines. Just 5 aces (1 more than Nastase, who also has 2 service winners to Borg's 0)… which is a surprise given the gap in strength between the two players serve. That's down to Borg's relatively safe placement (and Nastase's ability to hit the lines when he goes for it)
He makes good use of the body serve too, often forcing errors with the shot
Borg's second serve is fairly ordinary. Shot for shot, it might be comparable to Nastase…. but the gap between his first and second is much wider than for Nastase, so it doesn't look it
Like everything else, Nastase makes returning look easy, so when he misses returnable balls, it looks like he's playing badly. I don't think he did. 71% return rate is healthy against Borg's serve. One point about the body serves. Nasty has no problem anticipating or reacting to it - invariably he's moved out of the way, usually to play a BH return, so he's not jammed by the delivery. But tends to miss these makeable, but not easy balls
Against the second serve, Nastase does what he wants. Takes balls from inside the court (on odd occasions, he stands inside to take first serves too), stands in 1/2 way between center line and outside line (looking for a FH), chip-charges frequently and well.
Still, he doesn't have the power to attack second serves off the baseline - only when he chip-charges is he a threat. He wins 9/13 chip charge points but Borg wins 56% second serve points. Perhaps Nastase should have looked to do it more.
Nastase's serve isn't nearly as strong as Borg's but it isn't weak either. Not a huge difference between the two serves either. Still, primarily credit to Borg for returning it so surely. He doesn't miss many makeable returns and puts it in play relatively authoritively given he's up against constant serve-volleying (admittedly, helped by Nastase's style of serve-volleying, which we'll get to)
Notable is how far better Borg's FH return is to his BH and how much he prefers it. BH returns are looped in, FHs are pounded whenever he can. Look at the 20 runaround FH - and he only misses 3. He takes to even running around (i.e. backing away) to hit FH return in the ad court... leaving the court completely wide open. Its not a good play. He's can't hit the ball hard enough to simply be too powerful for Nastase to handle the volley... and the court couldn't be more open. Doesn't do it often and mostly when he's well on top of the match, but it is an indication of how strongly he prefers his FH
It was the first of 5 consecutive Wimbledon titles for Borg and would remain the only instance in the Open Era of a player winning the event without loss of set until 2017. Nastase had also not dropped a set en route to the final
Borg won 122 points, Nastase 98
Borg serve-volleyed off all but 6 first serves and rarely off second. Nastase, all but 4 times of first serves and the majority off seconds
Serve Stats
Borg...
- 1st serve percentage (69/112) 62%
- 1st serve points won (51/69) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (24/43) 56%
- Aces 5
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (32/112) 29%
Nastase...
- 1st serve percentage (70/108) 65%
- 1st serve points won (44/70) 63%
- 2nd serve points won (17/38) 45%
- Aces 4, Service Winners 2
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (22/108) 20%
Serve Patterns
Borg served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 11%
Nastase served...
- to FH 35%
- to BH 65%
Return Stats
Borg made...
- 83 (48 FH, 35 BH), including 20 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 16 Errors, comprising...
- 3 Unforced (3 FH), including 2 runaround FH
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- Return Rate (83/105) 79%
Nastase made...
- 78 (34 FH, 44 BH), including 4 runaround FHs & 13 return-approaches
- 2 Winners (2 BH)
- 27 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH), including 2 return-approach attempts
- 23 Forced (7 FH, 16 BH)
- Return Rate (78/110) 71%
Break Points
Borg 6/10 (8 games)
Nastase 2/12 (5 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Borg 48 (15 FH, 11 BH, 9 FHV, 6 BHV, 7 OH)
Nastase 32 (10 FH, 5 BH, 13 FHV, 4 BHV)
Borg had 14 from serve-volley points
- 4 first volleys (1 FHV, 3 BHV)
- 5 second volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
- 3 third volleys (1 FHV, 2 OH)
- 1 fourth volley (1 FHV)
- 1 re-approach volley (1 OH)
- 1 other BHV was a stop
- 24 passes (13 FH, 10 BH, 1 FHV)
- FHs - 7 cc (1 return, 1 return, 1 running-down-drop-volley played net-to-net), 1 running-down-drop shot dtl, 4 inside-out and 1 inside-in
- BHs - 5 cc, 3 dtl (1 return, 1 running-down-drop-shot) and 2 inside-out
- FHV - played from just behind the service line but counted a net point
- regular FHs - 1 at net and 1 dtl (off a 'delayed' serve-volley point)
- regular BH - 1 net chord dribbler (with Nastase at net)
Nastase had 18 from serve-volley points
- 11 first 'volleys' (7 FHV, 1 BHV, 3 FH at net)… 1 of the FH at net was a drop shot
- 6 second volleys (4 FHV, 2 BHV)… 1 BHV was a net chord dribbler played net-to-net
- 1 third volley (1 FHV)
- 2 from return-approach points (1 FHV, 1 BHV)… the BHV was played net-to-net
- 11 passes (6 FH, 5 BH)
- FHs - 2 cc, 2 dtl and 2 inside-out
- BHs - 2 dtl (1 return), 2 inside-out (1 return) and 1 inside-out/dtl
- 1 FH at net, which Borg at net gave up on and turned away from
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Borg 42
- 10 Unforced (3 FH, 4 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 32 Forced (9 FH, 19 BH, 1 FHV, 3 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47
Nastase 39
- 18 Unforced (2 FH, 1 BH, 7 FHV, 7 BHV, 1 OH)
- 21 Forced (8 FH, 10 BH, 1 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.8
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Borg was...
- 64/87 (74%) at net, including...
- 46/63 (73%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 42/58 (72%) off 1st serve and..
- 4/5 (80%) off 2nd serve
--
- 1/1 return-approaching
- 1/2 forced back/retreated
Nastase was...
- 62/108 (57%) at net, including...
- 45/83 (54%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 34/60 (57%) off 1st serve and..
- 11/23 (48%) off 2nd serve
--
- 9/13 (69%) return-approaching
Match Report
Consummate from Borg - his serve, return and passing in particular being impressive. Net play is also the best I've seen from him (which isn't necessarily saying much - but its good by a general standard too). Nastase plays pretty but has a problem on the pass and is prone to sloppy errors at net
Playing Style
An important distinction to keep in mind is between style and quality and its particularly pertinent to Nastase. Certainly in this match - and probably in general (haven't seen enough of him to judge). He makes the game look so easy that its easy to say he played badly or was careless in making errors. In my experience - playing and watching and not just tennis - that's usually just a visual perception, an illusion if you like
Some people just make games look easy. Doesn't mean it is for them. Borg at net is the counter-thesis of this
Separating style from quality, I think a big dose of how stylish Nastase is is his use of touch rather than power.... because he doesn't have power and in situations where power would be superior to even great touch
Serve & Return
To start, Borg serve-volleys almost always off first serve (the few he doesn't are mostly 'delayed' serve-volleys, where he steps into court and holds off on approaching but is ready to do so if the return warrants it) and almost never off seconds
Nastase also all but always serve-volleys off first serve (when he doesn't, he usually comes in off third ball) and most of the time on seconds
Borg sends down a meaty first serve. Power, not placement is the point... he seems to be hitting it as hard as he can, without licking lines. Just 5 aces (1 more than Nastase, who also has 2 service winners to Borg's 0)… which is a surprise given the gap in strength between the two players serve. That's down to Borg's relatively safe placement (and Nastase's ability to hit the lines when he goes for it)
He makes good use of the body serve too, often forcing errors with the shot
Borg's second serve is fairly ordinary. Shot for shot, it might be comparable to Nastase…. but the gap between his first and second is much wider than for Nastase, so it doesn't look it
Like everything else, Nastase makes returning look easy, so when he misses returnable balls, it looks like he's playing badly. I don't think he did. 71% return rate is healthy against Borg's serve. One point about the body serves. Nasty has no problem anticipating or reacting to it - invariably he's moved out of the way, usually to play a BH return, so he's not jammed by the delivery. But tends to miss these makeable, but not easy balls
Against the second serve, Nastase does what he wants. Takes balls from inside the court (on odd occasions, he stands inside to take first serves too), stands in 1/2 way between center line and outside line (looking for a FH), chip-charges frequently and well.
Still, he doesn't have the power to attack second serves off the baseline - only when he chip-charges is he a threat. He wins 9/13 chip charge points but Borg wins 56% second serve points. Perhaps Nastase should have looked to do it more.
Nastase's serve isn't nearly as strong as Borg's but it isn't weak either. Not a huge difference between the two serves either. Still, primarily credit to Borg for returning it so surely. He doesn't miss many makeable returns and puts it in play relatively authoritively given he's up against constant serve-volleying (admittedly, helped by Nastase's style of serve-volleying, which we'll get to)
Notable is how far better Borg's FH return is to his BH and how much he prefers it. BH returns are looped in, FHs are pounded whenever he can. Look at the 20 runaround FH - and he only misses 3. He takes to even running around (i.e. backing away) to hit FH return in the ad court... leaving the court completely wide open. Its not a good play. He's can't hit the ball hard enough to simply be too powerful for Nastase to handle the volley... and the court couldn't be more open. Doesn't do it often and mostly when he's well on top of the match, but it is an indication of how strongly he prefers his FH
Last edited: