Marin Cilic beat Novak Djokovic 5-7, 7-6(4), 6-3 in the Queen’s Club final, 2018 on grass
It was Cilic’s second title at the event and he had been runner-up the previous year. It was Djokovic's second runner-up showing and he would go onto win the upcoming Wimbledon
Cilic won 113 points, Djokovic 109
Serve Stats
Cilic...
- 1st serve percentage (54/113) 48%
- 1st serve points won (46/54) 85%
- 2nd serve points won (34/59) 58%
- Aces 17 (1 second serve), Service Winners 4
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (38/113) 34%
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (81/109) 74%
- 1st serve points won (62/81) 77%
- 2nd serve points won (14/28) 50%
- Aces 11, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 5
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (45/109) 41%
Serve Pattern
Cilic served...
- to FH 36%
- to BH 49%
- to Body 16%
Djokovic served...
- to FH 55%
- to BH 41%
- to Body 4%
Return Stats
Cilic made...
- 59 (35 FH, 24 BH)
- 33 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (4 FH, 3 BH)
- 26 Forced (11 FH, 15 BH)
- Return Rate (59/104) 57%
Djokovic made...
- 69 (25 FH, 44 BH)
- 17 Errors, comprising...
- 6 Unforced (4 FH, 2 BH)
- 11 Forced (7 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (69/107) 64%
Break Points
Cilic 1/8 (3 games)
Djokovic 1/6 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Cilic 37 (23 FH, 12 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
Djokovic 11 (5 FH, 6 BH)
Cilic's FHs - 7 cc (1 pass, 1 at net), 6 dtl (1 pass), 1 dtl/inside-out, 5 inside-out, 2 inside-in, 1 longline, 1 drop shot
- BHs - 3 cc (1 pass), 7 dtl (3 passes - 1 slice), 2 longline (1 at net)
Djokovic's FHs - 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc, 1 net chord dribbler
- BHs - 3 dtl (1 pass), 1 inside-out, 1 longline, 1 running-down-drop-shot drop shot at net
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Cilic 47
- 39 Unforced (16 FH, 22 BH, 1 OH)... with 1 FH at net
- 8 Forced (1 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.7
Djokovic 33
- 20 Unforced (11 FH, 9 BH)
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: The 'Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is a measure of how aggressive of intent the average UE made was. 60 is maximum, 20 is minimum. This match has been scored using a four point scale - 2 defensive, 4 neutral, 5 attacking, 6 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Cilic was 7/14 (50%) at net
Djokovic was...
- 2/10 (20%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
A wonderful, fun match, topsy turvy of nature and extreme in the difference in how the two players play. Its almost all Cilic attacking, Djokovic defending which on grass, would heavily favour the attacker. Relative advantage in serve-return complex due to better ability to return tough serves by Djokovic cuts back into his playing disadvantage to leave things virtually equal
Extreme difference in playing style? Forget the FH, Cilic has more BH winners than Djoko has total winner. Cilic with 23 FH winners and 12 BH winners. Djoko with 11 winners from all shots
Topsy turvy nature? Cilic has better of first set, but loses it. Djokovic has better of second set, but loses it. Djokovic has match point in the second set (its service winner’d away)
The most crucial point of the match is a turnaround. Djoko’s been running around and defending all match, Cilic very little. But roles are reversed as Cilic scampers about to retrieve 3-4 tough shots with late pushed-back ‘gets’ before drawing an (unforced) error to pinch a point in the decisive break late in the match, with Djoko's BH - otherwise the rock of the match - faltering just enough to let it happen
Relative advantage in serve-return complex due to return? Despite Cilic leading aces 17-11 and first serve ace/service winner rate 37% - 15%, Djoko lead unreturned rate 41% -34%
That happens sometimes when returner is very aggressive to give up lots of freebies for benefit of making powerful returns. Not here. 26/33 Cilic return errors are FEs. Good serves from Djoko, but the kind he, as a returner is making. It takes considerably less to draw an error out of Cilic than it does Djoko
Things being virtually equal? Both players win the exact same number of points they serve - Cilic 113, Djoko 109
Break points - Cilic 1/8, Djoko 1/6 (both having them in 3 games)
Serve & Return
First serve in - Cilic 48%, Djoko 74%
If you see nothing other than that stat alone, what odds would you give of Cilic winning this? Sounds like a formula for 3 & 4 Djokovic
Some very big second serving from Cilic is what keeps that from happening. While his first serves go for aces and service winners, his seconds act like a normal match’s firsts; Drawing weak returns that he can wade into (and he’s in a wading mood, even beyond his norm - see winner counts to see how that works out)
Sans considerable 6 double faults, Cilic wins 34/53 or 64% second serve points. Usually, you see Djoko winning that kind of a figure returning second serves. Double faults count though, and 6 is a significant cost to having that kind of effect
As Djoko begins to get grip on power and placement of Cilic’s second serves, Cilic switches to serving more at the body. He directs high 16% there, usually second serves. Excellent placement. Despite typical, sleek movement, Djoko isn’t at ease handling it. Forced to squat, hold racquet up like a stop sign couple of times to make the return even
Not bad returning from Djoko in all. 4 service winners from Cilic is indicator of his giving a full effort (they’d have gone for aces if he weren’t). Normal enough to take it easy against serving of this calibre, but none of that from Djoko. If he’s aced a lot, it because the serves are perfect, not because he can’t be bothered trying his best
Not too clean of hitting the second shot though, but he’s only down from his best (not a reasonable standard to expect for any given match), not poor. Lot of weak returns to tough serves that he at least is capable of returning with authority. And he does get a dangerous few returns back deep as is his way. Ironically, its usually against first serves
For that matter, so does Cilic. He’s nowhere near as good at moving to wide returns and making them as indicated earlier, but the ones he bops back to baseline are as Djokovic’ish as Djoko’s own hits
Serve-return matters in 4 nutshells -
- Cilic huges serves, first and second. Firsts going for aces regularly, seconds drawing weak returns he can readily attack or putaway at once. Low in count not too big a problem in that light
- Djoko returning as consistently as he can against first rate opposition. Makes the returns that are makeable, even difficult ones, but weakly. Gets his share of damagingly deep ones too
- Very high in-count from Djoko, serving well. Nowhere near as devastating as Cilic but it doesn’t have to be because Cilic isn’t the mover Djoko is. This kind of ‘just-enough-to-draw-the-error’ serving is typical
of Djoko
- Cilic, nowhere near as good as Djoko at returning tough serves, or even routine + (a bit harder than routine, example, powerful serve, deep-ish but right in swing-zone) ones. But like Djoko, bops a few right back to the baseline to end points or give himself control of it or at least, neutralizes Djoko’s initiative
Serve return matters in 2 numbers - unreturned serves - Cilic 34%, Djoko 41%
And then they rally
Play - Baseline
Winners - Cilic 37, Djoko 11
Errors Forced - Cilic 13, Djoko 8
UEs - Cilic 39, Djoko 20
Points - Cilic 70, Djoko 58… which is in proportion to points served to keep things even and both players holding
Obviously, the winner counts are radically different. That’s certainly accurate indicator of playing dynamics but exaggerates it a little. With Djoko making soft returns regularly, Cilic slaps away good number of easy winners of the third ball anywhere from at net (not serve-volleying but moving up to hit groundstroke) to well up in court
You see this in close serve-volley matches all the time - 1 player with higher unreturned rate, the other with corresponding higher number of 1st volley winners. In words, Djoko’s serves don’t come back, Cilic’s ones do weakly and he dismisses the ball on the spot. It comes to the same thing - Cilic brutalizing the ball makes for a better watch than serve ‘botting
Good 7-10 of Cilic’s winners are third ball putaways. Others are third ball shots where putaway isn’t obvious choice, but he goes for it and makes it (also misses fair bit trying). Its excellent grass court tennis in that play rarely reaches neutral. Cilic seizes control with third ball shot at least, against anything but strong returns. Djoko, with his higher lot of freebies, doesn’t get to as much because higher lot of Cilic’s returns are strong, but both players looking to be in command of rally from the get-go, including after a strong return
If dynamic edges down towards neutral, Cilic hammers the ball off both sides to seize control. Djoko doesn’t contest - he’s probably capable, but is content to counter-punch and trust to Cilic overreaching with aggression. Not a bad ploy in general against Cilic
It was Cilic’s second title at the event and he had been runner-up the previous year. It was Djokovic's second runner-up showing and he would go onto win the upcoming Wimbledon
Cilic won 113 points, Djokovic 109
Serve Stats
Cilic...
- 1st serve percentage (54/113) 48%
- 1st serve points won (46/54) 85%
- 2nd serve points won (34/59) 58%
- Aces 17 (1 second serve), Service Winners 4
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (38/113) 34%
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (81/109) 74%
- 1st serve points won (62/81) 77%
- 2nd serve points won (14/28) 50%
- Aces 11, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 5
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (45/109) 41%
Serve Pattern
Cilic served...
- to FH 36%
- to BH 49%
- to Body 16%
Djokovic served...
- to FH 55%
- to BH 41%
- to Body 4%
Return Stats
Cilic made...
- 59 (35 FH, 24 BH)
- 33 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (4 FH, 3 BH)
- 26 Forced (11 FH, 15 BH)
- Return Rate (59/104) 57%
Djokovic made...
- 69 (25 FH, 44 BH)
- 17 Errors, comprising...
- 6 Unforced (4 FH, 2 BH)
- 11 Forced (7 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (69/107) 64%
Break Points
Cilic 1/8 (3 games)
Djokovic 1/6 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Cilic 37 (23 FH, 12 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
Djokovic 11 (5 FH, 6 BH)
Cilic's FHs - 7 cc (1 pass, 1 at net), 6 dtl (1 pass), 1 dtl/inside-out, 5 inside-out, 2 inside-in, 1 longline, 1 drop shot
- BHs - 3 cc (1 pass), 7 dtl (3 passes - 1 slice), 2 longline (1 at net)
Djokovic's FHs - 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc, 1 net chord dribbler
- BHs - 3 dtl (1 pass), 1 inside-out, 1 longline, 1 running-down-drop-shot drop shot at net
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Cilic 47
- 39 Unforced (16 FH, 22 BH, 1 OH)... with 1 FH at net
- 8 Forced (1 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.7
Djokovic 33
- 20 Unforced (11 FH, 9 BH)
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: The 'Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is a measure of how aggressive of intent the average UE made was. 60 is maximum, 20 is minimum. This match has been scored using a four point scale - 2 defensive, 4 neutral, 5 attacking, 6 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Cilic was 7/14 (50%) at net
Djokovic was...
- 2/10 (20%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
A wonderful, fun match, topsy turvy of nature and extreme in the difference in how the two players play. Its almost all Cilic attacking, Djokovic defending which on grass, would heavily favour the attacker. Relative advantage in serve-return complex due to better ability to return tough serves by Djokovic cuts back into his playing disadvantage to leave things virtually equal
Extreme difference in playing style? Forget the FH, Cilic has more BH winners than Djoko has total winner. Cilic with 23 FH winners and 12 BH winners. Djoko with 11 winners from all shots
Topsy turvy nature? Cilic has better of first set, but loses it. Djokovic has better of second set, but loses it. Djokovic has match point in the second set (its service winner’d away)
The most crucial point of the match is a turnaround. Djoko’s been running around and defending all match, Cilic very little. But roles are reversed as Cilic scampers about to retrieve 3-4 tough shots with late pushed-back ‘gets’ before drawing an (unforced) error to pinch a point in the decisive break late in the match, with Djoko's BH - otherwise the rock of the match - faltering just enough to let it happen
Relative advantage in serve-return complex due to return? Despite Cilic leading aces 17-11 and first serve ace/service winner rate 37% - 15%, Djoko lead unreturned rate 41% -34%
That happens sometimes when returner is very aggressive to give up lots of freebies for benefit of making powerful returns. Not here. 26/33 Cilic return errors are FEs. Good serves from Djoko, but the kind he, as a returner is making. It takes considerably less to draw an error out of Cilic than it does Djoko
Things being virtually equal? Both players win the exact same number of points they serve - Cilic 113, Djoko 109
Break points - Cilic 1/8, Djoko 1/6 (both having them in 3 games)
Serve & Return
First serve in - Cilic 48%, Djoko 74%
If you see nothing other than that stat alone, what odds would you give of Cilic winning this? Sounds like a formula for 3 & 4 Djokovic
Some very big second serving from Cilic is what keeps that from happening. While his first serves go for aces and service winners, his seconds act like a normal match’s firsts; Drawing weak returns that he can wade into (and he’s in a wading mood, even beyond his norm - see winner counts to see how that works out)
Sans considerable 6 double faults, Cilic wins 34/53 or 64% second serve points. Usually, you see Djoko winning that kind of a figure returning second serves. Double faults count though, and 6 is a significant cost to having that kind of effect
As Djoko begins to get grip on power and placement of Cilic’s second serves, Cilic switches to serving more at the body. He directs high 16% there, usually second serves. Excellent placement. Despite typical, sleek movement, Djoko isn’t at ease handling it. Forced to squat, hold racquet up like a stop sign couple of times to make the return even
Not bad returning from Djoko in all. 4 service winners from Cilic is indicator of his giving a full effort (they’d have gone for aces if he weren’t). Normal enough to take it easy against serving of this calibre, but none of that from Djoko. If he’s aced a lot, it because the serves are perfect, not because he can’t be bothered trying his best
Not too clean of hitting the second shot though, but he’s only down from his best (not a reasonable standard to expect for any given match), not poor. Lot of weak returns to tough serves that he at least is capable of returning with authority. And he does get a dangerous few returns back deep as is his way. Ironically, its usually against first serves
For that matter, so does Cilic. He’s nowhere near as good at moving to wide returns and making them as indicated earlier, but the ones he bops back to baseline are as Djokovic’ish as Djoko’s own hits
Serve-return matters in 4 nutshells -
- Cilic huges serves, first and second. Firsts going for aces regularly, seconds drawing weak returns he can readily attack or putaway at once. Low in count not too big a problem in that light
- Djoko returning as consistently as he can against first rate opposition. Makes the returns that are makeable, even difficult ones, but weakly. Gets his share of damagingly deep ones too
- Very high in-count from Djoko, serving well. Nowhere near as devastating as Cilic but it doesn’t have to be because Cilic isn’t the mover Djoko is. This kind of ‘just-enough-to-draw-the-error’ serving is typical
of Djoko
- Cilic, nowhere near as good as Djoko at returning tough serves, or even routine + (a bit harder than routine, example, powerful serve, deep-ish but right in swing-zone) ones. But like Djoko, bops a few right back to the baseline to end points or give himself control of it or at least, neutralizes Djoko’s initiative
Serve return matters in 2 numbers - unreturned serves - Cilic 34%, Djoko 41%
And then they rally
Play - Baseline
Winners - Cilic 37, Djoko 11
Errors Forced - Cilic 13, Djoko 8
UEs - Cilic 39, Djoko 20
Points - Cilic 70, Djoko 58… which is in proportion to points served to keep things even and both players holding
Obviously, the winner counts are radically different. That’s certainly accurate indicator of playing dynamics but exaggerates it a little. With Djoko making soft returns regularly, Cilic slaps away good number of easy winners of the third ball anywhere from at net (not serve-volleying but moving up to hit groundstroke) to well up in court
You see this in close serve-volley matches all the time - 1 player with higher unreturned rate, the other with corresponding higher number of 1st volley winners. In words, Djoko’s serves don’t come back, Cilic’s ones do weakly and he dismisses the ball on the spot. It comes to the same thing - Cilic brutalizing the ball makes for a better watch than serve ‘botting
Good 7-10 of Cilic’s winners are third ball putaways. Others are third ball shots where putaway isn’t obvious choice, but he goes for it and makes it (also misses fair bit trying). Its excellent grass court tennis in that play rarely reaches neutral. Cilic seizes control with third ball shot at least, against anything but strong returns. Djoko, with his higher lot of freebies, doesn’t get to as much because higher lot of Cilic’s returns are strong, but both players looking to be in command of rally from the get-go, including after a strong return
If dynamic edges down towards neutral, Cilic hammers the ball off both sides to seize control. Djoko doesn’t contest - he’s probably capable, but is content to counter-punch and trust to Cilic overreaching with aggression. Not a bad ploy in general against Cilic