Jim Courier beat Petr Korda 7-5, 6-2, 6-1 in the French Open final, 1992 on clay
Courier was the defending champion and would lose in the final the following year. This was Korda’s first Slam final
Courier won 101 points, Korda 71
Serve Stats
Courier...
- 1st serve percentage (56/81) 69%
- 1st serve points won (42/56) 75%
- 2nd serve points won (12/25) 48%
- Aces 7, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (23/81) 29%
Korda...
- 1st serve percentage (54/91) 59%
- 1st serve points won (29/54) 54%
- 2nd serve points won (15/37) 41%
- Aces 5
- Double Faults 9
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (17/91) 19%
Serve Patterns
Courier served...
- to FH 24%
- to BH 72%
- to Body 4%
Korda served...
- to FH 20%
- to BH 76%
- to Body 5%
Return Stats
Courier made...
- 65 (20 FH, 45 BH), including 8 runaround FHs
- 12 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (3 FH, 4 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 5 Forced (2 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (65/82) 79%
Korda made...
- 55 (13 FH, 42 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 15 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (2 FH, 7 BH)
- 6 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (55/78) 71%
Break Points
Courier 7/15 (9 games)
Korda 2/6 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Courier 13 (6 FH, 3 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
Korda 27 (11 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV, 4 OH)
Courier's FHs - 1 cc pass, 3 inside-out, 1 running-down-drop-shot cc pass at net, 1 lob
- BHs (all passes) - 1 cc, 1 dtl at net, 1 sliced lob
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley FHV
Korda's FHs - 2 cc, 3 dtl (1 pass), 2 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-out, 3 drop shots (1 at net)
- BHs - 3 cc (2 passes), 2 dtl passes, 1 drop shot
- 2 from serve-volley points - a first volley OH & a second volley FHV
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Courier 24
- 13 Unforced (9 FH, 4 BH)
- 11 Forced (7 FH, 3 BH, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.7
Korda 56
- 40 Unforced (24 FH, 12 BH, 1 FHV, 3 BHV)
- 16 Forced (8 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 3 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49.8
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Courier was...
- 15/24 (63%) at net, including...
- 3/3 (100%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
Korda was...
- 20/38 (53%) at net, including...
- 6/9 (67%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 3/6 (50%) off 1st serve and...
- 3/3 (100%) off 2nd serve
---
- 1/1 return-approaching
- 0/3 forced back/retreated
Match Report
CClose to a mismatch. Courier is solidly strong in all ways, close to uniformly. At his best, Korda is up & down with aggressive shot choices, make some, miss some way. More often, Korda is outmatched. He doesn’t do anything particularly well. Court is on quick side for clay
Match long, Korda's 40 UEs stands out. Courier has 24 total errors (13 UEs, 11 FEs)
Interesting part of that is biggest pile of them are FHs, drawn by Courier's BH cc's
Courier has a just reputation for favouring his FH and for moving over to play FHs from BH side. He also has an unjust reputation for having a weak, or at least, not strong BH
When different handed players clash, its rare for one to proactively breakdown their opponents FH with BH cc’s. If a FH gives up lot of errors in such cases, its almost always the case that the players has looked to breakdown opponents BH, and it hasn’t gone well
Same result here, but dynamics are different. Its Courier who implements BH cc’s to target Korda’s FH
It works bloody well. Courier’s BH has tiny match low 4 UEs, Korda mammoth mtach high 24 FH UEs
That cc rally is more often seen than any other kind, but to be clear, thre’s plenty going on and it’s not a match where players just trade cc shots ‘til someone blinks
In first set, which is close, Korda goes for FH dtl winners regularly (without Courier pointedly playing to the FH). He’s got couple winners and Courier either makes running FH FEs or makes defensive gets, and of course Korda misses good few (more than he makes). He goes for it often enough to make things tense, in a what’ll-happen-next way
After losing first set is when Korda eases up and sticks to stock cc shots. And Courier’s happy to play along, with BH cc’s. His not moving over to play FH inside-outs to achieve same target might be a sign of being wary of the FH dtl counter or he’s savvy enough to see that the less powerful BH cc’s are enough (which they clearly are)
Not that Courier doesn’t hit firm BH cc’s, but of course, they’re not as powerful as his typical FH inside-outs. Its outlast play, at most, slightly pressuring (and usually not that), not beat-down play
Whatever the subtleties, Korda’s FH blinks up the errors in cc rallies, Courier’s firm of shot and iron consistent
Courier BH to Korda FH - biggest part of action, with Courier handily winning
Serve & Return
Healthy, hearty serving and returning from Courier. Korda’s off on both shots
Court is relatively quick, with in-swing zone serves drawing a few more errors than norm (including from Courier). Courier’s serve is strong of force. Doesn’t serve too wide, but has healthy 7 aces, 1 service winner
Korda’s serve is odd combo. Mode serve is weak. Courier plays runaround FH returns against first serves. But he darts the odd one through powerfully. 5 aces, when opponent is spontaneously running around to play FHs against first serves is an odd combo
Courier misses a few in-swing zone regulation returns, but returns with hearty force, including taking couple steps in to thump BH cc’s against second serves. Return rate of 79% with neutralizing and occasional initiative grabbing force is job well done
The worst of it is Korda's double faulting. He’s got 9 or 24% second serves. Atrocious. Courier could return twice as powerfully and it still wouldn’t justify it. And his second serve is just average anyway
Sans the doubles, Korda wins good 54% second serve points, same as Courier sans doubles
With the doubles, Courier has 48% to 41% lead in second serve points
That and Korda much of the time just starting point with his first serve, while Courier’s has power behind his first is putting Korda in a hole off the bat
Like his ground game, Korda’s returning is also inconsistent. He’s got 9 return UEs to 6 FEs. Courier is kind of server in general that when he’s not serving aces, isn’t serving damagingly wide and that’s true here too
Courier was the defending champion and would lose in the final the following year. This was Korda’s first Slam final
Courier won 101 points, Korda 71
Serve Stats
Courier...
- 1st serve percentage (56/81) 69%
- 1st serve points won (42/56) 75%
- 2nd serve points won (12/25) 48%
- Aces 7, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (23/81) 29%
Korda...
- 1st serve percentage (54/91) 59%
- 1st serve points won (29/54) 54%
- 2nd serve points won (15/37) 41%
- Aces 5
- Double Faults 9
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (17/91) 19%
Serve Patterns
Courier served...
- to FH 24%
- to BH 72%
- to Body 4%
Korda served...
- to FH 20%
- to BH 76%
- to Body 5%
Return Stats
Courier made...
- 65 (20 FH, 45 BH), including 8 runaround FHs
- 12 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (3 FH, 4 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 5 Forced (2 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (65/82) 79%
Korda made...
- 55 (13 FH, 42 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 15 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (2 FH, 7 BH)
- 6 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (55/78) 71%
Break Points
Courier 7/15 (9 games)
Korda 2/6 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Courier 13 (6 FH, 3 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
Korda 27 (11 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV, 4 OH)
Courier's FHs - 1 cc pass, 3 inside-out, 1 running-down-drop-shot cc pass at net, 1 lob
- BHs (all passes) - 1 cc, 1 dtl at net, 1 sliced lob
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley FHV
Korda's FHs - 2 cc, 3 dtl (1 pass), 2 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-out, 3 drop shots (1 at net)
- BHs - 3 cc (2 passes), 2 dtl passes, 1 drop shot
- 2 from serve-volley points - a first volley OH & a second volley FHV
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Courier 24
- 13 Unforced (9 FH, 4 BH)
- 11 Forced (7 FH, 3 BH, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.7
Korda 56
- 40 Unforced (24 FH, 12 BH, 1 FHV, 3 BHV)
- 16 Forced (8 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 3 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49.8
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Courier was...
- 15/24 (63%) at net, including...
- 3/3 (100%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
Korda was...
- 20/38 (53%) at net, including...
- 6/9 (67%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 3/6 (50%) off 1st serve and...
- 3/3 (100%) off 2nd serve
---
- 1/1 return-approaching
- 0/3 forced back/retreated
Match Report
CClose to a mismatch. Courier is solidly strong in all ways, close to uniformly. At his best, Korda is up & down with aggressive shot choices, make some, miss some way. More often, Korda is outmatched. He doesn’t do anything particularly well. Court is on quick side for clay
Match long, Korda's 40 UEs stands out. Courier has 24 total errors (13 UEs, 11 FEs)
Interesting part of that is biggest pile of them are FHs, drawn by Courier's BH cc's
Courier has a just reputation for favouring his FH and for moving over to play FHs from BH side. He also has an unjust reputation for having a weak, or at least, not strong BH
When different handed players clash, its rare for one to proactively breakdown their opponents FH with BH cc’s. If a FH gives up lot of errors in such cases, its almost always the case that the players has looked to breakdown opponents BH, and it hasn’t gone well
Same result here, but dynamics are different. Its Courier who implements BH cc’s to target Korda’s FH
It works bloody well. Courier’s BH has tiny match low 4 UEs, Korda mammoth mtach high 24 FH UEs
That cc rally is more often seen than any other kind, but to be clear, thre’s plenty going on and it’s not a match where players just trade cc shots ‘til someone blinks
In first set, which is close, Korda goes for FH dtl winners regularly (without Courier pointedly playing to the FH). He’s got couple winners and Courier either makes running FH FEs or makes defensive gets, and of course Korda misses good few (more than he makes). He goes for it often enough to make things tense, in a what’ll-happen-next way
After losing first set is when Korda eases up and sticks to stock cc shots. And Courier’s happy to play along, with BH cc’s. His not moving over to play FH inside-outs to achieve same target might be a sign of being wary of the FH dtl counter or he’s savvy enough to see that the less powerful BH cc’s are enough (which they clearly are)
Not that Courier doesn’t hit firm BH cc’s, but of course, they’re not as powerful as his typical FH inside-outs. Its outlast play, at most, slightly pressuring (and usually not that), not beat-down play
Whatever the subtleties, Korda’s FH blinks up the errors in cc rallies, Courier’s firm of shot and iron consistent
Courier BH to Korda FH - biggest part of action, with Courier handily winning
Serve & Return
Healthy, hearty serving and returning from Courier. Korda’s off on both shots
Court is relatively quick, with in-swing zone serves drawing a few more errors than norm (including from Courier). Courier’s serve is strong of force. Doesn’t serve too wide, but has healthy 7 aces, 1 service winner
Korda’s serve is odd combo. Mode serve is weak. Courier plays runaround FH returns against first serves. But he darts the odd one through powerfully. 5 aces, when opponent is spontaneously running around to play FHs against first serves is an odd combo
Courier misses a few in-swing zone regulation returns, but returns with hearty force, including taking couple steps in to thump BH cc’s against second serves. Return rate of 79% with neutralizing and occasional initiative grabbing force is job well done
The worst of it is Korda's double faulting. He’s got 9 or 24% second serves. Atrocious. Courier could return twice as powerfully and it still wouldn’t justify it. And his second serve is just average anyway
Sans the doubles, Korda wins good 54% second serve points, same as Courier sans doubles
With the doubles, Courier has 48% to 41% lead in second serve points
That and Korda much of the time just starting point with his first serve, while Courier’s has power behind his first is putting Korda in a hole off the bat
Like his ground game, Korda’s returning is also inconsistent. He’s got 9 return UEs to 6 FEs. Courier is kind of server in general that when he’s not serving aces, isn’t serving damagingly wide and that’s true here too