Novak Djokovic beat Nicolas Massu 7-6(5), 6-4 in the Amersfoort final, 2006 on clay
This was Djokovic’s first title and he was 19 years old. Massu was seeded 4th, Djokovic 3rd
Djokovic won 80 points, Massu 77
[Note: I’m missing partial data for the following
Set 1, Game 2, Point 4 - serve direction, corresponding return and return error unknown (probably to BH and UE, but not marked)]
Serve Stats
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (36/68) 53%
- 1st serve points won (27/36) 75%
- 2nd serve points won (16/32) 50%
- Aces 7 (2 second serves), Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (22/68) 32%
Massu...
- 1st serve percentage (40/89) 45%
- 1st serve points won (27/40) 68%
- 2nd serve points won (25/49) 51%
- Aces 11 (1 second serve), Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (23/89) 26%
Serve Pattern
Djokovic served...
- to FH 48%
- to BH 49%
- to Body 3%
Massu served...
- to FH 25%
- to BH 73%
- to Body 2%
Return Stats
Djokovic made...
- 62 (15 FH, 47 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 6 Forced (6 BH)
- 1 ?? (against a second serve)
- Return Rate (62/85) 73%
Massu made...
- 43 (27 FH, 16 BH), including 7 runaround FHs
- 14 Errors, comprising...
- 8 Unforced (7 FH, 1 BH), including 3 runaround FHS
- 6 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (43/65) 66%
Break Points
Djokovic 3/10 (5 games)
Massu 2/4 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Djokovic 17 (10 FH, 6 BH, 1 BHV)
Massu 19 (13 FH, 2 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Djokovic's FHs - 6 cc (1 pass, 1 at net), 3 inside-out, 1 inside-in/cc at net
- BHs - 4 dtl (1 return, 1 pass), 1 inside-out, 1 drop shot
Massu's FHs - 1 cc at net, 4 dtl (1 pass at net), 2 inside-out, 4 inside-in, 1 longline/cc, 1 drop shot
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl pass at net
- the OH was on the bounce
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Djokovic 32
- 24 Unforced (14 FH, 10 BH)
- 8 Forced (5 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV)... the FHV was baseline pass attempt (not swinging)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.1
Massu 37
- 23 Unforced (14 FH, 8 BH, 1 BHV)
- 14 Forced (8 FH, 4 BH, 1 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.3
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Djokovic was 7/9 (78%) at net, with...
- 2/2 forced back/retreated
Massu was...
- 9/15 (60%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying, a 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Good, hard hitting match from both players. Djokovic is just a little better at a few things - returning (both consistency and handling force), getting a few more first serves in, vigour of the BH, defence - to come up on top. Court is quick for clay, with comfy stomach high bounce ideal for ripping balls
Djoko winning just 3 more points in the match looks odd, but that’s due to Massu’s service games getting extended. Djoko also serves 21 fewer points. In percentages, he wins 51.0% of points while serving 43%
Break points - Djoko 3/10 (5 games), Massu 2/4 (3 games)
Along with Djoko always being the one to be up a break, that’s fairly comfy for him. Only time he’s in trouble when down 0-3 in the tiebreak (1 mini-break, a double fault). The game prior is a 16 point hold for Massu, who has to save a set point in it
The two players play similarly, with aforementioned small edge for Djoko in a few areas. The only one where Massu has one is in volume of grunting - and its much more than a ‘small edge’. It’s the most ferocious grunt I’ve heard, like the kind a karate master unleashes. Not necessarily a good thing as he telegraphs when he’s about to hit particularly big, particularly the FH, but he does it even with the serve. It sounds as if its designed to intimidate and he does draw it out to unnecessarily too
Serve & Return
Both serve heartily, including second serves (Djoko has 2, Massu 1 second serve aces). Massu goes well beyond ‘heartily’ in second set to ‘very big’, where he’s banging them down at Andy Roddick levels of power
1st serve unreturnable rate - Djoko 17%, Massu 28%
Very high figures for clay (albeit, quick for clay), with Massu having substantially bigger serve coming through. Probably worth serving at a slightly lower in-count (Djoko serves at 53%, Massu 45%)
But Djoko leads unreturneds 32% - 26%. That’s advantage number 1, the return. Against hefty or powerful but not too wide serves (not necessarily first serves either), Djoko doesn’t take a step back and smacks them back without missing much. Massu is apt to miss or not hit as cleanly to give up softer return. Djoko’s also able to stretch and lunge to fend a few big first serves back while Massu rarely faces such serves
Return errors breakdown
- UEs - Djoko 4, Massu 8
- FEs - both 6
(1 Djoko error is unknown, probably a UE)
Djoko also delivering a few troublingly deep returns down the middle without strain. When Massu gets a strong return off by contrast, its an effort shot - usually accompanied by lion’s roar
Second serve points won - Djoko 50%, Massu 51%
Indicator of match being more hard-court like than clay, Massu not trailing much in court action. Also, justifying his low in count. If he can win a big load of first serves wantonly going all in (which he only does in second set), 51% second serve points is good enough to probably win. And the way he serves in second set, looks like that’s liable to happen
First serve points won - Djoko 75%, Massu 68%
… and Massu’s first serve points in second set, when he’s full-blasting every first serve, is actually the lowest winning rate by either player in a set. Wins 62%, with other numbers being 69%, 78% and 70%
The problems of serving even that big to someone that returns like Djoko. If its not wide on top of humongous (and when its humongous, its less likely to be wide), its apt to be smacked back just as hard - and now it’s the server that’s in frying pan. Literally, return to sender
This was Djokovic’s first title and he was 19 years old. Massu was seeded 4th, Djokovic 3rd
Djokovic won 80 points, Massu 77
[Note: I’m missing partial data for the following
Set 1, Game 2, Point 4 - serve direction, corresponding return and return error unknown (probably to BH and UE, but not marked)]
Serve Stats
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (36/68) 53%
- 1st serve points won (27/36) 75%
- 2nd serve points won (16/32) 50%
- Aces 7 (2 second serves), Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (22/68) 32%
Massu...
- 1st serve percentage (40/89) 45%
- 1st serve points won (27/40) 68%
- 2nd serve points won (25/49) 51%
- Aces 11 (1 second serve), Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (23/89) 26%
Serve Pattern
Djokovic served...
- to FH 48%
- to BH 49%
- to Body 3%
Massu served...
- to FH 25%
- to BH 73%
- to Body 2%
Return Stats
Djokovic made...
- 62 (15 FH, 47 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 6 Forced (6 BH)
- 1 ?? (against a second serve)
- Return Rate (62/85) 73%
Massu made...
- 43 (27 FH, 16 BH), including 7 runaround FHs
- 14 Errors, comprising...
- 8 Unforced (7 FH, 1 BH), including 3 runaround FHS
- 6 Forced (3 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (43/65) 66%
Break Points
Djokovic 3/10 (5 games)
Massu 2/4 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Djokovic 17 (10 FH, 6 BH, 1 BHV)
Massu 19 (13 FH, 2 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Djokovic's FHs - 6 cc (1 pass, 1 at net), 3 inside-out, 1 inside-in/cc at net
- BHs - 4 dtl (1 return, 1 pass), 1 inside-out, 1 drop shot
Massu's FHs - 1 cc at net, 4 dtl (1 pass at net), 2 inside-out, 4 inside-in, 1 longline/cc, 1 drop shot
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl pass at net
- the OH was on the bounce
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Djokovic 32
- 24 Unforced (14 FH, 10 BH)
- 8 Forced (5 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV)... the FHV was baseline pass attempt (not swinging)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.1
Massu 37
- 23 Unforced (14 FH, 8 BH, 1 BHV)
- 14 Forced (8 FH, 4 BH, 1 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.3
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Djokovic was 7/9 (78%) at net, with...
- 2/2 forced back/retreated
Massu was...
- 9/15 (60%) at net, including...
- 0/1 serve-volleying, a 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Good, hard hitting match from both players. Djokovic is just a little better at a few things - returning (both consistency and handling force), getting a few more first serves in, vigour of the BH, defence - to come up on top. Court is quick for clay, with comfy stomach high bounce ideal for ripping balls
Djoko winning just 3 more points in the match looks odd, but that’s due to Massu’s service games getting extended. Djoko also serves 21 fewer points. In percentages, he wins 51.0% of points while serving 43%
Break points - Djoko 3/10 (5 games), Massu 2/4 (3 games)
Along with Djoko always being the one to be up a break, that’s fairly comfy for him. Only time he’s in trouble when down 0-3 in the tiebreak (1 mini-break, a double fault). The game prior is a 16 point hold for Massu, who has to save a set point in it
The two players play similarly, with aforementioned small edge for Djoko in a few areas. The only one where Massu has one is in volume of grunting - and its much more than a ‘small edge’. It’s the most ferocious grunt I’ve heard, like the kind a karate master unleashes. Not necessarily a good thing as he telegraphs when he’s about to hit particularly big, particularly the FH, but he does it even with the serve. It sounds as if its designed to intimidate and he does draw it out to unnecessarily too
Serve & Return
Both serve heartily, including second serves (Djoko has 2, Massu 1 second serve aces). Massu goes well beyond ‘heartily’ in second set to ‘very big’, where he’s banging them down at Andy Roddick levels of power
1st serve unreturnable rate - Djoko 17%, Massu 28%
Very high figures for clay (albeit, quick for clay), with Massu having substantially bigger serve coming through. Probably worth serving at a slightly lower in-count (Djoko serves at 53%, Massu 45%)
But Djoko leads unreturneds 32% - 26%. That’s advantage number 1, the return. Against hefty or powerful but not too wide serves (not necessarily first serves either), Djoko doesn’t take a step back and smacks them back without missing much. Massu is apt to miss or not hit as cleanly to give up softer return. Djoko’s also able to stretch and lunge to fend a few big first serves back while Massu rarely faces such serves
Return errors breakdown
- UEs - Djoko 4, Massu 8
- FEs - both 6
(1 Djoko error is unknown, probably a UE)
Djoko also delivering a few troublingly deep returns down the middle without strain. When Massu gets a strong return off by contrast, its an effort shot - usually accompanied by lion’s roar
Second serve points won - Djoko 50%, Massu 51%
Indicator of match being more hard-court like than clay, Massu not trailing much in court action. Also, justifying his low in count. If he can win a big load of first serves wantonly going all in (which he only does in second set), 51% second serve points is good enough to probably win. And the way he serves in second set, looks like that’s liable to happen
First serve points won - Djoko 75%, Massu 68%
… and Massu’s first serve points in second set, when he’s full-blasting every first serve, is actually the lowest winning rate by either player in a set. Wins 62%, with other numbers being 69%, 78% and 70%
The problems of serving even that big to someone that returns like Djoko. If its not wide on top of humongous (and when its humongous, its less likely to be wide), its apt to be smacked back just as hard - and now it’s the server that’s in frying pan. Literally, return to sender