Match Stats/Report - Djokovic vs Murray, Australian Open final, 2011

Waspsting

Hall of Fame
Novak Djokovic beat Andy Murray 6-4, 6-2, 6-3 in the Australian Open final, 2011 on hard court

It was Djokovic's second title at the event and he would go onto win the next 2 years as well. Murray had been runner-up the previous year and won the pair's last 3 matches. The two would go onto contest the finals in 2013, 2015 and 2016 as well a semi the following year, with Djokovic winning all the matches

Djokovic won 106 points, Murray 78

Serve Stats
Djokovic...
- 1st serve percentage (50/75) 67%
- 1st serve points won (35/50) 70%
- 2nd serve points won (15/25) 60%
- Aces 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (15/75) 20%

Murray...
- 1st serve percentage (58/109) 53%
- 1st serve points won (37/58) 64%
- 2nd serve points won (16/51) 31%
- Aces 6, Service Winners 3 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (28/109) 26%

Serve Patterns
Djokovic served...
- to FH 55%
- to BH 40%
- to Body 5%

Murray served...
- to FH 40%
- to BH 51%
- to Body 9%

Return Stats
Djokovic made...
- 77 (32 FH, 45 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 19 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (2 FH, 3 BH)
- 14 Forced (9 FH, 5 BH)
- Return Rate (77/105) 73%

Murray made...
- 60 (35 FH, 25 BH)
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH)
- 8 Forced (3 FH, 5 BH)
- Return Rate (60/75) 80%

Break Points
Djokovic 7/18 (10 games)
Murray 3/4 (3 game)

Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Djokovic 20 (11 FH, 5 BH, 2 FHV, 2 OH)
Murray 12 (8 FH, 2 BH, 2 OH)

Djokovic's FHs - 2 cc, 2 dtl (1 pass), 5 inside-out, 1 inside-in and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass at net), 2 dtl (1 pass) and 1 lob

Murray's FHs - 1 cc return, 3 dtl (1 pass), 3 inside-out (1 at net) and 1 inside-in/cc
- BHs - 1 cc pass and 1 dtl

Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Djokovic 38
- 30 Unforced (15 FH, 13 BH, 1 FHV, 1 OH)... with 1 non-net swinging FHV
- 8 Forced (5 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50.7

Murray 67
- 54 Unforced (22 FH, 28 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
- 13 Forced (7 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.4

(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)

(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)

Net Points & Serve-Volley
Djokovic was...
- 7/12 (58%) at net, with...
- 0/1 retreated

Murray was...
- 6/20 (30%) at net, with...
- 1/4 (25%) forced back/retreated

Match Report
Djokovic is solid enough and often impressive in his hard hitting, while Murray is poor of consistency and passive of play in a one-sided and dull match on a slow-ish hard court

The two play similarly. Both serve solidly and return very well. Play is ball bashing of nature, usually around middle of court. Djokovic hits harder, deeper and far more consistently while also being more willing to attack with wide shots. Djokovic defends excellently often and well overall while Murray's stomach for it varies across match

Djoko lead the baseline hitting in first set - hitting harder and looking to attack or at least, beat down Murray. Murray counter-punches. Missing a fair few winner attempts, Djoko largely tones down to beat down play. The set ends with sole break, ironically in one of the more attacking games Murray plays. Couple of excellent points from Djokovic in it, especially one where he defends with gusto before taking control of point and finish at net

Murray had been passive, if not poor in first set and that drops to poor and error riddled in second. Djoko stays solid and playing beat down baseline stuff and Murray caves. Djoko has break point for the bagel, but misses an attacking return. Murray not only holds, but breaks to love to follow before Djoko breaks again to wrap up the set

Third set is best of bunch, though coloured by Murray looking like a frustrated dying duck. He breaks to open but plays a very poor game ending with an OH miss to be broken back. Djoko breaks again next chance in an 18 point game, ending with a great BH dtl pass winner after being on the defensive all point. Murray breaks back at once - and consolidates after saving 2 more break points. From 3-3, Djoko wins next 3 games. Murray hits harder and looks to step up more and come to net in this set, while also appearing tired enough to not move well and miss regulation shots. His play is probably at its best, but contrasts with whiney behavior. Curiously, Djoko wins just 10/21 first serve points but 7/9 second in the set. Some great defensive play from him in particular in the set

Serve, Return & Play
Just solid serving from both, while the returning is excellent. Djoko's large superiority in play is key, not the serve-return complex

As such, he doesn't go for much on the serve and lands 67% first serves in. Murray is just 53% - and that's with holding back on the big serve most of the time. He needs to, to get a higher lot in since he's winning just 31% second serve points, but 53% in while holding back is particularly low

Terrific 80% return rate by Murray, while Djoko is still good 73%. Both return firmly in a way that server would need to actively be looking to seize control of point. Djoko gets a higher lot deep to baseline or particularly powerfully to put Murray on defensive, but that's the exception not the norm. Some particularly good returning by Djoko against powerful, wide serves that he doesn't just put back in play, but gets back quite firmly too. Murray has similar returns, but against less challenging serves

Second serve points won - Djoko 60%, Murray 31% speaks to how the two stack up in play

Much of play is closed court ball bashing. Djoko usually hits harder and deeper. By his standard, not particularly deep. And he's more consistent. How much and for what reason varies a bit. For most of match, Murray's remains well behind baseline and is the reactive partner in the neutral rallies (its mostly neutral, not attacker-defender dynamic) and gets beat down. Other times he moves poorly or just misses regulation shots

Djoko also takes up attacking more, especially with the FH. And misses quite a lot so doing. A full 46% of his UEs are winner attempts to just 11% of Murray's. Not a problem for Djoko since he can just fall back on the ball-bashing rallies to come out ahead. From neutral, he occasionally shifts to mildly attacking with wide shots and moving Murray around a bit.

Murray's movements and defensive play varies. Its quite good early but gets choppy second set onward, with some tired/lazy looking shots. Still, inconsistency in neutral play is a bigger problem for him than poor defence. Djoko's defence is excellent, though not tested much. Murray tends to fall back to neutral when Djoko runs down a few balls defensively. credit Djoko's defence, and the electrically quick way he moves into position for shots afterwards, but weak from Murray. He's essentially counting on outlasting Djoko from baseline, which is the opposite of what actually happens

Murray's at his least passive in final set when he steps up, hits harder and looks to come to net more. It doesn't go well and he's a very poor 6/20 at net, a combination of missing regulation volleys, poor movement and some outstanding passes and defensive lobbing from Djokovic involved in that number

Key difference is in UEs. Djoko has 30, Murray 54. All but 1 of Djoko's and 4 of Murray's are baseline shots. That's in the context of Djoko leading rallies by hitting harder, deeper, playing closer to baseline and turning to attack more (he's +8 on winners and +5 on errors forced) - and the mismatch is clear. Note also very large gap in UEFI - Djoko very high 50.7, Murray 44.4

Breakdown of UEs
- Neutral - Djoko 12, Murray 36
- Attacking - Djoko 4, Murray 12
- Winner Attempts - Djoko 14, Murray 6

Counter-punching as he does, Murray would need to be far more consistent on neutral UEs and defend well enough/have Djokovic mess up attacking to be competitive. He doesn't get close in any area

Summing up, drab, closed-court ball bashing match. Positive standouts include both players returning and Djokovic's defending when called upon. Djoko plays pretty well - hitting hard and leading play, willing to attack but not needing to and smartly enough, falling back to ball bashing when attacking isn't as effective as he'd like. More negatives than positives though, with Murray passive and inconsistent from the back, and wearing a distinct lack of heart on his sleeve through most of it

Stats for Djoko's semi with Roger Federer - Duel Match Stats/Report - Djokovic vs Federer, Australian Open semi-final & Dubai final, 2011 | Talk Tennis (tennis-warehouse.com)
Stats for '10 final between Murray and Federer - Match Stats/Report - Federer vs Murray, Australian Open final, 2010 | Talk Tennis (tennis-warehouse.com)
Stats for the '12 final between Djokovic and and Rafael Nadal - Match Stats/Report - Djokovic vs Nadal, Australian Open final 2012 | Talk Tennis (tennis-warehouse.com)
 
Ah fook, the bump made me think Wasp was back :(
200w.gif
 
Murray was utterly abysmal in this match. Absolutely destroyed and humilated :-D

Shocking Slam finalist tbh even adjusting for competition
 
Murray was utterly abysmal in this match. Absolutely destroyed and humilated :-D

Shocking Slam finalist tbh even adjusting for competition

Well that can hardly be the whole picture can it when he beat this same guy in TWO Slam finals! :rolleyes:
 
Well that can hardly be the whole picture can it when he beat this same guy in TWO Slam finals! :rolleyes:
That is because of Ivan Lendl coaching and some help from the wind maybe. While Murray was never favorite over Djokovic, he did have game to outgrind occasionally.
 
That is because of Ivan Lendl coaching and some help from the wind maybe. While Murray was never favorite over Djokovic, he did have game to outgrind occasionally.

Well good for Ivan and Murray's straight sets demolition of Djokovic in the 2013 Wimby final on a sunny, windless day proved that he didn't need adverse weather conditions to beat him.
 
Well good for Ivan and Murray's straight sets demolition of Djokovic in the 2013 Wimby final on a sunny, windless day proved that he didn't need adverse weather conditions to beat him.
2013 Wimbledon is like 3 years away from this match though.

Murray withdrew from RG and had perfect preparation. Federer out Nadal out. His competition till the final was easy.

Djokovic played Berdych in QF Delpo in sf. But ok.
 
2013 Wimbledon is like 3 years away from this match though.

Murray withdrew from RG and had perfect preparation. Federer out Nadal out. His competition till the final was easy.

Djokovic played Berdych in QF Delpo in sf. But ok.

3 years away from what match? The 2013 Wimbledon final was less than a year after 2012 US Open.

Murray had to withdraw from RG because his back was starting to give him problems and he wanted to make sure he was fit enough for the grass. Before the end of the season he was forced to undergo back surgery.
 
3 years away from what match? The 2013 Wimbledon final was less than a year after 2012 US Open.

Murray had to withdraw from RG because his back was starting to give him problems and he wanted to make sure he was fit enough for the grass. Before the end of the season he was forced to undergo back surgery.
We are not talking USOpen 2012. The OP match is 2011 Australia. Murray was not a strong finalist without Ivan Lendl. Do you agree.
 
About the same probably. At the start of 2011 Djokovic 2.0 made his appearance and he took everybody by surprise. I think Murray underestimated him in that match and became his first victim of that season.
It was about the same

This match Djokovic won 106 pts and Murray 78
In that match Nadal won 106 pts and Djokovic 77
 
  • Like
Reactions: RS
Some light weight. Before Lendl came along (end of 2011) Murray had already beaten Djokovic in 3 Masters finals.
Yes and that was most impressive when Novak was playing catch up with fedal. So was Murray.

Zverev has won 2 big finals vs Nole in Rome, 1 in ATP finals while he did beat Djokovic in another ATP finals and Olympics sf. But that means almost nothing as Zverev never made it to Djokovic or lost to him convincingly in slams.
 
Well good for Ivan and Murray's straight sets demolition of Djokovic in the 2013 Wimby final on a sunny, windless day proved that he didn't need adverse weather conditions to beat him.
Marathon against Del Potro certainly helped Murray
 
Back
Top