Jack Draper beat Holger Rune 6-2, 6-2 in the Indian Wells final, 2025 on hard court
It was Draper’s first Masters final and Rune’s first on outdoor hard court. In the semi-final, Draper beat Carlos Alcaraz and Rune beat Daniil Medvedev, who had played the last 2 finals at the event (Alcaraz won both)
Draper won 59 points, Rune 39
Serve Stats
Draper...
- 1st serve percentage (26/46) 57%
- 1st serve points won (24/26) 92%
- 2nd serve points won (10/20) 50%
- Aces 10
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (18/46) 39%
Rune...
- 1st serve percentage (34/52) 65%
- 1st serve points won (20/34) 59%
- 2nd serve points won (7/18) 39%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (9/52) 17%
Serve Pattern
Draper served...
- to FH 37%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 13%
Rune served...
- to FH 34%
- to BH 60%
- to Body 6%
Return Stats
Draper made...
- 41 (18 FH, 23 BH), including 4 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 8 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 4 Forced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- Return Rate (41/50) 82%
Rune made...
- 28 (12 FH, 16 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 8 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (4 FH), including 1 runaround FH
- 4 Forced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (28/46) 61%
Break Points
Draper 4/7 (5 games)
Rune 0
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Draper 11 (5 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV, 2 OH)
Rune 6 (5 FH, 1 BH)
Draper's FHs - 2 cc, 1 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 inside-in/longline
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 down-the-middle/inside-out return pass (that Rune left), 1 drop shot at net
- both OHs were on the bounce
Rune's FHs - 4 cc (1 pass), 1 dtl
- BH - 1 longline at net
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Draper 24
- 15 Unforced (10 FH, 4 BH, 1 OH)... the OH was on the bounce from the baseline
- 9 Forced (6 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.7
Rune 28
- 20 Unforced (14 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- 8 Forced (4 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Draper was 6/9 (67%) at net
Rune was...
- 4/9 (44%) at net, including...
- 1/2 serve-volleying, both 1st serves
Match Report
Just what 2 & 2 looks like; a thorough crushing. Effective serving from Draper is behind most of it, the progression of winner rushing into early leads in both sets enhances perception of it. Flurry of aces aside, Draper appears to control and boss action too. Rune is out of sorts, troubled by high bounce, loose off the ground, regularly slow to react. Court is very slow, with very high bounce
Aces - Draper 10, Rune 1. That’s 38% off first serves for Draper, 3% for Rune
Draper opens up 4-0 lead in first set, and has break point for 5-0
And Draper breaks to start second set, and takes Rune to deuce before first change-over in the set
In other words, Draper always ahead in both sets
Funny thing is, per stats, he doesn’t actually dominate things as much as he appears to
Sans aces unreturned serves - Draper 22%, Rune 16% (they have identical 8 return errors - 4 UEs, 4 FEs, with Draper facing more serves)
FHs UEs - Draper 10, Rune 14 (both have 5 winners)
BHs UEs - Draper 4, Rune 5 (Draper has 3-1 winners advantage)
FEs - Draper 9, Rune 8
Net points won - Draper 6, Rune 4 (both at net 9 times)
Just small advantages for Draper in most areas. A FH UE or 2 more for Rune, a BH winner or 2 more for Draper, same number of return errors with Draper facing a few more serves, Draper winning couple more net points - small stuff
Aces (10-1) and first serve ace rate (38% to 3%) is only substantial difference
‘Substantial’ might be understating it
It turns what could be a tussle into a 2 & 2 boxing, with Draper winning 60% points serving 47% of them and break points reading 4/7 (5 games) to 0 in his favour
Another way of breaking match down is by point type
Draper wins 92% first serve points
All other points, Draper wins 35 points, Rune 37
Draper really, really making hay with his first serve but almost as importantly, returning well enough to effectively turn Rune’s first serve into a ‘second’ one (as in, near 50-50 prospects - Rune wins 59% first serve points)
First serve in - Draper 57%, Rune 65%
First serve ace rate - Draper 38%, Rune 3%
Unreturned serves - Draper 39%, Rune 17%
Good, hefty serve from Draper, but not overwhelming. Has the lefty’s slinginess going for it and Rune with no read. Along with no read, sometimes a little slow to react from Rune. It’s a very slow court and wouldn’t expect such a freebie or ace rate. Rune’s serve isn’t actually much smaller, though not as well placed. With Draper’s placement being very good
Lots of credit to Draper too for the consistency in returning. He stays pretty far, 4-6 paces back to return, and is able to return without leaving easy initiative off third ball. Very solid stuff at 82% return rate
Identical 8 return errors (4 UEs, 4 FEs) for the two players
The lefty Draper looks to play FHs whenever he can. Big cuts and big spin on it. Prefers to go inside-out to Rune’s FH, which he seems to have signalled out as weak side. BHs solidly firm struck shot too. Least bothered in cc rallies with Rune’s FH
Rune struggles with the bounce. Balls up to his shoulders often. Flays quick errors and FH can’t pack much punch. He looks to hit inside-out’ish from middle of court - more to hit to open court and ‘attack’ (he misses quickly and shots don’t have enough pace to be troubling even when makes them) than to breakdown Draper’s FH. Subtly different from Draper’s use of FH inside-out
Not to crazy degree. Plays back cc to Draper’s BH too
Draper’s BH just fine trading cc shots. If anything, looking, more solid shot. And not too bothered on the on-the-move FHs against the inside-out’ish stuff
Rune’s BH doesn’t see much action
Occasionally, Rune finds a rocket of line FH. Amidst sloppy errors, and unreliable on the running FH, he does find the odd winning FH longline
And his movement and reactions are off both on the return and in play. Makes heavier weather off a few running FHs than the ball presented warrants. On the return, slow reaction has hand in all the aces he suffers
Draper’s game drops after going up a break in second set. Aces dry up and he turns to trying to play drop shots. Does so badly, makes a few errors trying. At his best in first set and a bit, he’s commanding. The spin he gets on his FH being so troubling to Rune is credit to him
It was Draper’s first Masters final and Rune’s first on outdoor hard court. In the semi-final, Draper beat Carlos Alcaraz and Rune beat Daniil Medvedev, who had played the last 2 finals at the event (Alcaraz won both)
Draper won 59 points, Rune 39
Serve Stats
Draper...
- 1st serve percentage (26/46) 57%
- 1st serve points won (24/26) 92%
- 2nd serve points won (10/20) 50%
- Aces 10
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (18/46) 39%
Rune...
- 1st serve percentage (34/52) 65%
- 1st serve points won (20/34) 59%
- 2nd serve points won (7/18) 39%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (9/52) 17%
Serve Pattern
Draper served...
- to FH 37%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 13%
Rune served...
- to FH 34%
- to BH 60%
- to Body 6%
Return Stats
Draper made...
- 41 (18 FH, 23 BH), including 4 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 8 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 4 Forced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- Return Rate (41/50) 82%
Rune made...
- 28 (12 FH, 16 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 8 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (4 FH), including 1 runaround FH
- 4 Forced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (28/46) 61%
Break Points
Draper 4/7 (5 games)
Rune 0
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Draper 11 (5 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV, 2 OH)
Rune 6 (5 FH, 1 BH)
Draper's FHs - 2 cc, 1 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 inside-in/longline
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 down-the-middle/inside-out return pass (that Rune left), 1 drop shot at net
- both OHs were on the bounce
Rune's FHs - 4 cc (1 pass), 1 dtl
- BH - 1 longline at net
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Draper 24
- 15 Unforced (10 FH, 4 BH, 1 OH)... the OH was on the bounce from the baseline
- 9 Forced (6 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.7
Rune 28
- 20 Unforced (14 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- 8 Forced (4 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Draper was 6/9 (67%) at net
Rune was...
- 4/9 (44%) at net, including...
- 1/2 serve-volleying, both 1st serves
Match Report
Just what 2 & 2 looks like; a thorough crushing. Effective serving from Draper is behind most of it, the progression of winner rushing into early leads in both sets enhances perception of it. Flurry of aces aside, Draper appears to control and boss action too. Rune is out of sorts, troubled by high bounce, loose off the ground, regularly slow to react. Court is very slow, with very high bounce
Aces - Draper 10, Rune 1. That’s 38% off first serves for Draper, 3% for Rune
Draper opens up 4-0 lead in first set, and has break point for 5-0
And Draper breaks to start second set, and takes Rune to deuce before first change-over in the set
In other words, Draper always ahead in both sets
Funny thing is, per stats, he doesn’t actually dominate things as much as he appears to
Sans aces unreturned serves - Draper 22%, Rune 16% (they have identical 8 return errors - 4 UEs, 4 FEs, with Draper facing more serves)
FHs UEs - Draper 10, Rune 14 (both have 5 winners)
BHs UEs - Draper 4, Rune 5 (Draper has 3-1 winners advantage)
FEs - Draper 9, Rune 8
Net points won - Draper 6, Rune 4 (both at net 9 times)
Just small advantages for Draper in most areas. A FH UE or 2 more for Rune, a BH winner or 2 more for Draper, same number of return errors with Draper facing a few more serves, Draper winning couple more net points - small stuff
Aces (10-1) and first serve ace rate (38% to 3%) is only substantial difference
‘Substantial’ might be understating it
It turns what could be a tussle into a 2 & 2 boxing, with Draper winning 60% points serving 47% of them and break points reading 4/7 (5 games) to 0 in his favour
Another way of breaking match down is by point type
Draper wins 92% first serve points
All other points, Draper wins 35 points, Rune 37
Draper really, really making hay with his first serve but almost as importantly, returning well enough to effectively turn Rune’s first serve into a ‘second’ one (as in, near 50-50 prospects - Rune wins 59% first serve points)
First serve in - Draper 57%, Rune 65%
First serve ace rate - Draper 38%, Rune 3%
Unreturned serves - Draper 39%, Rune 17%
Good, hefty serve from Draper, but not overwhelming. Has the lefty’s slinginess going for it and Rune with no read. Along with no read, sometimes a little slow to react from Rune. It’s a very slow court and wouldn’t expect such a freebie or ace rate. Rune’s serve isn’t actually much smaller, though not as well placed. With Draper’s placement being very good
Lots of credit to Draper too for the consistency in returning. He stays pretty far, 4-6 paces back to return, and is able to return without leaving easy initiative off third ball. Very solid stuff at 82% return rate
Identical 8 return errors (4 UEs, 4 FEs) for the two players
The lefty Draper looks to play FHs whenever he can. Big cuts and big spin on it. Prefers to go inside-out to Rune’s FH, which he seems to have signalled out as weak side. BHs solidly firm struck shot too. Least bothered in cc rallies with Rune’s FH
Rune struggles with the bounce. Balls up to his shoulders often. Flays quick errors and FH can’t pack much punch. He looks to hit inside-out’ish from middle of court - more to hit to open court and ‘attack’ (he misses quickly and shots don’t have enough pace to be troubling even when makes them) than to breakdown Draper’s FH. Subtly different from Draper’s use of FH inside-out
Not to crazy degree. Plays back cc to Draper’s BH too
Draper’s BH just fine trading cc shots. If anything, looking, more solid shot. And not too bothered on the on-the-move FHs against the inside-out’ish stuff
Rune’s BH doesn’t see much action
Occasionally, Rune finds a rocket of line FH. Amidst sloppy errors, and unreliable on the running FH, he does find the odd winning FH longline
And his movement and reactions are off both on the return and in play. Makes heavier weather off a few running FHs than the ball presented warrants. On the return, slow reaction has hand in all the aces he suffers
Draper’s game drops after going up a break in second set. Aces dry up and he turns to trying to play drop shots. Does so badly, makes a few errors trying. At his best in first set and a bit, he’s commanding. The spin he gets on his FH being so troubling to Rune is credit to him