Stefan Edberg beat Ivan Lendl 6-1, 7-5, 6-0 in the Tokyo Outdoor final, 1991 on hard court
Edberg was ranked #1, Lendl #3. The two had met earlier in year at Australian Open semi (Lendl winning) and would go onto again later in the year at the US Open semi (Edberg would win) . Edberg was the double defending champion and would go onto win the Tokyo Indoor on carpet late in the year also
Edberg won 95 points, Lendl 62
Edberg serve-volleyed off all but 5 first serves and regularly off seconds
Serve Stats
Edberg...
- 1st serve percentage (53/81) 65%
- 1st serve points won (39/53) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (13/28) 46%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (24/81) 30%
Lendl...
- 1st serve percentage (42/76) 55%
- 1st serve points won (22/42) 52%
- 2nd serve points won (11/34) 32%
- Aces 4
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (13/76) 17%
Serve Patterns
Edberg served...
- to FH 19%
- to BH 60%
- to Body 21%
Lendl served...
- to FH 32%
- to BH 61%
- to Body 7%
Return Stats
Edberg made...
- 61 (20 FH, 41 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 8 return-approaches
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 5 Forced (1 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (61/74) 82%
Lendl made...
- 56 (9 FH, 47 BH)
- 4 Winners (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 23 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 BH)
- 22 Forced (6 FH, 16 BH)
- Return Rate (56/80) 70%
Break Points
Edberg 8/14 (8 games)
Lendl 2/4 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Edberg 24 (3 FH, 3 BH, 7 FHV, 8 BHV, 3 OH)
Lendl 24 (9 FH, 10 BH, 1 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
Edberg had 8 from serve-volley points
- 3 first volleys (1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- 4 second volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
- 1 third volley (1 BHV)... which can reasonably be called a re-approach volley
- 2 from return-approach points (2 FHV)
- 1 other FHV can reasonably be called an OH
- FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl pass and 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl at net
- BHs - 1 cc slice and 2 dtl (1 pass)
Lendl's FH passes - 3 cc and 1 dtl at net
- regular FHs - 2 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in return and 1 drop shot
- BHs (all passes) - 6 cc (3 returns)... 1 of the non-returns was a net chord flicker and 4 dtl
- 2 from serve-volley points, both first volley BHVs
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Edberg 24
- 14 Unforced (2 FH, 7 BH, 4 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 BH at net
- 10 Forced (2 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50.7
Lendl 45
- 16 Unforced (7 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 29 Forced (10 FH, 12 BH, 1 FH1/2V, 4 BHV, 2 BH1/2V)... with 1 BHV from baseline
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.5
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Edberg was...
- 62/85 (73%) at net, including...
- 40/59 (68%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 33/47 (70%) off 1st serve and...
- 7/12 (58%) off 2nd serve
---
- 7/8 (88%) return-approaching
- 1/1 retreated
Lendl was...
- 12/25 (48%) at net, including...
- 4/6 (67%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
Match Report
Poised and polished from Edberg, especially from the baseline. The Edberg serve-volleying vs Lendl return-passing contest is on mundane side. Lendl's play is often erratic. Conditions are on the slow side of normal but with slices staying very low
Both players sub-50% on their second serve points isn't unusual against good returners with strong court games, but Lendl is particularly poor winning just 32%. Coupled with a very ordinary 52% first serve points, he's left in huge hole on serve, holding 4 times while being broken 8. He's not bad, in a very unsubtle way, in return games
Edberg serve-volleys 90% off the time off 1st serves and 44% off 2nds. He does a lot better serve-volleying off second serves (winning 58%) than he does staying back (winning 40%, excluding his sole double fault)
Edberg's serve-volleying vs Lendl return-passing
Lendl belts returns at the serve-volleying Edberg. No chips, no blocks, no pushes - everything gets whacked
He's decent at it. Gets cramped by Edberg's body and body-ish serving. 21% of Edberg's serves are to the body and a lot more are close to it on BH side. Wouldn't be difficult, given its predictability to move around to hit FHs, but Lendl seems to like whacking BHs. Not a single runaround FH, or even attempt
His power isn't overwhelming and his placement isn't nuanced. He gives Edberg above average power balls to volley first up, short of error forcingly strong, but hard enough where controlling the first volley is tough. Decent job by Edberg putting the volley in play (5 volley UEs, + a BH at net), but he doesn't do much with the ball, placing it so that Lendl has regulation passing shots. Not easy to volley into corners against such hard hit balls, but doable for Edberg
Lendl's poor on the regulation pass and misses over and over again. He goes for winners straight out - and misses lines or hits top of tape. 22 groundstroke FEs are almost of this sort. He barely makes a 1, or even gets Edberg to hit a second volley. Its all or nothing for Lendl on the pass, and almost always, turns out be nothing
The exception is when the return is low as well as powerful, giving a very difficult first volley that odds would be Edberg missing. Here, Edberg does well to make so many balls (just 3 FEs on the volley), but leaves run-in passes that Lendl can take from well inside court. And here Lendl shines, barely missing a pass. Virtually all of Lendl's 11 non-return pass winners are from this type of situation
Its not bad strategy from Lendl. He executes poorly on the regulation passes and may have been better of going for something less than an outright winner on them all the time. Still, not hard to understand the thinking against a volleyer like Edberg and Lendl's natural style is along these lines. In general, he's not a 1-2 passer and Edberg more often than not dominates against anything other very strong passing
Lendl serve vs Edberg return
Superb returning from Edberg and his very high 82% return rate is 1 of the keys to result. And the highlight of the returning are the approaches. Fairly heavy second serving from Lendl, who would be aware of dangers of Edberg taking net. Edberg picks his balls and gets his returns deep or/and wide to come in behind. And not necessarily against second serves
Just as impressive as winning 7/8 such plays is that he doesn't miss a return trying it. His normal returns are solidly neutralizing, and when he picks one to come in behind, his judgment is near perfect
Not big serving from Lendl and at not high 55% first serves in, his showing is below par, but more credit to Edberg for high consistency while being neutralizing with the return and spiking it with top class return-approaches
Edberg was ranked #1, Lendl #3. The two had met earlier in year at Australian Open semi (Lendl winning) and would go onto again later in the year at the US Open semi (Edberg would win) . Edberg was the double defending champion and would go onto win the Tokyo Indoor on carpet late in the year also
Edberg won 95 points, Lendl 62
Edberg serve-volleyed off all but 5 first serves and regularly off seconds
Serve Stats
Edberg...
- 1st serve percentage (53/81) 65%
- 1st serve points won (39/53) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (13/28) 46%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (24/81) 30%
Lendl...
- 1st serve percentage (42/76) 55%
- 1st serve points won (22/42) 52%
- 2nd serve points won (11/34) 32%
- Aces 4
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (13/76) 17%
Serve Patterns
Edberg served...
- to FH 19%
- to BH 60%
- to Body 21%
Lendl served...
- to FH 32%
- to BH 61%
- to Body 7%
Return Stats
Edberg made...
- 61 (20 FH, 41 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 8 return-approaches
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 5 Forced (1 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (61/74) 82%
Lendl made...
- 56 (9 FH, 47 BH)
- 4 Winners (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 23 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 BH)
- 22 Forced (6 FH, 16 BH)
- Return Rate (56/80) 70%
Break Points
Edberg 8/14 (8 games)
Lendl 2/4 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Edberg 24 (3 FH, 3 BH, 7 FHV, 8 BHV, 3 OH)
Lendl 24 (9 FH, 10 BH, 1 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
Edberg had 8 from serve-volley points
- 3 first volleys (1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- 4 second volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
- 1 third volley (1 BHV)... which can reasonably be called a re-approach volley
- 2 from return-approach points (2 FHV)
- 1 other FHV can reasonably be called an OH
- FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl pass and 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl at net
- BHs - 1 cc slice and 2 dtl (1 pass)
Lendl's FH passes - 3 cc and 1 dtl at net
- regular FHs - 2 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in return and 1 drop shot
- BHs (all passes) - 6 cc (3 returns)... 1 of the non-returns was a net chord flicker and 4 dtl
- 2 from serve-volley points, both first volley BHVs
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Edberg 24
- 14 Unforced (2 FH, 7 BH, 4 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 1 BH at net
- 10 Forced (2 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50.7
Lendl 45
- 16 Unforced (7 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 29 Forced (10 FH, 12 BH, 1 FH1/2V, 4 BHV, 2 BH1/2V)... with 1 BHV from baseline
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.5
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Edberg was...
- 62/85 (73%) at net, including...
- 40/59 (68%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 33/47 (70%) off 1st serve and...
- 7/12 (58%) off 2nd serve
---
- 7/8 (88%) return-approaching
- 1/1 retreated
Lendl was...
- 12/25 (48%) at net, including...
- 4/6 (67%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
Match Report
Poised and polished from Edberg, especially from the baseline. The Edberg serve-volleying vs Lendl return-passing contest is on mundane side. Lendl's play is often erratic. Conditions are on the slow side of normal but with slices staying very low
Both players sub-50% on their second serve points isn't unusual against good returners with strong court games, but Lendl is particularly poor winning just 32%. Coupled with a very ordinary 52% first serve points, he's left in huge hole on serve, holding 4 times while being broken 8. He's not bad, in a very unsubtle way, in return games
Edberg serve-volleys 90% off the time off 1st serves and 44% off 2nds. He does a lot better serve-volleying off second serves (winning 58%) than he does staying back (winning 40%, excluding his sole double fault)
Edberg's serve-volleying vs Lendl return-passing
Lendl belts returns at the serve-volleying Edberg. No chips, no blocks, no pushes - everything gets whacked
He's decent at it. Gets cramped by Edberg's body and body-ish serving. 21% of Edberg's serves are to the body and a lot more are close to it on BH side. Wouldn't be difficult, given its predictability to move around to hit FHs, but Lendl seems to like whacking BHs. Not a single runaround FH, or even attempt
His power isn't overwhelming and his placement isn't nuanced. He gives Edberg above average power balls to volley first up, short of error forcingly strong, but hard enough where controlling the first volley is tough. Decent job by Edberg putting the volley in play (5 volley UEs, + a BH at net), but he doesn't do much with the ball, placing it so that Lendl has regulation passing shots. Not easy to volley into corners against such hard hit balls, but doable for Edberg
Lendl's poor on the regulation pass and misses over and over again. He goes for winners straight out - and misses lines or hits top of tape. 22 groundstroke FEs are almost of this sort. He barely makes a 1, or even gets Edberg to hit a second volley. Its all or nothing for Lendl on the pass, and almost always, turns out be nothing
The exception is when the return is low as well as powerful, giving a very difficult first volley that odds would be Edberg missing. Here, Edberg does well to make so many balls (just 3 FEs on the volley), but leaves run-in passes that Lendl can take from well inside court. And here Lendl shines, barely missing a pass. Virtually all of Lendl's 11 non-return pass winners are from this type of situation
Its not bad strategy from Lendl. He executes poorly on the regulation passes and may have been better of going for something less than an outright winner on them all the time. Still, not hard to understand the thinking against a volleyer like Edberg and Lendl's natural style is along these lines. In general, he's not a 1-2 passer and Edberg more often than not dominates against anything other very strong passing
Lendl serve vs Edberg return
Superb returning from Edberg and his very high 82% return rate is 1 of the keys to result. And the highlight of the returning are the approaches. Fairly heavy second serving from Lendl, who would be aware of dangers of Edberg taking net. Edberg picks his balls and gets his returns deep or/and wide to come in behind. And not necessarily against second serves
Just as impressive as winning 7/8 such plays is that he doesn't miss a return trying it. His normal returns are solidly neutralizing, and when he picks one to come in behind, his judgment is near perfect
Not big serving from Lendl and at not high 55% first serves in, his showing is below par, but more credit to Edberg for high consistency while being neutralizing with the return and spiking it with top class return-approaches
Last edited: