Stefan Edberg beat Pete Sampras 6-2, 6-7(2), 6-1 in the Los Angeles semi-final, 1990 on hard court
It was the first meeting between the pair. Edberg would go onto win the title by beating Michael Chang in the final. Sampras would shortly win his first Slam at the US Open. Edberg was ranked 2 at the time, Sampras 15. Sampras was 19 years old
Edberg won 97 points, Sampras 81
Edberg won 101, Sampras 81 (lowest possible estimate from missing points)
Edberg serve-volleyed off all but 4 first serves and all but 2 seconds. Sampras serve-volleyed off all first serves
(Note: I'm missing 1 Edberg service game which he held, a Sampras service game cuts off at 0-30 that he went onto lose and 1 Edberg service point that he won. On a small number of points, I've guessed serve type)
Serve Stats
Edberg...
- 1st serve percentage (65/93) 70%
- 1st serve points won (43/65) 66%
- 2nd serve points won (18/28) 64%
- Unknown serve point (1/1)
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (29/93) 31%
Sampras...
- 1st serve percentage (47/82) 57%
- 1st serve points won (30/47) 64%
- 2nd serve points won (17/35) 49%
- Aces 4, Service Winners 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (23/82) 28%
Serve Patterns
Edberg served...
- to FH 20%
- to BH 68%
- to Body 12%
Sampras served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 52%
- to Body 9%
Return Stats
Edberg made...
- 58 (24 FH, 34 BH), including 8 return-approaches
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 18 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 16 Forced (7 FH, 9 BH)
- Return Rate (58/82) 71%
Sampras made...
- 63 (14 FH, 49 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 11 Winners (7 FH, 4 BH)
- 29 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH), a return-approach attempt
- 28 Forced (6 FH, 22 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- Return Rate (63/92) 68%
Break Points
Edberg 5/11 (6 games)... including a deduced {1/1 (1 game)... the points won and games are accurate but there may have been more break points}
Sampras 1/7 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Edberg 33 (3 FH, 8 BH, 8 FHV, 10 BHV, 4 OH)
Sampras 31 (11 FH, 11 BH, 3 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 4 BHV, 1 OH)
Edberg had from 18 serve-volley points -
- 9 first volleys (6 FHV, 3 BHV)
- 8 second volleys (4 BHV, 4 OH)
- 1 third volley (1 FHV)
- 3 from return-approach points (1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- FH passes - 2 cc
- regular FH - 1 longline
- BH passes - 2 cc, 4 dtl (1 return) and 1 inside-out
- regular BH - 1 dtl
Sampras had 7 from serve-volley points -
- 4 first 'volleys' (1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH, 1 BH at net)… the OH was a drop mishit
- 3 second volleys (1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- 11 returns (7 FH, 4 BH), all passes
- FHs - 2 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out and 3 inside-in
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl and 2 inside-in
- FH passes - 2 cc
- regular FH - 1 inside-in
- BH passes - 3 cc, 1 dtl and 1 inside-out
- regular BHs - 1 dtl and 1 inside-out
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Edberg 26
- 8 Unforced (3 FH, 1 BH, 4 BHV)
- 18 Forced (6 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 7 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.8
Sampras 32
- 14 Unforced (3 FH, 4 BH, 2 FHV, 5 BHV)… 1 FH was a pass attempt at net
- 18 Forced (7 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Edberg was...
- 66/97 (68%) at net, including...
- 57/86 (66%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 40/61 (66%) off 1st serve and...
- 17/25 (68%) off 2nd serve
--
- 7/8 (88%) return-approaching
- 1/2 forced back/retreated
Sampras was...
- 33/58 (57%) at net, including...
- 28/46 (61%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 25/42 (60%) off 1st serve and...
- 3/4 (75%) off 2nd serve
--
- 0/1 return-approaching
- 1/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
Excellent match - thorough from Edberg and streaky from the 19 year old Pete Sampras, but the latter shows enough to demonstrate how dangerous he could be. The scoreline is deceptive, especially the first set, and the match was actually closer than it looks
Essentially, Edberg serve-volleys all match and Sampras does so off first serves. The court is a standard hard court. The two had apparently been doubles partners earlier in the year at Queens tournament on grass. Edberg is just a bit better - on both serve games and return games - but one can gather Sampras' potential to improve (particularly on return games, though in fact, its actually his serve game that made the biggest gains in years to come)
Edberg Serve/Sampras Return Game
Edberg serves in his usual way - not too powerful, high kickers aplenty, not line licking. He's not a serve-shot dependent guy - his game is based on the volley. Not unusually for him, he finishes with higher second serve-volley points won than first (68% for second, 66% for first)
Serving at 70% and just 1 double, you'd have to say he serves well by his standard. First question then... how does Sampras return?
Well, but streakily? Not well enough because of streakiness with hits of brilliance thrown in might be a good way to put it
With the serve not being overly powerful or well placed, there's scope for doing strong damage with the return. And Sampras does. Note the 11 return winners. Remarkably, he hits 7 FH winners in making just 14 such returns (Edberg only serves there 18 times, some of Sampras' FH returns were to body serves). So Sampras is doing the damage he that Edberg serve leaves the possibility for
Serves to FH are of course the minority as Edberg serves 68% to BH... and that's where quality of Sampras' returning is strangely not on (as opposed to off). Edberg's kicker to the one-handed BH is the danger ball, as it is for any 1-hander (not exactly a gift to 2 handers either). And on this court, it often gets up shoulder high
Sampras though handles it very well on eye test. Not troubled, not unable to get over the ball, not unable to pack a punch with his return... he doesn't have the common problems 1-handers do against the danger ball. Even so fine a returner as Ivan Lendl had fits with Edberg's high balls to the BH, but Sampras doesn't seem to
Doing damage with return + not having problems with serve should = great return performance. Its a good one, but falls short of great because Sampras just misses a large number of balls for no particular reason. Note Edberg's 31% unreturned rate. That's not too high, but usually gets in that ball park when returner is struggling to deal with balls. Sampras isn't... he just misses thought seemingly untroubled and without going for too much on the shot
Occasionally, Pete steps inside court to whack second serves with fair success. And his regulation return is strong too
In later matches of Pete's you'll see him missing returns because he seemingly isn't too interested on a point-to-point level or is struggling to handle the serve. Neither applies here, but he just misses. Given how comfortably he returned, 68% return rate is not a good figure for him
What he gets back, he gets back strongly and Edberg has a job on his hands on the first volley. Sampras passes strongly in play as well. Here the credit goes entirely to Edberg's volleying, which is as ever, excellent. 4 forecourt UEs to 9 FEs speak both to Edberg's consistency on the volley as well as the quality of Sampras' passing (including returning). Sampras' 9 passing shots in play also indicate the latter
Edberg's volleying is better still. He picks off winners and volleys into corner and plays 1-2 combos (note the 9 first volleys, 8 second volleys winner distribution), and puts difficult low and/or powerfully struck passes back in play etc.... the usual great job from Stefan up front in short. Particularly commendable because he was up against powerful shots all match
In a nutshell, better than normal serving from Edberg, overall good returning from Sampras (a combination of deadly and randomly error prone - not uniform), great volleying from Edberg and good passing by Pete. Edberg's volley and Sampras' return are the keys
It was the first meeting between the pair. Edberg would go onto win the title by beating Michael Chang in the final. Sampras would shortly win his first Slam at the US Open. Edberg was ranked 2 at the time, Sampras 15. Sampras was 19 years old
Edberg won 97 points, Sampras 81
Edberg won 101, Sampras 81 (lowest possible estimate from missing points)
Edberg serve-volleyed off all but 4 first serves and all but 2 seconds. Sampras serve-volleyed off all first serves
(Note: I'm missing 1 Edberg service game which he held, a Sampras service game cuts off at 0-30 that he went onto lose and 1 Edberg service point that he won. On a small number of points, I've guessed serve type)
Serve Stats
Edberg...
- 1st serve percentage (65/93) 70%
- 1st serve points won (43/65) 66%
- 2nd serve points won (18/28) 64%
- Unknown serve point (1/1)
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (29/93) 31%
Sampras...
- 1st serve percentage (47/82) 57%
- 1st serve points won (30/47) 64%
- 2nd serve points won (17/35) 49%
- Aces 4, Service Winners 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (23/82) 28%
Serve Patterns
Edberg served...
- to FH 20%
- to BH 68%
- to Body 12%
Sampras served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 52%
- to Body 9%
Return Stats
Edberg made...
- 58 (24 FH, 34 BH), including 8 return-approaches
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 18 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 16 Forced (7 FH, 9 BH)
- Return Rate (58/82) 71%
Sampras made...
- 63 (14 FH, 49 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 11 Winners (7 FH, 4 BH)
- 29 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH), a return-approach attempt
- 28 Forced (6 FH, 22 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- Return Rate (63/92) 68%
Break Points
Edberg 5/11 (6 games)... including a deduced {1/1 (1 game)... the points won and games are accurate but there may have been more break points}
Sampras 1/7 (4 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Edberg 33 (3 FH, 8 BH, 8 FHV, 10 BHV, 4 OH)
Sampras 31 (11 FH, 11 BH, 3 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 4 BHV, 1 OH)
Edberg had from 18 serve-volley points -
- 9 first volleys (6 FHV, 3 BHV)
- 8 second volleys (4 BHV, 4 OH)
- 1 third volley (1 FHV)
- 3 from return-approach points (1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- FH passes - 2 cc
- regular FH - 1 longline
- BH passes - 2 cc, 4 dtl (1 return) and 1 inside-out
- regular BH - 1 dtl
Sampras had 7 from serve-volley points -
- 4 first 'volleys' (1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH, 1 BH at net)… the OH was a drop mishit
- 3 second volleys (1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- 11 returns (7 FH, 4 BH), all passes
- FHs - 2 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out and 3 inside-in
- BHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl and 2 inside-in
- FH passes - 2 cc
- regular FH - 1 inside-in
- BH passes - 3 cc, 1 dtl and 1 inside-out
- regular BHs - 1 dtl and 1 inside-out
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Edberg 26
- 8 Unforced (3 FH, 1 BH, 4 BHV)
- 18 Forced (6 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 7 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.8
Sampras 32
- 14 Unforced (3 FH, 4 BH, 2 FHV, 5 BHV)… 1 FH was a pass attempt at net
- 18 Forced (7 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Edberg was...
- 66/97 (68%) at net, including...
- 57/86 (66%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 40/61 (66%) off 1st serve and...
- 17/25 (68%) off 2nd serve
--
- 7/8 (88%) return-approaching
- 1/2 forced back/retreated
Sampras was...
- 33/58 (57%) at net, including...
- 28/46 (61%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 25/42 (60%) off 1st serve and...
- 3/4 (75%) off 2nd serve
--
- 0/1 return-approaching
- 1/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
Excellent match - thorough from Edberg and streaky from the 19 year old Pete Sampras, but the latter shows enough to demonstrate how dangerous he could be. The scoreline is deceptive, especially the first set, and the match was actually closer than it looks
Essentially, Edberg serve-volleys all match and Sampras does so off first serves. The court is a standard hard court. The two had apparently been doubles partners earlier in the year at Queens tournament on grass. Edberg is just a bit better - on both serve games and return games - but one can gather Sampras' potential to improve (particularly on return games, though in fact, its actually his serve game that made the biggest gains in years to come)
Edberg Serve/Sampras Return Game
Edberg serves in his usual way - not too powerful, high kickers aplenty, not line licking. He's not a serve-shot dependent guy - his game is based on the volley. Not unusually for him, he finishes with higher second serve-volley points won than first (68% for second, 66% for first)
Serving at 70% and just 1 double, you'd have to say he serves well by his standard. First question then... how does Sampras return?
Well, but streakily? Not well enough because of streakiness with hits of brilliance thrown in might be a good way to put it
With the serve not being overly powerful or well placed, there's scope for doing strong damage with the return. And Sampras does. Note the 11 return winners. Remarkably, he hits 7 FH winners in making just 14 such returns (Edberg only serves there 18 times, some of Sampras' FH returns were to body serves). So Sampras is doing the damage he that Edberg serve leaves the possibility for
Serves to FH are of course the minority as Edberg serves 68% to BH... and that's where quality of Sampras' returning is strangely not on (as opposed to off). Edberg's kicker to the one-handed BH is the danger ball, as it is for any 1-hander (not exactly a gift to 2 handers either). And on this court, it often gets up shoulder high
Sampras though handles it very well on eye test. Not troubled, not unable to get over the ball, not unable to pack a punch with his return... he doesn't have the common problems 1-handers do against the danger ball. Even so fine a returner as Ivan Lendl had fits with Edberg's high balls to the BH, but Sampras doesn't seem to
Doing damage with return + not having problems with serve should = great return performance. Its a good one, but falls short of great because Sampras just misses a large number of balls for no particular reason. Note Edberg's 31% unreturned rate. That's not too high, but usually gets in that ball park when returner is struggling to deal with balls. Sampras isn't... he just misses thought seemingly untroubled and without going for too much on the shot
Occasionally, Pete steps inside court to whack second serves with fair success. And his regulation return is strong too
In later matches of Pete's you'll see him missing returns because he seemingly isn't too interested on a point-to-point level or is struggling to handle the serve. Neither applies here, but he just misses. Given how comfortably he returned, 68% return rate is not a good figure for him
What he gets back, he gets back strongly and Edberg has a job on his hands on the first volley. Sampras passes strongly in play as well. Here the credit goes entirely to Edberg's volleying, which is as ever, excellent. 4 forecourt UEs to 9 FEs speak both to Edberg's consistency on the volley as well as the quality of Sampras' passing (including returning). Sampras' 9 passing shots in play also indicate the latter
Edberg's volleying is better still. He picks off winners and volleys into corner and plays 1-2 combos (note the 9 first volleys, 8 second volleys winner distribution), and puts difficult low and/or powerfully struck passes back in play etc.... the usual great job from Stefan up front in short. Particularly commendable because he was up against powerful shots all match
In a nutshell, better than normal serving from Edberg, overall good returning from Sampras (a combination of deadly and randomly error prone - not uniform), great volleying from Edberg and good passing by Pete. Edberg's volley and Sampras' return are the keys