Stefan Edberg (Sweden) beat Alexander Volkov (Russia) 6-4, 6-2, 6-7(2), 0-6, 8-6 in a Davis Cup final rubber, 1994 on indoor carpet in Moscow, Russia
The result gave Sweden a 1-0 lead in the match, which they would go onto win 4-1 to win the event. Edberg would go onto lose the dead fourth rubber to Yevgeny Kafelnikov and Volkov would lose the final rubber to Magnus Larsson
Edberg won 169 points, Volkov 172
Edberg serve-volleyed off almost all first serves and majority of seconds, Volkov serve-volleyed almost half the time off first serves
(Note: 1 point has been tracked via audio. Set 3, Game 6, Point 3 - an Edberg first serve-point, serve-volley, return made and unknown first volley winner
On 1-2 points, I’ve made confident guesses regarding serve type)
Serve Stats
Edberg...
- 1st serve percentage (89/166) 54%
- 1st serve points won (61/89) 69%
- 2nd serve points won (40/77) 52%
- Aces 17, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 14
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (54/166) 33%
Volkov...
- 1st serve percentage (86/175) 49%
- 1st serve points won (60/86) 70%
- 2nd serve points won (47/89) 53%
- Aces 8 (1 second serve), Service Winners 2
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (48/175) 27%
Serve Patterns
Edberg served...
- to FH 30%
- to BH 54%
- to Body 16%
Volkov served...
- to FH 17%
- to BH 73%
- to Body 10%
Return Stats
Edberg made...
- 125 (32 FH, 93 BH), including 5 runaround FHs & 10 return-approaches
- 3 Winners (3 BH)
- 38 Errors, comprising...
- 17 Unforced (4 FH, 13 BH), including 3 runaround FHs & 4 return-approach attempts
- 21 Forced (1 FH, 20 BH)
- Return Rate (125/173) 72%
Volkov made...
- 98 (31 FH, 66 BH, 1 ??), including 1 runaround FH & 4 return-approaches
- 13 Winners (3 FH, 10 BH)
- 36 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 32 Forced (12 FH, 20 BH)
- Return Rate (98/152) 64%
Break Points
Edberg 6/12 (10 games)
Volkov 5/12 (7 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Edberg 56 (13 FH, 14 BH, 10 FHV, 11 BHV, 1 ?HV, 1 BH1/V, 6 OH)
Volkov 49 (17 FH, 21 BH, 4 FHV, 5 BHV, 2 OH)
Edberg had 22 from serve-volley points -
- 13 first 'volleys' (5 FHV, 6 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 1 OH)
- 8 second volleys (3 FHV, 1 BHV, 4 OH)
- 1 third volley (1 FHV)
- FHs - 6 dtl (4 passes), 1 dtl/inside-out, 3 inside-out, 1 drop shot at net, 2 lobs (1 not clean
- BHs - 7 cc (5 passes - 1 net chord pop over), 5 dtl [2 returns - 1 pass, 1 other pass (a net chord pop over)], 1 inside-in return pass, 1 lob
Volkov had 32 passes - 13 returns (3 FH, 10 BH) & 19 regular (11 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV)
- FH returns - 1 dtl, 2 inside-in
- BH returns - 2 cc, 3 dtl, 5 inside-in (1 can reasonably be called 'inside-in/cc')
- regular FHs - 5 cc, 4 dtl, 1 lob, 1 running-down-drop-shot cc at net
- regular BHs - 3 cc, 4 dtl
- FHV was swinging longline, non-net shot
- regular (non-pass) FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-in
- regular BHs - 2 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out
- 4 from serve-volley points (1 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH), all first volleys
- 1 from a return-approach point (1 BHV)
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Edberg 61
- 32 Unforced (9 FH, 10 BH, 3 FHV, 9 BHV, 1 OH)... with 1 baseline BHV
- 29 Forced (10 FH, 9 BH, 3 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 5 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49.4
Volkov 57
- 27 Unforced (11 FH, 10 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV)... with 1 non-net BHV
- 30 Forced (16 FH, 13 BH, 1 FHV)... with 2 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.7
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Edberg was...
- 88/140 (63%) at net, including...
- 63/103 (61%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 40/67 (60%) off 1st serve and...
- 23/36 (64%) off 2nd serve
---
- 7/10 (70%) return-approaching
Volkov was...
- 38/61 (62%) at net, including...
- 23/37 (62%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 18/30 (60%) off 1st serve and...
- 5/7 (71%) off 2nd serve
---
- 1/4 (25%) return-approaching
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
This match has it all. Quality serving, returning, serve-volleying, net play, baseline rallies, shot-making, creativity. As dual winged as can be - almost literally split down the middle of wings, both for net player and baseline rallies. And progression or storyline that couldn’t be more riveting. Quality of action varies, but its never poor from either player and often, excellent. The crowd is great - enthusiastic, loud but rarely disrespectful. Even the stats have come out beautiful, and uncannily even. Court is very fast
Volkov serves for the match at 5-4 and has match point so doing, before Edberg breaks. All 3 of Edberg’s return winners are in that game. If your going to hit 3 return winners in a match, doing it when opponent is serving for the match is good time
Edberg leads with serve-volleying. Off second serve, he mixes up serve-volleying and not almost all match and he stays back off a few first serves right at the end too
In all -
1st serve-volley frequency - 94%
2nd serve-volley frequency - 57%
1st serve winning rates - serve-volleying 60%, not 75%
2nd serve winning rates - serve-volleying 64%, not 63%
Volkov is a tall, lanky guy. Not slow, and his movement is plenty tested by Ederg’s volleying. Does he have a ‘big’ serve? His biggest are huge, but usually keeps it under wraps. Strong and steady off both wings from the back. If anything, proably a slightly BH preferring player and the cc from that side is pressuring. Scoops up low FHs nicely
Volkov isn’t net shy either but it takes him a set and half or so to get comfy coming in. He ‘delay’ serve-volleys. Takes 2-3 short steps into court after first serve and waits on returns. If its deep, falls back as playing groundstroke. Otherwise, plays approach shot and comes in. Or moves forward and actually volleys. Has good enough form around the net and volleys with punch and placement enough that seems an all-courter rather than a reluctant net player
He’s been marked with 30 first serve-volley points, which comes to 39% off first serves. Most return errors he draws with the would- be ‘delay’ serve-volley have not been marked serve-volley points. Occasionally, but minority of his 30 serve-volleys are bona fida, rush straight to net behind the serve also. He rarely and as effective surprise tactic second serve-volleys, in all 7 times or 8% of the time, almost all near the end of the match
So plenty of serve-volleying and plenty of not too. Edberg return-approaches some - both chip-charges and behind firmer shots, and Volkov, like with his second serve-volleying, indulges a little near the end. Edberg return-approaches 10 times, Volk 4
Baseline rallies are dual winged, with good, sound hitting and honours near even. If consistency is a wash, Edberg’s shot-making from the back is superior. Court is very fast and slightly wide and firmly hit balls are liable to force errors.
Both players look for approach chances - Edberg more proactively, but Volk considerably too
Rallying to net -
Edberg 18/27 at 67%
Volk 14/20 at 70% (some of Volks’ being ‘delay’ serve-volleys, relatively easy net points)
… with bulk of such points of Volk’s service games
Not many matches are statistically closer
First serve in - Edberg 54%, Volk 49%
First serve won - Edberg 68.5%, Volk 69.8%
Second serve won - Edberg 51.94%, Volk 52.81%
Shades of Borg-Gerulaitis ‘77 Wimbledon and Rafter-Agassi ‘00 Wimbledon, where you have to go to decimal places to get a difference between the players. First serve winning rates are relatively low for such a court
In all, Edberg winning 3 more points than he serves, Volks 3 less
Volks wins 3 more points total, though Edberg has extra break and 3 more games with break points in them
Edberg wins 49.56% of the points, serving 48.68% of them
Breaks points - Edberg 6/12, Volks 5/12
(Edberg does have break points in 10 games to Volks’ 7 - with Edberg’s concentration in tense final set and Volks’ 5 breaks coming in succession)
Are there any matches that are more balanced across wings? For both players, both at net and on baseline?
Edberg’s groundies -
Winners - FH 13, BH 14
UEs - FH 9, BH 10
FEs - FH 10, BH 9
Volk’s groundies -
Winners - FH 17, BH 21
UEs - FH 11, BH 10
FEs - FH 16, BH 13
Edberg’s ‘volleys’ -
Winners - FHV 10, BHV 12
UEs - FHV 3, BHV 9
FEs - FHV 4, BHV 6
Volk’s volleys -
Winners - FHV 4, BHV 5
UEs - FHV 2, BHV 4
FEs - FHV 1
Sans Edberg’s volleying UEs, near identical figures for both players across wings, both groundies and volleys. Remarkable
In all,
Winners - Edberg 56, Volk 49
Errors forced - Edberg 30, Volk 29
UEs - Edberg 32, Volk 27
Winners/UE differential - Edberg +24, Volk +22
Aggressively ended points/UE differential - Edberg +54, Volk +51
High quality stuff. Its not absolute elite is about extent of critique of it. Not even when Edberg’s bagelled and loses serve 5 times in a row
Most of all, the storyline and match progression. Only match comparable to it is Borg-McEnroe, ‘80 Wimby final and there’s no higher praise than that
Competitive first set, Edberg serve-volleying virtually always, Volk mainly on the baseline. 1 break, couple other games with break points in them. Such action continuing into second set, and its Volks who has break point in game 4. Which Edberg saves and goes on a winning tear. Including that hold, Edberg wins 5 games in a row. Through his playing well, not Volks playing badly
The result gave Sweden a 1-0 lead in the match, which they would go onto win 4-1 to win the event. Edberg would go onto lose the dead fourth rubber to Yevgeny Kafelnikov and Volkov would lose the final rubber to Magnus Larsson
Edberg won 169 points, Volkov 172
Edberg serve-volleyed off almost all first serves and majority of seconds, Volkov serve-volleyed almost half the time off first serves
(Note: 1 point has been tracked via audio. Set 3, Game 6, Point 3 - an Edberg first serve-point, serve-volley, return made and unknown first volley winner
On 1-2 points, I’ve made confident guesses regarding serve type)
Serve Stats
Edberg...
- 1st serve percentage (89/166) 54%
- 1st serve points won (61/89) 69%
- 2nd serve points won (40/77) 52%
- Aces 17, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 14
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (54/166) 33%
Volkov...
- 1st serve percentage (86/175) 49%
- 1st serve points won (60/86) 70%
- 2nd serve points won (47/89) 53%
- Aces 8 (1 second serve), Service Winners 2
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (48/175) 27%
Serve Patterns
Edberg served...
- to FH 30%
- to BH 54%
- to Body 16%
Volkov served...
- to FH 17%
- to BH 73%
- to Body 10%
Return Stats
Edberg made...
- 125 (32 FH, 93 BH), including 5 runaround FHs & 10 return-approaches
- 3 Winners (3 BH)
- 38 Errors, comprising...
- 17 Unforced (4 FH, 13 BH), including 3 runaround FHs & 4 return-approach attempts
- 21 Forced (1 FH, 20 BH)
- Return Rate (125/173) 72%
Volkov made...
- 98 (31 FH, 66 BH, 1 ??), including 1 runaround FH & 4 return-approaches
- 13 Winners (3 FH, 10 BH)
- 36 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 32 Forced (12 FH, 20 BH)
- Return Rate (98/152) 64%
Break Points
Edberg 6/12 (10 games)
Volkov 5/12 (7 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Edberg 56 (13 FH, 14 BH, 10 FHV, 11 BHV, 1 ?HV, 1 BH1/V, 6 OH)
Volkov 49 (17 FH, 21 BH, 4 FHV, 5 BHV, 2 OH)
Edberg had 22 from serve-volley points -
- 13 first 'volleys' (5 FHV, 6 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 1 OH)
- 8 second volleys (3 FHV, 1 BHV, 4 OH)
- 1 third volley (1 FHV)
- FHs - 6 dtl (4 passes), 1 dtl/inside-out, 3 inside-out, 1 drop shot at net, 2 lobs (1 not clean
- BHs - 7 cc (5 passes - 1 net chord pop over), 5 dtl [2 returns - 1 pass, 1 other pass (a net chord pop over)], 1 inside-in return pass, 1 lob
Volkov had 32 passes - 13 returns (3 FH, 10 BH) & 19 regular (11 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV)
- FH returns - 1 dtl, 2 inside-in
- BH returns - 2 cc, 3 dtl, 5 inside-in (1 can reasonably be called 'inside-in/cc')
- regular FHs - 5 cc, 4 dtl, 1 lob, 1 running-down-drop-shot cc at net
- regular BHs - 3 cc, 4 dtl
- FHV was swinging longline, non-net shot
- regular (non-pass) FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-in
- regular BHs - 2 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out
- 4 from serve-volley points (1 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH), all first volleys
- 1 from a return-approach point (1 BHV)
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Edberg 61
- 32 Unforced (9 FH, 10 BH, 3 FHV, 9 BHV, 1 OH)... with 1 baseline BHV
- 29 Forced (10 FH, 9 BH, 3 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 5 BHV, 1 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49.4
Volkov 57
- 27 Unforced (11 FH, 10 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV)... with 1 non-net BHV
- 30 Forced (16 FH, 13 BH, 1 FHV)... with 2 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.7
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Edberg was...
- 88/140 (63%) at net, including...
- 63/103 (61%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 40/67 (60%) off 1st serve and...
- 23/36 (64%) off 2nd serve
---
- 7/10 (70%) return-approaching
Volkov was...
- 38/61 (62%) at net, including...
- 23/37 (62%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 18/30 (60%) off 1st serve and...
- 5/7 (71%) off 2nd serve
---
- 1/4 (25%) return-approaching
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
This match has it all. Quality serving, returning, serve-volleying, net play, baseline rallies, shot-making, creativity. As dual winged as can be - almost literally split down the middle of wings, both for net player and baseline rallies. And progression or storyline that couldn’t be more riveting. Quality of action varies, but its never poor from either player and often, excellent. The crowd is great - enthusiastic, loud but rarely disrespectful. Even the stats have come out beautiful, and uncannily even. Court is very fast
Volkov serves for the match at 5-4 and has match point so doing, before Edberg breaks. All 3 of Edberg’s return winners are in that game. If your going to hit 3 return winners in a match, doing it when opponent is serving for the match is good time
Edberg leads with serve-volleying. Off second serve, he mixes up serve-volleying and not almost all match and he stays back off a few first serves right at the end too
In all -
1st serve-volley frequency - 94%
2nd serve-volley frequency - 57%
1st serve winning rates - serve-volleying 60%, not 75%
2nd serve winning rates - serve-volleying 64%, not 63%
Volkov is a tall, lanky guy. Not slow, and his movement is plenty tested by Ederg’s volleying. Does he have a ‘big’ serve? His biggest are huge, but usually keeps it under wraps. Strong and steady off both wings from the back. If anything, proably a slightly BH preferring player and the cc from that side is pressuring. Scoops up low FHs nicely
Volkov isn’t net shy either but it takes him a set and half or so to get comfy coming in. He ‘delay’ serve-volleys. Takes 2-3 short steps into court after first serve and waits on returns. If its deep, falls back as playing groundstroke. Otherwise, plays approach shot and comes in. Or moves forward and actually volleys. Has good enough form around the net and volleys with punch and placement enough that seems an all-courter rather than a reluctant net player
He’s been marked with 30 first serve-volley points, which comes to 39% off first serves. Most return errors he draws with the would- be ‘delay’ serve-volley have not been marked serve-volley points. Occasionally, but minority of his 30 serve-volleys are bona fida, rush straight to net behind the serve also. He rarely and as effective surprise tactic second serve-volleys, in all 7 times or 8% of the time, almost all near the end of the match
So plenty of serve-volleying and plenty of not too. Edberg return-approaches some - both chip-charges and behind firmer shots, and Volkov, like with his second serve-volleying, indulges a little near the end. Edberg return-approaches 10 times, Volk 4
Baseline rallies are dual winged, with good, sound hitting and honours near even. If consistency is a wash, Edberg’s shot-making from the back is superior. Court is very fast and slightly wide and firmly hit balls are liable to force errors.
Both players look for approach chances - Edberg more proactively, but Volk considerably too
Rallying to net -
Edberg 18/27 at 67%
Volk 14/20 at 70% (some of Volks’ being ‘delay’ serve-volleys, relatively easy net points)
… with bulk of such points of Volk’s service games
Not many matches are statistically closer
First serve in - Edberg 54%, Volk 49%
First serve won - Edberg 68.5%, Volk 69.8%
Second serve won - Edberg 51.94%, Volk 52.81%
Shades of Borg-Gerulaitis ‘77 Wimbledon and Rafter-Agassi ‘00 Wimbledon, where you have to go to decimal places to get a difference between the players. First serve winning rates are relatively low for such a court
In all, Edberg winning 3 more points than he serves, Volks 3 less
Volks wins 3 more points total, though Edberg has extra break and 3 more games with break points in them
Edberg wins 49.56% of the points, serving 48.68% of them
Breaks points - Edberg 6/12, Volks 5/12
(Edberg does have break points in 10 games to Volks’ 7 - with Edberg’s concentration in tense final set and Volks’ 5 breaks coming in succession)
Are there any matches that are more balanced across wings? For both players, both at net and on baseline?
Edberg’s groundies -
Winners - FH 13, BH 14
UEs - FH 9, BH 10
FEs - FH 10, BH 9
Volk’s groundies -
Winners - FH 17, BH 21
UEs - FH 11, BH 10
FEs - FH 16, BH 13
Edberg’s ‘volleys’ -
Winners - FHV 10, BHV 12
UEs - FHV 3, BHV 9
FEs - FHV 4, BHV 6
Volk’s volleys -
Winners - FHV 4, BHV 5
UEs - FHV 2, BHV 4
FEs - FHV 1
Sans Edberg’s volleying UEs, near identical figures for both players across wings, both groundies and volleys. Remarkable
In all,
Winners - Edberg 56, Volk 49
Errors forced - Edberg 30, Volk 29
UEs - Edberg 32, Volk 27
Winners/UE differential - Edberg +24, Volk +22
Aggressively ended points/UE differential - Edberg +54, Volk +51
High quality stuff. Its not absolute elite is about extent of critique of it. Not even when Edberg’s bagelled and loses serve 5 times in a row
Most of all, the storyline and match progression. Only match comparable to it is Borg-McEnroe, ‘80 Wimby final and there’s no higher praise than that
Competitive first set, Edberg serve-volleying virtually always, Volk mainly on the baseline. 1 break, couple other games with break points in them. Such action continuing into second set, and its Volks who has break point in game 4. Which Edberg saves and goes on a winning tear. Including that hold, Edberg wins 5 games in a row. Through his playing well, not Volks playing badly
Last edited: