Roger Federer beat Andreas Seppi 7-6(1), 6-4 in the Halle final, 2015 on grass
It was Federer’s 8th title at the event and third in a row. Seppi was unseeded and beat three seeds en route to the final. Federer would be runner-up at the upcoming Wimbledon. Earlier in the year, Seppi had won the pair’s third round match at Australian Open and ended Federer run of consecutive semi-finals at that event at 11 (Federer would reach the semis the next 3 years also)
Federer won 85 points, Seppi 72
Serve Stats
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (53/73) 73%
- 1st serve points won (43/53) 81%
- 2nd serve points won (10/20) 50%
- Aces 15 (1 second serve - bad bounce related & 3 not clean)
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (26/73) 36%
Seppi...
- 1st serve percentage (52/84) 62%
- 1st serve points won (34/52) 65%
- 2nd serve points won (18/32) 56%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (22/84) 26%
Serve Patterns
Federer served...
- to FH 42%
- to BH 55%
- to Body 3%
Seppi served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 60%
- to Body 1%
Return Stats
Federer made...
- 61 (24 FH, 37 BH), including 2 runaround FHs & 3 return-approaches
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 21 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (5 FH, 4 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 1 return-approach attempt
- 12 Forced (6 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (61/83) 73%
Seppi made...
- 47 (18 FH, 29 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH)
- 10 Forced (6 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (47/73) 64%
Break Points
Federer 1/5 (2 games)
Seppi 0/4 (3 games)
Winners (excluding serves, including returns)
Federer 22 (7 FH, 4 BH, 8 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
Seppi 14 (8 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
Federer's FHs - 1 dtl return, 1 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl, 1 inside-in, 1 longline pass, 1 lob
- BHs - 3 cc (1 pass, 1 not clean - bad bounce related), 1 dtl
- 3 from serve-volley points (3 FHV), all first volleys
- 2 other FHVs were swinging, non-net shots (1 cc, 1 longline)
- the OH was on the bounce from near the baseline
Seppi's FHs - 1 dtl pass, 2 inside-out, 2 inside-in, 2 drop shots, 1 longline
- BHs - 1 dtl pass, 1 running-down-drop-shot 'pass' cc at net (very finely angled, with Federer at net)
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Federer 36
- 25 Unforced (12 FH, 8 BH, 2 FHV, 3 BHV)... with 1 baseline FHV & 1 BH was a challenge (not counted in UEFI)
- 11 Forced (4 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 51.7
Seppi 36
- 20 Unforced (9 FH, 10 BH, 1 BHV)
- 16 Forced (6 FH, 9 BH, 1 Behind-Back)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Federer was...
- 21/30 (70%) at net, including...
- 7/10 (70%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 7/8 (88%) off 1st serve and...
- 0/2 off 2nd serve
---
- 2/3 (67%) return-approaching
- 1/1 forced back
Seppi was...
- 9/14 (64%) at net, with...
- 0/1 return-approaching
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Good match from both players and like a lot of grass matches, not much in the result. Particularly positive aspects for Federer are his serve (especially the high in-count) and net play (with serve-volleying and quick-dash, ‘sneak’ approaches making up the bulk), while Seppi plays a solidly strong, baseline game that’s probably a bit better than Fed’s more aggressive game. Nothing stands out as being poor
First set is near even, and though Seppi doesn’t have better of it, he does have all 3 break points with 2 of them set points (both aced away). Going into ‘breaker, Fed’s served 39 points, Seppi 38 for 6 holds apiece. Fed’s much better in the breaker though and cruises it 7-1
Fed has better of second set and gets deep into Seppi’s last 3 service games, eventually finishing with match’s sole break. He serves 30 points in the set to Seppi’s 42, but again, its Seppi who has the first break point of the set, before Fed’s been able to get into any return games
Fed with 22 winners, Sep 14
Fed forcing 16 errors, Sep 11
Pretty clear who the aggressor is, but being aggressive and being better are two different things. In court action, Seppi’s solid game probably edges ahead of Fed’s more flashy one
2nd serve points won - Seppi 56%, Fed 50% (despite Seppi having the only double fault)
… good indicator of how the two stack up in play. Meanwhile -
1st serve points won - Fed 81%, Seppi 65%
… with Fed leading aces 15-1 being an indicator of just how much better his serve is.
Putting the 2 together, it looks like Seppi is slightly better player, though much less eye-catching and its Federer having much better serve that overrides that
Serve & Return
73% in count for Fed is key - a huge figure. He doesn’t serve all out, despite the 15 aces
Very curiously, 3 of his aces are not clean (Seppi gets tiniest of nicks on the ball). The second serve ace is a product of a bad bounce and he has another winner that shoots through low for a not clean winner
Seppi returns firmly and regularly. Other than the aces, just 11 errors - 10 of them forced. Few too many aces though - looks like Fed can pull out the extra wide serve when and as he needs it. Smart to use it relatively sparingly too - why risk lowering in-count when the slightly lesser serves are winning you points?
Seppi’s serve is average, as just 1 ace hints at. Typically gets his firsts just wide enough to be ‘forceful’, 1 foot or so beyond swing zone at decent pace. Kind of serving that a really good and quick returner might return very consistently
Fed doesn’t return badly, but there’s room for improvement there. 12 FEs are by definition, not easy returns. They’re on the easy side for being marked FEs. Someone like Andy Murray on a good day might return 80% + against it. Fed manages 73%, which is just fine
Just a bit of aggressive returning from Fed. The 3 chip-charges fit into his general net seeking game and a couple of runaround FHs. Otherwise, blocks returns back
Seppi doesn’t attack second returns either. With Fed doing it a bit, that enhances impression of Seppi leading second serve points won as indicator of his being better court player (and certainly, baseliner at least)
It was Federer’s 8th title at the event and third in a row. Seppi was unseeded and beat three seeds en route to the final. Federer would be runner-up at the upcoming Wimbledon. Earlier in the year, Seppi had won the pair’s third round match at Australian Open and ended Federer run of consecutive semi-finals at that event at 11 (Federer would reach the semis the next 3 years also)
Federer won 85 points, Seppi 72
Serve Stats
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (53/73) 73%
- 1st serve points won (43/53) 81%
- 2nd serve points won (10/20) 50%
- Aces 15 (1 second serve - bad bounce related & 3 not clean)
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (26/73) 36%
Seppi...
- 1st serve percentage (52/84) 62%
- 1st serve points won (34/52) 65%
- 2nd serve points won (18/32) 56%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (22/84) 26%
Serve Patterns
Federer served...
- to FH 42%
- to BH 55%
- to Body 3%
Seppi served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 60%
- to Body 1%
Return Stats
Federer made...
- 61 (24 FH, 37 BH), including 2 runaround FHs & 3 return-approaches
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 21 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (5 FH, 4 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 1 return-approach attempt
- 12 Forced (6 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (61/83) 73%
Seppi made...
- 47 (18 FH, 29 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH)
- 10 Forced (6 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (47/73) 64%
Break Points
Federer 1/5 (2 games)
Seppi 0/4 (3 games)
Winners (excluding serves, including returns)
Federer 22 (7 FH, 4 BH, 8 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
Seppi 14 (8 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 2 OH)
Federer's FHs - 1 dtl return, 1 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl, 1 inside-in, 1 longline pass, 1 lob
- BHs - 3 cc (1 pass, 1 not clean - bad bounce related), 1 dtl
- 3 from serve-volley points (3 FHV), all first volleys
- 2 other FHVs were swinging, non-net shots (1 cc, 1 longline)
- the OH was on the bounce from near the baseline
Seppi's FHs - 1 dtl pass, 2 inside-out, 2 inside-in, 2 drop shots, 1 longline
- BHs - 1 dtl pass, 1 running-down-drop-shot 'pass' cc at net (very finely angled, with Federer at net)
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Federer 36
- 25 Unforced (12 FH, 8 BH, 2 FHV, 3 BHV)... with 1 baseline FHV & 1 BH was a challenge (not counted in UEFI)
- 11 Forced (4 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 51.7
Seppi 36
- 20 Unforced (9 FH, 10 BH, 1 BHV)
- 16 Forced (6 FH, 9 BH, 1 Behind-Back)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Federer was...
- 21/30 (70%) at net, including...
- 7/10 (70%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 7/8 (88%) off 1st serve and...
- 0/2 off 2nd serve
---
- 2/3 (67%) return-approaching
- 1/1 forced back
Seppi was...
- 9/14 (64%) at net, with...
- 0/1 return-approaching
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Good match from both players and like a lot of grass matches, not much in the result. Particularly positive aspects for Federer are his serve (especially the high in-count) and net play (with serve-volleying and quick-dash, ‘sneak’ approaches making up the bulk), while Seppi plays a solidly strong, baseline game that’s probably a bit better than Fed’s more aggressive game. Nothing stands out as being poor
First set is near even, and though Seppi doesn’t have better of it, he does have all 3 break points with 2 of them set points (both aced away). Going into ‘breaker, Fed’s served 39 points, Seppi 38 for 6 holds apiece. Fed’s much better in the breaker though and cruises it 7-1
Fed has better of second set and gets deep into Seppi’s last 3 service games, eventually finishing with match’s sole break. He serves 30 points in the set to Seppi’s 42, but again, its Seppi who has the first break point of the set, before Fed’s been able to get into any return games
Fed with 22 winners, Sep 14
Fed forcing 16 errors, Sep 11
Pretty clear who the aggressor is, but being aggressive and being better are two different things. In court action, Seppi’s solid game probably edges ahead of Fed’s more flashy one
2nd serve points won - Seppi 56%, Fed 50% (despite Seppi having the only double fault)
… good indicator of how the two stack up in play. Meanwhile -
1st serve points won - Fed 81%, Seppi 65%
… with Fed leading aces 15-1 being an indicator of just how much better his serve is.
Putting the 2 together, it looks like Seppi is slightly better player, though much less eye-catching and its Federer having much better serve that overrides that
Serve & Return
73% in count for Fed is key - a huge figure. He doesn’t serve all out, despite the 15 aces
Very curiously, 3 of his aces are not clean (Seppi gets tiniest of nicks on the ball). The second serve ace is a product of a bad bounce and he has another winner that shoots through low for a not clean winner
Seppi returns firmly and regularly. Other than the aces, just 11 errors - 10 of them forced. Few too many aces though - looks like Fed can pull out the extra wide serve when and as he needs it. Smart to use it relatively sparingly too - why risk lowering in-count when the slightly lesser serves are winning you points?
Seppi’s serve is average, as just 1 ace hints at. Typically gets his firsts just wide enough to be ‘forceful’, 1 foot or so beyond swing zone at decent pace. Kind of serving that a really good and quick returner might return very consistently
Fed doesn’t return badly, but there’s room for improvement there. 12 FEs are by definition, not easy returns. They’re on the easy side for being marked FEs. Someone like Andy Murray on a good day might return 80% + against it. Fed manages 73%, which is just fine
Just a bit of aggressive returning from Fed. The 3 chip-charges fit into his general net seeking game and a couple of runaround FHs. Otherwise, blocks returns back
Seppi doesn’t attack second returns either. With Fed doing it a bit, that enhances impression of Seppi leading second serve points won as indicator of his being better court player (and certainly, baseliner at least)
Last edited: