Gustavo Kuerten beat Alex Corretja 6-7(3), 7-5, 6-2, 6-0 in the French Open final, 2001 on clay
Kuerten was the defending champion and this was his third and last title at the event. Corretja was playing his second final, having previously lost in 1998 to Carlos Moya
Kuerten 136 won points, Corretja 108
Serve Stats
Kuerten...
- 1st serve percentage (72/123) 59%
- 1st serve points won (50/72) 69%
- 2nd serve points won (27/51) 53%
- Aces 10
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (30/123) 24%
Corretja...
- 1st serve percentage (64/121) 53%
- 1st serve points won (42/64) 66%
- 2nd serve points won (20/57) 35%
- Aces 5
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (14/121) 12%
Serve Patterns
Kuerten served...
- to FH 22%
- to BH 78%
Corretja served...
- to FH 21%
- to BH 72%
- to Body 7%
Return Stats
Kuerten made...
- 103 (34 FH, 69 BH), including 14 runaround FHs
- 4 Winners (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 3 Unforced (2 FH, 1 BH)
- 6 Forced (2 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (103/117) 88%
Corretja made...
- 91 (19 FH, 72 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 20 Errors, comprising...
- 10 Unforced (5 FH, 5 BH)
- 10 Forced (3 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (91/121) 75%
Break Points
Kuerten 9/17 (9 games)
Corretja 3/8 (7 games)
Winners (excluding serves, including returns)
Kuerten 33 (11 FH, 13 BH, 5 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
Corretja 36 (13 FH, 15 BH, 2 FHV, 5 BHV, 1 OH)
Kuerten's FHs - 2 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 2 dtl (1 return), 1 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl, 2 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc and 1 net chord dribbler
- BHs - 4 cc (2 passes), 4 dtl (1 pass, 1 at net), 3 inside-out returns (1 pass), 1 longline (bad bounce/wind related) and 1 lob
- 2 from serve-volley points (1 FHV, 1 BHV), both first volleys
Corretja's FHs -4 cc (2 passes), 1 cc/inside-in, 3 dtl (1 return, 1 pass at net), 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 2 drop shots and 1 lob
- BHs - 5 cc (1 return pass, 2 at net), 8 dtl (2 passes - 1 a net chord flicker, 1 at net), 1 inside-out and 1 net chord dribbler
- 4 from serve-volle points -
- 3 first volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 1 second volley (1 BHV)
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Kuerten 56
- 46 Unforced (24 FH, 17 BH, 2 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 10 Forced (5 FH, 1 BH, 2 FHV, 2 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.9
Corretja 69
- 43 Unforced (21 FH, 21 BH, 1 BHV)
- 26 Forced (12 FH, 14 BH)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net & 2 BH running-down-drop-shot (1 at net, 1 not)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 42.3
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Kuerten was ...
- 29/47 (62%) at net including...
- 7/9 (78%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 4/6 (67%) off 1st serve and...
- 3/3 (100%) off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Corretja was...
- 20/30 (67%) at net including...
- 8/10 (80%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 2/3 (67%) forced back/retreated
Match Report
An odd match with the wind equalizing action between the two players for most of 2 sets, and when it dies down, leaving them to play it out on merit and then it’s a mismatch; more for Corretja playing poorly than Kuerten well, though both elements are present
Part 1 - Windy, Play Checked
For most of 2 sets, hitting is relatively gentle from both sides, and not much attempt to attack by either player. Guga’s drop shots are the most attacking plays, and they’re not often seen. Its not outright passive who-blinks-first tennis - both players go for their shots at times, but certainly, wisely held back play from both, given windy conditions. Even Corretja’s hair is flapping about, as are the covers of the backboard behind the line judges
As such, consistency is most important factor. Its not greater consistency that sees Cor hold even of scoreline though. They’re roughly evenly matched on that front - and Cor attacks near as much as Guga (and usually, more successfully)
After 2 sets (not an exact match for Part 1, but close enough)
Guga - 22 winners, 17 errors forced, 36 UEs
Cor - 26 winners, 6 errors forced, 26 UEs
Aggressively ended points/UE differential - Guga +3, Cor +6
Good tennis, especially in light of difficult conditions. Hitting is on softer, safer side (not soft or gentle though), attacks are calculated and things are close to even
Part 2A - Less wind, Play Freer
Sun comes out as second set draws to an end, wind largely dies down (though not completely). Cor’s hitting doesn’t change much, but now, Guga’s able to step into court sooner rather than later in rallies to command, whereas before, they’d stuck it out rallying more passively. He doesn’t overdo it - big, wide BH cc approach shots are his most effective weapons (not going for winners from the back)
Command and dominate aren’t the same thing though. Cor’s still very much in it. Out-hit somewhat, and playing from deeper position certainly, but not out it. Excellent BH dtl shots to routine balls is his main weapon
7-5 scoreline is accurate indicator of 2nd set. 6-2 for the third less so though it points in right direction of Guga being better player. Break points for the set read Guga 2/3 (2 games), Cor 0/2 (2 games), with Cor having good shots on both his break points
Set 3 -
Guga - 4 winners, 7 errors forced, 6 UEs
Cor - 7 winners, 4 errors forced, 10 UEs
Aggressively ended points/UE differential - Guga +5, Cor +1
Still good tennis, still competitive, with Guga looking and being the better. More looking than being, what with his freer, looser play, but also actually better
Part 2B - Corretja falls apart
Along same lines of 2A, Guga upping his commanding play to more aggressive. Impressively, but bigger factor is Cor completely falling apart. Loose errors, movement getting worse and worse, waning efforts to chase balls or move for returns, even serving quality all fall off a cliff for Cor
Has anyone ever lost a set in a Slam final while winning just 2 points? Its not for lack of trying that Cor doesn’t
Up 5-0, 0-40 (returning), Guga has the easiest of OH putaways to end the match, having lost just 2 points in the set. He misses the OH. 2 points later, he has an on the bounce OH right on top of the net that makes the last one look difficult. He hits it short and around where Cor is standing, who’s able to fend it back over Guga - and Cor wins the point
Cor’s broken to end it all, but he does win 4 points in the game, which takes his tally for the set to 6. A pittance, but better than a likely record setting low 2
Set 4 -
Guga - 7 winners, 2 errors forced, 4 UEs
Cor - 1 winner, 7 UEs (also misses 7/13 returns - 5 of them UEs - and double faults twice)
Aggressively ended points - Guga +5, Cor -6
Fair reflection of Guga’s showing - very good. Cor is even worse than his numbers
Misses 7/13 returns - 5 of them UEs. Makes 5/19 first serves or 26%. Double faults twice. 0 approaches
His last net point is in Game 6, Set 3 - 46 points before the last. Last non-serve-volley net point is 27 points before that. Net play had made up a large part of his effectiveness earlier
To be clear, Guga plays very well near the end, at something close to his best. He’s going for and making his winners from the back. He doesn’t play as well as Cor plays badly… it would be very difficult to
Kuerten was the defending champion and this was his third and last title at the event. Corretja was playing his second final, having previously lost in 1998 to Carlos Moya
Kuerten 136 won points, Corretja 108
Serve Stats
Kuerten...
- 1st serve percentage (72/123) 59%
- 1st serve points won (50/72) 69%
- 2nd serve points won (27/51) 53%
- Aces 10
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (30/123) 24%
Corretja...
- 1st serve percentage (64/121) 53%
- 1st serve points won (42/64) 66%
- 2nd serve points won (20/57) 35%
- Aces 5
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (14/121) 12%
Serve Patterns
Kuerten served...
- to FH 22%
- to BH 78%
Corretja served...
- to FH 21%
- to BH 72%
- to Body 7%
Return Stats
Kuerten made...
- 103 (34 FH, 69 BH), including 14 runaround FHs
- 4 Winners (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 3 Unforced (2 FH, 1 BH)
- 6 Forced (2 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (103/117) 88%
Corretja made...
- 91 (19 FH, 72 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 20 Errors, comprising...
- 10 Unforced (5 FH, 5 BH)
- 10 Forced (3 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (91/121) 75%
Break Points
Kuerten 9/17 (9 games)
Corretja 3/8 (7 games)
Winners (excluding serves, including returns)
Kuerten 33 (11 FH, 13 BH, 5 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
Corretja 36 (13 FH, 15 BH, 2 FHV, 5 BHV, 1 OH)
Kuerten's FHs - 2 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 2 dtl (1 return), 1 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl, 2 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc and 1 net chord dribbler
- BHs - 4 cc (2 passes), 4 dtl (1 pass, 1 at net), 3 inside-out returns (1 pass), 1 longline (bad bounce/wind related) and 1 lob
- 2 from serve-volley points (1 FHV, 1 BHV), both first volleys
Corretja's FHs -4 cc (2 passes), 1 cc/inside-in, 3 dtl (1 return, 1 pass at net), 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 2 drop shots and 1 lob
- BHs - 5 cc (1 return pass, 2 at net), 8 dtl (2 passes - 1 a net chord flicker, 1 at net), 1 inside-out and 1 net chord dribbler
- 4 from serve-volle points -
- 3 first volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 1 second volley (1 BHV)
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Kuerten 56
- 46 Unforced (24 FH, 17 BH, 2 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
- 10 Forced (5 FH, 1 BH, 2 FHV, 2 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.9
Corretja 69
- 43 Unforced (21 FH, 21 BH, 1 BHV)
- 26 Forced (12 FH, 14 BH)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net & 2 BH running-down-drop-shot (1 at net, 1 not)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 42.3
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Kuerten was ...
- 29/47 (62%) at net including...
- 7/9 (78%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 4/6 (67%) off 1st serve and...
- 3/3 (100%) off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Corretja was...
- 20/30 (67%) at net including...
- 8/10 (80%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 2/3 (67%) forced back/retreated
Match Report
An odd match with the wind equalizing action between the two players for most of 2 sets, and when it dies down, leaving them to play it out on merit and then it’s a mismatch; more for Corretja playing poorly than Kuerten well, though both elements are present
Part 1 - Windy, Play Checked
For most of 2 sets, hitting is relatively gentle from both sides, and not much attempt to attack by either player. Guga’s drop shots are the most attacking plays, and they’re not often seen. Its not outright passive who-blinks-first tennis - both players go for their shots at times, but certainly, wisely held back play from both, given windy conditions. Even Corretja’s hair is flapping about, as are the covers of the backboard behind the line judges
As such, consistency is most important factor. Its not greater consistency that sees Cor hold even of scoreline though. They’re roughly evenly matched on that front - and Cor attacks near as much as Guga (and usually, more successfully)
After 2 sets (not an exact match for Part 1, but close enough)
Guga - 22 winners, 17 errors forced, 36 UEs
Cor - 26 winners, 6 errors forced, 26 UEs
Aggressively ended points/UE differential - Guga +3, Cor +6
Good tennis, especially in light of difficult conditions. Hitting is on softer, safer side (not soft or gentle though), attacks are calculated and things are close to even
Part 2A - Less wind, Play Freer
Sun comes out as second set draws to an end, wind largely dies down (though not completely). Cor’s hitting doesn’t change much, but now, Guga’s able to step into court sooner rather than later in rallies to command, whereas before, they’d stuck it out rallying more passively. He doesn’t overdo it - big, wide BH cc approach shots are his most effective weapons (not going for winners from the back)
Command and dominate aren’t the same thing though. Cor’s still very much in it. Out-hit somewhat, and playing from deeper position certainly, but not out it. Excellent BH dtl shots to routine balls is his main weapon
7-5 scoreline is accurate indicator of 2nd set. 6-2 for the third less so though it points in right direction of Guga being better player. Break points for the set read Guga 2/3 (2 games), Cor 0/2 (2 games), with Cor having good shots on both his break points
Set 3 -
Guga - 4 winners, 7 errors forced, 6 UEs
Cor - 7 winners, 4 errors forced, 10 UEs
Aggressively ended points/UE differential - Guga +5, Cor +1
Still good tennis, still competitive, with Guga looking and being the better. More looking than being, what with his freer, looser play, but also actually better
Part 2B - Corretja falls apart
Along same lines of 2A, Guga upping his commanding play to more aggressive. Impressively, but bigger factor is Cor completely falling apart. Loose errors, movement getting worse and worse, waning efforts to chase balls or move for returns, even serving quality all fall off a cliff for Cor
Has anyone ever lost a set in a Slam final while winning just 2 points? Its not for lack of trying that Cor doesn’t
Up 5-0, 0-40 (returning), Guga has the easiest of OH putaways to end the match, having lost just 2 points in the set. He misses the OH. 2 points later, he has an on the bounce OH right on top of the net that makes the last one look difficult. He hits it short and around where Cor is standing, who’s able to fend it back over Guga - and Cor wins the point
Cor’s broken to end it all, but he does win 4 points in the game, which takes his tally for the set to 6. A pittance, but better than a likely record setting low 2
Set 4 -
Guga - 7 winners, 2 errors forced, 4 UEs
Cor - 1 winner, 7 UEs (also misses 7/13 returns - 5 of them UEs - and double faults twice)
Aggressively ended points - Guga +5, Cor -6
Fair reflection of Guga’s showing - very good. Cor is even worse than his numbers
Misses 7/13 returns - 5 of them UEs. Makes 5/19 first serves or 26%. Double faults twice. 0 approaches
His last net point is in Game 6, Set 3 - 46 points before the last. Last non-serve-volley net point is 27 points before that. Net play had made up a large part of his effectiveness earlier
To be clear, Guga plays very well near the end, at something close to his best. He’s going for and making his winners from the back. He doesn’t play as well as Cor plays badly… it would be very difficult to
Last edited: