Ivan Lendl beat Yannick Noah 6-4, 6-1, 6-2 in the Australian Open semi-final, 1990 on hard court
Lendl would go onto win defend his title, beating Stefan Edberg in the final. This would be Noah’s only Slam semi-final showing outside his title run at French Open 1983
Lendl won 86 points, Noah 55
Noah serve-volleyed almost all the time
Serve Stats
Lendl...
- 1st serve percentage (44/68) 65%
- 1st serve points won (37/44) 84%
- 2nd serve points won (15/24) 63%
- Aces 3 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (9/68) 13%
Noah...
- 1st serve percentage (39/73) 53%
- 1st serve points won (24/39) 62%
- 2nd serve points won (15/34) 44%
- Aces 8, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (26/73) 36%
Serve Patterns
Lendl served...
- to FH 30%
- to BH 64%
- to Body 6%
Noah served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 57%
- to Body 10%
Return Stats
Lendl made...
- 46 (14 FH, 32 BH), including 2 return-approaches
- 7 Winners (2 FH, 5 BH)
- 17 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 15 Forced (5 FH, 10 BH)
- Return Rate (46/72) 64%
Noah made...
- 55 (17 FH, 38 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 6 return-approaches
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (3 FH, 2 BH), including 2 return-approach attempts
- 1 Forced (1 BH)
- Return Rate (55/64) 86%
Break Points
Lendl 6/9 (6 games)
Noah 0/2 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Lendl 36 (15 FH, 14 BH, 1 FHV, 4 BHV, 2 OH)
Noah 9 (1 FH, 2 BH, 4 FHV, 2 BHV)
Lendl had 24 passes - 7 returns (2 FH, 5 BH) & 17 regular (9 FH, 8 BH)
- FH returns - 1 dtl, 1 inside-in
- BH returns - 2 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in
- regular FHs - 2 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out, 3 inside-out, 1 inside-out/longline, 1 inside-in, 1 lob
- regular BHs - 3 cc (1 slice at net), 2 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-out, 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl/inside-out (non-net)
- regular (non-pass) FHs - 1 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl, 1 inside-in,
- regular BH - 1 dtl
- 4 from serve-volley points (4 BHV), all first volleys
Noah had 6 from serve-volley points -
- 3 first 'volleys' (1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 FH at net)... the FH at net was a drop shot
- 3 second volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV)
- BH passes - 1 cc, 1 dtl
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Lendl 16
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 1 BH, 1 OH)... with 1 BH pass attempt
- 12 Forced (7 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.5
Noah 40
- 20 Unforced (4 FH, 9 BH, 1 FHV, 5 BHV, 1 BHOH)
- 20 Forced (3 FH, 8 BH, 5 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 3 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Lendl was...
- 17/22 (77%) at net, including...
- 6/7 (86%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 1/2 return-approaching
Noah was...
- 34/73 (47%) at net, including...
- 24/53 (45%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 12/24 (50%) off 1st serve and...
- 12/29 (41%) off 2nd serve
---
- 4/6 (67%) return-approaching
Match Report
After competitive opening set, the serve-volleying Noah fades and its all Lendl in the next 2. Noah’s movements descend to very poor and isn’t upto handle Lendl’s low chip-returning. The court is slow
After 1 set, Lendl’s won 31 points, Noah 29 with both players serving 30 of them. Lendl snagging break to start, but Noah losing just 4 service points in next 4 holds
Second set starts competitively, with Noah holding to love and extending Lendl to 12 points to consolidate. And Noah advances to 40-30, game point after that. At that stage, Lendl’s won 40 points, Noah 41
From then on, Lendl wins 46 points (starting with the next 16), Noah 14
So what exactly happens to Noah? He’s either injured or thoroughly gassed. Best guess, the latter. His movements gets worse and worse. Moving forward, sideways or getting down
There’s no trigger incident for possibly injury. He shakes a leg once or twice and makes a few faces, but Noah always makes faces. He doesn’t seem to call for a medical time out (I’m not sure what the rules are for so doing during the period. In the final, Edberg received multiple treatments mid-match). He is sweating substantially and breathing heavily often. It’s a blindingly sunny day, the kind where one can imagine glare of sun of the court might be an issue for the players
It’d be a bit strange for Australian Open semi-finalist to get this gassed after a set and couple games of tennis, but not unheard of. And it looks like that’s what happened
The tennis is simple
Lendl’s serve game
Lendl serves at 3-quarter pace, keeps high in count of 65%. Some of the lightest serving I’ve seen from him.
- Returns don’t come back strong
- Lendl moves over to play FH inside-out to Noah’s BH. Not overly strong. Either keeps it at it to draw error or comes in off it and finishes at net. QED, clockwork dependable pattern
- Lendl throws in a few serve-volleys. Gets easy volleys and puts them away
- Easily outlasted/pushed around in baseline rallies, Noah takes to chip-charging returns or otherwise manufacturing chip approaches. Its better than playing Lendl’s game - though far from good
65% in count for Lendl is high. He’s got just 2 first serve aces from 44 first serves. Gentle serving
Noah is very consistent on the return. Even against toned down serving on slow court, 86% return rate is something
To Noah’s credit, he chip-charge returns weaker first serves as well as seconds. At least, for awhile. He chip-charge returns 6 times in first 5 return games of match, and then never again. So right when Lendl’s big winning run starts is when he stops
In baseline rallies -
- Winners - Lendl 5 (4 FH, 1 BH)
- Errors forced - Lendl 3, Noah 1
- UEs - Lendl 2 FH, Noah 13 (4 FH, 9 BH)
UEs speaks for themselves. They don’t take long in coming from Noah and his hitting is feeble too. Lot of moderate powered FH inside-out’ng from Lendl to draw all those BH UEs. He could undoubtedly hit much harder to be pressuring or even attacking, but no need to
Not a bad move from Noah to take on a few BH dtl kill shots. He misses them all (about 3-4), but what does he have to lose going for them?
Lendl would go onto win defend his title, beating Stefan Edberg in the final. This would be Noah’s only Slam semi-final showing outside his title run at French Open 1983
Lendl won 86 points, Noah 55
Noah serve-volleyed almost all the time
Serve Stats
Lendl...
- 1st serve percentage (44/68) 65%
- 1st serve points won (37/44) 84%
- 2nd serve points won (15/24) 63%
- Aces 3 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (9/68) 13%
Noah...
- 1st serve percentage (39/73) 53%
- 1st serve points won (24/39) 62%
- 2nd serve points won (15/34) 44%
- Aces 8, Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (26/73) 36%
Serve Patterns
Lendl served...
- to FH 30%
- to BH 64%
- to Body 6%
Noah served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 57%
- to Body 10%
Return Stats
Lendl made...
- 46 (14 FH, 32 BH), including 2 return-approaches
- 7 Winners (2 FH, 5 BH)
- 17 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 15 Forced (5 FH, 10 BH)
- Return Rate (46/72) 64%
Noah made...
- 55 (17 FH, 38 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 6 return-approaches
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (3 FH, 2 BH), including 2 return-approach attempts
- 1 Forced (1 BH)
- Return Rate (55/64) 86%
Break Points
Lendl 6/9 (6 games)
Noah 0/2 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Lendl 36 (15 FH, 14 BH, 1 FHV, 4 BHV, 2 OH)
Noah 9 (1 FH, 2 BH, 4 FHV, 2 BHV)
Lendl had 24 passes - 7 returns (2 FH, 5 BH) & 17 regular (9 FH, 8 BH)
- FH returns - 1 dtl, 1 inside-in
- BH returns - 2 cc, 1 dtl, 1 inside-out, 1 inside-in
- regular FHs - 2 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out, 3 inside-out, 1 inside-out/longline, 1 inside-in, 1 lob
- regular BHs - 3 cc (1 slice at net), 2 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-out, 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl/inside-out (non-net)
- regular (non-pass) FHs - 1 cc, 1 cc/inside-in, 1 dtl, 1 inside-in,
- regular BH - 1 dtl
- 4 from serve-volley points (4 BHV), all first volleys
Noah had 6 from serve-volley points -
- 3 first 'volleys' (1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 FH at net)... the FH at net was a drop shot
- 3 second volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV)
- BH passes - 1 cc, 1 dtl
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Lendl 16
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 1 BH, 1 OH)... with 1 BH pass attempt
- 12 Forced (7 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.5
Noah 40
- 20 Unforced (4 FH, 9 BH, 1 FHV, 5 BHV, 1 BHOH)
- 20 Forced (3 FH, 8 BH, 5 FHV, 1 FH1/2V, 3 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Lendl was...
- 17/22 (77%) at net, including...
- 6/7 (86%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 1/2 return-approaching
Noah was...
- 34/73 (47%) at net, including...
- 24/53 (45%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 12/24 (50%) off 1st serve and...
- 12/29 (41%) off 2nd serve
---
- 4/6 (67%) return-approaching
Match Report
After competitive opening set, the serve-volleying Noah fades and its all Lendl in the next 2. Noah’s movements descend to very poor and isn’t upto handle Lendl’s low chip-returning. The court is slow
After 1 set, Lendl’s won 31 points, Noah 29 with both players serving 30 of them. Lendl snagging break to start, but Noah losing just 4 service points in next 4 holds
Second set starts competitively, with Noah holding to love and extending Lendl to 12 points to consolidate. And Noah advances to 40-30, game point after that. At that stage, Lendl’s won 40 points, Noah 41
From then on, Lendl wins 46 points (starting with the next 16), Noah 14
So what exactly happens to Noah? He’s either injured or thoroughly gassed. Best guess, the latter. His movements gets worse and worse. Moving forward, sideways or getting down
There’s no trigger incident for possibly injury. He shakes a leg once or twice and makes a few faces, but Noah always makes faces. He doesn’t seem to call for a medical time out (I’m not sure what the rules are for so doing during the period. In the final, Edberg received multiple treatments mid-match). He is sweating substantially and breathing heavily often. It’s a blindingly sunny day, the kind where one can imagine glare of sun of the court might be an issue for the players
It’d be a bit strange for Australian Open semi-finalist to get this gassed after a set and couple games of tennis, but not unheard of. And it looks like that’s what happened
The tennis is simple
Lendl’s serve game
Lendl serves at 3-quarter pace, keeps high in count of 65%. Some of the lightest serving I’ve seen from him.
- Returns don’t come back strong
- Lendl moves over to play FH inside-out to Noah’s BH. Not overly strong. Either keeps it at it to draw error or comes in off it and finishes at net. QED, clockwork dependable pattern
- Lendl throws in a few serve-volleys. Gets easy volleys and puts them away
- Easily outlasted/pushed around in baseline rallies, Noah takes to chip-charging returns or otherwise manufacturing chip approaches. Its better than playing Lendl’s game - though far from good
65% in count for Lendl is high. He’s got just 2 first serve aces from 44 first serves. Gentle serving
Noah is very consistent on the return. Even against toned down serving on slow court, 86% return rate is something
To Noah’s credit, he chip-charge returns weaker first serves as well as seconds. At least, for awhile. He chip-charge returns 6 times in first 5 return games of match, and then never again. So right when Lendl’s big winning run starts is when he stops
In baseline rallies -
- Winners - Lendl 5 (4 FH, 1 BH)
- Errors forced - Lendl 3, Noah 1
- UEs - Lendl 2 FH, Noah 13 (4 FH, 9 BH)
UEs speaks for themselves. They don’t take long in coming from Noah and his hitting is feeble too. Lot of moderate powered FH inside-out’ng from Lendl to draw all those BH UEs. He could undoubtedly hit much harder to be pressuring or even attacking, but no need to
Not a bad move from Noah to take on a few BH dtl kill shots. He misses them all (about 3-4), but what does he have to lose going for them?