Nicolas Massu (Chile) beat Mardy Fish (USA) 6-3, 3-6, 2-6, 6-3, 6-4 in the Olympic Games final, 2004 on hard court in Athens, Greece
Massu was seeded 10th, Fish was unseeded. Fernando Gonzalez (Chile), who Fish had beaten in the semi-final, would win the Bronze medal by beating Taylor Dent (USA)
Massu would also win the doubles Gold, partnering with Gonzalez in another 5-set match against Germany
Massu won 153 points, Fish 151
Fish serve-volleyed about three-quarters of the time off first serves
Serve Stats
Massu...
- 1st serve percentage (89/155) 57%
- 1st serve points won (60/89) 67%
- 2nd serve points won (34/66) 52%
- Aces 10 (2 second serves)
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (39/155) 25%
Fish...
- 1st serve percentage (75/149) 50%
- 1st serve points won (53/75) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (37/74) 50%
- Aces 23 (2 second serves)
- Double Faults 9
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (45/149) 30%
Serve Patterns
Massu served...
- to FH 38%
- to BH 56%
- to Body 6%
Fish served...
- to FH 32%
- to BH 60%
- to Body 8%
Return Stats
Massu made...
- 95 (45 FH, 50 BH), including 18 runaround FHs
- 6 Winners (5 FH, 1 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 22 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (4 FH, 1 BH), including 3 runaround FHs
- 17 Forced (8 FH, 9 BH)
- Return Rate (95/140) 68%
Fish made...
- 110 (49 FH, 61 BH), including 6 return-approaches
- 7 Winners (2 FH, 5 BH)
- 29 Errors, comprising...
- 11 Unforced (4 FH, 7 BH)
- 18 Forced (8 FH, 10 BH)
- Return Rate (110/149) 74%
Break Points
Massu 6/12 (9 games)
Fish 6/13 (8 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Massu 24 (16 FH, 5 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
Fish 37 (5 FH, 11 BH, 8 FHV, 5 BHV, 8 OH)
Massu's FHs - 4 cc (1 return, 1 pass), 1 cc/inside-in, 3 dtl passes, 5 inside-out (4 returns - 2 runarounds, 1 pass), 1 inside-in, 1 inside-in/longline, 1 longline
- BH passes - 2 dtl (1 at net), 1 inside-out return, 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl at net
- regular BH - 1 net chord dribbler
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley FHV
- 1 other FHV was a swinging cc
Fish's FHs - 2 cc (1 return), 2 inside-out (1 at net), 1 inside-in return
- BHs - 2 cc (1 at net), 8 dtl (5 returns), 1 inside-out
- 10 from serve-volley points -
- 4 first volleys (2 BHV, 2 OH)
- 4 second volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
- 2 third volleys (2 OH)
- 2 other FHVs were swinging cc shots & 1 other OH was on the bounce from the baseline
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Massu 63
- 24 Unforced (17 FH, 7 BH)... with 1 BH at net pass attempt
- 39 Forced (22 FH, 17 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.9
Fish 81
- 60 Unforced (27 FH, 27 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV)... with 1 FH at net
- 21 Forced (6 FH, 6 BH, 1 FH1/2V, 4 BHV, 4 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.2
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Massu was...
- 10/11 (91%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 2nd serve
Fish was...
- 60/89 (67%) at net, including...
- 26/41 (63%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 5/6 (83%) return-approaching
- 0/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
Intense, lively, fun and very good match on a slow side of normal hard court. And with varied action. There’s a bit of almost every tennis skill set on show. All on show are -
- Good, big serving. Fish is more accurate, Massu when he wants to is bigger
- Very good returning, both defensively and offensively. Especially Fish. The aggressive returning is a defining part of match and turns the whole serve-return duel into a show
- Intense ball-striking from both players. Pressuring, bordering on attacking on power grounds alone on just the stock stuff. Fish is little more regular with it but again, Massu’s FH when he wants is the biggest dog in the park
- Fish’s shot tolerance and Massu’s speed and defence are both a treat to see
- Fish serve-volleys off first serves to add more variety
- Off the ground, Fish is more adventurous in attacking wide and does so off both wings. If anything, more the BH than FH. He gets a bit sloppy with it at times. Massu stays in powerfully pressuring mode more often, but again, his FH is deadliest shot when he wants it to be
Massu is stronger player at end and wins. His so being isn’t related to stamina, with the two players evenly matched of energy at that stage. And both are good
One player or the other take turns in having run of play, without the second fiddle playing badly. Match long figures have come out very close, with the runs canceling out
Points won - Massu 153, Fish 151
Points served - Massu 155, Fish 149
Break points - Massu 6/12, Fish 6/13 (Massu has them in 9 games, Fish 8)
Massu with 24 winners, 24 UEs, forcing 21 errors.
Fish 37 winners, 60 UEs, 39 errors forced
… to go with moderate freebies (Massu 25%, Fish 30% - with the latter helped with 76% first serve-volleying)
Those are deceptive figures. Would think its just solid player vs aggressive, loose one
Massu’s winners are low for 5 sets and Fish’s UEs are huge
Still, quality comes through. Massu with equal winners and UEs, Fish in net positives aggressively with the large lot of FEs he draws
aggressively ended points/UE differential - Massu +21, Fish +16
Constant intensity (rather than solid vs aggressive, loose) best describes the match. Baseline rallies are very hard hitting. Massu having better of them for being more solid. He is commendably so, but I would put that down more to Fish being loose. Occasionally sloppy, but not bad in context of dual beat-down staple action
Fish serve-volleying most of the time off first serves, so its not a baseline match. Not a bad contest there either, and he wins 63% so doing. Massu comes to net to shake hands, and is there just 11 times (Fish has 89 approaches, to contrast)
And finally, a very hot contest between server and returner
The two share 13 return winners - and only 1 is a pass. Plenty more winning wide returns, especially from Fish
That intensity of returning leads to both beefing up second serves, occasionally sending down a second ‘first’ serve. The 2 share 4 second serve aces - and none of them are due to misanticpation by returner
Only in last set does Fish not serve-volley much. He switches to powering his way to net from baseline rallies. He’s a stickler for ‘never approach cc’ and almost always comes in off line shots, but Massu’s steadily powerful on the pass (and very quick) to thwart him
Lot going on, almost all of of it good and certainly intense of nature
Run of play switching hands, but overall, virtually equal
Very good stuff, in short
Serve & Return
Strong serving met by substantial counter-attacking returning.
In counts are low. Match long, Massu 57%, Fish 50%
Those are lifted up by last set. After 4 sets, they’re Massu 42%, Fish 48%
On average, Fish serves bigger. He also serve-volleys most of the time off first serves
Massu’s fully unleashed first serves are bigger still. Must be around 140mph
Fish’s first serve placement is more precise
First serve ace rate - Massu 9%, Fish 28%
That doesn’t reflect the discrepancy in quality of first serves, though Fish’s is better. Massu’s figure is small, but he does serve with big power
Against such big serving, would think good returning would be normal, defensive returning
It isn’t. Both players, especially Fish, use the return as a weapon. Against both serves
Fish returns from on baseline or inside. Including against first serves. Against huge first serves even. He takes on dtl return winners against both serves. And delivers
Massu returns from more normal position, and takes his cue from Fish to attack with second return (he’s usually facing serve-volley against first serve). FHs is big weapon and he runsaround to take some huge cuts with it
Against baseline server, Massu has 5 return winners (all FHs, 2 runarounds), Fish 7 (2 FH, 5 BH - all the BHs dtl)
Plenty more error forcing returns from both. Plenty more pressuring returns. Good lot of third ball UEs drawn by above average force returns (for which, discredit to server, but it is more pressured than your run of the mill third ball UE)
You won’t find many matches where both players return with such gung-ho spirit
The shot choices are more edgily adventurous than ‘calculated risk taking’, but far from ‘wild’ too. Both return orthodoxly too much of the time, but attempts at winning return is always around the corner, especially by Fish
And very surprisingly, both retain good defensive returning too. Fish on baseline manages to reflex return back sound-barrier breaking first serves. His early position cuts down on how wide Massu can get his serves (1 reason for his low aces), but he doesn’t pay much of a price in terms of hard forced, overwhelmed by pace serves in swing zone (and he faces a lot of them). And early as he takes it, a push-reflex return is liable to rush Massu on third ball even
The combo of defensive and aggressive returning from Fish is outstanding. 1 type of aggressive return he probably under-uses is power return-approach. He’s 5/6 when going for it and doesn’t have an error trying. He’s done well with his for the throat straight winner returns, but not 5/6 good.
Regular attacking second returns leads to both players sending down big second serves and both players have 2 second serve aces. And good lot more that’s first serve calibre
Massu was seeded 10th, Fish was unseeded. Fernando Gonzalez (Chile), who Fish had beaten in the semi-final, would win the Bronze medal by beating Taylor Dent (USA)
Massu would also win the doubles Gold, partnering with Gonzalez in another 5-set match against Germany
Massu won 153 points, Fish 151
Fish serve-volleyed about three-quarters of the time off first serves
Serve Stats
Massu...
- 1st serve percentage (89/155) 57%
- 1st serve points won (60/89) 67%
- 2nd serve points won (34/66) 52%
- Aces 10 (2 second serves)
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (39/155) 25%
Fish...
- 1st serve percentage (75/149) 50%
- 1st serve points won (53/75) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (37/74) 50%
- Aces 23 (2 second serves)
- Double Faults 9
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (45/149) 30%
Serve Patterns
Massu served...
- to FH 38%
- to BH 56%
- to Body 6%
Fish served...
- to FH 32%
- to BH 60%
- to Body 8%
Return Stats
Massu made...
- 95 (45 FH, 50 BH), including 18 runaround FHs
- 6 Winners (5 FH, 1 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 22 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (4 FH, 1 BH), including 3 runaround FHs
- 17 Forced (8 FH, 9 BH)
- Return Rate (95/140) 68%
Fish made...
- 110 (49 FH, 61 BH), including 6 return-approaches
- 7 Winners (2 FH, 5 BH)
- 29 Errors, comprising...
- 11 Unforced (4 FH, 7 BH)
- 18 Forced (8 FH, 10 BH)
- Return Rate (110/149) 74%
Break Points
Massu 6/12 (9 games)
Fish 6/13 (8 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Massu 24 (16 FH, 5 BH, 2 FHV, 1 BHV)
Fish 37 (5 FH, 11 BH, 8 FHV, 5 BHV, 8 OH)
Massu's FHs - 4 cc (1 return, 1 pass), 1 cc/inside-in, 3 dtl passes, 5 inside-out (4 returns - 2 runarounds, 1 pass), 1 inside-in, 1 inside-in/longline, 1 longline
- BH passes - 2 dtl (1 at net), 1 inside-out return, 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl at net
- regular BH - 1 net chord dribbler
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley FHV
- 1 other FHV was a swinging cc
Fish's FHs - 2 cc (1 return), 2 inside-out (1 at net), 1 inside-in return
- BHs - 2 cc (1 at net), 8 dtl (5 returns), 1 inside-out
- 10 from serve-volley points -
- 4 first volleys (2 BHV, 2 OH)
- 4 second volleys (2 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
- 2 third volleys (2 OH)
- 2 other FHVs were swinging cc shots & 1 other OH was on the bounce from the baseline
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Massu 63
- 24 Unforced (17 FH, 7 BH)... with 1 BH at net pass attempt
- 39 Forced (22 FH, 17 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.9
Fish 81
- 60 Unforced (27 FH, 27 BH, 2 FHV, 4 BHV)... with 1 FH at net
- 21 Forced (6 FH, 6 BH, 1 FH1/2V, 4 BHV, 4 BH1/2V)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.2
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Massu was...
- 10/11 (91%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 2nd serve
Fish was...
- 60/89 (67%) at net, including...
- 26/41 (63%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 5/6 (83%) return-approaching
- 0/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
Intense, lively, fun and very good match on a slow side of normal hard court. And with varied action. There’s a bit of almost every tennis skill set on show. All on show are -
- Good, big serving. Fish is more accurate, Massu when he wants to is bigger
- Very good returning, both defensively and offensively. Especially Fish. The aggressive returning is a defining part of match and turns the whole serve-return duel into a show
- Intense ball-striking from both players. Pressuring, bordering on attacking on power grounds alone on just the stock stuff. Fish is little more regular with it but again, Massu’s FH when he wants is the biggest dog in the park
- Fish’s shot tolerance and Massu’s speed and defence are both a treat to see
- Fish serve-volleys off first serves to add more variety
- Off the ground, Fish is more adventurous in attacking wide and does so off both wings. If anything, more the BH than FH. He gets a bit sloppy with it at times. Massu stays in powerfully pressuring mode more often, but again, his FH is deadliest shot when he wants it to be
Massu is stronger player at end and wins. His so being isn’t related to stamina, with the two players evenly matched of energy at that stage. And both are good
One player or the other take turns in having run of play, without the second fiddle playing badly. Match long figures have come out very close, with the runs canceling out
Points won - Massu 153, Fish 151
Points served - Massu 155, Fish 149
Break points - Massu 6/12, Fish 6/13 (Massu has them in 9 games, Fish 8)
Massu with 24 winners, 24 UEs, forcing 21 errors.
Fish 37 winners, 60 UEs, 39 errors forced
… to go with moderate freebies (Massu 25%, Fish 30% - with the latter helped with 76% first serve-volleying)
Those are deceptive figures. Would think its just solid player vs aggressive, loose one
Massu’s winners are low for 5 sets and Fish’s UEs are huge
Still, quality comes through. Massu with equal winners and UEs, Fish in net positives aggressively with the large lot of FEs he draws
aggressively ended points/UE differential - Massu +21, Fish +16
Constant intensity (rather than solid vs aggressive, loose) best describes the match. Baseline rallies are very hard hitting. Massu having better of them for being more solid. He is commendably so, but I would put that down more to Fish being loose. Occasionally sloppy, but not bad in context of dual beat-down staple action
Fish serve-volleying most of the time off first serves, so its not a baseline match. Not a bad contest there either, and he wins 63% so doing. Massu comes to net to shake hands, and is there just 11 times (Fish has 89 approaches, to contrast)
And finally, a very hot contest between server and returner
The two share 13 return winners - and only 1 is a pass. Plenty more winning wide returns, especially from Fish
That intensity of returning leads to both beefing up second serves, occasionally sending down a second ‘first’ serve. The 2 share 4 second serve aces - and none of them are due to misanticpation by returner
Only in last set does Fish not serve-volley much. He switches to powering his way to net from baseline rallies. He’s a stickler for ‘never approach cc’ and almost always comes in off line shots, but Massu’s steadily powerful on the pass (and very quick) to thwart him
Lot going on, almost all of of it good and certainly intense of nature
Run of play switching hands, but overall, virtually equal
Very good stuff, in short
Serve & Return
Strong serving met by substantial counter-attacking returning.
In counts are low. Match long, Massu 57%, Fish 50%
Those are lifted up by last set. After 4 sets, they’re Massu 42%, Fish 48%
On average, Fish serves bigger. He also serve-volleys most of the time off first serves
Massu’s fully unleashed first serves are bigger still. Must be around 140mph
Fish’s first serve placement is more precise
First serve ace rate - Massu 9%, Fish 28%
That doesn’t reflect the discrepancy in quality of first serves, though Fish’s is better. Massu’s figure is small, but he does serve with big power
Against such big serving, would think good returning would be normal, defensive returning
It isn’t. Both players, especially Fish, use the return as a weapon. Against both serves
Fish returns from on baseline or inside. Including against first serves. Against huge first serves even. He takes on dtl return winners against both serves. And delivers
Massu returns from more normal position, and takes his cue from Fish to attack with second return (he’s usually facing serve-volley against first serve). FHs is big weapon and he runsaround to take some huge cuts with it
Against baseline server, Massu has 5 return winners (all FHs, 2 runarounds), Fish 7 (2 FH, 5 BH - all the BHs dtl)
Plenty more error forcing returns from both. Plenty more pressuring returns. Good lot of third ball UEs drawn by above average force returns (for which, discredit to server, but it is more pressured than your run of the mill third ball UE)
You won’t find many matches where both players return with such gung-ho spirit
The shot choices are more edgily adventurous than ‘calculated risk taking’, but far from ‘wild’ too. Both return orthodoxly too much of the time, but attempts at winning return is always around the corner, especially by Fish
And very surprisingly, both retain good defensive returning too. Fish on baseline manages to reflex return back sound-barrier breaking first serves. His early position cuts down on how wide Massu can get his serves (1 reason for his low aces), but he doesn’t pay much of a price in terms of hard forced, overwhelmed by pace serves in swing zone (and he faces a lot of them). And early as he takes it, a push-reflex return is liable to rush Massu on third ball even
The combo of defensive and aggressive returning from Fish is outstanding. 1 type of aggressive return he probably under-uses is power return-approach. He’s 5/6 when going for it and doesn’t have an error trying. He’s done well with his for the throat straight winner returns, but not 5/6 good.
Regular attacking second returns leads to both players sending down big second serves and both players have 2 second serve aces. And good lot more that’s first serve calibre