Miloslav Mecir beat Mats Wilander 6-1, 6-2 in the Hamburg semi-final, 1985 on clay
Mecir would go onto win the title, beating Henrik Sundstrom in the final. It was the pair’s first match. They would meet shortly after in the Rome semi-final, with Mecir again winning
Mecir won 60 points, Wilander 36
(Note: I’m missing partial data for 2 points -
Set 1, Game 5, point 5 - serve direction and corresponding return data
Set 2, Game 4, Point 3 - serve direction, corresponding return data and via audio and educated guess, its been marked a serve-volley. Confirmed net point, but not serve-volley)
Serve Stats
Mecir...
- 1st serve percentage (29/40) 73%
- 1st serve points won (21/29) 72%
- 2nd serve points won (6/11) 55%
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (3/40) 8%
Wilander...
- 1st serve percentage (33/56) 59%
- 1st serve points won (16/33) 48%
- 2nd serve points won (7/23) 30%
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (6/56) 11%
Serve Patterns
Mecir served...
- to FH 46%
- to BH 41%
- to Body 13%
Wilander served...
- to FH 45%
- to BH 43%
- to Body 11%
Return Stats
Mecir made...
- 49 (24 FH, 23 BH, 2 ??), including 3 runaround FHs & 6 return-approaches
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 2 Forced (2 FH)
- Return Rate (49/55) 89%
Wilander made...
- 36 (20 FH, 16 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 3 Errors, all unforced...
- 3 Unforced (2 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (36/39) 92%
Break Points
Mecir 6/14 (6 games)
Wilander 1/2 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Mecir 28 (12 FH, 10 BH, 3 FHV, 3 BHV)
Wilander 5 (2 FH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Mecir's regular FHs - 2 cc, 1 inside-out/dtl, 3 drop shots (2 at net)
- FH passes - 4 cc, 1 lob, 1 running-down-drop-shot cc at net
- regular BHs - 3 dtl, 1 inside-out/dtl, 2 drop shots
- BH passes - 1 dtl, 3 lobs
- 2 from return-approach points (2 FHV)
Wilander's FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Mecir 24
- 15 Unforced (2 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV, 4 BHV)
- 9 Forced (3 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... the BHV was a baseline pass attempt
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50.7
Wilander 28
- 14 Unforced (5 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 14 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Mecir was 19/27 (70%) at net, with...
- 4/6 (67%) return-approaching
- 0/2 forced back/retreated
Wilander was...
- 12/27 (44%) at net, including...
- 3/7 (43%), serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
To coin a phrase, ‘white magic’ from Mecir. As in, there is some observable pattern or structure to what he does (the ‘white’ part) and what he does is amazing (the ‘magic’). Though he does it with such gentle ease that one would think he’s simply playing a park player that he’s toying around with for fun
28 winners from Mec or 1.87 per game. Putting that in context -
- both players combined have 11 unreturned serves/double faults
- both players combined have 29 UEs (15 by Mec, 14 for Mats)
- both players combined have 23 FEs (9 by Mec, 14 by Mats)
- Mats has 5 winners. Mec has more than double that of either FH or BH alone (and he has more volleys too)
28 winners, 15 UEs. Would take some searching to find virtual 2:1 winners to UEs showing on clay. There’s only a handful of such showings from full serve-volley matches on grass
Mec doesn’t serve-volley. Point-starter of a serve (he has no aces and just 3/40 unreturned serves), as harmless as can be. Returns consistently against slightly less weak serve then his own (still in harmless territory), with just the early taken, spanked return-approaches damaging
Otherwise, virtually all points with equal prospects for both players
From there, Mec turns the soon to be French Open champion inside-out
cc + dtl 1-2s off both wings is the backbone of his offence
First cc shot isn’t too wide or powerful, but enough to get Mats close enough to sideline, from where Mats responds with comfy cc of his own
Second shot goes dtl, again, not overly powerful, and he follows to net
Rarely, ball goes through for winner. More often, Mats with running, sliding ‘get’ to reach ball and very forced passing error
Smaller amount of wrong-footing shots. BH inside-out’ish shots are handy here
Doesn’t take long to get to the 1-2. No long, unnecessary pre-amble of groundies exchanges. Though he’s actually come out better even at that, and has 4 neutral UEs to 8 from Mats
Drop shots. Gorgeous, disguised, perfect drop shots for winners. Both wings. He hasn’t pushed Mats back to set up so the disguise is important
On the volley, prefers angled, drop volleys, including inside-out ones. But success of net play is based on the artsy baseline set up. He’s left with easy finishing volleys and isn’t actually too good there. 6 winners, 5 UEs on the volley - with both the misses and winners being easy ones. And 2 of those winners come from another starring ‘move’…
Very early taken, spanked return-approach. Again, return does more of the work than the volleying. The only time power rises to damaging levels
Outplayed and toyed with from the back, Mats takes to coming in himself, including via serve-volley. Which opens up different drawer of passing magic for Mec
Pinpoint perfect, angled passing winners on the move/slide. Way he makes those, would think stable position pass would be a gimme for Mec - and you’d be right
But where’s the art, magic or fun in just putting pass after pass winner? Mec throws in gorgeous lobs to mix it up. Again, off both wings. Not a ghost of a chance for Mats to reach them
28 winners, 24 errors (15 UEs, 9 FEs) from Mec, while forcing 14 more errors. Mats has 5 winners, 14 UEs
And what is Mats doing while all this is going on?( Mostly watching and running)
Like Mec, harmless serve and very consistent return against an even more harmless one
Trades a few groundies, solidly. Til Mec starts his pretty 1-2+ combos
Hurt by those, Mats turns to manufacturing approaches himself. Solid to good ones, if not as precisely artful as Mec’s
First volley he gets at net is something between ‘regulation, under-net’ to ‘lowish’
Has to volley up to it some. Mats’ isn’t the most powerful puncher of volleys to begin with and from this height, would be extremely difficult to get very aggressive volley deep. And he’s no drop volleyer, so he looks to go deep
Doesn’t miss much, but decent look at pass for Mec. For the rest, see earlier description of Mec’s passing
Cutely, both players at net 27 times. Mec wins 19 of his, Mats 12 (and 2 of Mats’ is via unreturned serves)
I think Mec is playing with a wooden racquet. Its got a ‘V’ neck, but looks like its wooden
How has it all come out in numbers?
In count isn’t too important. Its more so for Mats because his second serves occasionally get spank, return-approached and because he takes to first serve-volleying some
Mecir would go onto win the title, beating Henrik Sundstrom in the final. It was the pair’s first match. They would meet shortly after in the Rome semi-final, with Mecir again winning
Mecir won 60 points, Wilander 36
(Note: I’m missing partial data for 2 points -
Set 1, Game 5, point 5 - serve direction and corresponding return data
Set 2, Game 4, Point 3 - serve direction, corresponding return data and via audio and educated guess, its been marked a serve-volley. Confirmed net point, but not serve-volley)
Serve Stats
Mecir...
- 1st serve percentage (29/40) 73%
- 1st serve points won (21/29) 72%
- 2nd serve points won (6/11) 55%
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (3/40) 8%
Wilander...
- 1st serve percentage (33/56) 59%
- 1st serve points won (16/33) 48%
- 2nd serve points won (7/23) 30%
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (6/56) 11%
Serve Patterns
Mecir served...
- to FH 46%
- to BH 41%
- to Body 13%
Wilander served...
- to FH 45%
- to BH 43%
- to Body 11%
Return Stats
Mecir made...
- 49 (24 FH, 23 BH, 2 ??), including 3 runaround FHs & 6 return-approaches
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (2 FH, 2 BH)
- 2 Forced (2 FH)
- Return Rate (49/55) 89%
Wilander made...
- 36 (20 FH, 16 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 3 Errors, all unforced...
- 3 Unforced (2 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (36/39) 92%
Break Points
Mecir 6/14 (6 games)
Wilander 1/2 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Mecir 28 (12 FH, 10 BH, 3 FHV, 3 BHV)
Wilander 5 (2 FH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Mecir's regular FHs - 2 cc, 1 inside-out/dtl, 3 drop shots (2 at net)
- FH passes - 4 cc, 1 lob, 1 running-down-drop-shot cc at net
- regular BHs - 3 dtl, 1 inside-out/dtl, 2 drop shots
- BH passes - 1 dtl, 3 lobs
- 2 from return-approach points (2 FHV)
Wilander's FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Mecir 24
- 15 Unforced (2 FH, 8 BH, 1 FHV, 4 BHV)
- 9 Forced (3 FH, 4 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... the BHV was a baseline pass attempt
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 50.7
Wilander 28
- 14 Unforced (5 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 14 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH, 1 BHV)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Mecir was 19/27 (70%) at net, with...
- 4/6 (67%) return-approaching
- 0/2 forced back/retreated
Wilander was...
- 12/27 (44%) at net, including...
- 3/7 (43%), serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
To coin a phrase, ‘white magic’ from Mecir. As in, there is some observable pattern or structure to what he does (the ‘white’ part) and what he does is amazing (the ‘magic’). Though he does it with such gentle ease that one would think he’s simply playing a park player that he’s toying around with for fun
28 winners from Mec or 1.87 per game. Putting that in context -
- both players combined have 11 unreturned serves/double faults
- both players combined have 29 UEs (15 by Mec, 14 for Mats)
- both players combined have 23 FEs (9 by Mec, 14 by Mats)
- Mats has 5 winners. Mec has more than double that of either FH or BH alone (and he has more volleys too)
28 winners, 15 UEs. Would take some searching to find virtual 2:1 winners to UEs showing on clay. There’s only a handful of such showings from full serve-volley matches on grass
Mec doesn’t serve-volley. Point-starter of a serve (he has no aces and just 3/40 unreturned serves), as harmless as can be. Returns consistently against slightly less weak serve then his own (still in harmless territory), with just the early taken, spanked return-approaches damaging
Otherwise, virtually all points with equal prospects for both players
From there, Mec turns the soon to be French Open champion inside-out
cc + dtl 1-2s off both wings is the backbone of his offence
First cc shot isn’t too wide or powerful, but enough to get Mats close enough to sideline, from where Mats responds with comfy cc of his own
Second shot goes dtl, again, not overly powerful, and he follows to net
Rarely, ball goes through for winner. More often, Mats with running, sliding ‘get’ to reach ball and very forced passing error
Smaller amount of wrong-footing shots. BH inside-out’ish shots are handy here
Doesn’t take long to get to the 1-2. No long, unnecessary pre-amble of groundies exchanges. Though he’s actually come out better even at that, and has 4 neutral UEs to 8 from Mats
Drop shots. Gorgeous, disguised, perfect drop shots for winners. Both wings. He hasn’t pushed Mats back to set up so the disguise is important
On the volley, prefers angled, drop volleys, including inside-out ones. But success of net play is based on the artsy baseline set up. He’s left with easy finishing volleys and isn’t actually too good there. 6 winners, 5 UEs on the volley - with both the misses and winners being easy ones. And 2 of those winners come from another starring ‘move’…
Very early taken, spanked return-approach. Again, return does more of the work than the volleying. The only time power rises to damaging levels
Outplayed and toyed with from the back, Mats takes to coming in himself, including via serve-volley. Which opens up different drawer of passing magic for Mec
Pinpoint perfect, angled passing winners on the move/slide. Way he makes those, would think stable position pass would be a gimme for Mec - and you’d be right
But where’s the art, magic or fun in just putting pass after pass winner? Mec throws in gorgeous lobs to mix it up. Again, off both wings. Not a ghost of a chance for Mats to reach them
28 winners, 24 errors (15 UEs, 9 FEs) from Mec, while forcing 14 more errors. Mats has 5 winners, 14 UEs
And what is Mats doing while all this is going on?( Mostly watching and running)
Like Mec, harmless serve and very consistent return against an even more harmless one
Trades a few groundies, solidly. Til Mec starts his pretty 1-2+ combos
Hurt by those, Mats turns to manufacturing approaches himself. Solid to good ones, if not as precisely artful as Mec’s
First volley he gets at net is something between ‘regulation, under-net’ to ‘lowish’
Has to volley up to it some. Mats’ isn’t the most powerful puncher of volleys to begin with and from this height, would be extremely difficult to get very aggressive volley deep. And he’s no drop volleyer, so he looks to go deep
Doesn’t miss much, but decent look at pass for Mec. For the rest, see earlier description of Mec’s passing
Cutely, both players at net 27 times. Mec wins 19 of his, Mats 12 (and 2 of Mats’ is via unreturned serves)
I think Mec is playing with a wooden racquet. Its got a ‘V’ neck, but looks like its wooden
How has it all come out in numbers?
In count isn’t too important. Its more so for Mats because his second serves occasionally get spank, return-approached and because he takes to first serve-volleying some