Andy Murray beat Gilles Simon 6-4, 7-6(6) in the Madrid final, 2008 on indoor hard court
It was Murray’s second Masters title and second in a row, having won in Cincinnati. In between, he’d been runner-up at the US Open. Simon was unseeded and had won his last 3 matches in third set tie-breaks, including beating top seed Rafael Nadal in the semi-final. This was the last edition of the indoor tournament and following year, its Masters slot was taken by Shanghai
Murray won 75 points, Simon 66
(Note: I have only partial visual for 1 point, a FH return error by Murray against a first serve. Its been marked an FE
Partial missing point - Set 1, Game 9, Point 4)
Serve Stats
Murray...
- 1st serve percentage (43/66) 65%
- 1st serve points won (36/43) 84%
- 2nd serve points won (12/23) 52%
- Aces 10
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (21/66) 32%
Simon...
- 1st serve percentage (41/75) 55%
- 1st serve points won (29/41) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (19/34) 56%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (16/75) 21%
Serve Patterns
Murray served...
- to FH 45%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 5%
Simon served...
- to FH 45%
- to BH 53%
- to Body 2%
Return Stats
Murray made...
- 58 (29 FH, 29 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 2 return-approaches
- 3 Winners (1 FH, 2 BH)
- 15 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (7 BH)
- 8 Forced (7 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (58/74) 78%
Simon made...
- 45 (26 FH, 19 BH), including 4 runaround FHs
- 1 Winners (1 BH)
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 3 Unforced (3 FH)
- 8 Forced (6 FH, 2 BH)
- Return Rate (45/66) 68%
Break Points
Murray 1/4 (2 games)
Simon 0
Winners (excluding serves, including returns)
Murray 12 (3 FH, 6 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Simon 18 (6 FH, 8 BH, 2 FHV, 2 BHV)
Murray FHs - 2 dtl (1 return, 1 pass at net), 1 inside-out
- BHs - 2 dtl (1 return, 1 pass), 2 inside-out (1 return), 1 drop shot, 1 lob
Simon's FHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 1 dtl, 2 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl
- BH - 4 cc (2 passes), 1 dtl return, 1 longline, 2 running-down-drop-shot passes at net (1 cc, 1 dtl)
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley FHV
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Murray 32
- 22 Unforced (11 FH, 11 BH)
- 10 Forced (7 FH, 2 BH, 1 OH)... the OH was flagrantly forced, on the bounce from the baseline against an at net smash
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45
Simon 41
- 25 Unforced (14 FH, 9 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 16 Forced (5 FH, 10 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.8
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Murray was...
- 14/19 (74%) at net, with...
- 1/2 return-approaching
- 1/1 forced back/retreated
Simon was...
- 10/18 (56%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Murray having the better serve is the main difference between the two players, both of whom deliver polished showings on a quick court
That difference doesn’t amount to much; just 1 break in the match (and just 1 other break point in all the other games). Even going through the match without facing break point isn’t a guarantee of victory for Murray. Simon has first two set points in the second set tie-break - the second of them on his own serve - so easy for the match to have gone to decider
Murray though has had better of things, and its mostly because of his serve
Aces - Murray 10, Simon 1 (also, Sim has 1 double fault to Murray’s 0)
Unreturned serves - Murray 32%, Simon 21%
Court action is close enough to even, the two playing in slightly different ways
Winners - Murray 12, Simon 18
Errors Forced - Murray 16, Simon 10
(Aggressively ended points - both 28)
UEs - Murray 22, Simon 25
Just the difference of 3 UEs in Murray’s favour, with Simon having 2 volleying ones (including the most crucial of all on match point) to Murray’s 0. So a difference of 1 ground UE, in a baseline match
Close as can be. But for the big freebie cushion
Neither player gets carried away on quick court. Both play from baseline, both strike the ball with clean ease. Murray’s usually further up near the baseline than Sim. Sim occasionally injects an extra dose of power into his shots, particularly the BHs
Nice job by Murray coming to net to finish points, almost always dtl in the best possible way. His dtl BH is particularly effective for being damaging. Rarely does Murray go for clean winners from the back, but his polished hitting is enough to keep any ambitions Sim might have of so doing in check
Sim though is one cool customer. More than happy to play along and wait. Often well behind baseline, but he too strikes the ball beautifully and does in fact, go for his shots. Never rashly, rarely even in a hurray, so excellent judgement. Hits rate remains sub-optimal though - room for improvement in execution, but smartly played
Serve & Return
Murray with better serve and returning steadily on a court where that’s not easy. The numbers, if not deceptive, aren’t entirely what they appear
Murray’s 10-1 lead in aces is clear indicator of both his superiority and the quality of his serve. He doesn’t serve his first until serving out the first set (where he serves 3 of them) and continues to send down 1 a game for rest of match
Sim somewhat loses interest in denying aces. The aces would go unreturned anyway, but certainly a few he could get a racquet on at least. They’re fast serves, but good lot aren’t too far away from Sim as they pass by
0 double faults for Murray. His second serve is weak, an invitation to be thrashed. Sim comes to that party late. Only at the very end does he smack a few with full power and deep and these end the point at a stroke. If there’s an area where Sim’s judgment’s off, its in being too perfect in his percentage play; trailing as he does on the serve, taking a risk or 2 is necessary. Going after the very go-after-able second serves would have been a good start, but little of that from Sim
Great as 10 aces look, its Murray’s return that’s more impressive. Sim with a decent serve, and on court like this, can be bothersome. Murray returns it with fair comfort. Serves out wide to FH draw errors (all but 1 of his FEs are FHs), but he’s very secure against good serves to his BH. Against second serves, steps in and whacks the ball early. 3 return winners from Murray, against a better second serve than his own - including at crucial juncture late in tie-break
Sim leading 2nd serve points won 56% to 52% good indicator of how well he plays, and this despite having the only double fault and Murray regularly going after his second serves (which also leads to errors trying though)
Gist - Strong serving and good returning (both getting balls back and attacking as appropriate) by Murray. Simon with room for upping his 2nd returning aggression. When he does right at the end, he’s a hit but most of match, lets doesn’t do more than put the weak serves back in play
It was Murray’s second Masters title and second in a row, having won in Cincinnati. In between, he’d been runner-up at the US Open. Simon was unseeded and had won his last 3 matches in third set tie-breaks, including beating top seed Rafael Nadal in the semi-final. This was the last edition of the indoor tournament and following year, its Masters slot was taken by Shanghai
Murray won 75 points, Simon 66
(Note: I have only partial visual for 1 point, a FH return error by Murray against a first serve. Its been marked an FE
Partial missing point - Set 1, Game 9, Point 4)
Serve Stats
Murray...
- 1st serve percentage (43/66) 65%
- 1st serve points won (36/43) 84%
- 2nd serve points won (12/23) 52%
- Aces 10
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (21/66) 32%
Simon...
- 1st serve percentage (41/75) 55%
- 1st serve points won (29/41) 71%
- 2nd serve points won (19/34) 56%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (16/75) 21%
Serve Patterns
Murray served...
- to FH 45%
- to BH 50%
- to Body 5%
Simon served...
- to FH 45%
- to BH 53%
- to Body 2%
Return Stats
Murray made...
- 58 (29 FH, 29 BH), including 1 runaround FH & 2 return-approaches
- 3 Winners (1 FH, 2 BH)
- 15 Errors, comprising...
- 7 Unforced (7 BH)
- 8 Forced (7 FH, 1 BH)
- Return Rate (58/74) 78%
Simon made...
- 45 (26 FH, 19 BH), including 4 runaround FHs
- 1 Winners (1 BH)
- 11 Errors, comprising...
- 3 Unforced (3 FH)
- 8 Forced (6 FH, 2 BH)
- Return Rate (45/66) 68%
Break Points
Murray 1/4 (2 games)
Simon 0
Winners (excluding serves, including returns)
Murray 12 (3 FH, 6 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Simon 18 (6 FH, 8 BH, 2 FHV, 2 BHV)
Murray FHs - 2 dtl (1 return, 1 pass at net), 1 inside-out
- BHs - 2 dtl (1 return, 1 pass), 2 inside-out (1 return), 1 drop shot, 1 lob
Simon's FHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 1 dtl, 2 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl
- BH - 4 cc (2 passes), 1 dtl return, 1 longline, 2 running-down-drop-shot passes at net (1 cc, 1 dtl)
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley FHV
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Murray 32
- 22 Unforced (11 FH, 11 BH)
- 10 Forced (7 FH, 2 BH, 1 OH)... the OH was flagrantly forced, on the bounce from the baseline against an at net smash
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45
Simon 41
- 25 Unforced (14 FH, 9 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
- 16 Forced (5 FH, 10 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.8
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Murray was...
- 14/19 (74%) at net, with...
- 1/2 return-approaching
- 1/1 forced back/retreated
Simon was...
- 10/18 (56%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Murray having the better serve is the main difference between the two players, both of whom deliver polished showings on a quick court
That difference doesn’t amount to much; just 1 break in the match (and just 1 other break point in all the other games). Even going through the match without facing break point isn’t a guarantee of victory for Murray. Simon has first two set points in the second set tie-break - the second of them on his own serve - so easy for the match to have gone to decider
Murray though has had better of things, and its mostly because of his serve
Aces - Murray 10, Simon 1 (also, Sim has 1 double fault to Murray’s 0)
Unreturned serves - Murray 32%, Simon 21%
Court action is close enough to even, the two playing in slightly different ways
Winners - Murray 12, Simon 18
Errors Forced - Murray 16, Simon 10
(Aggressively ended points - both 28)
UEs - Murray 22, Simon 25
Just the difference of 3 UEs in Murray’s favour, with Simon having 2 volleying ones (including the most crucial of all on match point) to Murray’s 0. So a difference of 1 ground UE, in a baseline match
Close as can be. But for the big freebie cushion
Neither player gets carried away on quick court. Both play from baseline, both strike the ball with clean ease. Murray’s usually further up near the baseline than Sim. Sim occasionally injects an extra dose of power into his shots, particularly the BHs
Nice job by Murray coming to net to finish points, almost always dtl in the best possible way. His dtl BH is particularly effective for being damaging. Rarely does Murray go for clean winners from the back, but his polished hitting is enough to keep any ambitions Sim might have of so doing in check
Sim though is one cool customer. More than happy to play along and wait. Often well behind baseline, but he too strikes the ball beautifully and does in fact, go for his shots. Never rashly, rarely even in a hurray, so excellent judgement. Hits rate remains sub-optimal though - room for improvement in execution, but smartly played
Serve & Return
Murray with better serve and returning steadily on a court where that’s not easy. The numbers, if not deceptive, aren’t entirely what they appear
Murray’s 10-1 lead in aces is clear indicator of both his superiority and the quality of his serve. He doesn’t serve his first until serving out the first set (where he serves 3 of them) and continues to send down 1 a game for rest of match
Sim somewhat loses interest in denying aces. The aces would go unreturned anyway, but certainly a few he could get a racquet on at least. They’re fast serves, but good lot aren’t too far away from Sim as they pass by
0 double faults for Murray. His second serve is weak, an invitation to be thrashed. Sim comes to that party late. Only at the very end does he smack a few with full power and deep and these end the point at a stroke. If there’s an area where Sim’s judgment’s off, its in being too perfect in his percentage play; trailing as he does on the serve, taking a risk or 2 is necessary. Going after the very go-after-able second serves would have been a good start, but little of that from Sim
Great as 10 aces look, its Murray’s return that’s more impressive. Sim with a decent serve, and on court like this, can be bothersome. Murray returns it with fair comfort. Serves out wide to FH draw errors (all but 1 of his FEs are FHs), but he’s very secure against good serves to his BH. Against second serves, steps in and whacks the ball early. 3 return winners from Murray, against a better second serve than his own - including at crucial juncture late in tie-break
Sim leading 2nd serve points won 56% to 52% good indicator of how well he plays, and this despite having the only double fault and Murray regularly going after his second serves (which also leads to errors trying though)
Gist - Strong serving and good returning (both getting balls back and attacking as appropriate) by Murray. Simon with room for upping his 2nd returning aggression. When he does right at the end, he’s a hit but most of match, lets doesn’t do more than put the weak serves back in play
Last edited: