Thomas Muster beat Aaron Krickstein 6-3, 6-1, 6-3 in the Monte Carlo final, 1992 on clay
It was Muster’s first title at the event, and he would go onto win in ‘95 and ‘96 also. It was Krickstein’s only Masters event final
Muster won 90 points, Krickstein 60
(Note: I’m missing serve direction and corresponding return data for 3 points
Points in question
- Set 1, Game 6, Point 2
- Set 1, Game 9, Point 10
- Set 3, Game 9, Point 5)
Serve Stats
Muster...
- 1st serve percentage (55/74) 74%
- 1st serve points won (36/55) 65%
- 2nd serve points won (15/19) 79%
- Aces 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (11/74) 15%
Krickstein...
- 1st serve percentage (43/76) 57%
- 1st serve points won (20/43) 47%
- 2nd serve points won (17/33) 52%
- Aces 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (8/76) 11%
Serve Patterns
Muster served...
- to FH 29%
- to BH 66%
- to Body 5%
Krickstein served...
- to FH 42%
- to BH 55%
- to Body 3%
Return Stats
Muster made...
- 68 (40 FH, 26 BH, 2 ??), including 10 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 FH), a runaround FH
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (1 FH, 4 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 1 Forced (1 FH)
- Return Rate (68/76) 89%
Krickstein made...
- 63 (22 FH, 40 BH, 1 ??), including 4 runaround FHs
- 10 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (6 FH, 3 BH), including 3 runaround FHs
- 1 Forced (1 BH)
- Return Rate (63/74) 85%
Break Points
Muster 7/11 (7 games)
Krickstein 1/5 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Muster 29 (15 FH, 3 BH, 2 FHV, 2 BHV, 7 OH)
Krickstein 13 (6 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
Muster's - FHs - 2 cc (1 runaround return), 5 dtl, 3 dtl/inside-out, 4 inside-out (1 bad bounce related whiff), 1 drop shot
- BHs - 1 cc pass, 2 dtl (1 pass, 1 at net)
Krickstein's FHs - 1 cc, 2 dtl, 1 inside-in, 1 drop shot, 1 lob
- BHs - 3 dtl (2 passes - 1 slice that flicked net chord), 1 at net), 1 drop shot, 1 lob (sliced)
- the BHV was a lob from just behind service line but has been marked a net point
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Muster 39
- 32 Unforced (12 FH, 18 BH, 1 FHV, 1 OH)
- 7 Forced (2 FH, 4 BH, 1 OH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.8
Krickstein 50
- 36 Unforced (15 FH, 20 BH, 1 OH)... with 1 OH on the bounce from the baseline
- 14 Forced (7 FH, 6 BH, 1 Over-the-Shoulder)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.8
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Muster was 21/30 (70%) at net, with...
- 1/1 forced back
Krickstein was 6/12 (50%) at net, with...
- 0/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
Muster is pointedly aggressive with FH shot-making and net approaches in crushing an out-matched Krickstein. If the result isn’t surprising, Muster’s style of play is. He wouldn’t be playing this way in rampaging through the field on clay a few years later
Muster’s showing is as close to a typical, high end Gustavo Kuerten showing as his own.
Typical Muster showing would be a grind down, persistent power hitting off both sides, with FH seeing more action and Muster backing away to hit those occasionally. FH inside-out main weapon. All done with gusto and an animalistic vigour
Gusto and animalistic vigour are here, but the shot-making would be highly unusual for him in ‘95/’96. He regularly lashes FH dtl winners. Shot-making (just going for the shot from routine normal position) style, not point construction (working the court open to leave clear shot choice). Goes BH dtl aggressively too, but less often and is apt to mishit such balls
Not just dtl from side of court. There are 3 dtl/inside-out winners - adventurous shots from closer to center line, where cc would be normal shot choice (especially for percentage grinder like Muster is reputed to be), but he goes for and nails the winner in other direction. To go with 5 regular dtl winners
He’s got 15 FH winners (Krick has 13 total), 8 of them dtl based. That’s 0.6 FH winners per game
He’s got 29 winners total, which comes to 1.16 per game
Also, frequents the forecourt. 30 approaches from Muster. Usually power-hitting his way up, but rarely, just manufacturing an approach from neutral position
I haven’t seen Muster play this way. Its folly to draw conclusions from one match, but if this is an indicator of how he was playing around this period, then there were a lot of big changes from here to ‘95/96
Not that what made him so effective in those later years is absent. The vigorous, hard-hitting stuff is still there. And that alone would be enough to beat down Krickstein
Muster bludgeons groundies, Krick reacts. Doesn’t take long for Krick to be substantially reacting with his shots, and sometimes outright defending, with his shots getting softer as rally goes on, Muster’s corresponding harder (drop in Krick’s force triggering the change, not a rise in Muster’s)
Early on, Muster’s heavier with the top spin and ball bounces high. Krick struggles to hit high balls back with any authority. Seems to steel himself to do so, and when he hits back in such a way as to compete for advantage (as opposed to reactively), Muster responds with less top-spinny, more powerful hitting
And the shot-making. And the net play
Some oddities to Krick’s game. There’s not much discrepancy in strength of his groundies across wings, and in that light, he favours FH more than is justified. Players move-over to play FHs when its far stronger shot. Why waste energy moving around and compromise court position when FH is about same strength as BH?
Does it on the return too, where he takes to playing runaround FH returns against first serves
And he never looks to counter Muster’s OHs. Probably the best part of Muster’s net game is the back-pedalling OHs, which he plays well. But moving back and from well behind service line, good lof of them aren’t sure point-enders. But Krick literally stops playing as soon as Muster gets up for a smash - the sight seems to signal point over for him, though many of the smashes are worth defending against
You’d never see Michael Chang do this, but that’s not a good basis of comparison. Many players, especially clay courters, would keep their focus on during such situations. And what’s more odd is that lob is a favourite of Krick’s
Guy who loves to lob, but seems to concede the point as soon as OH is made… weird combo
Action & Stats
Both players serve gently, just start the point stuff. 14/16 combined return errors have been marked UEs
Krick playing spontaneous runaround FH returns to first serves tells you what you need to know about strength of serves. Not difficult, but unnecessary and not so easy (and Krick not good enough) to be clock-work easy. He’s got couple return errors trying. No real pressure on him to return strongly. Muster starts rallies power-hitting, not going for third ball winners
Gist of it is in high return rates - Muster 89%, Krick 85%. There are no double faults. Then they rally
Winners - Muster 29, Krick 13
Errors Forced - Musters 14, Krick 7
UEs - Muster 32, Krick 36
You blank out the names and look at these figures (throwing in net points of Muster 21/30, Krick 6/12) and you’d think this was a Guga showing, not Muster
It was Muster’s first title at the event, and he would go onto win in ‘95 and ‘96 also. It was Krickstein’s only Masters event final
Muster won 90 points, Krickstein 60
(Note: I’m missing serve direction and corresponding return data for 3 points
Points in question
- Set 1, Game 6, Point 2
- Set 1, Game 9, Point 10
- Set 3, Game 9, Point 5)
Serve Stats
Muster...
- 1st serve percentage (55/74) 74%
- 1st serve points won (36/55) 65%
- 2nd serve points won (15/19) 79%
- Aces 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (11/74) 15%
Krickstein...
- 1st serve percentage (43/76) 57%
- 1st serve points won (20/43) 47%
- 2nd serve points won (17/33) 52%
- Aces 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (8/76) 11%
Serve Patterns
Muster served...
- to FH 29%
- to BH 66%
- to Body 5%
Krickstein served...
- to FH 42%
- to BH 55%
- to Body 3%
Return Stats
Muster made...
- 68 (40 FH, 26 BH, 2 ??), including 10 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 FH), a runaround FH
- 6 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (1 FH, 4 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 1 Forced (1 FH)
- Return Rate (68/76) 89%
Krickstein made...
- 63 (22 FH, 40 BH, 1 ??), including 4 runaround FHs
- 10 Errors, comprising...
- 9 Unforced (6 FH, 3 BH), including 3 runaround FHs
- 1 Forced (1 BH)
- Return Rate (63/74) 85%
Break Points
Muster 7/11 (7 games)
Krickstein 1/5 (3 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Muster 29 (15 FH, 3 BH, 2 FHV, 2 BHV, 7 OH)
Krickstein 13 (6 FH, 5 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)
Muster's - FHs - 2 cc (1 runaround return), 5 dtl, 3 dtl/inside-out, 4 inside-out (1 bad bounce related whiff), 1 drop shot
- BHs - 1 cc pass, 2 dtl (1 pass, 1 at net)
Krickstein's FHs - 1 cc, 2 dtl, 1 inside-in, 1 drop shot, 1 lob
- BHs - 3 dtl (2 passes - 1 slice that flicked net chord), 1 at net), 1 drop shot, 1 lob (sliced)
- the BHV was a lob from just behind service line but has been marked a net point
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Muster 39
- 32 Unforced (12 FH, 18 BH, 1 FHV, 1 OH)
- 7 Forced (2 FH, 4 BH, 1 OH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48.8
Krickstein 50
- 36 Unforced (15 FH, 20 BH, 1 OH)... with 1 OH on the bounce from the baseline
- 14 Forced (7 FH, 6 BH, 1 Over-the-Shoulder)... with 1 FH running-down-drop-shot at net
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.8
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Muster was 21/30 (70%) at net, with...
- 1/1 forced back
Krickstein was 6/12 (50%) at net, with...
- 0/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
Muster is pointedly aggressive with FH shot-making and net approaches in crushing an out-matched Krickstein. If the result isn’t surprising, Muster’s style of play is. He wouldn’t be playing this way in rampaging through the field on clay a few years later
Muster’s showing is as close to a typical, high end Gustavo Kuerten showing as his own.
Typical Muster showing would be a grind down, persistent power hitting off both sides, with FH seeing more action and Muster backing away to hit those occasionally. FH inside-out main weapon. All done with gusto and an animalistic vigour
Gusto and animalistic vigour are here, but the shot-making would be highly unusual for him in ‘95/’96. He regularly lashes FH dtl winners. Shot-making (just going for the shot from routine normal position) style, not point construction (working the court open to leave clear shot choice). Goes BH dtl aggressively too, but less often and is apt to mishit such balls
Not just dtl from side of court. There are 3 dtl/inside-out winners - adventurous shots from closer to center line, where cc would be normal shot choice (especially for percentage grinder like Muster is reputed to be), but he goes for and nails the winner in other direction. To go with 5 regular dtl winners
He’s got 15 FH winners (Krick has 13 total), 8 of them dtl based. That’s 0.6 FH winners per game
He’s got 29 winners total, which comes to 1.16 per game
Also, frequents the forecourt. 30 approaches from Muster. Usually power-hitting his way up, but rarely, just manufacturing an approach from neutral position
I haven’t seen Muster play this way. Its folly to draw conclusions from one match, but if this is an indicator of how he was playing around this period, then there were a lot of big changes from here to ‘95/96
Not that what made him so effective in those later years is absent. The vigorous, hard-hitting stuff is still there. And that alone would be enough to beat down Krickstein
Muster bludgeons groundies, Krick reacts. Doesn’t take long for Krick to be substantially reacting with his shots, and sometimes outright defending, with his shots getting softer as rally goes on, Muster’s corresponding harder (drop in Krick’s force triggering the change, not a rise in Muster’s)
Early on, Muster’s heavier with the top spin and ball bounces high. Krick struggles to hit high balls back with any authority. Seems to steel himself to do so, and when he hits back in such a way as to compete for advantage (as opposed to reactively), Muster responds with less top-spinny, more powerful hitting
And the shot-making. And the net play
Some oddities to Krick’s game. There’s not much discrepancy in strength of his groundies across wings, and in that light, he favours FH more than is justified. Players move-over to play FHs when its far stronger shot. Why waste energy moving around and compromise court position when FH is about same strength as BH?
Does it on the return too, where he takes to playing runaround FH returns against first serves
And he never looks to counter Muster’s OHs. Probably the best part of Muster’s net game is the back-pedalling OHs, which he plays well. But moving back and from well behind service line, good lof of them aren’t sure point-enders. But Krick literally stops playing as soon as Muster gets up for a smash - the sight seems to signal point over for him, though many of the smashes are worth defending against
You’d never see Michael Chang do this, but that’s not a good basis of comparison. Many players, especially clay courters, would keep their focus on during such situations. And what’s more odd is that lob is a favourite of Krick’s
Guy who loves to lob, but seems to concede the point as soon as OH is made… weird combo
Action & Stats
Both players serve gently, just start the point stuff. 14/16 combined return errors have been marked UEs
Krick playing spontaneous runaround FH returns to first serves tells you what you need to know about strength of serves. Not difficult, but unnecessary and not so easy (and Krick not good enough) to be clock-work easy. He’s got couple return errors trying. No real pressure on him to return strongly. Muster starts rallies power-hitting, not going for third ball winners
Gist of it is in high return rates - Muster 89%, Krick 85%. There are no double faults. Then they rally
Winners - Muster 29, Krick 13
Errors Forced - Musters 14, Krick 7
UEs - Muster 32, Krick 36
You blank out the names and look at these figures (throwing in net points of Muster 21/30, Krick 6/12) and you’d think this was a Guga showing, not Muster