Rafael Nadal beat Carlos Alcaraz 6-4, 4-6, 6-3 in the Indian Wells semi-final, 2022 on hard court
Nadal would go onto lose the final to Taylor Fritz. Alcaraz would shortly after win his maiden masters title in Miami. Nadal had recently won the Australian Open. Alcaraz would go onto win his maiden Slam at US Open later in the year
Nadal won 106 points, Alcaraz 102
Serve Stats
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (72/108) 67%
- 1st serve points won (45/72) 63%
- 2nd serve points won (16/36) 44%
- Aces 2
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (21/108) 19%
Alcaraz...
- 1st serve percentage (63/100) 63%
- 1st serve points won (38/63) 60%
- 2nd serve points won (17/37) 46%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (17/100) 17%
Serve Pattern
Nadal served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 63%
- to Body 5%
Alcaraz served...
- to FH 32%
- to BH 56%
- to Body 12%
Return Stats
Nadal made...
- 80 (31 FH, 49 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 16 Errors, comprising...
- 12 Unforced (5 FH, 7 BH)
- 4 Forced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (80/97) 82%
Alcaraz made...
- 83 (33 FH, 50 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 19 Errors, comprising...
- 10 Unforced (3 FH, 7 BH)
- 9 Forced (3 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (83/104) 80%
Break Points
Nadal 6/21 (8 games)
Alcaraz 5/14 (6 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Nadal 18 (4 FH, 2 BH, 4 FHV, 3 BHV, 5 OH)
Alcaraz 38 (18 FH, 10 BH, 2 FHV, 5 BHV, 3 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 1 cc pass, 1 dtl return, 1 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-out
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass at net)
- 3 from serve-volley points - 2 first volleys (1 FHV, 1 OH) & 1 third volley (1 BHV)
- 1 other FHV was a non-net, swinging inside-out & 2 other OHs were on the bounce
Alcaraz' FHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 1 dtl, 3 dtl/inside-out, 7 inside-out (1 pass), 1 inside-in/cc, 1 inside-in/longline, 3 drop shots (1 net chord flicker)
- BHs - 6 cc (1 pass), 1 dtl at net, 1 inside-out, 1 lob, 1 lob/dtl
- 5 from serve-volley points - (2 FHV, 3 BHV), all first vollleys
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Nadal 43
- 31 Unforced (23 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV)... with 2 FH at net
- 12 Forced (6 FH, 4 BH, 2 BHV)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.7
Alcaraz 64
- 45 Unforced (21 FH, 22 BH, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
- 19 Forced (10 FH, 7 BH, 2 FHV)... with 1 BH at net (pass attempt)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.1
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Nadal was...
- 20/35 (57%) at net, including...
- 6/7 (86%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 0/3 forced back/retreated
Alcaraz was...
- 20/28 (71%) at net, including...
- 6/7 (86%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 2/2 retreated
Match Report
There’s a lot going in this 3-hour struggle
- Alcaraz unleashes all out assault, Nadal calmly weathers it - and gets better of things
- Rising winds leads to both players scaling down to firm, who-blinks-first tennis - and Alcaraz edges things
- After winds die down, play ticks up to normal tennis, with Alcaraz more aggressive, but not in all out assault way. Both players use net and there’s excellence on both the volley and the pass. Nadal pinches the result here
Throw in long games, including couple of epic length ones and a ton of break points. Key to outcome is a quiet, background one: High consistency of Nadal’s BH. Court is slow
Points won are close (Nadal 106, Alcs 102), as are points served (Nadal 108, Alcs 100 - with Nadal serving the extra game)
Freebies are very close (Nadal 19%, Alcs 17%)
In baseline rallies, Alcs has 22 winners, Nadal 4 (1 of which is a return)
Alcs has more BH cc winners than Nadal has total baseline winners. And 16 FHs in all directions (+ more passes)
With net points similar (Nadal has 35, Alcs 28), and Alcs in fact much more successful up there (Nadal wins 57%, Alcs 71%), Nadal’s would need to be much more secure (that is, have fewer UEs) to offset the massive gap in baseline winners
Nadal’s BH has 6 UEs
The other 3 groundies on show have 21, 21 and 22
He doesn’t necessarily win the match because of BH consistency, but he’d certainly lose it without it. The ultimate win is something of a pinch, with Nadal gaining against trend break in the final set
Its funny how match long figures have come out so normal, when by sets, they’re anything but
Match long Nadal wins 51% of points, serving 52% or -
- points won - Nadal 106, Alcs 102
- points served - Nadal 108, Alcs 100
Broken down by set, however -
- set 1, Nadal wins 53% of points, serving just 35% of them
- set 2, Alcaraz wins 54% of points, serving just 39% of them
- set 3, Nadal wins 54% of points, but serving 66% of them
1 break differential for all 3 sets. And different reason for extreme differences in points served in them
Set 1 is only one that looks like what it is; Alcs constantly in trouble to hold, and eventually giving out. 4/5 games go to deuce, ranging from 18 points to 8. No Nadal game goes beyond 30 but he is broken twice too
Set 2 is essentially even, bar outlier 20 point game
Set 3 sees Alcs hold very easily (loses 1 point for 3 holds), other than when he’s broken to 30, while challenging Nadal’s serve
Cross the above, very different types of sets with different types of action in them to further complicate match description
In set 1, Alcs is flaming aggression. He has 17 winners, 26 UEs for the set (which is on par with Nadal’s 18 and 31 for the entire match - and Alcs for rest of match has 21 winners, 19 UEs). Nadal has 5 winners, 7 UEs
Would think all those UEs are winner attempt misses, but no. Only 3 are
Its neutral UEs (he has 14, Nadal 4) and attacking UEs (he has 9, Nadal 1) where he falls behind
Some brilliant shots and plays from Alcs, but he’s pretty sloppy too. Strangely, not for being aggressive but for more basic stuff. As match wears on, he actually hangs in with Nadal neutrally.
Rest of match, neutral UEs read Nadal 12, Alcs 15
Breaks points for set, Nadal 3/17 (5 games), Alcs 2/2
In set 2, winds pick up, curbing whatever intent Alcs may have had to carry on his merry onslaught, and action becomes about who can keep the ball in play just trading groundies
They hit pretty firmly, given the obviously difficult conditions. Rallies don’t last too long, but long enough to attribute the UEs to conditions more than sloppiness of players
UEs for set Nadal 15 (10 FH, 4 BH, 1 volley), Alcs 14 (5 FH, 8 BH, 1 volley)
(Note on stat taking in the wind. I tend to ignore the wind and mark in accordance with ball faced, unless there’s a clear wobble on the ball for routine shot miss. Wind obviously causes many such micro wobbles and prevents confidence of ball being where it should be, even without wobbles
The alternative would be to mark every routine-looking error an FE because its windy
Wind related stats tend to under-rate action, in terms of high UEs which aren’t actually routine or easy shots)
Its not for the whole set. Breeze becomes problematic around game 5 - and next 5 games are all breaks. Last of those breaks takes 20 points, and wind’s died down by late-middle of the game
Winds dying down in middle of 20 point game, which Nadal is serving, leaves room for Alcs to seize action again for last half of the game to break. Which leaves him to serve out, which takes 8 points
Break points for set, Nadal 2/3 (2 games), Alcs 3/9 (3 games), with all the games coming in a row and the serve-out right after it going to deuce
And the decider. Alcs holds with more ease than either player has done all match, losing 1 point in 3 holds. While Nadal’s given a rough ride, surviving a 14 point game (3 break points) and deuce game after to stay on serve
So its against run of action that Nadal snags break, which he largely does off his own racquet
Some excellent exchanges with Nadal at net, Alcs passing in the set
Break points for set, Nadal 1/1, Alcs 0/3 (1 game)
Through all that - flaming aggression, winds, net play, passing, one player or the other having run of action, dying winds - the 1 thing that doesn’t change is security of Nadal’s BH, with its 6 UEs (1 in first set, 1 in last, rest in between when its windy)
Serve & Return
Not too important. Its slow court, and returning isn’t difficult. Nadal gets better of it
Just 3 aces in match (Nadal 2, Alcs 1)
Alcs with corresponding better double faults 3-4
So both players with more doubles than aces. Product of very low aces
Nadal leads freebies 19% to 17%. Call it negligible
Freebies (from servers point of view) -
- aces - Nadal 2, Alcs 1
- return FEs drawn - Nadal 9, Alcs 4
- return UEs drawn - Nadal 10, Alcs 12
FEs would be the standout and only area where there’s significant difference
That’d either be due to Nadal resisting making FEs (that is, making tough returns that Alcs can’t) or Nadal delivering more damaging serves (that is, FE drawing serves)
Its more the latter. Few more damaging, wide serves from Nadal than Alcs (amidst unthreatening serving from both)
Nadal also a little more on the ball returning, with Alcs rarely lazy in his movement
Nadal with 1 or 2 ‘good’ UEs (that is, going for winning return). He has 1 winner, misses at least 1 more
Gist - Nadal little better serve (few more damaging ones), Nadal a little more consistently focused on the return (Alcs rarely tuning out)
Not too important - returns are readily made with about equal force by both players
It can matter in match so close, whatever edge there is is Nadal’s
Nadal would go onto lose the final to Taylor Fritz. Alcaraz would shortly after win his maiden masters title in Miami. Nadal had recently won the Australian Open. Alcaraz would go onto win his maiden Slam at US Open later in the year
Nadal won 106 points, Alcaraz 102
Serve Stats
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (72/108) 67%
- 1st serve points won (45/72) 63%
- 2nd serve points won (16/36) 44%
- Aces 2
- Double Faults 4
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (21/108) 19%
Alcaraz...
- 1st serve percentage (63/100) 63%
- 1st serve points won (38/63) 60%
- 2nd serve points won (17/37) 46%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (17/100) 17%
Serve Pattern
Nadal served...
- to FH 33%
- to BH 63%
- to Body 5%
Alcaraz served...
- to FH 32%
- to BH 56%
- to Body 12%
Return Stats
Nadal made...
- 80 (31 FH, 49 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 16 Errors, comprising...
- 12 Unforced (5 FH, 7 BH)
- 4 Forced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (80/97) 82%
Alcaraz made...
- 83 (33 FH, 50 BH), including 2 runaround FHs
- 19 Errors, comprising...
- 10 Unforced (3 FH, 7 BH)
- 9 Forced (3 FH, 6 BH)
- Return Rate (83/104) 80%
Break Points
Nadal 6/21 (8 games)
Alcaraz 5/14 (6 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Nadal 18 (4 FH, 2 BH, 4 FHV, 3 BHV, 5 OH)
Alcaraz 38 (18 FH, 10 BH, 2 FHV, 5 BHV, 3 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 1 cc pass, 1 dtl return, 1 dtl/inside-out, 1 inside-out
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass at net)
- 3 from serve-volley points - 2 first volleys (1 FHV, 1 OH) & 1 third volley (1 BHV)
- 1 other FHV was a non-net, swinging inside-out & 2 other OHs were on the bounce
Alcaraz' FHs - 2 cc (1 pass), 1 dtl, 3 dtl/inside-out, 7 inside-out (1 pass), 1 inside-in/cc, 1 inside-in/longline, 3 drop shots (1 net chord flicker)
- BHs - 6 cc (1 pass), 1 dtl at net, 1 inside-out, 1 lob, 1 lob/dtl
- 5 from serve-volley points - (2 FHV, 3 BHV), all first vollleys
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Nadal 43
- 31 Unforced (23 FH, 6 BH, 2 FHV)... with 2 FH at net
- 12 Forced (6 FH, 4 BH, 2 BHV)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.7
Alcaraz 64
- 45 Unforced (21 FH, 22 BH, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
- 19 Forced (10 FH, 7 BH, 2 FHV)... with 1 BH at net (pass attempt)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.1
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Nadal was...
- 20/35 (57%) at net, including...
- 6/7 (86%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 0/3 forced back/retreated
Alcaraz was...
- 20/28 (71%) at net, including...
- 6/7 (86%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 2/2 retreated
Match Report
There’s a lot going in this 3-hour struggle
- Alcaraz unleashes all out assault, Nadal calmly weathers it - and gets better of things
- Rising winds leads to both players scaling down to firm, who-blinks-first tennis - and Alcaraz edges things
- After winds die down, play ticks up to normal tennis, with Alcaraz more aggressive, but not in all out assault way. Both players use net and there’s excellence on both the volley and the pass. Nadal pinches the result here
Throw in long games, including couple of epic length ones and a ton of break points. Key to outcome is a quiet, background one: High consistency of Nadal’s BH. Court is slow
Points won are close (Nadal 106, Alcs 102), as are points served (Nadal 108, Alcs 100 - with Nadal serving the extra game)
Freebies are very close (Nadal 19%, Alcs 17%)
In baseline rallies, Alcs has 22 winners, Nadal 4 (1 of which is a return)
Alcs has more BH cc winners than Nadal has total baseline winners. And 16 FHs in all directions (+ more passes)
With net points similar (Nadal has 35, Alcs 28), and Alcs in fact much more successful up there (Nadal wins 57%, Alcs 71%), Nadal’s would need to be much more secure (that is, have fewer UEs) to offset the massive gap in baseline winners
Nadal’s BH has 6 UEs
The other 3 groundies on show have 21, 21 and 22
He doesn’t necessarily win the match because of BH consistency, but he’d certainly lose it without it. The ultimate win is something of a pinch, with Nadal gaining against trend break in the final set
Its funny how match long figures have come out so normal, when by sets, they’re anything but
Match long Nadal wins 51% of points, serving 52% or -
- points won - Nadal 106, Alcs 102
- points served - Nadal 108, Alcs 100
Broken down by set, however -
- set 1, Nadal wins 53% of points, serving just 35% of them
- set 2, Alcaraz wins 54% of points, serving just 39% of them
- set 3, Nadal wins 54% of points, but serving 66% of them
1 break differential for all 3 sets. And different reason for extreme differences in points served in them
Set 1 is only one that looks like what it is; Alcs constantly in trouble to hold, and eventually giving out. 4/5 games go to deuce, ranging from 18 points to 8. No Nadal game goes beyond 30 but he is broken twice too
Set 2 is essentially even, bar outlier 20 point game
Set 3 sees Alcs hold very easily (loses 1 point for 3 holds), other than when he’s broken to 30, while challenging Nadal’s serve
Cross the above, very different types of sets with different types of action in them to further complicate match description
In set 1, Alcs is flaming aggression. He has 17 winners, 26 UEs for the set (which is on par with Nadal’s 18 and 31 for the entire match - and Alcs for rest of match has 21 winners, 19 UEs). Nadal has 5 winners, 7 UEs
Would think all those UEs are winner attempt misses, but no. Only 3 are
Its neutral UEs (he has 14, Nadal 4) and attacking UEs (he has 9, Nadal 1) where he falls behind
Some brilliant shots and plays from Alcs, but he’s pretty sloppy too. Strangely, not for being aggressive but for more basic stuff. As match wears on, he actually hangs in with Nadal neutrally.
Rest of match, neutral UEs read Nadal 12, Alcs 15
Breaks points for set, Nadal 3/17 (5 games), Alcs 2/2
In set 2, winds pick up, curbing whatever intent Alcs may have had to carry on his merry onslaught, and action becomes about who can keep the ball in play just trading groundies
They hit pretty firmly, given the obviously difficult conditions. Rallies don’t last too long, but long enough to attribute the UEs to conditions more than sloppiness of players
UEs for set Nadal 15 (10 FH, 4 BH, 1 volley), Alcs 14 (5 FH, 8 BH, 1 volley)
(Note on stat taking in the wind. I tend to ignore the wind and mark in accordance with ball faced, unless there’s a clear wobble on the ball for routine shot miss. Wind obviously causes many such micro wobbles and prevents confidence of ball being where it should be, even without wobbles
The alternative would be to mark every routine-looking error an FE because its windy
Wind related stats tend to under-rate action, in terms of high UEs which aren’t actually routine or easy shots)
Its not for the whole set. Breeze becomes problematic around game 5 - and next 5 games are all breaks. Last of those breaks takes 20 points, and wind’s died down by late-middle of the game
Winds dying down in middle of 20 point game, which Nadal is serving, leaves room for Alcs to seize action again for last half of the game to break. Which leaves him to serve out, which takes 8 points
Break points for set, Nadal 2/3 (2 games), Alcs 3/9 (3 games), with all the games coming in a row and the serve-out right after it going to deuce
And the decider. Alcs holds with more ease than either player has done all match, losing 1 point in 3 holds. While Nadal’s given a rough ride, surviving a 14 point game (3 break points) and deuce game after to stay on serve
So its against run of action that Nadal snags break, which he largely does off his own racquet
Some excellent exchanges with Nadal at net, Alcs passing in the set
Break points for set, Nadal 1/1, Alcs 0/3 (1 game)
Through all that - flaming aggression, winds, net play, passing, one player or the other having run of action, dying winds - the 1 thing that doesn’t change is security of Nadal’s BH, with its 6 UEs (1 in first set, 1 in last, rest in between when its windy)
Serve & Return
Not too important. Its slow court, and returning isn’t difficult. Nadal gets better of it
Just 3 aces in match (Nadal 2, Alcs 1)
Alcs with corresponding better double faults 3-4
So both players with more doubles than aces. Product of very low aces
Nadal leads freebies 19% to 17%. Call it negligible
Freebies (from servers point of view) -
- aces - Nadal 2, Alcs 1
- return FEs drawn - Nadal 9, Alcs 4
- return UEs drawn - Nadal 10, Alcs 12
FEs would be the standout and only area where there’s significant difference
That’d either be due to Nadal resisting making FEs (that is, making tough returns that Alcs can’t) or Nadal delivering more damaging serves (that is, FE drawing serves)
Its more the latter. Few more damaging, wide serves from Nadal than Alcs (amidst unthreatening serving from both)
Nadal also a little more on the ball returning, with Alcs rarely lazy in his movement
Nadal with 1 or 2 ‘good’ UEs (that is, going for winning return). He has 1 winner, misses at least 1 more
Gist - Nadal little better serve (few more damaging ones), Nadal a little more consistently focused on the return (Alcs rarely tuning out)
Not too important - returns are readily made with about equal force by both players
It can matter in match so close, whatever edge there is is Nadal’s