Rafael Nadal beat Roger Federer 6-4, 6-2 in the Indian Wells quarter-final, 2013 on hard court
Nadal would go onto win the title, beating Juan Martin del Potro in the final. Federer was the defending champion
Nadal won 73 points, Federer 54
Serve Stats
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (35/52) 67%
- 1st serve points won (27/35) 77%
- 2nd serve points won (9/17) 53%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (15/52) 29%
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (48/75) 64%
- 1st serve points won (30/48) 63%
- 2nd serve points won (8/27) 30%
- Aces 4, Service Winners 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (17/75) 23%
Serve Pattern
Nadal served...
- to FH 12%
- to BH 88%
Federer served...
- to FH 32%
- to BH 68%
Return Stats
Nadal made...
- 58 (21 FH, 37 BH), including 4 runaround FHs
- 12 Errors, comprising...
- 3 Unforced (1 FH, 2 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 9 Forced (5 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (58/75) 77%
Federer made...
- 35 (6 FH, 29 BH), including 3 runaround FHs & 2 return-approaches
- 14 Errors, comprising...
- 11 Unforced (3 FH, 8 BH)
- 3 Forced (3 BH)
- Return Rate (35/50) 70%
Break Points
Nadal 4/11 (6 games)
Federer 1/2 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Nadal 19 (9 FH, 9 BH, 1 OH)
Federer 7 (3 FH, 1 BH, 1 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 1 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 3 cc, 1 dtl pass, 2 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc, 1 inside-in/longline pass
- BHs - 7 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl passes
Federer's FHs - 2 dtl (1 at net), 1 inside-out
- BH - 1 inside-out at net (from a return-approach point)
- 1 from a serve-volley point - a first volley OH
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Nadal 28
- 15 Unforced (5 FH, 10 BH)
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.7
Federer 39
- 31 Unforced (12 FH, 17 BH, 2 FHV)
- 8 Forced (4 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 FH at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.5
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Nadal was 3/4 (75%) at net
Federer was...
- 11/20 (55%) at net, including...
- 2/5 (40%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 1/2 off 1st serve and...
- 1/3 (33%) off 2nd serve
---
- 1/2 return-approaching
Match Report
Something between a squeeze-out and a crushing on a normal paced hard court in a match characterized by poor movement from Federer in particular
Stats of particular interest -
Unreturned rates - Nadal 29%, Fed 23%
Winners - Nadal 19, Fed 7
UEs - Nadal 15, Fed 31
The UE difference is normal between the two, but not even in Nadal’s more convincing wins does he lead both freebies and winners (its rare for him to lead either) - let alone to that extent
Can all that boil down to sub-par movement alone? Fed is a bit stiff to start the match. By middle of first set, slowness to move towards FH side is more apparent. Second set is downright feeble, as if mentally gone on top of whatever’s off physically
Fed’s better at moving over to play FHs in lieu of BHs than he is moving across to take wide FHs
For that matter, Nadal’s a bit slow too - both moving to the side or moving back to cope with particularly deep balls
Nadal compensates by stepping in some and smacking BHs in particular harder than his norm. Fed plays much as he always does by contrast
Early on (first 3-4 games), the hitting is good from both players. Enough to potentially make for a good match. Both look to find the others BH - both leading with FH cc’s (Fed’s powerfully struck, Nadal’s slightly less so but with his usual heavier top spin), both also with an open-eye to to redirecting BH longline too
The FHs are powerful enough that BH longline counter doesn’t come up often for either player. Nadal gets it off a bit more, but its minor part of stock rallies, which are FH cc to BH cc
Off the BH, Nadal steps up and hammers the ball back cc. He’s got 6 BH cc winners. They’re going for clean winners are mostly down to Fed’s movement issues, but would be challenging balls - potentially error forcing and likely to draw weak response at least - even against a fully fit Fed. And the FH cc’s Fed rains down aren’t lacking for force. Good stuff from Nadal off the BH - proactive to challenge for control and strong execution
Fed’s BH by contrast is ‘bossed’ about. Normal enough for match-up, but on the higher side of degree to which it happens
A pretty soft service showing from Fed too. Takes a lot of pace off the ball for both serves. Nadal probably has more pace on the serve in the match. He does however, hit his spots nicely and still has 4 aces (Nadal has 1) and forces 9 return errors (only 3 the return errors Nadal draw have been marked FEs)
For Nadal to lead freebies, given that’s what’s going on on the forceful side of things, return UEs have to make up the slack. And they do
Return UEs - Nadal 3, Fed 11
Fed takes returns early from around the baseline as is his wont. Taking it that early but just blocking the return back is a inefficient move…. timing has to to be perfect and depth good to rush Nadal for third ball. Its rarely that good - and all taking the return early does is take time away from Fed to make the return against routine serves. No surprises regarding direction of Nadal’s serve, with the usual almost everything (88%) going to Fed’s BH. A general shortcoming in Fed’s game - and a below par showing of consistency within that context
Nadal would go onto win the title, beating Juan Martin del Potro in the final. Federer was the defending champion
Nadal won 73 points, Federer 54
Serve Stats
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (35/52) 67%
- 1st serve points won (27/35) 77%
- 2nd serve points won (9/17) 53%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (15/52) 29%
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (48/75) 64%
- 1st serve points won (30/48) 63%
- 2nd serve points won (8/27) 30%
- Aces 4, Service Winners 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (17/75) 23%
Serve Pattern
Nadal served...
- to FH 12%
- to BH 88%
Federer served...
- to FH 32%
- to BH 68%
Return Stats
Nadal made...
- 58 (21 FH, 37 BH), including 4 runaround FHs
- 12 Errors, comprising...
- 3 Unforced (1 FH, 2 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 9 Forced (5 FH, 4 BH)
- Return Rate (58/75) 77%
Federer made...
- 35 (6 FH, 29 BH), including 3 runaround FHs & 2 return-approaches
- 14 Errors, comprising...
- 11 Unforced (3 FH, 8 BH)
- 3 Forced (3 BH)
- Return Rate (35/50) 70%
Break Points
Nadal 4/11 (6 games)
Federer 1/2 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Nadal 19 (9 FH, 9 BH, 1 OH)
Federer 7 (3 FH, 1 BH, 1 BHV, 1 BH1/2V, 1 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 3 cc, 1 dtl pass, 2 inside-out, 1 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc, 1 inside-in/longline pass
- BHs - 7 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl passes
Federer's FHs - 2 dtl (1 at net), 1 inside-out
- BH - 1 inside-out at net (from a return-approach point)
- 1 from a serve-volley point - a first volley OH
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Nadal 28
- 15 Unforced (5 FH, 10 BH)
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 44.7
Federer 39
- 31 Unforced (12 FH, 17 BH, 2 FHV)
- 8 Forced (4 FH, 3 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 FH at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.5
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Nadal was 3/4 (75%) at net
Federer was...
- 11/20 (55%) at net, including...
- 2/5 (40%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 1/2 off 1st serve and...
- 1/3 (33%) off 2nd serve
---
- 1/2 return-approaching
Match Report
Something between a squeeze-out and a crushing on a normal paced hard court in a match characterized by poor movement from Federer in particular
Stats of particular interest -
Unreturned rates - Nadal 29%, Fed 23%
Winners - Nadal 19, Fed 7
UEs - Nadal 15, Fed 31
The UE difference is normal between the two, but not even in Nadal’s more convincing wins does he lead both freebies and winners (its rare for him to lead either) - let alone to that extent
Can all that boil down to sub-par movement alone? Fed is a bit stiff to start the match. By middle of first set, slowness to move towards FH side is more apparent. Second set is downright feeble, as if mentally gone on top of whatever’s off physically
Fed’s better at moving over to play FHs in lieu of BHs than he is moving across to take wide FHs
For that matter, Nadal’s a bit slow too - both moving to the side or moving back to cope with particularly deep balls
Nadal compensates by stepping in some and smacking BHs in particular harder than his norm. Fed plays much as he always does by contrast
Early on (first 3-4 games), the hitting is good from both players. Enough to potentially make for a good match. Both look to find the others BH - both leading with FH cc’s (Fed’s powerfully struck, Nadal’s slightly less so but with his usual heavier top spin), both also with an open-eye to to redirecting BH longline too
The FHs are powerful enough that BH longline counter doesn’t come up often for either player. Nadal gets it off a bit more, but its minor part of stock rallies, which are FH cc to BH cc
Off the BH, Nadal steps up and hammers the ball back cc. He’s got 6 BH cc winners. They’re going for clean winners are mostly down to Fed’s movement issues, but would be challenging balls - potentially error forcing and likely to draw weak response at least - even against a fully fit Fed. And the FH cc’s Fed rains down aren’t lacking for force. Good stuff from Nadal off the BH - proactive to challenge for control and strong execution
Fed’s BH by contrast is ‘bossed’ about. Normal enough for match-up, but on the higher side of degree to which it happens
A pretty soft service showing from Fed too. Takes a lot of pace off the ball for both serves. Nadal probably has more pace on the serve in the match. He does however, hit his spots nicely and still has 4 aces (Nadal has 1) and forces 9 return errors (only 3 the return errors Nadal draw have been marked FEs)
For Nadal to lead freebies, given that’s what’s going on on the forceful side of things, return UEs have to make up the slack. And they do
Return UEs - Nadal 3, Fed 11
Fed takes returns early from around the baseline as is his wont. Taking it that early but just blocking the return back is a inefficient move…. timing has to to be perfect and depth good to rush Nadal for third ball. Its rarely that good - and all taking the return early does is take time away from Fed to make the return against routine serves. No surprises regarding direction of Nadal’s serve, with the usual almost everything (88%) going to Fed’s BH. A general shortcoming in Fed’s game - and a below par showing of consistency within that context