Rafael Nadal beat Roger Federer 5-7, 6-1, 6-3 in the Madrid semi-final, 2011 on clay
Nadal would go onto lose the final to Novak Djokovic. Nadal and Federer had played the final the previous year and would go onto play the upcoming French Open final - Nadal won both matches
Nadal won 111 points, Federer 93
Serve Stats
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (82/101) 81%
- 1st serve points won (55/82) 67%
- 2nd serve points won (10/19) 53%
- Aces 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (25/101) 25%
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (64/103) 63%
- 1st serve points won (41/64) 64%
- 2nd serve points won (16/39) 41%
- Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (16/103) 15%
Serve Pattern
Nadal served...
- to FH 15%
- to BH 71%
- to Body 14%
Federer served...
- to FH 38%
- to BH 61%
- to Body 1%
Return Stats
Nadal made...
- 86 (36 FH, 50 BH), including 5 runaround FHs
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 15 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (3 FH, 2 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 10 Forced (5 FH, 5 BH)
- Return Rate (86/102) 84%
Federer made...
- 76 (15 FH, 61 BH), including 6 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 2 Winners (2 BH)
- 24 Errors, comprising...
- 16 Unforced (6 FH, 10 BH)
- 8 Forced (1 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (76/101) 75%
Break Points
Nadal 5/12 (8 games)
Federer 2/11 (8 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Nadal 22 (12 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Federer 36 (20 FH, 9 BH, 3 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 3 cc (1 pass), 1 cc/inside-in, 3 dtl (1 pass, 1 return), 3 inside-out, 1 inside-in and 1 longline/inside-out
- BHs - 3 cc (1 pass, 1 where Federer stopped playing, believing Nadal's previous ball was out), 1 dtl pass, 1 inside-out return pass, 1 longline pass and 1 running-down-drop-shot cc at net (very finely angled)
- 1 FHV was a swinging, non-net shot
Federer's FHs - 3 cc, 4 dtl, 8 inside-out, 3 inside-in and 2 drop shots
- BHs - 4 cc (1 pass), 3 dtl (1 at net) and 2 net chord dribbler returns
- 4 from serve-volley points -
- 3 first volleys (1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- 1 second volley (1 OH)
- 1 other FHV was a swinging shot
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Nadal 41
- 15 Unforced (6 FH, 9 BH)
- 26 Forced (9 FH, 16 BH, 1 BHV)... with 3 BH running-down-drop-shots at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46
Federer 63
- 53 Unforced (26 FH, 23 BH, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
- 10 Forced (5 FH, 4 BH, 1 FH1/2V)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.9
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Nadal was...
- 3/9 (33%) at net
Federer was...
- 25/37 (68%) at net, including...
- 6/10 (60%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 4/6 (67%) off 1st serve and...
- 2/4 (50%) off 2nd
---
- 1/1 return-approaching
- 2/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
When Nadal meets Federer on clay, it seems all roads lead to a Nadal win. While that's the case again here, the road taken is interestingly different from the beaten path. Conditions are quick for clay, as they tend to be in Madrid's altitude. wide balls tend to rush both players and moderate attacks are rewarded
Nor for that matter is the result never in doubt. Note break point stats - Nadal 5/12, Federer 2/11 with both having them in 8 games. Fed has near as many chances as the winner, but Nadal's just much better on the big points. Federer tends to play these big points meekly (if not too badly), Nadal plays an intensified version of his not-giving-anything-away + can-pounce-on-anything-weak-in-a-blink game on them
Nadal-Federer Clay Norm
Nadal is -
a) very consistent (i.e. not making unforced errors)
b) hitting a heavy ball for one being so consistent (i.e. being hard to attack)
c) defending like the dickens (i.e. resisting being forced into errors and having winners hit against him)
d) staying on the baseline (i.e. not many net points for him)
Federer's play typically is -
a) attacking (i.e. trying to force errors and hit winners)
b) loose (i.e. making many unforced errors, which goes with the territory of point a)
c) forced to up the attacking because his standard attacking plays aren't finishing points (which leads to more unforced errors)
d) mixing up attack from the baseline (particularly off the FH) and the net
Throw in Nadal FH cc to Federer BH leaving Fed at best impotent and at worst, bleeding errors. And that forces Fed to protect his BH by staying over to the BH side of the court and hitting FHs instead.... which leaves the other side of the court open for Nadal to aim FH inside-outs to
On serve-return dynamics, typically...
- Nadal gets a remarkable number of balls back in play (i.e. Fed doesn't win cheap points the way he would against other players)
- Federer's BH is targeted relentlessly
In this match...
Nadal would go onto lose the final to Novak Djokovic. Nadal and Federer had played the final the previous year and would go onto play the upcoming French Open final - Nadal won both matches
Nadal won 111 points, Federer 93
Serve Stats
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (82/101) 81%
- 1st serve points won (55/82) 67%
- 2nd serve points won (10/19) 53%
- Aces 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (25/101) 25%
Federer...
- 1st serve percentage (64/103) 63%
- 1st serve points won (41/64) 64%
- 2nd serve points won (16/39) 41%
- Service Winners 1
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (16/103) 15%
Serve Pattern
Nadal served...
- to FH 15%
- to BH 71%
- to Body 14%
Federer served...
- to FH 38%
- to BH 61%
- to Body 1%
Return Stats
Nadal made...
- 86 (36 FH, 50 BH), including 5 runaround FHs
- 2 Winners (1 FH, 1 BH)
- 15 Errors, comprising...
- 5 Unforced (3 FH, 2 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 10 Forced (5 FH, 5 BH)
- Return Rate (86/102) 84%
Federer made...
- 76 (15 FH, 61 BH), including 6 runaround FHs & 1 return-approach
- 2 Winners (2 BH)
- 24 Errors, comprising...
- 16 Unforced (6 FH, 10 BH)
- 8 Forced (1 FH, 7 BH)
- Return Rate (76/101) 75%
Break Points
Nadal 5/12 (8 games)
Federer 2/11 (8 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Nadal 22 (12 FH, 7 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV, 1 OH)
Federer 36 (20 FH, 9 BH, 3 FHV, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 3 cc (1 pass), 1 cc/inside-in, 3 dtl (1 pass, 1 return), 3 inside-out, 1 inside-in and 1 longline/inside-out
- BHs - 3 cc (1 pass, 1 where Federer stopped playing, believing Nadal's previous ball was out), 1 dtl pass, 1 inside-out return pass, 1 longline pass and 1 running-down-drop-shot cc at net (very finely angled)
- 1 FHV was a swinging, non-net shot
Federer's FHs - 3 cc, 4 dtl, 8 inside-out, 3 inside-in and 2 drop shots
- BHs - 4 cc (1 pass), 3 dtl (1 at net) and 2 net chord dribbler returns
- 4 from serve-volley points -
- 3 first volleys (1 FHV, 2 BHV)
- 1 second volley (1 OH)
- 1 other FHV was a swinging shot
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Nadal 41
- 15 Unforced (6 FH, 9 BH)
- 26 Forced (9 FH, 16 BH, 1 BHV)... with 3 BH running-down-drop-shots at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46
Federer 63
- 53 Unforced (26 FH, 23 BH, 3 BHV, 1 OH)
- 10 Forced (5 FH, 4 BH, 1 FH1/2V)
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.9
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Nadal was...
- 3/9 (33%) at net
Federer was...
- 25/37 (68%) at net, including...
- 6/10 (60%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 4/6 (67%) off 1st serve and...
- 2/4 (50%) off 2nd
---
- 1/1 return-approaching
- 2/2 forced back/retreated
Match Report
When Nadal meets Federer on clay, it seems all roads lead to a Nadal win. While that's the case again here, the road taken is interestingly different from the beaten path. Conditions are quick for clay, as they tend to be in Madrid's altitude. wide balls tend to rush both players and moderate attacks are rewarded
Nor for that matter is the result never in doubt. Note break point stats - Nadal 5/12, Federer 2/11 with both having them in 8 games. Fed has near as many chances as the winner, but Nadal's just much better on the big points. Federer tends to play these big points meekly (if not too badly), Nadal plays an intensified version of his not-giving-anything-away + can-pounce-on-anything-weak-in-a-blink game on them
Nadal-Federer Clay Norm
Nadal is -
a) very consistent (i.e. not making unforced errors)
b) hitting a heavy ball for one being so consistent (i.e. being hard to attack)
c) defending like the dickens (i.e. resisting being forced into errors and having winners hit against him)
d) staying on the baseline (i.e. not many net points for him)
Federer's play typically is -
a) attacking (i.e. trying to force errors and hit winners)
b) loose (i.e. making many unforced errors, which goes with the territory of point a)
c) forced to up the attacking because his standard attacking plays aren't finishing points (which leads to more unforced errors)
d) mixing up attack from the baseline (particularly off the FH) and the net
Throw in Nadal FH cc to Federer BH leaving Fed at best impotent and at worst, bleeding errors. And that forces Fed to protect his BH by staying over to the BH side of the court and hitting FHs instead.... which leaves the other side of the court open for Nadal to aim FH inside-outs to
On serve-return dynamics, typically...
- Nadal gets a remarkable number of balls back in play (i.e. Fed doesn't win cheap points the way he would against other players)
- Federer's BH is targeted relentlessly
In this match...