Rafael Nadal beat Ivan Ljubicic 3-6, 2-6, 6-3, 6-4, 7-6(3) in the Madrid final, 2005 on indoor hard court
It was Nadal's 4th Masters title of the year (and career), following Monte Carlo, Rome and Canadian Open and to date, remains his only title on indoor hard court. Ljubicic, playing his first Masters final, had won his last two tournaments recently on the same surface (Metz and Vienna) and would be runner up in Paris Masters shortly after
Nadal won 145 points, Ljubicic 154
Serve Stats
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (123/159) 77%
- 1st serve points won (88/123) 72%
- 2nd serve points won (13/36) 36%
- Aces 6
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (33/159) 21%
Ljubicic...
- 1st serve percentage (91/140) 65%
- 1st serve points won (70/91) 77%
- 2nd serve points won (26/49) 53%
- Aces 32 (2 second serves)
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (57/140) 41%
Serve Pattern
Nadal served...
- to FH 25%
- to BH 62%
- to Body 13%
Ljubicic served...
- to FH 48%
- to BH 52%
Return Stats
Nadal made...
- 77 (29 FH, 48 BH), including 2 return-approaches
- 25 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH)
- 24 Forced (11 FH, 13 BH)
- Return Rate (77/134) 57%
Ljubicic made...
- 124 (40 FH, 84 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 4 Winners (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 27 Errors, comprising...
- 13 Unforced (4 FH, 9 BH)
- 14 Forced (14 BH)
- Return Rate (124/157) 79%
Break Points
Nadal 4/9 (5 games)
Ljubicic 5/13 (8 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Nadal 29 (14 FH, 6 BH, 5 FHV, 2 BHV, 2 OH)
Ljubicic 52 (14 FH, 13 BH, 15 FHV, 7 BHV, 3 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 4 cc (2 passes), 3 dtl (2 passes), 2 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl, 3 inside-in and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 3 cc (2 passes), 1 dtl pass, 1 lob and 1 running-down-drop-shot cc at net pass
- 1 from a serve-volley point - a first volley, BHV
- 2 from return-approach points (1 FHV, 1 OH)
Ljubicic's FHs - 1 cc pass, 5 dtl (1 return), 2 dtl/inside-out, 5 inside-out and 1 longline
- BH - 4 cc (1 at net), 5 dtl, 1 inside-out return, 2 inside-in returns and 1 drop shot
- 3 from serve-volley points - 2 first volleys (1 FHV, 1 OH) and 1 second volley (1 BHV)
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Nadal 43
- 16 Unforced (13 FH, 3 BH)
- 27 Forced (13 FH, 13 BH, 1 FHV)... with 3 FH running-down-drop-shot at net & 2 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.3
Ljubicic 77
- 51 Unforced (26 FH, 24 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 FH at net & 1 BH at net
- 26 Forced (15 FH, 3 BH, 3 FHV, 3 FH1/2V, 2 BHV)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49.2
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Nadal was...
- 21/29 (72%) at net, including...
- 3/3 (100%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 2/2 return-approaching
- 0/1 retreated
Ljubicic was...
- 45/68 (66%) at net, including...
- 5/11 (45%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 2/7 (29%) off 1st serve and...
- 3/4 (75%) off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Highly entertaining and very good match of contrasting styles of play on a fast court. Ljubicic has the big serve and attacking game - all match coming to net and in parts, deadly from back too - Nadal has gentle serve and sound ground game with counter-punching. In fast conditions, that would seem to favour Ljubicic. Despite the result, so it proves
Like most 5 setters, quality of play fluctuates across the match. The action is best understood in terms of prospects
Ljubicic with his huge serve can and does hold easily most of the time. Including in the sets he loses. Nadal's prospects for gaining a break are slim at all times and to win sets, hustling out 1 break per set - maybe when Ljub misses a few first serves, or double faults or Nadal can come up with the good on the pass - is a reasonable match strategy
Even if he's successful - and its far from a given - he'd still need to hold. And liklihood of him doing doesn't look good. His serve is outright soft - easy to neutralize and with amibition, even attack - for about half the match and for the other half, it rises to still below average. Its not threatening at all. Even an average serve could be troublesome on this court - Nadal's isn't. Hence, Ljub can get into rallies readily on return, often from neutral position or even with initiative after his return
Putting it together, prospects of Ljub breaking - or at least making headway in return games - are a lot higher than Nadal. And so it plays out, despite the result
Points won - Nadal 145, Ljub 154
Points served - Nadal 159, Ljub 140
Break points stats - Nadal 4/9 (5 games), Ljub 5/13 (8 games)
More basically -
- Ljub is +5% on first serve points won
- Ljub +17% second serve points won
- somewhat compensated by Nadal +12% first serves in... but with Ljub still serving at excellent 65% and Nadal with terrible 36% second serve points won.... most likely outcome would be a Ljubicic win
So how does Nadal come away with the win? 'Playing the big points better'. He doesn't play them unduly play better than at other points in the match and Ljub likewise doesn't play them unduly worse, but a disproportionate number of big points goes Nadal way. I'd call that random chance - the way 6 coin flips sometimes come down 5 heads, 1 tails as opposed to the theoritcally 'correct' 3 heads, 3 tails
Conditioning is a factor in the result. Ljub had been playing tennis non-stop for 3 weeks and appears tired somewhere around late third/early fourth set. Nadal, according to commentary had some knee issues. He's wearing bands under both knees and his court coverage is well down from his personal norm all match
Serve & Return
Tremendous serving from Ljubicic. 32 aces and 41% unreturned rate. Not only does he serve at 65%, but for large part of match, his second serve is like a first serve. Its stronger than Nadal's first serve for starters
Ljub has 2 second serve aces, or 1 every 2/43 non double fault. Nadal has 6 first serve aces out of 123. In other words, Ljub serves a second serve ace 4.65% of the time, Nadal a first serve one 4.88%... with Nadal being a lot harder to ace than Ljub
Nadal has no read on the serve at all and takes to guessing. He does very well to return whatever isn't an ace. 25 errors doesn't look small (all but 1 are forced - many of them second serves) but is given 32 aces go by him. Quality of Ljub's serve goes down as match wears on. For first two sets, he's effectively serving 2 'first' serves. As his percentage drops, he takes something off first and second serve. Towards end, he doesn't seem able to serve as hard, though he still send down big serves regularly
Very unusual for Nadal to return-approach at all, let alone twice and he's driven to it during period when he's getting no counter-play at all. The first is a bona fida, push-charge return... the kind of thing you might see from John McEnroe. The second is a deep, looped return against a first serve that he dashes to net behind. He wins both points with winners
Nadal's serve is below average and it wouldn't be inaccurate to call it weak even. Most first serves are not only un-forceful but attackable. Second serves tend to be short and Ljub wallops them (main reason for Nadal winning just 36% such points). It does improve some as match goes on but at no time is a weapon. Ljub's returning quality fluctuates and late in match, he's sometimes lead footed. He has 4 winners.
On court like this and with relative strength of each players serve, I'd say both players return well by their own standard. Against Ljub's barrage, a normal returner could easily see 50% unreturned. Nadal keeps it down to 41%. His better returns are loopy and not short and Ljub retains initiative off point. Of course, plenty of outright weak returns where Ljub has big advantage. Ljub for his part returns just shy of 80%. He's facing a weak serve but court is quick. He's consistent and picks returns to attack. Few misses going for winners, but shot choice is good
In nutshell, top class serving from Ljub met with consistent-as-is-allowed returning by Nadal. Below average to weak serving from Nadal. Ljub returning consistently and could be probably be more damaging. He tries in wise amount, some success, some not
Play - Baseline & Net
Action varies across the match, and a bit strangely given how serve-return complex is, its Nadal's quality that determines how it goes
He is, as ever, consistent from the back with 16 UEs. Ljubicic has more than that off both sides - 26 from FH, 24 BH... consistency is a mismatch. The action shaping part of play, given Nadal's high consistency, becomes how heavily he hits. For first couple of sets, he doesn't hit heavy at all. Just putting ball in court stuff. And he leads with FH cc, as he likes to, which is consistent throughout match
With Nadal just putting balls in court without heat and dropping the ball short sooner or later, Ljub thrives by stepping in and hitting point ending shots. Ljub prefers BH, and hits some stunning, sharply angled cc winners as well as stepping in to firmly finish dtl. First set in particular is about Ljub's shot making vs Nadal's consistency and Ljub is well in the positives in it. Second set, he adds coming to net to finish on top of that - and wins even more easily
It was Nadal's 4th Masters title of the year (and career), following Monte Carlo, Rome and Canadian Open and to date, remains his only title on indoor hard court. Ljubicic, playing his first Masters final, had won his last two tournaments recently on the same surface (Metz and Vienna) and would be runner up in Paris Masters shortly after
Nadal won 145 points, Ljubicic 154
Serve Stats
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (123/159) 77%
- 1st serve points won (88/123) 72%
- 2nd serve points won (13/36) 36%
- Aces 6
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (33/159) 21%
Ljubicic...
- 1st serve percentage (91/140) 65%
- 1st serve points won (70/91) 77%
- 2nd serve points won (26/49) 53%
- Aces 32 (2 second serves)
- Double Faults 6
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (57/140) 41%
Serve Pattern
Nadal served...
- to FH 25%
- to BH 62%
- to Body 13%
Ljubicic served...
- to FH 48%
- to BH 52%
Return Stats
Nadal made...
- 77 (29 FH, 48 BH), including 2 return-approaches
- 25 Errors, comprising...
- 1 Unforced (1 FH)
- 24 Forced (11 FH, 13 BH)
- Return Rate (77/134) 57%
Ljubicic made...
- 124 (40 FH, 84 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 4 Winners (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 27 Errors, comprising...
- 13 Unforced (4 FH, 9 BH)
- 14 Forced (14 BH)
- Return Rate (124/157) 79%
Break Points
Nadal 4/9 (5 games)
Ljubicic 5/13 (8 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Nadal 29 (14 FH, 6 BH, 5 FHV, 2 BHV, 2 OH)
Ljubicic 52 (14 FH, 13 BH, 15 FHV, 7 BHV, 3 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 4 cc (2 passes), 3 dtl (2 passes), 2 inside-out, 1 inside-out/dtl, 3 inside-in and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 3 cc (2 passes), 1 dtl pass, 1 lob and 1 running-down-drop-shot cc at net pass
- 1 from a serve-volley point - a first volley, BHV
- 2 from return-approach points (1 FHV, 1 OH)
Ljubicic's FHs - 1 cc pass, 5 dtl (1 return), 2 dtl/inside-out, 5 inside-out and 1 longline
- BH - 4 cc (1 at net), 5 dtl, 1 inside-out return, 2 inside-in returns and 1 drop shot
- 3 from serve-volley points - 2 first volleys (1 FHV, 1 OH) and 1 second volley (1 BHV)
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Nadal 43
- 16 Unforced (13 FH, 3 BH)
- 27 Forced (13 FH, 13 BH, 1 FHV)... with 3 FH running-down-drop-shot at net & 2 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 46.3
Ljubicic 77
- 51 Unforced (26 FH, 24 BH, 1 FHV)... with 1 FH at net & 1 BH at net
- 26 Forced (15 FH, 3 BH, 3 FHV, 3 FH1/2V, 2 BHV)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 49.2
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Nadal was...
- 21/29 (72%) at net, including...
- 3/3 (100%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 2/2 return-approaching
- 0/1 retreated
Ljubicic was...
- 45/68 (66%) at net, including...
- 5/11 (45%) serve-volleying, comprising...
- 2/7 (29%) off 1st serve and...
- 3/4 (75%) off 2nd serve
---
- 0/1 forced back
Match Report
Highly entertaining and very good match of contrasting styles of play on a fast court. Ljubicic has the big serve and attacking game - all match coming to net and in parts, deadly from back too - Nadal has gentle serve and sound ground game with counter-punching. In fast conditions, that would seem to favour Ljubicic. Despite the result, so it proves
Like most 5 setters, quality of play fluctuates across the match. The action is best understood in terms of prospects
Ljubicic with his huge serve can and does hold easily most of the time. Including in the sets he loses. Nadal's prospects for gaining a break are slim at all times and to win sets, hustling out 1 break per set - maybe when Ljub misses a few first serves, or double faults or Nadal can come up with the good on the pass - is a reasonable match strategy
Even if he's successful - and its far from a given - he'd still need to hold. And liklihood of him doing doesn't look good. His serve is outright soft - easy to neutralize and with amibition, even attack - for about half the match and for the other half, it rises to still below average. Its not threatening at all. Even an average serve could be troublesome on this court - Nadal's isn't. Hence, Ljub can get into rallies readily on return, often from neutral position or even with initiative after his return
Putting it together, prospects of Ljub breaking - or at least making headway in return games - are a lot higher than Nadal. And so it plays out, despite the result
Points won - Nadal 145, Ljub 154
Points served - Nadal 159, Ljub 140
Break points stats - Nadal 4/9 (5 games), Ljub 5/13 (8 games)
More basically -
- Ljub is +5% on first serve points won
- Ljub +17% second serve points won
- somewhat compensated by Nadal +12% first serves in... but with Ljub still serving at excellent 65% and Nadal with terrible 36% second serve points won.... most likely outcome would be a Ljubicic win
So how does Nadal come away with the win? 'Playing the big points better'. He doesn't play them unduly play better than at other points in the match and Ljub likewise doesn't play them unduly worse, but a disproportionate number of big points goes Nadal way. I'd call that random chance - the way 6 coin flips sometimes come down 5 heads, 1 tails as opposed to the theoritcally 'correct' 3 heads, 3 tails
Conditioning is a factor in the result. Ljub had been playing tennis non-stop for 3 weeks and appears tired somewhere around late third/early fourth set. Nadal, according to commentary had some knee issues. He's wearing bands under both knees and his court coverage is well down from his personal norm all match
Serve & Return
Tremendous serving from Ljubicic. 32 aces and 41% unreturned rate. Not only does he serve at 65%, but for large part of match, his second serve is like a first serve. Its stronger than Nadal's first serve for starters
Ljub has 2 second serve aces, or 1 every 2/43 non double fault. Nadal has 6 first serve aces out of 123. In other words, Ljub serves a second serve ace 4.65% of the time, Nadal a first serve one 4.88%... with Nadal being a lot harder to ace than Ljub
Nadal has no read on the serve at all and takes to guessing. He does very well to return whatever isn't an ace. 25 errors doesn't look small (all but 1 are forced - many of them second serves) but is given 32 aces go by him. Quality of Ljub's serve goes down as match wears on. For first two sets, he's effectively serving 2 'first' serves. As his percentage drops, he takes something off first and second serve. Towards end, he doesn't seem able to serve as hard, though he still send down big serves regularly
Very unusual for Nadal to return-approach at all, let alone twice and he's driven to it during period when he's getting no counter-play at all. The first is a bona fida, push-charge return... the kind of thing you might see from John McEnroe. The second is a deep, looped return against a first serve that he dashes to net behind. He wins both points with winners
Nadal's serve is below average and it wouldn't be inaccurate to call it weak even. Most first serves are not only un-forceful but attackable. Second serves tend to be short and Ljub wallops them (main reason for Nadal winning just 36% such points). It does improve some as match goes on but at no time is a weapon. Ljub's returning quality fluctuates and late in match, he's sometimes lead footed. He has 4 winners.
On court like this and with relative strength of each players serve, I'd say both players return well by their own standard. Against Ljub's barrage, a normal returner could easily see 50% unreturned. Nadal keeps it down to 41%. His better returns are loopy and not short and Ljub retains initiative off point. Of course, plenty of outright weak returns where Ljub has big advantage. Ljub for his part returns just shy of 80%. He's facing a weak serve but court is quick. He's consistent and picks returns to attack. Few misses going for winners, but shot choice is good
In nutshell, top class serving from Ljub met with consistent-as-is-allowed returning by Nadal. Below average to weak serving from Nadal. Ljub returning consistently and could be probably be more damaging. He tries in wise amount, some success, some not
Play - Baseline & Net
Action varies across the match, and a bit strangely given how serve-return complex is, its Nadal's quality that determines how it goes
He is, as ever, consistent from the back with 16 UEs. Ljubicic has more than that off both sides - 26 from FH, 24 BH... consistency is a mismatch. The action shaping part of play, given Nadal's high consistency, becomes how heavily he hits. For first couple of sets, he doesn't hit heavy at all. Just putting ball in court stuff. And he leads with FH cc, as he likes to, which is consistent throughout match
With Nadal just putting balls in court without heat and dropping the ball short sooner or later, Ljub thrives by stepping in and hitting point ending shots. Ljub prefers BH, and hits some stunning, sharply angled cc winners as well as stepping in to firmly finish dtl. First set in particular is about Ljub's shot making vs Nadal's consistency and Ljub is well in the positives in it. Second set, he adds coming to net to finish on top of that - and wins even more easily
Last edited: