Rafael Nadal beat Casper Ruud 6-3, 6-3, 6-0 in the French Open final, 2022 on clay
It was Nadal’s 14th title at the event, record extending 22nd Slam and first clay title of the season. He’d won Australian Open earlier in the year. Ruud was seeded and playing his first Slam final final. The fifth seeded Nadal defeated 4 top seeds in winning the title
Nadal won 86 points, Ruud 55
Serve Stats
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (39/61) 64%
- 1st serve points won (32/39) 82%
- 2nd serve points won (10/22) 45%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (10/61) 16%
Ruud...
- 1st serve percentage (51/80) 64%
- 1st serve points won (27/51) 53%
- 2nd serve points won (9/29) 31%
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (9/80) 11%
Serve Pattern
Nadal served...
- to FH 7%
- to BH 93%
Ruud served...
- to FH 22%
- to BH 78%
Return Stats
Nadal made...
- 70 (20 FH, 50 BH), including 6 runaround FHs
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 5 Forced (2 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (70/79) 89%
Ruud made...
- 48 (10 FH, 38 BH), including 7 runaround FHs
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (2 BH)
- 7 Forced (7 BH)
- Return Rate (48/58) 83%
Break Points
Nadal 8/16 (9 games)
Ruud 2/3 (2 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Nadal 35 (14 FH, 15 BH, 5 BHV, 1 OH)
Ruud 15 (9 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 2 cc passes, 1 cc/inside-in, 3 dtl (1 at net), 7 inside-out and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 8 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl, 1 longline, 1 longline/cc pass at net, 2 running-down-drop-shot dtl at net (1 pass)
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley BHV
Ruud's FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out, 3 inside-out (1 at net), 1 inside-out/dtl and running-down-drop-shot ''cc'' at net (very finely played)
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass)
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley BHV
- 1 swinging FHV
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Nadal 28
- 15 Unforced (10 FH, 4 BH, 1 BHOH)... with 1 FH at net
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 6 BH, 1 BH1/2V)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48
Ruud 40
- 27 Unforced (19 FH, 7 BH, 1 BHV)
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.6
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Nadal was...
- 15/21 (71%) at net, including...
- 2/3 (67%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 0/1 forced back
Ruud was...
- 10/18 (56%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
Match Report
Match of two neat halves - the first competitive with good quality, sound tennis from both players and things close to even, the second with Nadal at his absolute best crushing a heavily outmatched Ruud
After losing the first set, Ruud breaks to go up 3-1 in the second. At that stage, 13 games into match -
- Points won - Nadal 39, Ruud 38, with…
-Winners - Nadal 14, Ruud 11
- Errors Forced - Nadal 6, Ruud 9
(hence, aggressively ended points - both 20)
- UEs - Nadal 10, Ruud 14
That’s the last game Ruud wins as Nadal reels off the next 11 games. Across this period -
- Points won - Nadal 47, Ruud 17, with…
- Winners - Nadal 21, Ruud 4
- Errors Forced - Nadal 7, Ruud 4
- UEs - Nadal 5, Ruud 13
Sound stuff from both players in first half, Nadal a touch better
Ridiculously good stuff from Nadal in second half to squash Ruud
Nadal dominating play with his FH is very common. Here, his BH is just as commanding. There isn’t a safe spot for Ruud to go to. Ruud himself looks to play a steady BH, power hitting FH game. The BH stays steady enough, but gets bullied by Nadal’s stock FH cc’ng to give up weak balls that Nadal can attack. The power hitting FH isn’t too strong, but gets the job done in first half before faltering in second half
Key features of playing dynamics when Nadal has initiative are -
- Nadal FH cc’ng to Ruud’s BH (standard Nadal stuff)
- Ruud BH holding up (i.e. not giving up errors), but sooner or later yielding weak balls that Nadal moves over and attacks with FHs, usually inside-out but also apt to run Ruud side to side
When Ruud has lead position -
- takes big cut, swinging FHs and hits them in all directions. Hard hitting, moving-opponent around, beat down play. He does not stick to hitting cc to systematically target Nadal’s BH
- plays BH longline (to avoid Nadal’s FH) to Nadal’s BH. Not strongly hit. How and how well Nadal responds varies some
Essentially, Ruud looks to play a hammering FH, steady BH game. He hammers the FH, but doesn’t have enough power with it to be overly damaging. Neither Nadal’s movement or shot tolerance is exceptional, and Ruud’s able to aggressively win points hitting in all directions
Comparing Ruud’s beat down FH hitting to Dominic Thiem’s against Nadal in the period 2017-2019, the earlier match up is simply higher tier from both players; Thiem hit a lot harder and with greater spin than Ruud does (Ruud probably hits with greater variety of direction - an area where he’s exceptional and alternates between inside-out, line, inside-in and cc without much pattern) and Nadal’s resistance and defence against Thiem was correspondingly greater
It doesn’t take too much to force errors out of Nadal here. Against Thiem, nothing short of overwhelming would yield same result - and occasionally, not even that. This isn’t a ‘miracle’ wall showing from Nadal by any means
As for Ruud’s BH, it stays steady with just 7 UEs (only Nadal’s own has lower number, a stingy 4) and that’s against an above par breaking-BH-down FH cc’ng showing from Nadal; Not content with just routine heavy FH cc’s, Nadal goes extra wide to drag Ruud off court too
Ruud’s BH though lacks punch and yields weaker balls. Nadal steps around easily to thrash FHs to opposite side to finish points
Logically and wisely enough, when Ruud has ball on BH, he avoids going cc and plays line to Nadal’s BH. Still consistent and still not strongly. Nadal has time to move around to play FHs and in first half, usually plays it back inside-in. There are line rallies between Ruud’s BH and Nadal’s BH or FH inside-in - with Ruud the lighter hitter, but consistency a wash
In second half, Nadal goes to town with powerful BH cc’s and ends up crushing Ruud. Nadal’s BH play is standout feature of match, and he’s about as devastating with it as he often is with FH (and virtually never is off BH). Finishes points with BH cc (he’s got 7 winners and forces errors with it) or draws defensive reply. Either persists with more powerful BH cc’s or goes dtl to run Ruud around or finish the point. Almost exactly what he generally does with his FH
Features of Nadal’s showing -
- 35 winners to 28 total errors (15 UEs, 13 FEs) is ridiculous for a baseline clay showing
- more winners off both wings than UEs - FH 14-10, BH 15-4. FH figure isn’t unusual (though excellent), BH figure is beyond ridiculous
- more BH winners than total errors 15-10. Similarly ridiculous
- More BH winners than FH ones is unusual for him
- Just the very low 4 BH UEs would qualify as excellent, even if that side were just holding the fort. Having it doing the amount of damage it does on top of that is something else
The very best FH showings from the very best FHs like Nadal himself, Roger Federer or Juan Martin del Potro have winner/error ratios like Nadal’s BH here. More BH winners than UE showings are very rare to begin with and most are based on solidity (i.e very low BH UEs so not many winners necessary). Here, Nadal has that, but exceptionally high damage done too
Key to all this is Ruud’s BH being bullied to tune of giving up balls for Nadal to attack. Ruud’s BH isn’t strong, but it isn’t puny either. Nadal just happens to go about exploiting his hitting advantage from his FH cc’ng in particularly aggressive way, and his BH play is similarly powerful
Neutral UEs read Nadal 8, Ruud 17. A sound base to bleed Ruud out, but Nadal goes a much more aggressive route
Another day, another period, Nadal might just keep raining down FH cc’s to draw errors or limit attacking play to move around FH inside-outs, while responding to BH line with neutral BH line or non-aggressive cc - and then he’d have to deal with Ruud’s hammered FHs
Here, he responds to BH line with attacking BH cc’s - and runs Ruud around same way of the BH as he does off the FH
It was Nadal’s 14th title at the event, record extending 22nd Slam and first clay title of the season. He’d won Australian Open earlier in the year. Ruud was seeded and playing his first Slam final final. The fifth seeded Nadal defeated 4 top seeds in winning the title
Nadal won 86 points, Ruud 55
Serve Stats
Nadal...
- 1st serve percentage (39/61) 64%
- 1st serve points won (32/39) 82%
- 2nd serve points won (10/22) 45%
- Aces 1
- Double Faults 3
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (10/61) 16%
Ruud...
- 1st serve percentage (51/80) 64%
- 1st serve points won (27/51) 53%
- 2nd serve points won (9/29) 31%
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (9/80) 11%
Serve Pattern
Nadal served...
- to FH 7%
- to BH 93%
Ruud served...
- to FH 22%
- to BH 78%
Return Stats
Nadal made...
- 70 (20 FH, 50 BH), including 6 runaround FHs
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 4 Unforced (1 FH, 3 BH)
- 5 Forced (2 FH, 3 BH)
- Return Rate (70/79) 89%
Ruud made...
- 48 (10 FH, 38 BH), including 7 runaround FHs
- 9 Errors, comprising...
- 2 Unforced (2 BH)
- 7 Forced (7 BH)
- Return Rate (48/58) 83%
Break Points
Nadal 8/16 (9 games)
Ruud 2/3 (2 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Nadal 35 (14 FH, 15 BH, 5 BHV, 1 OH)
Ruud 15 (9 FH, 2 BH, 1 FHV, 2 BHV, 1 OH)
Nadal's FHs - 2 cc passes, 1 cc/inside-in, 3 dtl (1 at net), 7 inside-out and 1 drop shot
- BHs - 8 cc (1 pass), 2 dtl, 1 longline, 1 longline/cc pass at net, 2 running-down-drop-shot dtl at net (1 pass)
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley BHV
Ruud's FHs - 1 cc, 1 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out, 3 inside-out (1 at net), 1 inside-out/dtl and running-down-drop-shot ''cc'' at net (very finely played)
- BHs - 2 cc (1 pass)
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley BHV
- 1 swinging FHV
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Nadal 28
- 15 Unforced (10 FH, 4 BH, 1 BHOH)... with 1 FH at net
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 6 BH, 1 BH1/2V)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 48
Ruud 40
- 27 Unforced (19 FH, 7 BH, 1 BHV)
- 13 Forced (6 FH, 7 BH)... with 1 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.6
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Nadal was...
- 15/21 (71%) at net, including...
- 2/3 (67%) serve-volleying, all 1st serves
---
- 0/1 forced back
Ruud was...
- 10/18 (56%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
Match Report
Match of two neat halves - the first competitive with good quality, sound tennis from both players and things close to even, the second with Nadal at his absolute best crushing a heavily outmatched Ruud
After losing the first set, Ruud breaks to go up 3-1 in the second. At that stage, 13 games into match -
- Points won - Nadal 39, Ruud 38, with…
-Winners - Nadal 14, Ruud 11
- Errors Forced - Nadal 6, Ruud 9
(hence, aggressively ended points - both 20)
- UEs - Nadal 10, Ruud 14
That’s the last game Ruud wins as Nadal reels off the next 11 games. Across this period -
- Points won - Nadal 47, Ruud 17, with…
- Winners - Nadal 21, Ruud 4
- Errors Forced - Nadal 7, Ruud 4
- UEs - Nadal 5, Ruud 13
Sound stuff from both players in first half, Nadal a touch better
Ridiculously good stuff from Nadal in second half to squash Ruud
Nadal dominating play with his FH is very common. Here, his BH is just as commanding. There isn’t a safe spot for Ruud to go to. Ruud himself looks to play a steady BH, power hitting FH game. The BH stays steady enough, but gets bullied by Nadal’s stock FH cc’ng to give up weak balls that Nadal can attack. The power hitting FH isn’t too strong, but gets the job done in first half before faltering in second half
Key features of playing dynamics when Nadal has initiative are -
- Nadal FH cc’ng to Ruud’s BH (standard Nadal stuff)
- Ruud BH holding up (i.e. not giving up errors), but sooner or later yielding weak balls that Nadal moves over and attacks with FHs, usually inside-out but also apt to run Ruud side to side
When Ruud has lead position -
- takes big cut, swinging FHs and hits them in all directions. Hard hitting, moving-opponent around, beat down play. He does not stick to hitting cc to systematically target Nadal’s BH
- plays BH longline (to avoid Nadal’s FH) to Nadal’s BH. Not strongly hit. How and how well Nadal responds varies some
Essentially, Ruud looks to play a hammering FH, steady BH game. He hammers the FH, but doesn’t have enough power with it to be overly damaging. Neither Nadal’s movement or shot tolerance is exceptional, and Ruud’s able to aggressively win points hitting in all directions
Comparing Ruud’s beat down FH hitting to Dominic Thiem’s against Nadal in the period 2017-2019, the earlier match up is simply higher tier from both players; Thiem hit a lot harder and with greater spin than Ruud does (Ruud probably hits with greater variety of direction - an area where he’s exceptional and alternates between inside-out, line, inside-in and cc without much pattern) and Nadal’s resistance and defence against Thiem was correspondingly greater
It doesn’t take too much to force errors out of Nadal here. Against Thiem, nothing short of overwhelming would yield same result - and occasionally, not even that. This isn’t a ‘miracle’ wall showing from Nadal by any means
As for Ruud’s BH, it stays steady with just 7 UEs (only Nadal’s own has lower number, a stingy 4) and that’s against an above par breaking-BH-down FH cc’ng showing from Nadal; Not content with just routine heavy FH cc’s, Nadal goes extra wide to drag Ruud off court too
Ruud’s BH though lacks punch and yields weaker balls. Nadal steps around easily to thrash FHs to opposite side to finish points
Logically and wisely enough, when Ruud has ball on BH, he avoids going cc and plays line to Nadal’s BH. Still consistent and still not strongly. Nadal has time to move around to play FHs and in first half, usually plays it back inside-in. There are line rallies between Ruud’s BH and Nadal’s BH or FH inside-in - with Ruud the lighter hitter, but consistency a wash
In second half, Nadal goes to town with powerful BH cc’s and ends up crushing Ruud. Nadal’s BH play is standout feature of match, and he’s about as devastating with it as he often is with FH (and virtually never is off BH). Finishes points with BH cc (he’s got 7 winners and forces errors with it) or draws defensive reply. Either persists with more powerful BH cc’s or goes dtl to run Ruud around or finish the point. Almost exactly what he generally does with his FH
Features of Nadal’s showing -
- 35 winners to 28 total errors (15 UEs, 13 FEs) is ridiculous for a baseline clay showing
- more winners off both wings than UEs - FH 14-10, BH 15-4. FH figure isn’t unusual (though excellent), BH figure is beyond ridiculous
- more BH winners than total errors 15-10. Similarly ridiculous
- More BH winners than FH ones is unusual for him
- Just the very low 4 BH UEs would qualify as excellent, even if that side were just holding the fort. Having it doing the amount of damage it does on top of that is something else
The very best FH showings from the very best FHs like Nadal himself, Roger Federer or Juan Martin del Potro have winner/error ratios like Nadal’s BH here. More BH winners than UE showings are very rare to begin with and most are based on solidity (i.e very low BH UEs so not many winners necessary). Here, Nadal has that, but exceptionally high damage done too
Key to all this is Ruud’s BH being bullied to tune of giving up balls for Nadal to attack. Ruud’s BH isn’t strong, but it isn’t puny either. Nadal just happens to go about exploiting his hitting advantage from his FH cc’ng in particularly aggressive way, and his BH play is similarly powerful
Neutral UEs read Nadal 8, Ruud 17. A sound base to bleed Ruud out, but Nadal goes a much more aggressive route
Another day, another period, Nadal might just keep raining down FH cc’s to draw errors or limit attacking play to move around FH inside-outs, while responding to BH line with neutral BH line or non-aggressive cc - and then he’d have to deal with Ruud’s hammered FHs
Here, he responds to BH line with attacking BH cc’s - and runs Ruud around same way of the BH as he does off the FH
Last edited: