Marcelo Rios beat Andre Agassi 6-4, 2-6, 7-6(1), 5-7, 6-3 in the Grand Slam Cup final, 1998 on indoor hard court in Munich, Germany
It was the only final at the event for both players. Rios finished the year ranked #2 and had risen to #1 earlier in the year. Agassi would go onto reach and finish #1 the following year
Rios won 154 points, Agassi 155
Serve Stats
Rios...
- 1st serve percentage (99/156) 63%
- 1st serve points won (69/99) 70%
- 2nd serve points won (31/57) 54%
- Aces 18 (3 second serves)
- Double Faults 10
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (49/156) 31%
Agassi...
- 1st serve percentage (81/153) 53%
- 1st serve points won (60/81) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (39/72) 54%
- Aces 9
- Double Faults 8
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (49/153) 32%
Serve Patterns
Rios served...
- to FH 42%
- to BH 57%
- to Body 1%
Agassi served...
- to FH 46%
- to BH 53%
- to Body 1%
Return Stats
Rios made...
- 96 (41 FH, 55 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 8 Winners (4 FH, 4 BH)
- 40 Errors, comprising...
- 18 Unforced (11 FH, 7 BH)
- 22 Forced (7 FH, 15 BH)
- Return Rate (96/145) 66%
Agassi made...
- 97 (37 FH, 60 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 31 Errors, comprising...
- 10 Unforced (4 FH, 6 BH)
- 21 Forced (9 FH, 12 BH)
- Return Rate (97/146) 66%
Break Points
Rios 5/13 (7 games)
Agassi 5/11 (9 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Rios 46 (27 FH, 12 BH, 1 FHV, 4 BHV, 2 OH)
Agassi 20 (9 FH, 8 BH, 3 FHV)
Rios' FHs - 2 cc, 10 dtl (1 return, 1 pass), 1 dtl/inside-out, 9 inside-out (2 returns, 1 at net), 1 inside-out/dtl and 4 inside-in (1 return, 1 at net)
- BHs - 7 cc (2 returns, 3 passes) and 5 dtl (2 returns)
- 1 from a return-approach point, a BHV
- 2 other BHVs were swinging shots (1 non-net shot)
- 1 'OH' was played while on the floor, after Rios slipped
Agassi's FHs - 1 cc, 3 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out, 2 inside-out (1 at net), 1 inside-out/dtl and 1 inside-in
- BHs - 6 cc (1 return, 1 pass, 1 at net) and 2 dtl (1 pass)
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a second volley FHV
- 1 other FHV was a swinging shot
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Rios 76
- 54 Unforced (27 FH, 26 BH, 1 FHV)
- 22 Forced (12 FH, 10 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.8
Agassi 51
- 25 Unforced (11 FH, 12 BH, 2 BHV)
- 26 Forced (13 FH, 13 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 51.2
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Rios was...
- 13/16 (81%) at net, with...
- 1/1 return-approaching
Agassi was...
- 15/21 (71%) at net, including...
- 1/2 serve-volleying, both 1st serves
---
- 0/1 return-approaching
Match Report
An amazing, very lively and as entertaining a match as you'll find, a see-saw, baseline contest on a fast court. Rios brings the attacking flair and sublime shotmaking, Agassi provides the solid, hard hitting element. One or the other has better of play - when Rios' is 'on', its him and when he's not quite 'on' (if not 'off'), its Agassi. At the end, Rios is 'on'
The court is fast. The kind of court where a big serving serve-volleyer might hold games like clockwork in 2 minutes. Even Agassi and Rios' serves are weapons on it - and freebies gained with the serve make up substantial amount of match - almost exactly the same for both players, so it cancels out
When rallies develop, Rios works his magic - for better or worse. Starting with the return (and of course, the serve too) itself - he hits some amazing sharply angled or dtl slapped returns to end points or get Agassi running to defend. He goes for his winners from the back all match - shots set up by the serve, shots from regulation positions, shots set up by the return. Or when a neutral rally develops, he finds a way to turn it into an open court situation by finding angles where none seem to exist and before long, he has a shot at a winner and goes for it. Or he doesn't have a shot at the winner but goes for it anway.
Sometimes he makes the bulk - and he wins sets. And sometiems he doesn't - and he loses sets. Its not all the time. Sometimes he plays along 'normally', but the normal stuff is the exception and a respite from the dashing shot-making and point construction. And its not wild or desperate stuff - he's in control and as events demonstrate, percentages are in his favour for long term success - just glorious, dashing play
Agassi's not quite just a spectator on the other end. With court opening up, he's almost forced counter-attack. Its clear he'd rather play a game of 'who-can-boss-who' hitting hard and perhaps, he'd take attack if he could draw short balls from that dynamic. Situation doesn't come up often enough to tell - Rios attacks first. As often as not even before rally begins (i.e. with the return or the serve). Some attacking wide returning from Agassi too or power hits to the baseline - strong stuff by a normal standard, a drop in the lake next to Rios' showing. On whole, Agassi remains strong of hitting and very consistent. Though Rios takes the eye, Agassi right in there in all ways
Rios might take almost all eyes, but match is virtually dead even. Agassi plays just as well, though far less flashily
Statistically, the match is extraordinarily even in so many ways. There are other matches like this, but they tend to play out uniformly. But for a see-saw encounter of 5 sets to end up with so many things virtually dead equal is very surprising. Match long stats are of limited value because any given period of play might be deviating from the overall trends drastically, but have a look at how similar
Points won - Rios 154, Agassi 155
Points served - Rios 156, Agassi 153
Break Points - Rios 5/13, Agassi 5/11
Virtually nothing in that. Agassi with neglibile, shadow of a ghost of an edge
Games with break points - Rios 7, Agassi 9
That looks better for Agassi in terms of (statistical) superiority. Realistically, its match of parts so it doesn't matter
Unreturned serves - Rios 49/156 at 31%, Agassi 49/153 at 32%
Double Faults - Rios 10, Agassi 8, hence...
Return Rates - both 66%
Freebies are identical. Their breakdowns are in line with Rios aggressor, Agassi more solid - on both the serve and the return
Aces - Rios 18, Agassi 9
Return FEs - Rios 22, Agassi 21, leaving the slack to be made up by....
Return UEs - Rios 18, Agassi 10
Rios much higher ace count is obviously a product of his serving more aggressively. His much higher Return UE count is product of his returnign more aggressively. He's got 8 return winners to Agassi's 1 - and that's not the whole iceberg. He strikes boatloads of error forcing and initiative grabbing wide returns on top of that too. Agassi strikes a fair few too - but nowhere near as much as Rios
They even serve in similar directions -
- to FH - Rios 42%, Agassi 46%
- to BH - Rios 57%, Agassi 53%
- to Body - both 1%
More basically -
First serve in - Rios 63%, Agassi 53%
First serve won - Rios 70%, Agassi 74%
Second serve won - both 54%
Virtually equal again. Realistically, not too important. At the death in 5th set, Agassi winning 2/14 or 14% second serve points is key. Other sets, figures are 64%, 78%, 59% and 64%. There are similar flucutations for all 4 serves in the match. But if your looking for a statistically significant point, Agassi's 53% first serves in, given a fairly ordinary serve, is not good. With a serve like that, he can reasonably expect it to be 60%+ and in that sense, low in-count is crucial factor. How important it is realistically is less clear - Rios is quite capable of cleaning up on Agassi's first serve points when he gets going
In play -
Points won - Rios 97, Agassi 96, broken down as....
Winners - Rios 46, Agassi 20
Errors Forced - Rios 26, Agassi 22
UEs - Rios 54, Agassi 25
In other words, Rios is + 30 points ended aggressively, Agassi is +31 on UEs
Both are well in the positives point ended aggressively/UE differential - Rios +18, Agassi +17... very well played match
Very, very high UEFIs of Rios 52.8, Agassi 51.2. Even 100% serve-volley matches aren't always this high and this is very much a baseline match (the 2 combine for 37 approaches in 309 points)
Breakdown of UEs -
- Neutral - Rios 13, Agassi 9
- Attacking - Rios 13, Agassi 4
- Winner Attempts - Rios 28, Agassi 12
That actually is surprising. Some explanation and analysis
Agassi has considerably better of things neutrally and more so than the small gap in UEs - but little control in keeping dynamics so. Rios' 13 neutral errors are mostly sloppy misses to regulation balls. Agassi's tend to be tricky, not easy, tilted to being defensive shots. When Agassi leads play, he hits hard and well off both sides. Its sort of play that should be good to keep his opponent honest. Rios has other ideas. He plays along, trailing in consistency but not hitting, and sooner or later, turns the dynamic into a more fluid, attacking-defender one with wide angled shots off both sides
It was the only final at the event for both players. Rios finished the year ranked #2 and had risen to #1 earlier in the year. Agassi would go onto reach and finish #1 the following year
Rios won 154 points, Agassi 155
Serve Stats
Rios...
- 1st serve percentage (99/156) 63%
- 1st serve points won (69/99) 70%
- 2nd serve points won (31/57) 54%
- Aces 18 (3 second serves)
- Double Faults 10
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (49/156) 31%
Agassi...
- 1st serve percentage (81/153) 53%
- 1st serve points won (60/81) 74%
- 2nd serve points won (39/72) 54%
- Aces 9
- Double Faults 8
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (49/153) 32%
Serve Patterns
Rios served...
- to FH 42%
- to BH 57%
- to Body 1%
Agassi served...
- to FH 46%
- to BH 53%
- to Body 1%
Return Stats
Rios made...
- 96 (41 FH, 55 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 8 Winners (4 FH, 4 BH)
- 40 Errors, comprising...
- 18 Unforced (11 FH, 7 BH)
- 22 Forced (7 FH, 15 BH)
- Return Rate (96/145) 66%
Agassi made...
- 97 (37 FH, 60 BH), including 1 return-approach
- 1 Winner (1 BH)
- 31 Errors, comprising...
- 10 Unforced (4 FH, 6 BH)
- 21 Forced (9 FH, 12 BH)
- Return Rate (97/146) 66%
Break Points
Rios 5/13 (7 games)
Agassi 5/11 (9 games)
Winners (including returns, excluding serves)
Rios 46 (27 FH, 12 BH, 1 FHV, 4 BHV, 2 OH)
Agassi 20 (9 FH, 8 BH, 3 FHV)
Rios' FHs - 2 cc, 10 dtl (1 return, 1 pass), 1 dtl/inside-out, 9 inside-out (2 returns, 1 at net), 1 inside-out/dtl and 4 inside-in (1 return, 1 at net)
- BHs - 7 cc (2 returns, 3 passes) and 5 dtl (2 returns)
- 1 from a return-approach point, a BHV
- 2 other BHVs were swinging shots (1 non-net shot)
- 1 'OH' was played while on the floor, after Rios slipped
Agassi's FHs - 1 cc, 3 dtl, 1 dtl/inside-out, 2 inside-out (1 at net), 1 inside-out/dtl and 1 inside-in
- BHs - 6 cc (1 return, 1 pass, 1 at net) and 2 dtl (1 pass)
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a second volley FHV
- 1 other FHV was a swinging shot
Errors (excluding serves and returns)
Rios 76
- 54 Unforced (27 FH, 26 BH, 1 FHV)
- 22 Forced (12 FH, 10 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 52.8
Agassi 51
- 25 Unforced (11 FH, 12 BH, 2 BHV)
- 26 Forced (13 FH, 13 BH)
- Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 51.2
(Note 1: All 1/2 volleys refer to such shots played at net. 1/2 volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke numbers)
(Note 2: the Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is an indicator of how aggressive the average UE was. The numbers presented for these two matches are keyed on 4 categories - 20 defensive, 40 neutral, 50 attacking and 60 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Rios was...
- 13/16 (81%) at net, with...
- 1/1 return-approaching
Agassi was...
- 15/21 (71%) at net, including...
- 1/2 serve-volleying, both 1st serves
---
- 0/1 return-approaching
Match Report
An amazing, very lively and as entertaining a match as you'll find, a see-saw, baseline contest on a fast court. Rios brings the attacking flair and sublime shotmaking, Agassi provides the solid, hard hitting element. One or the other has better of play - when Rios' is 'on', its him and when he's not quite 'on' (if not 'off'), its Agassi. At the end, Rios is 'on'
The court is fast. The kind of court where a big serving serve-volleyer might hold games like clockwork in 2 minutes. Even Agassi and Rios' serves are weapons on it - and freebies gained with the serve make up substantial amount of match - almost exactly the same for both players, so it cancels out
When rallies develop, Rios works his magic - for better or worse. Starting with the return (and of course, the serve too) itself - he hits some amazing sharply angled or dtl slapped returns to end points or get Agassi running to defend. He goes for his winners from the back all match - shots set up by the serve, shots from regulation positions, shots set up by the return. Or when a neutral rally develops, he finds a way to turn it into an open court situation by finding angles where none seem to exist and before long, he has a shot at a winner and goes for it. Or he doesn't have a shot at the winner but goes for it anway.
Sometimes he makes the bulk - and he wins sets. And sometiems he doesn't - and he loses sets. Its not all the time. Sometimes he plays along 'normally', but the normal stuff is the exception and a respite from the dashing shot-making and point construction. And its not wild or desperate stuff - he's in control and as events demonstrate, percentages are in his favour for long term success - just glorious, dashing play
Agassi's not quite just a spectator on the other end. With court opening up, he's almost forced counter-attack. Its clear he'd rather play a game of 'who-can-boss-who' hitting hard and perhaps, he'd take attack if he could draw short balls from that dynamic. Situation doesn't come up often enough to tell - Rios attacks first. As often as not even before rally begins (i.e. with the return or the serve). Some attacking wide returning from Agassi too or power hits to the baseline - strong stuff by a normal standard, a drop in the lake next to Rios' showing. On whole, Agassi remains strong of hitting and very consistent. Though Rios takes the eye, Agassi right in there in all ways
Rios might take almost all eyes, but match is virtually dead even. Agassi plays just as well, though far less flashily
Statistically, the match is extraordinarily even in so many ways. There are other matches like this, but they tend to play out uniformly. But for a see-saw encounter of 5 sets to end up with so many things virtually dead equal is very surprising. Match long stats are of limited value because any given period of play might be deviating from the overall trends drastically, but have a look at how similar
Points won - Rios 154, Agassi 155
Points served - Rios 156, Agassi 153
Break Points - Rios 5/13, Agassi 5/11
Virtually nothing in that. Agassi with neglibile, shadow of a ghost of an edge
Games with break points - Rios 7, Agassi 9
That looks better for Agassi in terms of (statistical) superiority. Realistically, its match of parts so it doesn't matter
Unreturned serves - Rios 49/156 at 31%, Agassi 49/153 at 32%
Double Faults - Rios 10, Agassi 8, hence...
Return Rates - both 66%
Freebies are identical. Their breakdowns are in line with Rios aggressor, Agassi more solid - on both the serve and the return
Aces - Rios 18, Agassi 9
Return FEs - Rios 22, Agassi 21, leaving the slack to be made up by....
Return UEs - Rios 18, Agassi 10
Rios much higher ace count is obviously a product of his serving more aggressively. His much higher Return UE count is product of his returnign more aggressively. He's got 8 return winners to Agassi's 1 - and that's not the whole iceberg. He strikes boatloads of error forcing and initiative grabbing wide returns on top of that too. Agassi strikes a fair few too - but nowhere near as much as Rios
They even serve in similar directions -
- to FH - Rios 42%, Agassi 46%
- to BH - Rios 57%, Agassi 53%
- to Body - both 1%
More basically -
First serve in - Rios 63%, Agassi 53%
First serve won - Rios 70%, Agassi 74%
Second serve won - both 54%
Virtually equal again. Realistically, not too important. At the death in 5th set, Agassi winning 2/14 or 14% second serve points is key. Other sets, figures are 64%, 78%, 59% and 64%. There are similar flucutations for all 4 serves in the match. But if your looking for a statistically significant point, Agassi's 53% first serves in, given a fairly ordinary serve, is not good. With a serve like that, he can reasonably expect it to be 60%+ and in that sense, low in-count is crucial factor. How important it is realistically is less clear - Rios is quite capable of cleaning up on Agassi's first serve points when he gets going
In play -
Points won - Rios 97, Agassi 96, broken down as....
Winners - Rios 46, Agassi 20
Errors Forced - Rios 26, Agassi 22
UEs - Rios 54, Agassi 25
In other words, Rios is + 30 points ended aggressively, Agassi is +31 on UEs
Both are well in the positives point ended aggressively/UE differential - Rios +18, Agassi +17... very well played match
Very, very high UEFIs of Rios 52.8, Agassi 51.2. Even 100% serve-volley matches aren't always this high and this is very much a baseline match (the 2 combine for 37 approaches in 309 points)
Breakdown of UEs -
- Neutral - Rios 13, Agassi 9
- Attacking - Rios 13, Agassi 4
- Winner Attempts - Rios 28, Agassi 12
That actually is surprising. Some explanation and analysis
Agassi has considerably better of things neutrally and more so than the small gap in UEs - but little control in keeping dynamics so. Rios' 13 neutral errors are mostly sloppy misses to regulation balls. Agassi's tend to be tricky, not easy, tilted to being defensive shots. When Agassi leads play, he hits hard and well off both sides. Its sort of play that should be good to keep his opponent honest. Rios has other ideas. He plays along, trailing in consistency but not hitting, and sooner or later, turns the dynamic into a more fluid, attacking-defender one with wide angled shots off both sides