Andy Roddick beat Guillermo Coria 6-7(2), 6-3, 6-1, 0-0 retired in the Miami final, 2004 on hard court
This was Roddick’s first title at the event. Coria would win the next Masters event in Monte Carlo
Roddick won 105 points, Coria 76
Serve Stats
Roddick...
- 1st serve percentage (45/74) 61%
- 1st serve points won (39/45) 87%
- 2nd serve points won (17/29) 59%
- Aces 11 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (35/74) 47%
Coria...
- 1st serve percentage (81/107) 76%
- 1st serve points won (43/81) 53%
- 2nd serve points won (15/26) 58%
- Aces 4
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (19/107) 18%
Serve Pattern
Roddick served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 56%
- to Body 6%
Coria served...
- to FH 44%
- to BH 51%
- to Body 5%
Return Stats
Roddick made...
- 87 (46 FH, 41 BH), including 7 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 15 Errors, comprising...
- 14 Unforced (8 FH, 6 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 1 Forced (1 FH)
- Return Rate (87/106) 82%
Coria made...
- 37 (13 FH, 24 BH)
- 24 Errors, comprising...
- 8 Unforced (4 FH, 4 BH)
- 16 Forced (4 FH, 12 BH)
- Return Rate (37/72) 51%
Break Points
Roddick 5/11 (6 games)
Coria 1/2 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Roddick 25 (15 FH, 7 BH, 3 OH)
Coria 17 (4 FH, 8 BH, 4 FHV, 1 BHV)
Roddick's FHs - 2 cc (1 pass at net), 1 cc/down-the-middle at net, 4 dtl (1 return), 2 inside-out, 1 inside-out/longline, 2 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc, 1 longline/inside-out, 1 drop shot
- BHs - 6 dtl (1 slice at net), 1 inside-out
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley OH
Coria's FHs - 2 inside-out, 1 drop shot, 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl pass at net
- BHs - 1 cc, 4 dtl (1 pass, 1 at net), 1 drop shot, 2 lobs
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley BHV
- 1 other FHV was a non-net, swinging cc shot
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Roddick 38
- 32 Unforced (15 FH, 17 BH)
- 6 Forced (4 FH, 1 BH, 1 Back-to-Net)... the Back-to-Net can reasonbly be called a FH
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.2
Coria 44
- 25 Unforced (15 FH, 10 BH)... with 1 FH pass attempt
- 19 Forced (11 FH, 6 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 2 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.6
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: The 'Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is a measure of how aggressive of intent the average UE made was. 60 is maximum, 20 is minimum. This match has been scored using a four point scale - 2 defensive, 4 neutral, 5 attacking, 6 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Roddick was...
- 15/22 (68%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 1/2 forced back
Coria was...
- 7/12 (58%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
Match Report
Good contest between big serving, aggressive Roddick vs quick, steady, counter-punching Coria until Coria does does something to his back. His game linearly falls away from then and Roddick gains upper hand more and more, corresponding to longer match goes, before Coria ultimately calls it quits. Court is slow, and there’s enough breeze for much of match to be a factor
Trigger incident happens on serve game 11 of first set. Coria tends to his back quietly after running for a ball and is cautious in walking to his chair and sitting down at the end of the game. Takes a lengthy medical time out at the change-over. Steels himself to win the set in a tiebreak, but he at least seems to know which way wind is blowing. The irritated/frustrated way he tosses his racquet at the change-over is opposite of what one would expect from the winner of the set
His play doesn’t fall of radically. Starts with serving lighter and not moving as rapidly, which for with him, isn’t difficult to detect since he’s so quick otherwise. ‘Slow for Coria’ is more than good enough to compete and faster than all but handful of players. Smoothly, he gets worse - pace of serve, speed of foot and strength of shot. A graph outlining his decline would be a straight sloping down line
Since he’s neck and neck with Rod when fully fit, even a little decline would see Rod rise above, and Rod becomes stronger player for the slight drop. Which deepens and deepens as Rod dominates more and more. Rod doesn’t play particularly well in bossing action about
In the circumstance, match long stats are of limited value and match is better thought of as two part affair. First part is first set, a normal and good contest. Second part moves into mismatch, with Coria gradually fading
Part 1 - Normal Contest
Coria wins 7-6(2). He hurts himself in game 11
First serve in - Rod 58%, Coria 76%
First serve won - Rod 77%, Coria 72%
Second serve won - Rod 44%, Coria 63%
Darn good, big serving, aggressive player vs small serving, steady one
Coria with a below average serve at best. About 80% harmless, with 20% tricky. Slippery darted out wide serve being chief threat, as much for surprise as quality.
Very good in count. And he wins almost as many first serve points as much bigger serving Rod
Second serve points good indicator of how the the two stack up in play. Coria better, both good
Aces/double faults - Rod 5/2, Coria 1/0
Freebies - Rod 42%, Coria 24%
Rod getting a lot more out of the serve shot, as expected
Winners - Rod 4 (2 FH, 1 BH, 1 OH), Coria 9 (2 FH, 3 BH, 3 FHV, 1 BHV)
Errors forced - Rod 7, Coria 2
UEs - Rod 16 (6 FH, 10 BH), Cora 7 (5 FH, 2 BH)
Action is Rod leading, looking to overpower and Coria counter-punching
Rod looking to dictate off both wings, naturally more with FH. Coria quick and tested on running shots. Its breezy enough that precision attacking play and shot-making is hampered
Few surprises here, particularly Coria with such an advantage in winners
Most of it relates to drop shots.
3/5 ground winners, 1 is a pass, leaving just 1 bona fida, ground-to-ground winner (a BH dtl)
2/4 net ones are drop shot related, 1 other is from surprise serve-volley, leaving 1 bona fida, coming in from rallying (its set up by a good FH inside-out)
Some gorgeous drop shotting by Coria. Its crucial in tiebreak
42% freebies limits Rod’s scope for striking winners, but he’s got good initiative on third ball often enough. Feasible to hit winning shots. If he’s tempered in his shot choices, its wise given breeze. Breeze probably has hand in some of his failed shot-making, including crucial dtl winner attempt misses in the ‘breaker
Relatively low winners and high errors forced from Rod. Situations like this generally arise for couple reason
- measured, clinical attacking play. Just doing enough to win the point and a credit to the attacker or
- high end defence that denies clean winners
Combo of the two here. Coria on the run is very good
UEs along expected lines, with Coria more consistent off the BH accounting for it. That’s not just neutral consistency; Rod not averse to trying to attack with BH too. But it is FH he leads with more. Good lot of edging-towards attacking UEs off that side, particularly mishits. The breeze?
Rod is harder hitter and the one leading neutral rallies
More credit Coria for consistency than Rod for being loose, with Coria reacting, if not defending as staple
Coria winning 52% of points, serving 46% of them
Break points - Rod 1/1 , Coria 1/2 (both in 1 game)
Coria with couple winning drop shot plays and Rod missing couple not-obvious dtl winner attempts help decide tiebreak
This was Roddick’s first title at the event. Coria would win the next Masters event in Monte Carlo
Roddick won 105 points, Coria 76
Serve Stats
Roddick...
- 1st serve percentage (45/74) 61%
- 1st serve points won (39/45) 87%
- 2nd serve points won (17/29) 59%
- Aces 11 (1 second serve)
- Double Faults 2
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (35/74) 47%
Coria...
- 1st serve percentage (81/107) 76%
- 1st serve points won (43/81) 53%
- 2nd serve points won (15/26) 58%
- Aces 4
- Double Faults 1
- Unreturned Serve Percentage (19/107) 18%
Serve Pattern
Roddick served...
- to FH 39%
- to BH 56%
- to Body 6%
Coria served...
- to FH 44%
- to BH 51%
- to Body 5%
Return Stats
Roddick made...
- 87 (46 FH, 41 BH), including 7 runaround FHs
- 1 Winner (1 FH)
- 15 Errors, comprising...
- 14 Unforced (8 FH, 6 BH), including 1 runaround FH
- 1 Forced (1 FH)
- Return Rate (87/106) 82%
Coria made...
- 37 (13 FH, 24 BH)
- 24 Errors, comprising...
- 8 Unforced (4 FH, 4 BH)
- 16 Forced (4 FH, 12 BH)
- Return Rate (37/72) 51%
Break Points
Roddick 5/11 (6 games)
Coria 1/2 (1 game)
Winners (including returns, excluding aces)
Roddick 25 (15 FH, 7 BH, 3 OH)
Coria 17 (4 FH, 8 BH, 4 FHV, 1 BHV)
Roddick's FHs - 2 cc (1 pass at net), 1 cc/down-the-middle at net, 4 dtl (1 return), 2 inside-out, 1 inside-out/longline, 2 inside-in, 1 inside-in/cc, 1 longline/inside-out, 1 drop shot
- BHs - 6 dtl (1 slice at net), 1 inside-out
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley OH
Coria's FHs - 2 inside-out, 1 drop shot, 1 running-down-drop-shot dtl pass at net
- BHs - 1 cc, 4 dtl (1 pass, 1 at net), 1 drop shot, 2 lobs
- 1 from a serve-volley point, a first volley BHV
- 1 other FHV was a non-net, swinging cc shot
Errors (excluding returns and serves)
Roddick 38
- 32 Unforced (15 FH, 17 BH)
- 6 Forced (4 FH, 1 BH, 1 Back-to-Net)... the Back-to-Net can reasonbly be called a FH
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 47.2
Coria 44
- 25 Unforced (15 FH, 10 BH)... with 1 FH pass attempt
- 19 Forced (11 FH, 6 BH, 1 FHV, 1 BHV)... with 2 BH running-down-drop-shot at net
Unforced Error Forcefulness Index 45.6
(Note 1: all half-volleys refer to such shots played at net. Half -volleys played from other parts of the court are included within relevant groundstroke counts)
(Note 2: The 'Unforced Error Forcefulness Index is a measure of how aggressive of intent the average UE made was. 60 is maximum, 20 is minimum. This match has been scored using a four point scale - 2 defensive, 4 neutral, 5 attacking, 6 winner attempt)
Net Points & Serve-Volley
Roddick was...
- 15/22 (68%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
---
- 1/2 forced back
Coria was...
- 7/12 (58%) at net, including...
- 1/1 serve-volleying, a 1st serve
Match Report
Good contest between big serving, aggressive Roddick vs quick, steady, counter-punching Coria until Coria does does something to his back. His game linearly falls away from then and Roddick gains upper hand more and more, corresponding to longer match goes, before Coria ultimately calls it quits. Court is slow, and there’s enough breeze for much of match to be a factor
Trigger incident happens on serve game 11 of first set. Coria tends to his back quietly after running for a ball and is cautious in walking to his chair and sitting down at the end of the game. Takes a lengthy medical time out at the change-over. Steels himself to win the set in a tiebreak, but he at least seems to know which way wind is blowing. The irritated/frustrated way he tosses his racquet at the change-over is opposite of what one would expect from the winner of the set
His play doesn’t fall of radically. Starts with serving lighter and not moving as rapidly, which for with him, isn’t difficult to detect since he’s so quick otherwise. ‘Slow for Coria’ is more than good enough to compete and faster than all but handful of players. Smoothly, he gets worse - pace of serve, speed of foot and strength of shot. A graph outlining his decline would be a straight sloping down line
Since he’s neck and neck with Rod when fully fit, even a little decline would see Rod rise above, and Rod becomes stronger player for the slight drop. Which deepens and deepens as Rod dominates more and more. Rod doesn’t play particularly well in bossing action about
In the circumstance, match long stats are of limited value and match is better thought of as two part affair. First part is first set, a normal and good contest. Second part moves into mismatch, with Coria gradually fading
Part 1 - Normal Contest
Coria wins 7-6(2). He hurts himself in game 11
First serve in - Rod 58%, Coria 76%
First serve won - Rod 77%, Coria 72%
Second serve won - Rod 44%, Coria 63%
Darn good, big serving, aggressive player vs small serving, steady one
Coria with a below average serve at best. About 80% harmless, with 20% tricky. Slippery darted out wide serve being chief threat, as much for surprise as quality.
Very good in count. And he wins almost as many first serve points as much bigger serving Rod
Second serve points good indicator of how the the two stack up in play. Coria better, both good
Aces/double faults - Rod 5/2, Coria 1/0
Freebies - Rod 42%, Coria 24%
Rod getting a lot more out of the serve shot, as expected
Winners - Rod 4 (2 FH, 1 BH, 1 OH), Coria 9 (2 FH, 3 BH, 3 FHV, 1 BHV)
Errors forced - Rod 7, Coria 2
UEs - Rod 16 (6 FH, 10 BH), Cora 7 (5 FH, 2 BH)
Action is Rod leading, looking to overpower and Coria counter-punching
Rod looking to dictate off both wings, naturally more with FH. Coria quick and tested on running shots. Its breezy enough that precision attacking play and shot-making is hampered
Few surprises here, particularly Coria with such an advantage in winners
Most of it relates to drop shots.
3/5 ground winners, 1 is a pass, leaving just 1 bona fida, ground-to-ground winner (a BH dtl)
2/4 net ones are drop shot related, 1 other is from surprise serve-volley, leaving 1 bona fida, coming in from rallying (its set up by a good FH inside-out)
Some gorgeous drop shotting by Coria. Its crucial in tiebreak
42% freebies limits Rod’s scope for striking winners, but he’s got good initiative on third ball often enough. Feasible to hit winning shots. If he’s tempered in his shot choices, its wise given breeze. Breeze probably has hand in some of his failed shot-making, including crucial dtl winner attempt misses in the ‘breaker
Relatively low winners and high errors forced from Rod. Situations like this generally arise for couple reason
- measured, clinical attacking play. Just doing enough to win the point and a credit to the attacker or
- high end defence that denies clean winners
Combo of the two here. Coria on the run is very good
UEs along expected lines, with Coria more consistent off the BH accounting for it. That’s not just neutral consistency; Rod not averse to trying to attack with BH too. But it is FH he leads with more. Good lot of edging-towards attacking UEs off that side, particularly mishits. The breeze?
Rod is harder hitter and the one leading neutral rallies
More credit Coria for consistency than Rod for being loose, with Coria reacting, if not defending as staple
Coria winning 52% of points, serving 46% of them
Break points - Rod 1/1 , Coria 1/2 (both in 1 game)
Coria with couple winning drop shot plays and Rod missing couple not-obvious dtl winner attempts help decide tiebreak